Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump presidency discussion thread V

Options
189111314335

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 10,799 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve


    everlast75 wrote: »
    Monday's schedule for DJT is clear, other than one meeting.... with Mike Pence.

    Imagine, this whole time if it turned out it was Pence who was ratting him out to Mueller.

    The fallout would be glorious.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,531 ✭✭✭jooksavage


    DrumSteve wrote: »
    Imagine, this whole time if it turned out it was Pence who was ratting him out to Mueller.

    The fallout would be glorious.


    I remembering reading about a mob prosecutor who said that the most gratifying part of the job was seeing the wiseguys scramble turn on each other when they realised the jig was up. The guys who took the hardest line on suspected rats turned out to be the biggest snitches of all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,799 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve


    jooksavage wrote: »
    I remembering reading about a mob prosecutor who said that the most gratifying part of the job was seeing the wiseguys scramble turn on each other when they realised the jig was up. The guys who took the hardest line on suspected rats turned out to be the biggest snitches of all.

    Christ, imagine it was trump ratting out all the lads below him to try keep himself in a job.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,300 ✭✭✭✭everlast75




  • Registered Users Posts: 7,236 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    everlast75 wrote: »
    Monday's schedule for DJT is clear, other than one meeting.... with Mike Pence.

    A clear schedule? I guess that means he's going to sit in his bed with his bucket of KFC live tweeting Fox and Friends.
    everlast75 wrote: »

    Because of course he is.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,951 ✭✭✭B0jangles


    everlast75 wrote: »


    No, no, it's not that he can't spell simple words, it's the lead into a bit of 'clever' wordplay:

    MUELLER REPORT IS A TOTAL STITCH UP

    JUST TRYING TO PIN DEMOCRAT CRIMES ON TRUMP


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,570 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    everlast75 wrote: »

    He hasn't had his morning covfefe yet.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,075 ✭✭✭relax carry on


    Come on. He's insane. He must be. Who in their right mind would believe anything he says now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,300 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Come on. He's insane. He must be. Who in their right mind would believe anything he says now.

    that's the truth of it.

    His tweets are something to be openly mocked now. They aren't even sensational, or noteworthy. They are just tired and "old hat".

    The deficit is spiralling, North Korea is ignoring him, the Reps got annihilated in the mid-terms, his own justice dept believe he is guilty of 2 felonies, Russia is clearly wagging the dog, as is Saudi Arabia, he can't find people to work from him.

    It's only a matter of time folks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,758 ✭✭✭Pelvis


    everlast75 wrote: »
    Stop smocking him!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,229 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    DrumSteve wrote: »
    Imagine, this whole time if it turned out it was Pence who was ratting him out to Mueller.

    The fallout would be glorious.

    one word: Lodestar


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,680 ✭✭✭serfboard


    TomOnBoard wrote: »
    would anyone be caring about all this at all if Trump had not taken the Presidency
    That's the thing for me. I don't think anyone would.

    There's a theory that Trump never really wanted the Presidency at all, and that it started out as a way to boost his own ratings in order to get a more lucrative contract for The Apprentice.

    Unfotunately, it all went wrong and he ended up winning. Pictures of him on the night show him being as surprised as anyone else.

    Of course, once he got in, and he saw all the available grifting opportunities, he relished it. Plus, he loved the title, the deference that comes with it, and the adoration and adulation from the rallies he continued to hold after the campaign was over.

    Now however, the remit given to a Special Prosecutor to investigate possible collusion, and any other criminal activity that he comes accross, has lead to Trump's activities going back decades being examined.

    I think that Trump will come to rue the day he won the Presidency. It has opened him up to all sorts of possible criminal charges that he would otherwise probably not have faced.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,368 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    serfboard wrote: »
    That's the thing for me. I don't think anyone would.

    There's a theory that Trump never really wanted the Presidency at all, and that it started out as a way to boost his own ratings in order to get a more lucrative contract for The Apprentice.

    Unfotunately, it all went wrong and he ended up winning. Pictures of him on the night show him being as surprised as anyone else.

    Of course, once he got in, and he saw all the available grifting opportunities, he relished it. Plus, he loved the title, the deference that comes with it, and the adoration and adulation from the rallies he continued to hold after the campaign was over.

    Now however, the remit given to a Special Prosecutor to investigate possible collusion, and any other criminal activity that he comes accross, has lead to Trump's activities going back decades being examined.

    I think that Trump will come to rue the day he won the Presidency. It has opened him up to all sorts of possible criminal charges that he would otherwise probably not have faced.

    Very good point.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,565 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    everlast75 wrote: »

    So now he has admitted that the business transactions took place and by extension (it was a simple business transaction) that he knew about.

    Thats a pretty far cry from him claiming to the press that he had no dealings with Russia.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,229 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    So now he has admitted that the business transactions took place and by extension (it was a simple business transaction) that he knew about.

    Thats a pretty far cry from him claiming to the press that he had no dealings with Russia.

    Two separate matters


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,446 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    So now he has admitted that the business transactions took place and by extension (it was a simple business transaction) that he knew about.

    Thats a pretty far cry from him claiming to the press that he had no dealings with Russia.

    The transaction he's talking about was the payments to Stormy Daniels and Karen MacDougal, thereby related to campaign finance violations. Not anything to do with Russia.

    He's also purposely causing obfuscation with his tweet by talking about how they didn't find any collusion with Russia as part of Comey's interview on Friday even though that interview related to Clinton's emails and potential FBI bias against Trump, not collusion.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,294 ✭✭✭PropJoe10


    everlast75 wrote: »


    Unbelievable.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,300 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    So now he has admitted that the business transactions took place and by extension (it was a simple business transaction) that he knew about.

    Calling Cohen a liar is pot, kettle and black stuff.

    Trump himself said he knew nothing about the hush money payments, which was a lie.

    He was then caught on tape, and lied about what was said, even though we could all hear different.

    Now, he admits he knew of them, without acknowledging that he lied previously of course.

    He says the "Dems go to", when the Justice Dept appointees are his appointees and Republicans..

    Denies that its a campaign finance violation - if it was not, then why talk about paying it in cash on tape, then why did Rudy say on Fox and Friends ...

    “Imagine if that came out on Oct. 15, 2016, in the middle of the last debate with Hillary Clinton?" Giuliani asked.

    "Cohen made it go away," he added. "He did his job."

    And then finishes it off, by calling the SDNY prosecution a witch hunt, a term previously reserved for Mueller's investigation.

    At this stage, a 3 year old could debunk his defence strategy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,565 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    duploelabs wrote: »
    Leroy42 wrote: »
    So now he has admitted that the business transactions took place and by extension (it was a simple business transaction) that he knew about.

    Thats a pretty far cry from him claiming to the press that he had no dealings with Russia.

    Two separate matters
    Ah ok, didn't spot that.

    Change Russia for Stormy and the substance is still the same.

    Total witch hunt yet he continues to be shown to be lying


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,146 ✭✭✭✭StringerBell


    He doesn't have a strategy, its just reactive and instinctual.

    Don't go putting any more thought into it than necessary. Its a result of his entire life not having to worry about consequences or think further down the line, where whatever he says goes unchallenged or people who do challenge it just get removed from his world.

    People while supporting him laud his "counter punching" because they literally have nothing else they can scrape together and thats the closest thing to a compliment they can find for him. He is a great keyboard warrior is basically what it amounts to. Well done Mr President. He is unable to hide his cowardly nature for very long though and never in person.

    The sooner this thing ends the better, who knows the long term damage his presidency is going to leave behind because though he is an idiot with no clear agenda or ideology other than whats good for Trump right now, some do and they are getting things done at times in the background.

    "People say ‘go with the flow’ but do you know what goes with the flow? Dead fish."



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,229 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Interesting speculation made here that Trump will resign 10 minutes before his term finishes so acting president Pence can pardon him

    https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-impeachment-resignation-robert-mueller-mueller-probe-russia-1251580


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,300 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Interesting point on O'Donnell Friday night.

    If Trump had lost the presidential election, he would be charged alongside Cohen by the SDNY.

    Therefore, the only thing that is stopping that from happening is a memo, a legal opinion. There is nothing in the constitution which prohibits the President from being criminally charged.

    It makes me wonder, are they waiting to rack up more crimes before launching their attempt to charge the Pres, if they haven't already (possibly the case under seal in 9th Circuit)


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    duploelabs wrote: »
    Interesting speculation made here that Trump will resign 10 minutes before his term finishes so acting president Pence can pardon him

    https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-impeachment-resignation-robert-mueller-mueller-probe-russia-1251580
    Risky stuff since Pence isn't looking squeaky clean in this either.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,446 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    everlast75 wrote: »
    It makes me wonder, are they waiting to rack up more crimes before launching their attempt to charge the Pres, if they haven't already (possibly the case under seal in 9th Circuit)

    "Come at the King... you best not miss" - Omar, The Wire

    If they're going to charge Trump with anything, it needs to be absolutely airtight with no route of escape, because if the first charges brought against him can be side-stepped, he'll use it to delegitimise and shut down the entire thing.

    Mueller has shown he's the man for the job, but they need to have it all sown up before any charges are brought against him.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,300 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Penn wrote: »
    "Come at the King... you best not miss" - Omar, The Wire

    If they're going to charge Trump with anything, it needs to be absolutely airtight with no route of escape, because if the first charges brought against him can be side-stepped, he'll use it to delegitimise and shut down the entire thing.

    Mueller has shown he's the man for the job, but they need to have it all sown up before any charges are brought against him.

    I take the point that you only get one shot, whether it be by indictment or impeachment but...

    To be fair, i don't doubt that the charges against Trump are anything but airtight. We have audio recording. Cohen can plead guilty all he wants to certain crimes, including the two involving DJT, but the Southern District would only accept that plea if they were certain he committed the crimes he plead guilty to.

    In my opinion, it is the magnitude of the crime, or alternatively the number of crimes that will influence whether parties proceed or not.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Penn wrote: »
    The transaction he's talking about was the payments to Stormy Daniels and Karen MacDougal, thereby related to campaign finance violations. Not anything to do with Russia.

    On mobile so I won't link to it now, but there was an article on thehill.com yesterday where Rand Paul was suggesting that campaign laws might be over criminalised!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭SimonTemplar


    All this is looking increasingly unlikely Trump will be running in 2020.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    All this is looking increasingly unlikely Trump will be running in 2020.

    Oh, He'll run alright..

    GOP will not impeach him , simple as that - Or at least not until his popularity with GOP voters falls off a cliff , which has not happened yet..

    He will run because being President could possibly be the only thing to keep him out if jail if everything we are hearing and surmising from the Mueller investigation comes to pass.

    If he wins , then he's golden , if he loses then as previously mentioned he pulls the "resign 10 minutes early" trick and Pence pardons him.

    The downside to the second option is that there will likely be lots of State level charges waiting for him that a POTUS can't pardon.

    But bottom line , Trumps ONLY chance of survival is re-election and he will do anything and everything to try to achieve that.

    That is the real concern - What would he be willing to do to survive??


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Quin_Dub wrote: »
    Oh, He'll run alright..

    GOP will not impeach him , simple as that - Or at least not until his popularity with GOP voters falls off a cliff , which has not happened yet..

    He will run because being President could possibly be the only thing to keep him out if jail if everything we are hearing and surmising from the Mueller investigation comes to pass.

    If he wins , then he's golden , if he loses then as previously mentioned he pulls the "resign 10 minutes early" trick and Pence pardons him.

    The downside to the second option is that there will likely be lots of State level charges waiting for him that a POTUS can't pardon.

    But bottom line , Trumps ONLY chance of survival is re-election and he will do anything and everything to try to achieve that.

    That is the real concern - What would he be willing to do to survive??

    The next presidential campaign will be an absolute circus.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,300 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    On mobile so I won't link to it now, but there was an article on thehill.com yesterday where Rand Paul was suggesting that campaign laws might be over criminalised!

    Well, he should introduce legislative change then so.

    In the meantime, until those changes take effect, the current law is the law and thankfully, one cannot retrospectively change it.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement