Family forced to squat in house....

maxsmum

Why aren't benefits cut off after 2 kids?
People will say the subsequent kids will suffer but it seems like an obvious deterrant

Odelay

Last baby is 12 weeks old and she is up the duff already. Says it all.

Why don’t they ask why she keeps having unprotected sex when she has nowhere to live??

Odyssey 2005

Start a crowd funding page to buy condoms .

Odelay

Odelay wrote: »

Last baby is 12 weeks old and she is up the duff already. Says it all.

Why don’t they ask why she keeps having unprotected sex when she has nowhere to live??

In fairness, they must be working hard if they can afford to have all these children. At almost €2500 per month for childcare (yes, I mean childcare, not the mortgage) I can't afford to have any more. They have my admiration.

Fr_Dougal

Fr_Dougal wrote: »

Tusla need to step in where they see that ‘parents’ aren’t capable of caring for children. It would stop people like this, and the likes of Cash, from gaming the system.

Something like this does need to be done. Unfortunately, our state doesn't have an impressive record when it comes to taking children into state care.... And while the vast majority of foster carers are extraordinary, loving people, there have been some awful examples of neglect there, too.

branie2

Awful

FutureGuy

The floodgates are open.

whisky_galore

Berserker wrote: »

Are you talking about forced abortions? If not, what happens when baby arrives and they don't have the deposit/savings?

Sell it on the open market. Worked for the religious orders didn't it?

Deebles McBeebles

I ain't gonna work on Maggie's farm no more
No, I ain't gonna work on Maggie's farm no more

NoteAgent

And these are the exact same type of people that will blame immigrants for draining the states resources.

gerrybbadd

"Forced":rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Feisar

The gall of him. Christ if I couldn't provide for my family I'd be hiding in shame, not sitting front and center with a sheet of paper telling me to get out.

Mrsmum

Are neither of them working ?

If not, give them a house in Longford (think that where the cheapest houses are) or somewhere where they will fill schools that are under threat of closure. Having your mammy down the road is not an entitlement.

whisky_galore

Mrsmum wrote: »

Are neither of them working ?

If not, give them a house in Longford (think that where the cheapest houses are) or somewhere where they will fill schools that are under threat of closure. Having your mammy down the road is not an entitlement.

Why won't mammy take them in?

whiskeyman

They named the kid Levi?











It must be in their genes...

Mrsmum

whisky_galore wrote: »

Why won't mammy take them in?

More than likely, mammy knows the system and they learned it at her knee.

downtheroad

On the housing list 3 years, with 2 children aged 20 months and 3 months and she's now 4 weeks pregnant.

And she said "We need somewhere for us all to live as a family," Ms Wilde said. "I'm four-weeks pregnant. Some people are saying I'm trying to jump the queue but that's not true."

Disgraceful behaviour and the usual lack of personal responsibility. If they get given a house it is sending a message that people should just start having as many kids as young as they possibly can.

Deebles McBeebles

Makes me wish I was 20 years younger and had a womb. I'd pop 'em out willy-nilly for whatever waster would have me. Like ping pong balls out of a Thai performers hooch.

Immortal Starlight

Never fail to be amazed at the brass necks of these. I’m entitled to. I want. I’m entitled to. I want. It’s never ending.

Icsics

So their career choice is to have lots of kids who the rest of us will pay for. Absolutely disgraceful. Get jobs & get a house where you can afford, but this doesn't seem to enter into it.

Sweet.Science

Icsics wrote: »

So their career choice is to have lots of kids who the rest of us will pay for. Absolutely disgraceful. Get jobs & get a house where you can afford, but this doesn't seem to enter into it.

You will get a bigger house for free if you do it the other way around

Edgware

Three month old baby and pregnant again.
Ah God love them. Give them a house quickly

El_Bee

downtheroad wrote: »

If they get given a house it is sending a message that people should just start having as many kids as young as they possibly can.

I mean, looking at our welfare state, that's not exactly a secret.

Lollipops23

I have an extended family member who is shaping up to be exactly like this one; had her second baby there recently (still a teen) and hasn't even gotten a leaving cert to her name. No ambition besides living off the state; I doubt there's much hope for her kids given how little value she places on education or bettering oneself.

SirGerryAdams

Sometimes I wish I never had a hard working bone in my body.

I'm living away from my family, house sharing with idiots approaching my 30's. All my money I've earnt sitting in the bank will eventually go on a house.

While leeches are brought up by their leech parents learning how to leech.

These people go on more holidays than me, have nicer houses and don't have to share with strangers, have way more free time than me to enjoy.

What's the point?

SirGerryAdams

downtheroad wrote: »

On the housing list 3 years, with 2 children aged 20 months and 3 months and she's now 4 weeks pregnant.

And she said "We need somewhere for us all to live as a family," Ms Wilde said. "I'm four-weeks pregnant. Some people are saying I'm trying to jump the queue but that's not true."

Disgraceful behaviour and the usual lack of personal responsibility. If they get given a house it is sending a message that people should just start having as many kids as young as they possibly can.

Still time for an abortion!

SirGerryAdams

Berserker wrote: »

Are you talking about forced abortions? If not, what happens when baby arrives and they don't have the deposit/savings?

Cut their dole.

Yurt2

SirGerryAdams wrote: »

Still time for an abortion!

Who's the real scumbag in this equation?

Deebles McBeebles

SirGerryAdams wrote: »

Still time for an abortion!

Very different story if they headline was 'Irresponsible woman has 8 weeks to make decision'.

SirGerryAdams

Yurt! wrote: »

Who's the real scumbag in this equation?

??

You do know that having an abortion due to not being able to financially support another child is a valid and common reason for them?

It's child cruelty to bring another kid into that world they are living.