Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on [email protected] for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact [email protected]

Abortion Discussion, Part the Fourth

1888990919294»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 11,369 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Yesterday, The UK court of appeal overturned the 28 month prison sentence given to Carla Foster for illegally obtaining abortion pills. 45-year-old Carla Foster was handed a 28-month sentence in June; however, the UK Court of Appeal reduced her sentence to 14 months suspended. She will also have to complete 50 days of activity.

    She has spent 35 days in Foston Hall Prison and the Court of Appeal heard she was refused any form of communication with her three children, one of whom is autistic, while in prison.

    One of the three appeal court judges described the case as “very sad”. Justice Victoria Sharp.commented " “It is a case that calls for compassion, not punishment, and where no useful purpose is served by detaining Ms Foster in custody,".



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,075 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato
    Golgafrinchan 'B' Ark


    She has spent 35 days in Foston Hall Prison and the Court of Appeal heard she was refused any form of communication with her three children, one of whom is autistic, while in prison.

    That is disgraceful. She should not have been imprisoned while her appeal was still being heard (it only took a few weeks). It seems there is a vindictiveness in play here and the real victims of this are not her but her children.

    Bring back the :pac:



  • Registered Users Posts: 2 amanda36


    This is ridiculous



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,089 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Says it all.




  • Registered Users Posts: 32,075 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato
    Golgafrinchan 'B' Ark


    Ohio votes to place abortion rights in the state constitution.

    Almost 57% of voters in the conservative-leaning state backed the measure.

    Its success is likely to bolster Democrats' hopes that abortion rights remain a winning issue ahead of elections in 2024.

    It also extends an unbeaten record for ballot measures designed to protect abortion rights since the nationwide right to the procedure was rescinded by the Supreme Court last year. This is the seventh such measure to pass.

    But Ohio's measure, known as Issue 1, was widely seen as the toughest fight so far for abortion rights supporters as it was the first Republican-led state to consider changing its constitution to explicitly guarantee the right.

    The amendment will change the state's constitution to include protections for abortion access. It will establish "an individual right to one's own reproductive medical treatment", including on abortion, contraception and miscarriage care. It will take effect on 7 December, 30 days after the election.

    Supporters of the amendment warned voters that unless it passed, more restrictive laws could be introduced including a ban on abortions after six weeks of pregnancy with no exceptions.

    Abortion is currently legal in Ohio until 22 weeks of pregnancy.

    Bring back the :pac:



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,089 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Ohio was the state with the pregnant 10 year old girl forced to travel to Indiana for her abortion. The Indiana AG went after the local Dr. that provided the abortion medication, suing her, etc. In good news, that state's supreme court has reprimanded the AG for his conduct.




  • Registered Users Posts: 32,075 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato
    Golgafrinchan 'B' Ark


    Shows you how out of step with the electorate the Ohio legislators were when they tried to impose a six week ban (since suspended)

    With any luck this issue will really hurt the womb watchers electorally.

    Bring back the :pac:



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,089 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    The sweep to power in Virginia in the local elections has been attributed to campaigning on it in the state. Creepy Youngkin the governor there was all over how as soon as a ban was passed by the legislature, he'd sign it. Well, gotta wait till there's another election.

    Youngkin's whispered about as a possible compromise candidate should TFG disintegrate completely, and likely in 2028.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,397 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Safe Access Zones Bill passes final stage in Dail by overwhelming majority

    To me this reflects the extensive cross-party pro-choice that now exists in the Dail and suggests the government can go pretty much as far as it wants with liberalisation of the law in the wake of the ongoing review



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,075 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato
    Golgafrinchan 'B' Ark


    Gript link 😯 can't find anything on RTE or Irish Times though, oireachtas.ie has the debate up until one of the propopsed amendments was defeated but not after that.

    Bring back the :pac:



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,397 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Here's a brief Newstalk report if you don't trust ole grift.ie

    Here's a list of the naysayers if that is what you were looking for

    Aontú’s Peadar Tóibín, and Independents Mattie McGrath, Danny Healy-Rae, Michael Healy-Rae, Peter Fitzpatrick, Noel Grealish, Michael Collins, Richard O’Donoghue, Seán Canney, and Michael Lowry.

    Predictable names there, minus Carol Nolan for some reason. Not a government TD among them, this seems like ancient history now




  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Ye gods, is Michael Lowry still a TD?



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,075 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato
    Golgafrinchan 'B' Ark


    Oireachtas site now updated

    Interesting that there were no absentions recorded, Carol Nolan must have been absent for whatever reason.

    Some of the commentary from the Healy-Raes, Michael Collins et al is just bizarre.

    I do not support this Bill and I will not be supporting it going forward. The right to protest and the freedom to exercise one's religion are pillars of a democratic society. 

    I'm not aware of any religion in which standing around outside maternity hospitals whether silently or otherwise is a form of worship.

    Remember the 2018 debates here and in the media when we were constantly told that the opposition to repeal of the 8th was not religious in nature... 🤥

    They really need to press on now and remove the 3 day wait and seriously look at the time limit too.

    Bring back the :pac:



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,089 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    IANAL, and I'm REALLY unhappy the Judge in Nevada ruled the way he did, but this proposed state constitution amendment was kind of poorly worded:

    (can't link, apparently Boards is going through captcha, and it's not on archive. yet, site is thehill.com. googling nevada abortion russell thehill.com should get it.)

    "Judge rejects attempt to enshrine abortion rights on Nevada ballot"

    The Judge ruled it too broad - it is, and it isn't. It tried to be specific about forms of abortion and shouldn't, like why tubal ligation is enshrined but the more common, and FDA approved, Bilateral salpingectomy isn't? I get a vibe of 'resolution by committee' where maybe copying what another state like Ohio did would have passed.

    Still, even in failing it keeps the issue in the news and it might be that the Nevada supreme court overrules the judge in question.



  • Registered Users Posts: 32,075 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato
    Golgafrinchan 'B' Ark


    No surprises here

    And no surprise that the Russian Orthodox Church is right in there.

    Authorities are concerned that the decreasing number of young people, particularly men, will make it more difficult for the Russian military to recruit soldiers. There are also worries about the effects of a stagnant population on the economy.

    They might consider that the kleptocratic shít economy is causing the stagnant population? And who wants to raise sons just so they can be conscripted and killed in pointless wars?

    Bring back the :pac:



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,043 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    Yep, the Nazis banned abortion, at least for Aryan women, for much the same reasons.



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,434 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Actually, no. Abortion was already banned in Germany before the Nazis came along; under the Weimar republic it was decriminalised only the case of grave danger to the life of the mother.

    The Nazis in fact widened access to abortion, making it available in in cases of deformity or disability, if either parent was the carrier of a genetic disease, if either parent was Jewish, or on various other eugenic grounds. And of course in many circumstances they practiced forced abortions, again on eugenic grounds. But they also increased the penalties for abortion in cases where it wasn't permitted, up to and including the death penalty for repeat offender abortion practitioners.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    And who wants to raise sons just so they can be conscripted and killed in pointless wars?

    The white boys from Moscow and St Petersburg are largely free of this risk which applies, in the main, to the sons of the Turkic + Asiatic republics and other ethnic minorities within the Russian Federation. The abortion rate in Russia is down substantially from twenty years back, when it was around two million abortions per year - that's now reduced to around half a million per year, or a reduction from around eight times the Irish rate to around twice the Irish rate.

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/1034529/russia-total-number-of-abortions/



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,673 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    At one stage they were performing around 6M a year. apparently at one point they had more abortions in a year than live births. the decrease in the last 20 years is most likely down to the increased availability of contraception.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    the decrease in the last 20 years is most likely down to the increased availability of contraception.

    That and a set of tax breaks which apply to larger families only:

    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/20/putin-wants-mortgage-relief-and-cash-for-big-russian-families.html

    ...plus a set of frankly blunt adverts exhorting the women of Russia to produce one for you, one for your husband and one for your country - a bizarre line which I think first saw use in Australia. Russia is also attempting to address its demographic decline by stealing unknown thousands of children from Ukraine.

    https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-children-taken-ukraine/32527298.html

    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/9/20/ukraine-calls-for-return-of-abducted-children-as-more-arrive-in-belarus



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Kenya proving once again that if you can't go in the front door, you can always go down the backstreet:

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-67473183

    "At an unregulated clinic on the outskirts of Nairobi, the man in charge offers women abortions for 2,500 Kenyan shillings ($16; £13). [...] He charges extra for the safe disposal of the foetus. If the woman cannot afford that he pays someone to throw it in the river."



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    [...] one for you, one for your husband and one for your country [...]

    Family policy hit by war inflation - VVP now calling for four, five, even eight children. Bonus - in the second video, one lad helpfully pointing out that if a woman has more than one kid, then it's easier for her to say goodbye to one of them.




Advertisement