Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Gemma not taking enforced retirement too well

Options
1…7475777980…333

Comments

  • Options
    #2282
    Blueshoe
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,964 ✭✭✭Blueshoe


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    Having issues spelling Twitter? Or is Twotter a new edgy name that the cool kids are using these days?


    It's twotter


  • Options
    #2283
    Stephen15
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    ILoveYourVibes wrote: »
    dont even

    That image was a set up guy wasn't even part of the protest


  • Options
    #2284
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,490 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Stephen15 wrote: »
    That image was allegedly a set up guy wasn't even part of the protest

    FYP for you.


  • Options
    #2285
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 82,265 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Stephen15 wrote: »
    That image was a set up guy wasn't even part of the protest

    Been over that already, Herr Istanbul


  • Options
    #2286
    MarquisDeSad
    Closed Accounts Posts: 188 ✭✭MarquisDeSad


    Stephen15 wrote: »
    That image was a set up guy wasn't even part of the protest

    Why do you have a problem with the nazi salute? Given your beliefs.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #2287
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Stephen15 wrote: »
    That image was a set up guy wasn't even part of the protest

    Welcome back Steve, you've got no proof that he was a plant. And it's not surprising that a nazi would show up alongside Nazis such as Justin Barrett.


  • Options
    #2288
    Stephen15
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    batgoat wrote: »
    Welcome back Steve, you've got no proof that he was a plant. And it's not surprising that a nazi would show up alongside Nazis such as Justin Barrett.

    And you have no proof he wasn't. Justin Barrett wasn't even at the protest it was that was the one that Gemma called off as she feared Antifa would be there but the likes of Glen Miller from the yellow vests showed up anyway.


  • Options
    #2289
    Eric Cartman
    Registered Users Posts: 26,282 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    Stephen15 wrote: »
    And you have no proof he wasn't. Justin Barrett wasn't even at the protest it was that was the one that Gemma called off as she feared Antifa would be there but the likes of Glen Miller from the yellow vests showed up anyway.

    justin barrett seems to be like santa claus, he's at every 'nazi / far right' thing going all of the time and the link of anyone being within spitting distance of him (well whether he's there or not) is enough to label everyone nazi's


  • Options
    #2290
    Odhinn
    Registered Users Posts: 8,080 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    Overheal wrote: »
    Ohhhh he’s just waving everyone waves like that :rolleyes:




    Yep. And at night we like to march around all stiff kneed, carrying torches and singing songs. Perfectly normal.


  • Options
    #2291
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Odhinn wrote: »
    Yep. And at night we like to march around all stiff kneed, carrying torches and singing songs. Perfectly normal.

    Fecking arthritis in the knees is a bugger, makes the candle light novena even harder alright.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #2292
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The Nal wrote: »
    Its the only move she had left. Theres a public order there that if violated, could result in a conviction and although minor, can make it a nightmare to travel to places like America. The sort of things that don't go away every time you hit US customs.

    Gems of course has no issue leaving her 8 or 9 supporters to do her dirty work and face prosecution though.

    She'd hardly fly would she, given the chemtrails etc.

    It would be like someone constantly campaigning against divorce and then needing to end their marriage one way or another.


  • Options
    #2293
    Birneybau
    Registered Users Posts: 10,268 ✭✭✭✭Birneybau


    DubInMeath wrote: »
    The Nal wrote: »
    Its the only move she had left. Theres a public order there that if violated, could result in a conviction and although minor, can make it a nightmare to travel to places like America. The sort of things that don't go away every time you hit US customs.

    Gems of course has no issue leaving her 8 or 9 supporters to do her dirty work and face prosecution though.

    She'd hardly fly would she, given the chemtrails etc.

    It would be like someone constantly campaigning against divorce and then needing to end their marriage one way or another.

    Chemtrails don't affect those IN the plane, duh


  • Options
    #2294
    Annasopra
    Registered Users Posts: 41,055 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    DubInMeath wrote: »
    She'd hardly fly would she, given the chemtrails etc.

    It would be like someone constantly campaigning against divorce and then needing to end their marriage one way or another.

    You mean like Justin Barrett?

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Options
    #2295
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Birneybau wrote: »
    Chemtrails don't affect those IN the plane, duh

    Wait until she hears about aerotoxic syndrome.


  • Options
    #2296
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    PragerU release a video outlining their lawsuit of Google for taking down their videos

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6C6_NVj964


    Is it just me or does that guy look like a deep fake computer generation.

    Its interesting how every other video they put out massively promotes capitalism but when a private company's choices don't suit them, they spin this yarn.


  • Options
    #2297
    SoundsRight
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 408 ✭✭SoundsRight


    Britain has lost it's measle-free status, after a drop in the uptake of the MMR jab. Would be interesting to see if it's replictaed over here.


  • Options
    #2298
    Odhinn
    Registered Users Posts: 8,080 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    SoundsRight wrote: »
    Britain has lost it's measle-free status, after a drop in the uptake of the MMR jab. Would be interesting to see if it's replictaed over here.

    It would seem to be -


    Strikingly, scientists are suggesting that there may be more than seasonal factors and mere accident at play. Measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine immunisation rates dipped sharply in the years following Andrew Wakefield’s now discredited research in 1998 linking the vaccine with bowel disease and autism.
    That means large numbers of today’s late teens are unvaccinated. At the height of the Wakefield-fuelled controversy over the MMR jabs, the uptake of the vaccine in Ireland dropped to 70 per cent before slowly recovering.
    https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/health-family/the-return-of-mumps-why-has-the-disease-gained-a-hold-in-ireland-1.3794092


  • Options
    #2299
    Eric Cartman
    Registered Users Posts: 26,282 ✭✭✭✭Eric Cartman


    Deleted User wrote: »
    PragerU release a video outlining their lawsuit of Google for taking down their videos

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6C6_NVj964


    Is it just me or does that guy look like a deep fake computer generation.

    Its interesting how every other video they put out massively promotes capitalism but when a private company's choices don't suit them, they spin this yarn.

    Lets say you have a pub, a private business, you cannot have a pub that does not allow women, you can't have a pub that doesn't allow travellers / blacks etc... they have the right to refuse admission to individuals but not collectively a group just because they don't like how that group appear. It doesn't infringe on their rights as a business, its not a religious thing or some deeply held belief that allows them to decide their patronage. This is what youtube should be acting like but it may aswell have a sign up now that says "no conservatives"


  • Options
    #2300
    cookie1977
    Registered Users Posts: 6,794 ✭✭✭cookie1977


    Eric Cartman wrote: »
    Lets say you have a pub, a private business, you cannot have a pub that does not allow women, you can't have a pub that doesn't allow travellers / blacks etc... they have the right to refuse admission to individuals but not collectively a group just because they don't like how that group appear. It doesn't infringe on their rights as a business, its not a religious thing or some deeply held belief that allows them to decide their patronage. This is what youtube should be acting like but it may aswell have a sign up now that says "no conservatives"


    It's what reason for the refusal that is at the heart of the issue. If the woman was spouting hate speech in the pub they could bar her with no come back on them.


  • Options
    #2301
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Eric Cartman wrote: »
    Lets say you have a pub, a private business, you cannot have a pub that does not allow women, you can't have a pub that doesn't allow travellers / blacks etc... they have the right to refuse admission to individuals but not collectively a group just because they don't like how that group appear. It doesn't infringe on their rights as a business, its not a religious thing or some deeply held belief that allows them to decide their patronage. This is what youtube should be acting like but it may aswell have a sign up now that says "no conservatives"

    That would be a valid complaint if it was strictly conservatives facing this problem. There's a ton of left wing political talking heads facing demonetisation. Private businesses don't want their ads beside divisive political rhetoric. Doesn't matter which side of the aisle they fall. If that brand is associated with either far left or right (or up or down), they risk alienating a portion of their customers beyond their control.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #2302
    Ash.J.Williams
    Registered Users Posts: 20,944 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Eric Cartman wrote: »
    Lets say you have a pub, a private business, you cannot have a pub that does not allow women, you can't have a pub that doesn't allow travellers / blacks etc... they have the right to refuse admission to individuals but not collectively a group just because they don't like how that group appear. It doesn't infringe on their rights as a business, its not a religious thing or some deeply held belief that allows them to decide their patronage. This is what youtube should be acting like but it may aswell have a sign up now that says "no conservatives"

    Sh1te analogy...


  • Options
    #2303
    Stephen15
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    Ash.J.Williams wrote: »
    Sh1te analogy...

    Please elaborate?


  • Options
    #2304
    Portsalon
    Closed Accounts Posts: 702 ✭✭✭Portsalon


    Ash.J.Williams wrote: »
    Sh1te analogy...

    Produce a better one, or crawl back into the slime.


  • Options
    #2305
    TheRepentent
    Registered Users Posts: 1,086 ✭✭✭TheRepentent


    Portsalon wrote: »
    Produce a better one, or crawl back into the slime.
    Lulz..we got a live one here:rolleyes:

    Wanna support genocide?Cheer on the murder of women and children?The Ruzzians aren't rapey enough for you? Morally bankrupt cockroaches and islamaphobes , Israel needs your help NOW!!

    http://tinyurl.com/2ksb4ejk


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_war_crimes

    https://www.btselem.org/



  • Options
    #2306
    Ash.J.Williams
    Registered Users Posts: 20,944 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Stephen15 wrote: »
    Please elaborate?

    No


  • Options
    #2307
    Ash.J.Williams
    Registered Users Posts: 20,944 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Portsalon wrote: »
    Produce a better one, or crawl back into the slime.

    No


  • Options
    #2308
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Eric Cartman wrote: »
    Lets say you have a pub, a private business, you cannot have a pub that does not allow women, you can't have a pub that doesn't allow travellers / blacks etc... they have the right to refuse admission to individuals but not collectively a group just because they don't like how that group appear. It doesn't infringe on their rights as a business, its not a religious thing or some deeply held belief that allows them to decide their patronage. This is what youtube should be acting like but it may aswell have a sign up now that says "no conservatives"

    You can lob anyone out of a pub if they're being racist...


  • Options
    #2309
    Blueshoe
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,964 ✭✭✭Blueshoe


    batgoat wrote: »
    You can lob anyone out of a pub if they're being racist...

    You can't lob a traveller out though


  • Options
    #2310
    batgoat
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Blueshoe wrote: »
    You can't lob a traveller out though

    And? I think it's a pretty **** thing to do to throw a person out for such a reason.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #2311
    Blueshoe
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,964 ✭✭✭Blueshoe


    batgoat wrote: »
    And? I think it's a pretty **** thing to do to throw a person out for such a reason.

    For being racist? Why not?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement