Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Brexit discussion thread IX (Please read OP before posting)

Options
1324325327329330

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,269 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    Looks like UK firms are already establishing new import opportunities in the US. The US has become the UK's largest trading partner for both imports and exports.

    https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-trade/u-s-overtakes-germany-as-uks-biggest-source-of-imports-uk-trade-department-idUKKCN1UZ1BI
    To bad the single market trade is worth about 4x as much and the FTA will make UK look like the gimp in Pulp Fiction in comparison to what US will get from such a deal if it gets approved one day (remember even republicans think months at least to draft it as an optimistic view and that's nothing of Trump doing his "throw toys out of pram" to bully his counterpart routine or the democratic house blocking it etc.).


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,202 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Nody wrote: »
    To bad the single market trade is worth about 4x as much and the FTA will make UK look like the gimp in Pulp Fiction in comparison to what US will get from such a deal if it gets approved one day (remember even republicans think months at least to draft it as an optimistic view and that's nothing of Trump doing his "throw toys out of pram" to bully his counterpart routine or the democratic house blocking it etc.).
    There was a quote that was going around twitter from US trade negotiators about negotiations with the EU that went along the lines of "The first time we had to negotiate with a market of equal power. Normally we just fax the terms and tell them to sign."


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,035 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    Looks like UK firms are already establishing new import opportunities in the US. The US has become the UK's largest trading partner for both imports and exports.

    https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-trade/u-s-overtakes-germany-as-uks-biggest-source-of-imports-uk-trade-department-idUKKCN1UZ1BI

    EU > US trade. Also on UK doorstep.

    The EU, taken as a whole is the UK's largest trading partner. In 2018, UK exports to the EU were £289 billion (46% of all UK exports). UKimports from the EU were £345 billion (54% of all UK imports)

    https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-7851


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,080 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    J Mysterio wrote: »
    EU > US trade. Also on UK doorstep.

    The EU, taken as a whole is the UK's largest trading partner. In 2018, UK exports to the EU were £289 billion (46% of all UK exports). UKimports from the EU were £345 billion (54% of all UK imports)

    https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-7851

    And - All that US trade stops dead on October 31st.

    At the absolute best it'd be the New Year before even a loose outline of a deal was ready , and even if Trump signs it the House won't approve it so trade will remain stopped indefinitely.

    Also - Any deal that's acceptable to the US won't be compatible with any deal with the EU.

    The US will demand the lowering of food standards , which means that the EU won't do a deal with the UK as a result.

    There is simply no scenario that a Post No-Deal Brexit UK is better off than they are today..

    All the spin in the world won't change that fundamental immutable fact.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,541 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Paschal Donoghoe did go to London. This is actually correct.


    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1162317877942394880


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 21,520 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Paschal Donoghue did go to London. This is actually correct.


    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1162317877942394880

    And certain Brexiteers had been advocating that they no longer talk to the EU but to Ireland and that they should 'bribe them or threaten them or whatever'....

    They are trying to create a narrative that they are in control while everyone else is sitting with their back to them.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Stop moaning ffs


    Quin_Dub wrote: »
    And - All that US trade stops dead on October 31st.

    At the absolute best it'd be the New Year before even a loose outline of a deal was ready , and even if Trump signs it the House won't approve it so trade will remain stopped indefinitely.

    Also - Any deal that's acceptable to the US won't be compatible with any deal with the EU.

    The US will demand the lowering of food standards , which means that the EU won't do a deal with the UK as a result.

    There is simply no scenario that a Post No-Deal Brexit UK is better off than they are today..

    All the spin in the world won't change that fundamental immutable fact.


    Ian Dunt on the latest remainiacs podcast pointed out that Trump is threatening to leave the WTO and seems determined to, yet brexiters are counting on wto as some sort of saviour.
    So when it comes to it the UK will be in a total limbo at best, as vassal state will just follow whatever US dictates


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,269 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    Quin_Dub wrote: »
    And - All that US trade stops dead on October 31st.

    At the absolute best it'd be the New Year before even a loose outline of a deal was ready , and even if Trump signs it the House won't approve it so trade will remain stopped indefinitely.

    Also - Any deal that's acceptable to the US won't be compatible with any deal with the EU.

    The US will demand the lowering of food standards , which means that the EU won't do a deal with the UK as a result.

    There is simply no scenario that a Post No-Deal Brexit UK is better off than they are today..

    All the spin in the world won't change that fundamental immutable fact.
    I disagree on this point; I think there will be a deal that all export to EU meeting EU standards. The problem for UK is that the US deal will wipe out their local farmers (along with trade tariffs etc.) and only a very small luxury style exporting will survive as it requires certified meat etc. to go to EU. This will be the same way there is US meat export to EU meeting EU requirements but in terms of volume it's not huge or for example Brazilian meat that need to meet traceability, no hormone treatment, slaughtering standards etc. This leaves UK between two impossible requirements; they can't go to US standards because they don't have the scale or market to compete but they can't remain at EU standard with an US trade deal as it will be to expensive for their farmers to compete (and US will require full market access). Farmers get to sail away on the Brexit boat as (yet another) casualty for "taking back control by giving it away completely to a third party instead of shared power as a trade block" as the second is loss of sovereignty while the first is somehow remaining sovereign by shooting yourself in the head instead.


  • Registered Users Posts: 459 ✭✭Dytalus


    Paschal Donoghoe did go to London. This is actually correct.


    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1162317877942394880

    I came across this while browsing the Twitter responses to that.

    https://twitter.com/taxreviewer77/status/1162296006085685248

    I think it says something of the current state of our relations with the UK that I ran headfirst into Poe's Law on this.

    The fact that someone of equivalent rank to Paschal is regarded as an 'EU leader' by virtue of being German, while our own Minister is ignored despite the Backstop being the big sticking point, is a rather frustrating reveal of the British opinion of Ireland.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,293 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Looks like UK firms are already establishing new import opportunities in the US. The US has become the UK's largest trading partner for both imports and exports.

    https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-trade/u-s-overtakes-germany-as-uks-biggest-source-of-imports-uk-trade-department-idUKKCN1UZ1BI

    biggest source of imports?

    so does the US need the UK more than the UK needs them?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,202 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Just checked there, but I can't find any reference to the EU/UK new WTO schedule of tariffs. Last I can find is that they were still being objected to back in March. Anyone got any more up to date news on this?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,269 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    Just checked there, but I can't find any reference to the EU/UK new WTO schedule of tariffs. Last I can find is that they were still being objected to back in March. Anyone got any more up to date news on this?
    Last I heard was the same with EU looking at taking the full volume if needed to get it through while UK still had as much of a plan as they did with Brexit in general (i.e. unicorns and pixy dust).


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,429 ✭✭✭brickster69


    J Mysterio wrote: »
    EU > US trade. Also on UK doorstep.

    The EU, taken as a whole is the UK's largest trading partner. In 2018, UK exports to the EU were £289 billion (46% of all UK exports). UKimports from the EU were £345 billion (54% of all UK imports)

    https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-7851

    Yes and the rest of the world is the UK's largest import and export market and growing day by day.

    All roads lead to Rome.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,541 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Telegraph reporting now on a leaked German memo to it's Finance Minister that Germany will not back renegotiation of the WA.
    Germany expects No Deal and will not renegotiate, says leaked briefing


    Germany expects a No Deal Brexit and is not prepared to renegotiate the withdrawal agreement, according to leaked details of an internal briefing paper for Angela Merkel’s government.

    The leaked paper is the first evidence that Germany may be preparing to let Britain walk away with No Deal rather than back down to Boris Johnson’s demand to drop the Irish backstop.

    The paper was prepared by civil servants for the German finance minister, Olaf Scholz, ahead of face-to-face talks with the chancellor of the exchequer, Sajid Javid, in Berlin on Friday.

    Paywalled

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/08/16/germany-expects-no-deal-will-not-renegotiate-says-leaked-briefing/?auth=loggedInNotPremium&ppw=true&reghardpw=true&regsoftpw=true


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,646 ✭✭✭54and56


    Water John wrote: »
    54&56, here is a Govn't Minister giving a reason as to why Clarke couldn't be PM;

    The energy minister, Kwasi Kwarteng, said he thought it would be “an odd thing” for Clarke to take the helm at the age of 79. “I’m 44 years old. He was an MP before I was born. He’s been around for a long time,” Kwarteng told Today.

    “I think it would be an odd thing for him to lead a unity government, you know. I think he’s nearly 80.” Guardian.

    Who left him out in public?

    Well apart from Kwasi Kwarteng's statement being pure ageist it ignores two key things:-

    1. A caretaker PM, based on the JC proposal, would be a single issue/event PM. He would facilitate blocking a no deal Brexit by seeking (and undoubtedly securing) an extension from the EU to allow time for a GE. I'm confident whoever was caretaker PM, whether aged 8 or 80 would, with the full weight of the Dominc Grieve et al behind him, be able to deliver his lines in HoC and in Brussels.

    2. Age is irrelevant, just look at Warren Buffet who is 88 and still running one of the worlds most successful investment companies or Warren Buffets Chairman Charlie Munger who is 95!!! Ken Clarke at a sprightly 79 remains a very able and articulate politician, far more able and articulate than Kwasi Kwarteng. In fact I'd go so far as to say Ken Clarke's IQ is greater than the combined IQ of the entire ERG membership excluding JRM who is indeed a very sharp operator.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,429 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Telegraph reporting now on a leaked German memo to it's Finance Minister that Germany will not back renegotiation of the WA.



    Paywalled

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/08/16/germany-expects-no-deal-will-not-renegotiate-says-leaked-briefing/?auth=loggedInNotPremium&ppw=true&reghardpw=true&regsoftpw=true

    Is this the politicians or businesses saying this ?

    All roads lead to Rome.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,375 ✭✭✭✭kunst nugget


    Is this the politicians or businesses saying this ?

    It's an internal briefing document from German civil servants. Don't worry, BMW are coming in on horseback to save good ol' Blighty from Kraut von Bureaucracy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,646 ✭✭✭54and56


    Mod Note

    No memes please.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,080 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Yes and the rest of the world is the UK's largest import and export market and growing day by day.

    That's just simply untrue.

    The UK do not have a hint of a sniff of any trade deal with anyone anywhere.. Other than of course those titans of global Commerce , the Faroe Islands.

    In the event of No Deal , all UK Imports and exports move to WTO rules instantly.

    There are no deals "ready and waiting" to be signed with anyone.

    And if the UK do as they have said more than once and apply zero tariffs on a whole host of goods , then no one will sign a deal as under WTO rules everyone has to get the same deal so why would they bother with a deal when they have already been given unfettered access to the UK market?


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,541 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    BBC Radio 4's World at One came from Dublin today. Good analysis and well worth while listening to.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0007l3h


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,202 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Dominic Grieve has said that he would support a GNU, but not one with Corbyn as interim PM. Exactly what you'd expect; no Tory rebel would countenance such a thing. What's the betting Corbyn digs his heels in and kills this off before it gets off the ground?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,346 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    Just musing here, does anybody know if Corbyn actually wrote to Mary Lou about his interim PM plan?


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,107 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Telegraph reporting now on a leaked German memo to it's Finance Minister that Germany will not back renegotiation of the WA.



    Paywalled

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/08/16/germany-expects-no-deal-will-not-renegotiate-says-leaked-briefing/?auth=loggedInNotPremium&ppw=true&reghardpw=true&regsoftpw=true

    Here is the article in full from another website :

    https://news.yahoo.com/germany-expects-no-deal-not-111725069.html


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,429 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Quin_Dub wrote: »

    There are no deals "ready and waiting" to be signed with anyone.

    Did you here the one about when Trump met Raab ?

    DT: What's your deficit with the EU Dom ?

    DR : Oh, about 100 Billion Donald

    DT : Nice, we will take it all. And at a better price than what you are buying in now.

    DR : Wow, cheers Donald. How much ?

    DT : How about 5 Billion Dom ?

    DR : Sounds great Donald. That's 5 billion less than the EU charge us.

    Lots of laughs

    DT : I know your joking Dom, but we will pay you 5 Billion for that.

    All roads lead to Rome.



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,850 ✭✭✭Stop moaning ffs


    Did you here the one about when Trump met Raab ?

    DT: What's your deficit with the EU Dom ?

    DR : Oh, about 100 Billion Donald

    DT : Nice, we will take it all. And at a better price than what you are buying in now.

    DR : Wow, cheers Donald. How much ?

    DT : How about 5 Billion Dom ?

    DR : Sounds great Donald. That's 5 billion less than the EU charge us.

    Lots of laughs

    DT : I know your joking Dom, but we will pay you 5 Billion for that.


    Do you genuinely believe Trump or the US is Britain’s Trade deal saviour somehow? If So you really haven’t been paying attention to how trump works and certainly not paying attention to how the US operates when it comes to trade deals.
    ‘America doesn’t have friends. It has interests’.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,080 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Did you here the one about when Trump met Raab ?

    DT: What's your deficit with the EU Dom ?

    DR : Oh, about 100 Billion Donald

    DT : Nice, we will take it all. And at a better price than what you are buying in now.

    DR : Wow, cheers Donald. How much ?

    DT : How about 5 Billion Dom ?

    DR : Sounds great Donald. That's 5 billion less than the EU charge us.

    Lots of laughs

    DT : I know your joking Dom, but we will pay you 5 Billion for that.

    Again.. Donald Trump doesn't approve Trade deals.. Nancy Pelosi and the House Democrats do..

    Trump can tell Raab or anyone else anything he likes.. The UK still aren't getting a trade deal signed with the US any time soon.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 518 ✭✭✭Lackadaisical


    It’s also forgetting that Trump’s reign in power might be a bad memory this time in 2021 while the British may have hitched themselves to the most toxic and controversial presidency in US history.

    If you’ve a centrist Democrat and the reemergence of the center of the Republicans, it doesn’t bode well for the UK.

    You’ve also got the issue of a Brexited UK run by the far left of Labour which would absolutely infuriate the GOP.

    Lots of possibilities that don’t really work out fantastically for the British-US relationship.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,429 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Do you genuinely believe Trump or the US is Britain’s Trade deal saviour somehow? If So you really haven’t been paying attention to how trump works and certainly not paying attention to how the US operates when it comes to trade deals.
    ‘America doesn’t have friends. It has interests’.

    No but i know a growing Rest of the world is a better place to do business than a shrinking EU. EU is 20% now, soon to be 14% and once Albania and co. join it will become smaller and smaller.

    All roads lead to Rome.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,346 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    20silkcut wrote: »
    Personally myself and I’m sure many of you here, would rather things remain as they are, than a United ireland in the immediate term.
    Meant to reply to this yesterday.
    The bolded bit is the crux of the gap here.
    You want to preserve the status quo, whereas the majority of Irish people living in NI don't.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,080 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    No but i know a growing Rest of the world is a better place to do business than a shrinking EU. EU is 20% now, soon to be 14% and once Albania and co. join it will become smaller and smaller.

    This just doesn't make any sense.

    There is no place to do business for the UK if they leave under no-deal.

    As part of the EU , the UK have access to the entire globe.. Outside , they have access to nothing.

    It's utterly delusional to think that the UK will negotiate a better deal with anyone than they already have via the EU.

    EVERY single country that the UK looks to do a deal with will demand better terms from the UK than they get today from the EU and the UK will have to give it to them as they have zero leverage.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement