Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Greta and the aristocrat sail the high seas to save the planet.
Options
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
"provide(s) a means to absorb additional emissions in that they also provide (at) present an opportunity for agriculture to compensate for delays in reducing CO2 emissions etc"You are quoting yourself, and trying to pass it off as quoting the original research. The word 'absorb' is not used in anything you link.Stop making shit up and wasting peoples time with it.Here is the quote from your original post introducing this issue:
*New science, by a global team of IPCC researchers based at Oxford University, shows categorically that methane from Britain's ruminants is not causing global warming – instead ruminants provide a viable pathway to
net zero emissions from UK agriculture by 2030.
Simply explaining that the word I used ie 'absorb' can be used in a number of different contexts. And used in the first instance along with a quote taken directly from the oxford review document. And paraphrased in my subsequently comment. Something you clearly didnt understand.
But If you are once again trying to argue over semantics - you may take your own advice and "Stop making shit up and wasting peoples time with it".
Btw that quote above* in my original comment is taken directly from the linked article. The scientific findings support it. Strangely though you never provide any links in any of your comments. But try to disparage anyone who does. But there we are.
And btw that's scientific findings from new research which has been undertaken by IPCC scientists based in oxford.
And it's clear you dont understand the linked Oxford research document either. But hey keep making it up if that's where you're at!0 -
Advertisement
-
-
-
That quote you cite is taken from the British Veterinary Association - which has been debunked as misrepresenting the research.Simply explaining that the word I used ie 'absorb' can be used in a number of different contexts. And used in the first instance along with a quote taken directly from the oxford review document. And paraphrased in my subsequently comment. Something you clearly didnt understand.
But If you are once again trying to argue over semantics - you may take your own advice and "Stop making shit up and wasting peoples time with it".
Btw that quote above* in my original comment is taken directly from the linked article. The scientific findings support it. Strangely though you never provide any links in any of your comments. But try to disparage anyone who does. But there we are.
And btw that's scientific findings from new research which has been undertaken by IPCC scientists based in oxford.
And it's clear you dont understand the linked Oxford research document either. But hey keep making it up if that's where you're at!
Cite from these two links, the article and paper directly related to the research - no 'paraphrasing' where you insert you own words:
https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/publications/climate-metrics-for-ruminant-livestock/
https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/reports/Climate-metrics-for-ruminant-livestock.pdf
That's the research. That research does not support what you cite from the BVA article.
You are fully aware that the actual research does not support what the BVA says, as well - you prove this, by going to fairly transparent efforts to refer to the BVA article while pretending it is the original research, and by trying to pass off a quote of your own words as the research - only to later climb-down and admit that you 'paraphrased' it (i.e. were making shit up).
You are literally in denial of the research - denial as in, stating that the claims from the research are not true, which by the way is a valid connotation of Denial that you will find in the dictionary, if you want to go look it up - and your tactic follows the same pattern of science denialists in general, of trying to obstruct discussion by denying bloody obvious stuff, so people waste large amounts of text debating utterly stupid trivialities.
You know full well that you're doing that as well - all posters reading can see it.0 -
-
That quote you cite is taken from the British Veterinary Association - which has been debunked as misrepresenting the research.....
TLDR ...
"Debunked" by your good self? If you check you will see I linked the research briefing for you if you remember. And evidently there's nothing in your comment - neither expertise nor relevant qualifications to debunk any of it. Again that's a complete failure to understand what the reseach or findings details or the context. And yes btw It's an area in which I am qualified. So you can quit with the bs. I'll stick with the science thanks 
Ps the only reason for the singular paraphrasing was for some reason you failed to comprehend the alternative use of the word 'absorb' or the context of the sentence but hey thats where we're at. I'm going to leave you arguing with yourself - and just because you dont like the science or it doesnt suit a GND agenda means bugger all.0 -
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
Professor Moriarty wrote: »Good. Hobbs is a tool. Well done RTE for promoting climate change awareness. Just following in Greta's wake, but kudos nonetheless.
ya remember when greta discovered climate change out in her yacht that time.
some wind up merchant you are
behave!0 -
-
-
Deleted User wrote: »ya remember when greta discovered climate change out in her yacht that time.
some wind up merchant you are
behave!
Nope. Greta didn't discover climate change, she simply promoted awareness of climate change. Climate change exists. But the scientists don't know what they're talking about and Greta is a whatever.0 -
-
Advertisement
-
![[Deleted User]](/applications/dashboard/design/images/defaulticon.png)
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement