Strokestown **Mod Note in Post #4461**

368100

Fann Linn wrote: »

That's the question which should be answered tomorrow. Legal advice earlier this evening found some flaws in the order.

Well flaw in technicality of the order aside, it doesnt negate the fact that they didnt make a single payment since drawing the mortgage 14 years ago so fully intended on not paying

Fann Linn

368100 wrote: »

Well flaw in technicality of the order aside, it doesnt negate the fact that they didnt make a single payment since drawing the mortgage 14 years ago so fully intened on not paying

Im not disputing that.

markodaly

klaaaz wrote: »

Another poster who has no proof that there was a court order. So you think that the farmer's family are illegally squatting in their own home tonight then?

Ah great, fake news on the PizzaGate level.

There was a court order. The only one disputing this is some internet trolls and muppets. No serious commentator has stated that there was no court order and it was all done illegally.

In other words, you are talking $hite.

Fann Linn

runawaybishop wrote: »

Was the judge not wearing his hat when he signed it?

Yawn.

markodaly

People are talking $hite. Going on about the UDA, there was no court order, the guys involved are 'respected' members of the local community....

Meanwhile as the facts are coming out, the people supporting these parasites are looking like utter plebs.

BattleCorp

368100 wrote: »

Fann Linn wrote: »

That's the question which should be answered tomorrow. Legal advice earlier this evening found some flaws in the order.

Well flaw in technicality of the order aside, it doesnt negate the fact that they didnt make a single payment since drawing the mortgage 14 years ago so fully intended on not paying

Is it true that they made no payments in 14 years????

klaaaz

markodaly wrote: »

Ah great, fake news on the PizzaGate level.

There was a court order. The only one disputing this is some internet trolls and muppets. No serious commentator has stated that there was no court order and it was all done illegally.

In other words, you are talking $hite.

So when the law of the land was not followed by an alleged court order in which no written news outlet has stated that such a court order even exists, then the defenders of the banksters in this thread treat criticism of the banksters and their hired violent goonsters as "fake news!"

368100

BattleCorp wrote: »

Is it true that they made no payments in 14 years????

Yes, from a reliable source. Not a single payment made since it was drawn.

Fann Linn

368100 wrote: »

Yes, from a reliable source. Not a single payment made since it was drawn.

Any links?

BattleCorp

368100 wrote: »

BattleCorp wrote: »

Is it true that they made no payments in 14 years????

Yes, from a reliable source. Not a single payment made since it was drawn.

If that's true, anybody remotely defending the farmers need to really look at themselves.

368100

Fann Linn wrote: »

Any links?

Its not a source that would be in a news report.

Fann Linn

Fann Linn wrote: »

Any links?

You already stated that you were not disputing the fact no payments have been made

tipptom

If it was the Sherriff who has hired these loyalist scum for these evictions then he should be sacked in the morning.

There are bigger and better farms than this that have led to evictions that people would have been more sympathetic towards whose owners have engaged with the banks to resolve the situation that has not led to this powder keg situation.

Its obvious that these people should be evicted but to go at it a week before Christmas with Loyalist thugs was an incitement by an incompetent idiot who already has blood on his hands that could turn worse over the next while.

Fann Linn

markodaly wrote: »

People are talking $hite. Going on about the UDA, there was no court order, the guys involved are 'respected' members of the local community....

Meanwhile as the facts are coming out, the people supporting these parasites are looking like utter plebs.

Well, do you dispute the UDA/ Loyalist connection?

Fann Linn

Fann Linn wrote: »

Im not disputing that.

.

Fann Linn

bubblypop wrote: »

You already stated that you were not disputing the fact no payments have been made

Just looking for the links.

P_1

awec wrote: »

Ben of the clan Gilroy.

Scrolling through Twitter it seems not only is young Ben of the clan Gilroy up to his neck in it but so is the king of the eejits, big Jim "tinfoil hat" Corr.

Whatever chance this had of becoming a proper movement to address the grievances we have at the 2 speed recovery it's dead in the water now

NIMAN

markodaly wrote: »

+1000%

Unfortunately, this incident seems to have brought out lots of idiots.
We really are a pitiful childish nation when it comes to being responsible with money.

Or any mention of anything 'British'.....
..... all the same boys packed out the pubs to watch Liverpool v Man Utd and cheer on 'their' team on Sunday.

vicwatson

NIMAN wrote: »

Or any mention of anything 'British'.....
..... all the same boys packed out the pubs to watch Liverpool v Man Utd and cheer on 'their' team on Sunday.

That old chestnut :rolleyes:

Fann Linn

NIMAN wrote: »

Or any mention of anything 'British'.....
..... all the same boys packed out the pubs to watch Liverpool v Man Utd and cheer on 'their' team on Sunday.

Still waiting on Mark's answer. Btw it was your neighbours up north on twitter who named and shamed Ian Kyle Paisley Graham.

Franz Von Peppercorn

noodler wrote: »

Who wants to tell the Belgian taxpayer they aren't getting their money back because Irish people who voluntarily borrowed money from KBC reckon its fair game not to pay it back because of perceived issues with their lending practices?

Was KBC bailed out.

Odd though that the free market applies to borrowers (don’t pay or we’ll take it away) and not to lenders (oh. You lent 2 million euro to bozo the clown. That’s not your fault. Here’s a tax payer bailout).

Even odder that tax payers get angry with the little guy and not the big guy.

Geuze

klaaaz wrote: »

but they rather pick on a vulnerable farmer instead.

People who commit VAT fraud of 177,000 are not vulnerable, they are cold, calculating criminals.

368100

Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »

Was KBC bailed out.

Odd though that the free market applies to borrowers (don’t pay or we’ll take it away) and not to lenders (oh. You lent 2 million euro to bozo the clown. That’s not your fault. Here’s a tax payer bailout).

Even odder that tax payers get angry with the little guy and not the big guy.

No they werent, I detailed it in a previous post

Franz Von Peppercorn

368100 wrote: »

No they werent, I detailed it in a previous post

So what’s the Belgian taxpayer got to do with anything?

markodaly

klaaaz wrote: »

So when the law of the land was not followed by an alleged court order in which no written news outlet has stated that such a court order even exists, then the defenders of the banksters in this thread treat criticism of the banksters and their hired violent goonsters as "fake news!"

The court order that doesn't exist..... clutching at straws. I suppose any port in a storm.

Yes, people are stupid enough to believe anything.

368100

Franz Von Peppercorn wrote: »

So what’s the Belgian taxpayer got to do with anything?

I dont know, I didnt bring it up

JP Liz V1

Are the evictees back in the house?

markodaly

Fann Linn wrote: »

Well, do you dispute the UDA/ Loyalist connection?

Yes. Its all crap spouted on Social media. What is the actual Link here?

The owner of the company bought a cat from an ex UDA man or something really tenuous like that?

Show me facts!

riemann

Geuze wrote: »

People who commit VAT fraud of 177,000 are not vulnerable, they are cold, calculating criminals.

No that's probably not true.

A likely circumstance is a man engaged in business unfortunately not in full understanding of how the tax system works at first. Instead of putting vat contribution of invoice away, it goes into cash flow.
Stupid, yes.
Criminal, no.
Illegal, yes.

Sad situation for all involved.

Jeff2

JP Liz V1 wrote: »

Are the evictees back in the house?

Two are after not paying.

It's better than Corrie.