Gemma not taking enforced retirement too well

alastair

alastair wrote: »

Best to park that notion that her actions don’t have consequences all the same, eh?

Still radio silence on this I see.

Timberrrrrrrr

DubInMeath wrote: »

Still radio silence on this I see.

As if he will come back and admit that he is wrong:pac:

Timberrrrrrrr

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

As if he will come back and admit that he is wrong:pac:

Careful she gets a little upset at times about being called a dude.

Birneybau

DubInMeath wrote: »

Still radio silence on this I see.

Just another one of these disengenuous posters

oranbhoy67

The Nal wrote: »

https://twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/1228629798907469824?s=19

shes broke the law there

could be fun times ahead

olestoepoke

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

As if he will come back and admit that he is wrong:pac:

Another victory for the Social Justice Warriors. Thank goodness for that.

Timberrrrrrrr

olestoepoke wrote: »

Another victory for the Social Justice Warriors. Thank goodness for that.

What are you talking about? He made a claim and was proven wrong, are you saying people shouldn't be pulled up for making false claims?

Using idiotic terms like "Social Justice Warriors" really says more about you than the people disproving false claims. The truth hurts huh?

RonanG86

olestoepoke wrote: »

Another victory for the Social Justice Warriors. Thank goodness for that.

What does Social Justice Warrior mean?

Timberrrrrrrr

RonanG86 wrote: »

What does Social Just Warrior mean?

Anyone that calls out racist scum are considered to be an SJW these days. Prepare yourself for other such fùckwittery as "woke, gaslighting, leftie" etc.

It's fun to play bingo with these words, quite often hit a full house in this thread alone.

RonanG86

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Anyone that calls out racist scum are considered to be an SJW these days. Prepare yourself for other such fùckwittery as "woke, gaslighting, leftie" etc.

It's fun to play bingo with these words, quite often hit a full house in this thread alone.

Oh, I know the implication. I'm just dying to see someone who uses it actually define it.

Timberrrrrrrr

RonanG86 wrote: »

Oh, I know the implication. I'm just dying to see someone who uses it actually define it.

Good luck with that

olestoepoke

RonanG86 wrote: »

What does Social Just Warrior mean?

Ok, heres the difference between a "social activist" and a "social justice warrior"

Social activist: "Oh look, there's no wheelchair ramps into that building. Let's build a ramp!"

Social justice warrior: "Let's persecute the people using the stairs and make them feel bad for having legs!!!"

Hope that helps:D

olestoepoke

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

What are you talking about? He made a claim and was proven wrong, are you saying people shouldn't be pulled up for making false claims?

Using idiotic terms like "Social Justice Warriors" really says more about you than the people disproving false claims. The truth hurts huh?

I guess thats told me. Quick someone who disagrees with us, everyone check his boards history to see if theres anything that can be used against him, really is hilarious. I really don't know who is worse, the facist nazi loving lunatics in this country or the anti-facist lunatics. Who will save us from all the lunatics?

alastair

olestoepoke wrote: »

I guess thats told me. Quick someone who disagrees with us, everyone check his boards history to see if theres anything that can be used against him, really is hilarious. I really don't know who is worse, the facist nazi loving lunatics in this country or the anti-facist lunatics. Who will save us from all the lunatics?

Ehh, nobody needed to check anybody’s history. A factually false claim was made, and it was corrected - with facts. Glad to help.

olestoepoke

alastair wrote: »

Ehh, nobody needed to check anybody’s history. A factually false claim was made, and it was corrected - with facts. Glad to help.

Well if you read back in the thread the guys history was checked and thrown back at him. Honestly don't know where someone finds the time or has the inclination to go checking another posters history, a little obsessive if you ask me:D

alastair

olestoepoke wrote: »

Well if you read back in the thread the guys history was checked and thrown back at him. Honestly don't know where someone finds the time or has the inclination to go checking another posters history, a little obsessive if you ask me:D

What’s rather more obsessive is pretending that the post you’re commenting on had anything to do with history-checking. As is throwing about inane terms at the drop of a hat.

olestoepoke

alastair wrote: »

What’s rather more obsessive is pretending that the post you’re commenting on had anything to do with history-checking. As is throwing about inane terms at the drop of a hat.

Oh I agree wholeheartedly. Please don't check my history. I'm nervous now. Might take awhile I've been on Boards for over seven years and have forgotten most of what I've said or posted. Go easy on me please, I'm not a Facist I swear:D

iebamm2580

olestoepoke wrote: »

Oh I agree wholeheartedly. Please don't check my history. I'm nervous now. Might take awhile I've been on Boards for over seven years and have forgotten most of what I've said or posted. Go easy on me please, I'm not a Facist I swear:D

Did you just prove alastair undeniably wrong?

olestoepoke

iebamm2580 wrote: »

Did you just prove alastair undeniably wrong?

I don't know did I?:D

iebamm2580

olestoepoke wrote: »

I don't know did I?:D

Haha about the guys posting history not being checked, dont worry wait for the explanation, it could be a good one usually some pedantic ****.

alastair

olestoepoke wrote: »

Oh I agree wholeheartedly. Please don't check my history. I'm nervous now. Might take awhile I've been on Boards for over seven years and have forgotten most of what I've said or posted. Go easy on me please, I'm not a Facist I swear:D

Case in point. There’s an obsession at play here alright.

olestoepoke

olestoepoke wrote: »

Well if you read back in the thread the guys history was checked and thrown back at him. Honestly don't know where someone finds the time or has the inclination to go checking another posters history, a little obsessive if you ask me:D

Nothing about being obsessive, more knowing that the poster in question has a few things in common with some people like gems

1. They have a habit of posting faux outrage and concern.

2. They have a habit of posting stuff as facts and when pointed out that their wrong, they deflect, ignore or just block people.

3. They don't like immigrants, despite apparently being one themselves.

The post quoted was one of many that could have been highlighted and fairly fitted the foil to her argument that poor ould gems could be reading the thread, something which she's decided to ignore also.

If you want obsession I could tell you about a hacker that I know in the U.K. and what they did after their father was attacked because he's Pakistani, you'd **** yourself.

olestoepoke

DubInMeath wrote: »

Nothing about being obsessive, more knowing that the poster in question has a few things in common with some people like gems

1. They have a habit of posting faux outrage and concern.

2. They have a habit of posting stuff as facts and when pointed out that their wrong, they deflect, ignore or just block people.

3. They don't like immigrants, despite apparently being one themselves.

The post quoted was one of many that could have been highlighted and fairly fitted the foil to her argument that poor ould gems could be reading the thread, something which she's decided to ignore also.

If you want obsession I could tell you about a hacker that I know in the U.K. and what they did after their father was attacked because he's Pakistani, you'd **** yourself.

I'm intrigued, please share your story.

olestoepoke

olestoepoke wrote: »

I'm intrigued, please share your story.

In short a few people are no longer getting benefits after their nixers have been shared with the U.K.dss, and a few people are no longer working after their posts were shared with their employers and customers and their work devices encrypted.

olestoepoke

DubInMeath wrote: »

In short a few people are no longer getting benefits after their nixers have been shared with the U.K.dss, and a few people are no longer working after their posts were shared with their employers and customers and their work devices encrypted.

I think I should be safe enough. I don't do "nixers" and my private life is pretty mundane.:D

olestoepoke

olestoepoke wrote: »

I think I should be safe enough. I don't do "nixers" and my private life is pretty mundane.:D

Same here, but I wouldn't want my financial and identity details being auctioned off to scammers.

The Nal

She hasn't tweeted any nonsense in a while is she on holidays from Crazy Town?

TheRepentent

The Nal wrote: »

She hasn't tweeted any nonsense in a while is she on holidays from Crazy Town?

The meds have finally kicked in:p

The Nal

The Nal wrote: »

She hasn't tweeted any nonsense in a while is she on holidays from Crazy Town?

She's still staggered that she didn't get elected.

Decided to check in on Gems and he who managed to have a shill get discussion of him here shut down and as expected they are both all about Covid-19 now.