Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Water charges for excessive usage

Options
1798081828385»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,565 ✭✭✭K.Flyer


    Why should IW be treated any different than the ESB? They both maintain national infrastructure that supplies consumed and necessary to every property?

    Seriously?
    Irish water were a shambles from the beginning, from their convoluted efforts to bill people to their PR.
    Every property that uses electricity and is connected to the grid has a meter and charged for usage.
    They only require one name to be responsible for that bill, not how many are in the house, the pps numbers of each occupant etc, and only so many properties will be metered the rest to be a flat fee and use what they like.
    It's not as if we had no water or discussions about charges before IW. If there was a wrong way to go about setting it up IW ticked every box.


  • Registered Users Posts: 684 ✭✭✭Benedict


    K.Flyer wrote: »
    Seriously?
    Irish water were a shambles from the beginning, from their convoluted efforts to bill people to their PR.
    Every property that uses electricity and is connected to the grid has a meter and charged for usage.
    They only require one name to be responsible for that bill, not how many are in the house, the pps numbers of each occupant etc, and only so many properties will be metered the rest to be a flat fee and use what they like.
    It's not as if we had no water or discussions about charges before IW. If there was a wrong way to go about setting it up IW ticked every box.


    Yes, but if there was a rule that people without meters paid a flat fee and those with meters paid according to usage, then those without a meter could argue that they only use a small amount so if they had a meter, they would pay less. This again would be unfair to those who want a meter but cannot get one. Those who use massive amounts would be happy - but not those who use very little.

    Remember that only slightly more than half the homes in Ireland have meters.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,892 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Why should IW be treated any different than the ESB? They both maintain national infrastructure that supplies consumed and necessary to every property?


    When did paying for electricity change from general taxation to metering :confused:


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,565 ✭✭✭K.Flyer


    Benedict wrote: »
    Yes, but if there was a rule that people without meters paid a flat fee and those with meters paid according to usage, then those without a meter could argue that they only use a small amount so if they had a meter, they would pay less. This again would be unfair to those who want a meter but cannot get one. Those who use massive amounts would be happy - but not those who use very little.

    Remember that only slightly more than half the homes in Ireland have meters.

    Which proves that the manner in which Irish Water went about attempting to charge for water, flip flopping from one idea to another, metering some but no plans ever to meter others (apartments), was farcical from the outset.


  • Registered Users Posts: 684 ✭✭✭Benedict


    If they introduce a flat fee they cannot link it to whether or not you have a meter. If they did, other problems of unfairness could arise.

    The fact is that any future fee-charging system must completely ignore the meters.

    The next question is what happens when the meters begin to need maintenance work. Will it be better to simply remove them one by one as problems occur and sell them for scrap?

    Why spend more money servicing meters which will never be used?

    And could it happen that a malfunctioning meter could cause water-flow problems for the associated home-owner?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,892 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Anybody hoping for the return of water charges hear the reply by an Taoiseach yesterday when asked about it ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,296 ✭✭✭✭branie2


    Not me


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,892 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    branie2 wrote: »
    Not me

    Short version of a short answer. Not happening.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28,729 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    charlie14 wrote: »
    Short version of a short answer. Not happening.

    Even Micheal knows he has enough on his plate with the anger over the housing situation, and the other issues that haven't gone away and are re-emerging with the receding of the Covid issue, that to poke the public further by having another go at water charges would be political suicide.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,892 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    _Kaiser_ wrote: »
    Even Micheal knows he has enough on his plate with the anger over the housing situation, and the other issues that haven't gone away and are re-emerging with the receding of the Covid issue, that to poke the public further by having another go at water charges would be political suicide.

    I believe even Fine Gael know it at this stage. Michael Noonan called it correctly in 2016 when he compared water charges electorally to a dead cat on a pitch


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,578 ✭✭✭Yellow_Fern


    Does any one here have experience dealing with the new Water.ie service. I have an old terrace shop front with a very convoluted water supply and Id love a meter installed. Are they straightforward to deal with?


Advertisement