nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Gemma not taking enforced retirement too well

[Deleted User]

She's permanently on twitter now tweeting links to wacky stories from a few years ago and every single conspiracy theory she can get her hands on

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Blueshoe

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Having issues spelling Twitter? Or is Twotter a new edgy name that the cool kids are using these days?

It's twotter

Stephen15

ILoveYourVibes wrote: »

dont even

That image was a set up guy wasn't even part of the protest

Timberrrrrrrr

Stephen15 wrote: »

That image was allegedly a set up guy wasn't even part of the protest

FYP for you.

Overheal

Stephen15 wrote: »

That image was a set up guy wasn't even part of the protest

Been over that already, Herr Istanbul

MarquisDeSad

Stephen15 wrote: »

That image was a set up guy wasn't even part of the protest

Why do you have a problem with the nazi salute? Given your beliefs.

batgoat

Stephen15 wrote: »

That image was a set up guy wasn't even part of the protest

Welcome back Steve, you've got no proof that he was a plant. And it's not surprising that a nazi would show up alongside Nazis such as Justin Barrett.

Stephen15

batgoat wrote: »

Welcome back Steve, you've got no proof that he was a plant. And it's not surprising that a nazi would show up alongside Nazis such as Justin Barrett.

And you have no proof he wasn't. Justin Barrett wasn't even at the protest it was that was the one that Gemma called off as she feared Antifa would be there but the likes of Glen Miller from the yellow vests showed up anyway.

Eric Cartman

Stephen15 wrote: »

And you have no proof he wasn't. Justin Barrett wasn't even at the protest it was that was the one that Gemma called off as she feared Antifa would be there but the likes of Glen Miller from the yellow vests showed up anyway.

justin barrett seems to be like santa claus, he's at every 'nazi / far right' thing going all of the time and the link of anyone being within spitting distance of him (well whether he's there or not) is enough to label everyone nazi's

Odhinn

Overheal wrote: »

Ohhhh he’s just waving everyone waves like that :rolleyes:

Yep. And at night we like to march around all stiff kneed, carrying torches and singing songs. Perfectly normal.

[Deleted User]

Odhinn wrote: »

Yep. And at night we like to march around all stiff kneed, carrying torches and singing songs. Perfectly normal.

Fecking arthritis in the knees is a bugger, makes the candle light novena even harder alright.

[Deleted User]

The Nal wrote: »

Its the only move she had left. Theres a public order there that if violated, could result in a conviction and although minor, can make it a nightmare to travel to places like America. The sort of things that don't go away every time you hit US customs.

Gems of course has no issue leaving her 8 or 9 supporters to do her dirty work and face prosecution though.

She'd hardly fly would she, given the chemtrails etc.

It would be like someone constantly campaigning against divorce and then needing to end their marriage one way or another.

Birneybau

DubInMeath wrote: »

The Nal wrote: »

Its the only move she had left. Theres a public order there that if violated, could result in a conviction and although minor, can make it a nightmare to travel to places like America. The sort of things that don't go away every time you hit US customs.

Gems of course has no issue leaving her 8 or 9 supporters to do her dirty work and face prosecution though.

She'd hardly fly would she, given the chemtrails etc.

It would be like someone constantly campaigning against divorce and then needing to end their marriage one way or another.

Chemtrails don't affect those IN the plane, duh

Annasopra

DubInMeath wrote: »

She'd hardly fly would she, given the chemtrails etc.

It would be like someone constantly campaigning against divorce and then needing to end their marriage one way or another.

You mean like Justin Barrett?

[Deleted User]

Birneybau wrote: »

Chemtrails don't affect those IN the plane, duh

Wait until she hears about aerotoxic syndrome.

[Deleted User]

PragerU release a video outlining their lawsuit of Google for taking down their videos

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6C6_NVj964

Is it just me or does that guy look like a deep fake computer generation.

Its interesting how every other video they put out massively promotes capitalism but when a private company's choices don't suit them, they spin this yarn.

SoundsRight

Britain has lost it's measle-free status, after a drop in the uptake of the MMR jab. Would be interesting to see if it's replictaed over here.

Odhinn

SoundsRight wrote: »

Britain has lost it's measle-free status, after a drop in the uptake of the MMR jab. Would be interesting to see if it's replictaed over here.

It would seem to be -

Strikingly, scientists are suggesting that there may be more than seasonal factors and mere accident at play. Measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine immunisation rates dipped sharply in the years following Andrew Wakefield’s now discredited research in 1998 linking the vaccine with bowel disease and autism.
That means large numbers of today’s late teens are unvaccinated. At the height of the Wakefield-fuelled controversy over the MMR jabs, the uptake of the vaccine in Ireland dropped to 70 per cent before slowly recovering.

https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/health-family/the-return-of-mumps-why-has-the-disease-gained-a-hold-in-ireland-1.3794092

Eric Cartman

Deleted User wrote: »

PragerU release a video outlining their lawsuit of Google for taking down their videos

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6C6_NVj964

Is it just me or does that guy look like a deep fake computer generation.

Its interesting how every other video they put out massively promotes capitalism but when a private company's choices don't suit them, they spin this yarn.

Lets say you have a pub, a private business, you cannot have a pub that does not allow women, you can't have a pub that doesn't allow travellers / blacks etc... they have the right to refuse admission to individuals but not collectively a group just because they don't like how that group appear. It doesn't infringe on their rights as a business, its not a religious thing or some deeply held belief that allows them to decide their patronage. This is what youtube should be acting like but it may aswell have a sign up now that says "no conservatives"

cookie1977

Eric Cartman wrote: »

Lets say you have a pub, a private business, you cannot have a pub that does not allow women, you can't have a pub that doesn't allow travellers / blacks etc... they have the right to refuse admission to individuals but not collectively a group just because they don't like how that group appear. It doesn't infringe on their rights as a business, its not a religious thing or some deeply held belief that allows them to decide their patronage. This is what youtube should be acting like but it may aswell have a sign up now that says "no conservatives"

It's what reason for the refusal that is at the heart of the issue. If the woman was spouting hate speech in the pub they could bar her with no come back on them.

[Deleted User]

Eric Cartman wrote: »

Lets say you have a pub, a private business, you cannot have a pub that does not allow women, you can't have a pub that doesn't allow travellers / blacks etc... they have the right to refuse admission to individuals but not collectively a group just because they don't like how that group appear. It doesn't infringe on their rights as a business, its not a religious thing or some deeply held belief that allows them to decide their patronage. This is what youtube should be acting like but it may aswell have a sign up now that says "no conservatives"

That would be a valid complaint if it was strictly conservatives facing this problem. There's a ton of left wing political talking heads facing demonetisation. Private businesses don't want their ads beside divisive political rhetoric. Doesn't matter which side of the aisle they fall. If that brand is associated with either far left or right (or up or down), they risk alienating a portion of their customers beyond their control.

Ash.J.Williams

Eric Cartman wrote: »

Lets say you have a pub, a private business, you cannot have a pub that does not allow women, you can't have a pub that doesn't allow travellers / blacks etc... they have the right to refuse admission to individuals but not collectively a group just because they don't like how that group appear. It doesn't infringe on their rights as a business, its not a religious thing or some deeply held belief that allows them to decide their patronage. This is what youtube should be acting like but it may aswell have a sign up now that says "no conservatives"

Sh1te analogy...

Stephen15

Ash.J.Williams wrote: »

Sh1te analogy...

Please elaborate?

Portsalon

Ash.J.Williams wrote: »

Sh1te analogy...

Produce a better one, or crawl back into the slime.

TheRepentent

Portsalon wrote: »

Produce a better one, or crawl back into the slime.

Lulz..we got a live one here:rolleyes:

Ash.J.Williams

Stephen15 wrote: »

Please elaborate?

Ash.J.Williams

Portsalon wrote: »

Produce a better one, or crawl back into the slime.

batgoat

Eric Cartman wrote: »

Lets say you have a pub, a private business, you cannot have a pub that does not allow women, you can't have a pub that doesn't allow travellers / blacks etc... they have the right to refuse admission to individuals but not collectively a group just because they don't like how that group appear. It doesn't infringe on their rights as a business, its not a religious thing or some deeply held belief that allows them to decide their patronage. This is what youtube should be acting like but it may aswell have a sign up now that says "no conservatives"

You can lob anyone out of a pub if they're being racist...

Blueshoe

batgoat wrote: »

You can lob anyone out of a pub if they're being racist...

You can't lob a traveller out though

batgoat

Blueshoe wrote: »

You can't lob a traveller out though

And? I think it's a pretty **** thing to do to throw a person out for such a reason.

Blueshoe

batgoat wrote: »

And? I think it's a pretty **** thing to do to throw a person out for such a reason.

For being racist? Why not?