Donegal Asylum Centre Torched

mammajamma

An article on the new direct provision centre in the small Donegal town of Moville, posted on the irish times just 11 hours ago.

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/were-being-sold-a-pup-and-our-good-nature-exploited-37556724.html

And a quote form an activist "this is hugely positive for the town and the cultural diversity will be amazing." Also " if people have to queue a bit longer at the doctor's surgery or make room in the classrooms for more children, it's a small price to pay compared to what the people seeking asylum have gone through"

Overnight, the hotel was set on fire, as reported here;

https://www.thejournal.ie/fire-moville-hotel-direct-provision-4359104-Nov2018/


As seems to be the case with these places, the people of the town were the last to know about their imminent diversification. Same thing in Wicklow, same thing in Rooskey in Sligo and elsewhere too I suppose.

The asylum seekers are earmarked to come from Syria, Brazil, Congo, Georgia, Pakistan, Nigeria etc. Most of the countries are very suspect in terms of "refugee" countries in my opinion.

What will happen next is now up in the air.

You'd wonder why the likes of Zappone doesn't make provision in her own locality? The people of Rooskey should pay particular attention to how this all unfolds.

I think its quite obvious, albeit anecdotally, that the vast majority of people don't want these centers in their tiny towns. And it appears that if the government is willing to throw these small towns under the bus, then people will start to take direct action.

If you lived in a small community and learned of a direct provision centre being set up, would you support it, or not support it? Why?

EDIT: A bunch of people stating support for this in the poll, yet a complete absence of a comment on why. Reminds me very much of this silly cartoon (not a perfect analogy, but close enough)



EDIT 2: I came across what seems to be the only video of the townhall meeting that was held in Donegal. Its 30 odd minutes long, but at least skim through it to see the sheer ineptitude on display. Excellent questions raised, truly terrible "answers" provided. What a shambles. To save time, just skip to the 7 minute mark, unless you want to hear the generic, pointless "pitch".

mammajamma

mammajamma wrote: »

An article on the new direct provision centre in the small Donegal town of Moville, posted on the irish times just 11 hours ago.

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/were-being-sold-a-pup-and-our-good-nature-exploited-37556724.html

And a quote form an activist "this is hugely positive for the town and the cultural diversity will be amazing." Also " if people have to queue a bit longer at the doctor's surgery or make room in the classrooms for more children, it's a small price to pay compared to what the people seeking asylum have gone through"

Overnight, the hotel was set on fire, as reported here;

https://www.thejournal.ie/fire-moville-hotel-direct-provision-4359104-Nov2018/


As seems to be the case with these places, the people of the town were the last to know about their imminent diversification. Same thing in Wicklow, same thing in Rooskey in Sligo and elsewhere too I suppose.

The asylum seekers are earmarked to come from Syria, Brazil, Congo, Georgia, Pakistan, Nigeria etc. Most of the countries are very suspect in terms of "refugee" countries in my opinion.

What will happen next is now up in the air.

You'd wonder why the likes of Zappone doesn't make provision in her own locality? The people of Rooskey should pay particular attention to how this all unfolds.

I think its quite obvious, albeit anecdotally, that the vast majority of people don't want these centers in their tiny towns. And it appears that if the government is willing to throw these small towns under the bus, then people will start to take direct action.

If you lived in a small community and learned of a direct provision centre being set up, would you support it, or not support it? Why?

Lisdoonvarna in Clare, locals were left out of decision-making process despite being vehemently opposed. Zappone and her cosseted ilk can take a long walk off a short pier.

questionmark?

I got my suspicions that the asylum seekers wouldn't have liked to move to Moville either!!

mammajamma

Deleted User wrote: »

Lisdoonvarna in Clare, locals were left out of decision-making process despite being vehemently opposed. Zappone and her cosseted ilk can take a long walk off a short pier.

It seems to be quite apparent what is happening here. In areas of large population where there is more "power" behind peoples voices politically, the government have decided to take sneaky advantage of the relative weakness of small rural towns.

The politicians say diversification is great (when viewed through binoculars a million miles away from here they live themselves)

Allinall

mammajamma wrote: »

An article on the new direct provision centre in the small Donegal town of Moville, posted on the irish times just 11 hours ago.

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/were-being-sold-a-pup-and-our-good-nature-exploited-37556724.html

And a quote form an activist "this is hugely positive for the town and the cultural diversity will be amazing." Also " if people have to queue a bit longer at the doctor's surgery or make room in the classrooms for more children, it's a small price to pay compared to what the people seeking asylum have gone through"

Overnight, the hotel was set on fire, as reported here;

https://www.thejournal.ie/fire-moville-hotel-direct-provision-4359104-Nov2018/


As seems to be the case with these places, the people of the town were the last to know about their imminent diversification. Same thing in Wicklow, same thing in Rooskey in Sligo and elsewhere too I suppose.

The asylum seekers are earmarked to come from Syria, Brazil, Congo, Georgia, Pakistan, Nigeria etc. Most of the countries are very suspect in terms of "refugee" countries in my opinion.

What will happen next is now up in the air.

You'd wonder why the likes of Zappone doesn't make provision in her own locality? The people of Rooskey should pay particular attention to how this all unfolds.

I think its quite obvious, albeit anecdotally, that the vast majority of people don't want these centers in their tiny towns. And it appears that if the government is willing to throw these small towns under the bus, then people will start to take direct action.

If you lived in a small community and learned of a direct provision centre being set up, would you support it, or not support it? Why?

Not so subtle condoning of criminal activity to support racism.

Well done OP.

whiskeyman

Locals attempt at giving them a warm welcome...

alchemist33

Anyone got any figues for how many asylum seekers are housed in Dublin and/or the countryside?

mammajamma

Allinall wrote: »

Not so subtle condoning of criminal activity to support racism.

Well done OP.

Otherwise known in reality as "the news".

You know, when things happen that are of enough importance they receive national broadcast on television and media.

Your post is a not so subtle "don't pay attention" to support undemocratic, unwanted government decisions.

Well done yourself.

Allinall

mammajamma wrote: »

Otherwise known in reality as "the news".

You know, when things happen that are of enough importance they receive national broadcast on television and media.

Your post is a not so subtle "don't pay attention" to support undemocratic, unwanted government decisions.

Well done yourself.

Undemocratic eh?

How’d you figure that one out?

mammajamma

Allinall wrote: »

Undemocratic eh?

How’d you figure that one out?

So far you have contributed "racism!"

How about making a case for why you support asylum centres in small rural towns?

Allinall

mammajamma wrote: »

So far you have contributed "racism!"

How about making a case for why you support asylum centres in small rural towns?

Any answer to your “undemocratic” claim?

What makes you think I support asylum centers in small towns?

CinemaGuy45

Well, I have to say posting on this thread seems like a waste of time the people of Donegal did not expend a load of hot air on a forum.

The poll is a waste of time along with the way the whole thread is framed.


What has happened has happened the way I would have framed it is not if we agree or disagree with the question I would have asked is anybody surprised by this or could we have seen it coming?

Richard Hillman

Patriots

mammajamma

Allinall wrote: »

Any answer to your “undemocratic” claim?

What makes you think I support asylum centers in small towns?

I presume undemocratic because;

1) The locals were not consulted about anything beforehand.
2) The locals were apparently "the last to know"
3) This appears to be echoed in several other places where it as already happened.
4) By reading the articles attached to the OP
5) (In one single instance so far) somebody felt politically disempowered to the point that they took criminal action

And so forth.

What makes me think you support it?

1) Your very post didn't remark anything about the news
2) You immediately dropped the "racism!" bomb.
3) You have said nothing about the subject at hand in subsequent posts, preferring to nitpick at my statements

So that's where my assumption is coming from that you support these centres in small rural towns.

Now that ive answered your questions, answer mine. Do you support them or not, and why?

EDIT: And of course, the poster was never seen again

mammajamma

CinemaGuy45 wrote: »

Well, I have to say posting on this thread seems like a waste of time the people of Donegal did not expend a load of hot air on a forum.

The poll is a waste of time along with the way the whole thread is framed.


What has happened has happened the way I would have framed it is not if we agree or disagree with the question I would have asked is anybody surprised by this or could we have seen it coming?

Absolutely true to certain extents. But its important at the same time to debate and talk about these developments, otherwise they get brushed under the carpet.

As for the poll, as you say, people clicking the "yes I support it", but absolutely no commentary on why its a good idea to them.

Richard Hillman

The Germans put a lot of their migrants in small rural towns. It's handy because when the backward rural folk complain about their crimes, the metropolitan liberals can just tar them as racists.

The same strategy is happening here. Although Mr Varadkar and Mr Coveney should be aware that Merkel is getting chucked out for it and will need high level security for the rest of her life. The 2 boys probably won't be bothered as they gunning down a retirement gig at the UN.

kneemos

mammajamma wrote: »

An article on the new direct provision centre in the small Donegal town of Moville, posted on the irish times just 11 hours ago.

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/were-being-sold-a-pup-and-our-good-nature-exploited-37556724.html

And a quote form an activist "this is hugely positive for the town and the cultural diversity will be amazing." Also " if people have to queue a bit longer at the doctor's surgery or make room in the classrooms for more children, it's a small price to pay compared to what the people seeking asylum have gone through"

Overnight, the hotel was set on fire, as reported here;

https://www.thejournal.ie/fire-moville-hotel-direct-provision-4359104-Nov2018/


As seems to be the case with these places, the people of the town were the last to know about their imminent diversification. Same thing in Wicklow, same thing in Rooskey in Sligo and elsewhere too I suppose.

The asylum seekers are earmarked to come from Syria, Brazil, Congo, Georgia, Pakistan, Nigeria etc. Most of the countries are very suspect in terms of "refugee" countries in my opinion.

What will happen next is now up in the air.

You'd wonder why the likes of Zappone doesn't make provision in her own locality? The people of Rooskey should pay particular attention to how this all unfolds.

I think its quite obvious, albeit anecdotally, that the vast majority of people don't want these centers in their tiny towns. And it appears that if the government is willing to throw these small towns under the bus, then people will start to take direct action.

If you lived in a small community and learned of a direct provision centre being set up, would you support it, or not support it? Why?

From what I read last week loads of folk in the town were in favour of using the Hotel for asylum seekers.

Have you got the actual figures for and against?

mammajamma

Richard Hillman wrote: »

The Germans put a lot of their migrants in small rural towns. It's handy because when the backward rural folk complain about their crimes, the metropolitan liberals can just tar them as racists.

The same strategy is happening here. Although Mr Varadkar and Mr Coveney should be aware that Merkel is getting chucked out for it and will need high level security for the rest of her life. The 2 boys probably won't be bothered as they gunning down a retirement gig at the UN.

I honestly don't know what exactly is happening in other countries, but I'm not surprised at this strategy here, or that it would be used elsewhere.

Its all so very convenient to dump these people in the least likely places to be able to afford it, and least likely to be able to politically challenge it. Out of sight, out of mind.

From the irish times article, it is referenced that other places have received next to no resources. These places are just convenient dumping grounds.

backspin.

Richard Hillman wrote: »

The Germans put a lot of their migrants in small rural towns. It's handy because when the backward rural folk complain about their crimes, the metropolitan liberals can just tar them as racists.

The same strategy is happening here. Although Mr Varadkar and Mr Coveney should be aware that Merkel is getting chucked out for it and will need high level security for the rest of her life. The 2 boys probably won't be bothered as they gunning down a retirement gig at the UN.

It's cheaper too. Small rural towns normally have cheap or unused buildings that would be more difficult to find in large towns and cities.

mammajamma

kneemos wrote: »

From what I read last week loads of folk in the town were in favour of using the Hotel for asylum seekers.

Have you got the actual figures for and against?

I think you really have to be cynical of reported news. Talk to people on the ground and you'll get a much different picture of "welcome"

You could have 10 people come out in support of it, then it could be reported as "many people are in favour".

And don't dismiss people from very far away throwing in their support too. Theres some kind of link with a activist centre in Derry supporting this. 500 people "like" their facebook/twitter page, and hey presto, now "loads support the idea in Moville".

So to answer your question, no, there wont be any publicly available information on numbers for and against this in Donegal. The only solid way is to talk to people from there. It is made practically impossible. And that's probably not a mistake.

Yer Da sells Avon

This woman in Ballaghaderreen sums up my own views. However, dumping people into direct provision centres for lengthy periods of time doesn't seem very humane, especially in crap towns that lack the infrastructure for the populations they already have.

Cockford Ollie

I think they should be held in a big off shore tanker or one of the uninhabited barren islands while thier applications are being processed.

mammajamma

Yer Da sells Avon wrote: »

This woman in Ballaghaderreen sums up my own views. However, dumping people into direct provision centres for lengthy periods of time doesn't seem very humane, especially in crap towns that lack the infrastructure for the populations they already have.

Again, I very much question this idea that "the vast majority support it" from news articles where there is always a complete absence of numbers.

Why cant the people of a small community be allowed have a counted consensus on what is going to dramatically impact their daily lives? Why not a vote? Why not report those numbers?

I also question an article, in particular, that focuses on one single person, throws out the "vast majority" thing, and then finishes with a supportive quote from a vested NGO.

Also, referring to them as "crap towns" really is the icing on the cake for these communities, and says so much.

conorhal

backspin. wrote: »

It's cheaper too. Small rural towns normally have cheap or unused buildings that would be more difficult to find in large towns and cities.

And very remote. There aren't even public transport links to Dublin where these peoples cases are being heard... sort of an odd place to dump people. It's almost as if there's an agenda at play, is the Beara Peninsula perhaps a little 'too Irish' for the liking of some? Perhaps in need of the full benefits for the wonders of multiculturalism weather they want them or not?

4068ac1elhodqr

A larger provincial town would probably suffice, what is 100 new folks in a town of 1300 going to do?

Assuming they're not doctors and engineers, there is only so much typical 1st gen migration blue-collar/unskilled work available,
and <10yrs the auto-johnny minicab, robotic burger flipper and automatic dishwasher3000 will slurp up all the low-skilled work anyways.

mammajamma

Malia Cool Okra wrote: »

A larger provincial town would probably suffice, what is 100 new folks in a town of 1300 going to do?

Assuming they're not doctors and engineers, there is only so much typical 1st gen migration blue-collar/unskilled work available,
and <10yrs the auto-johnny minicab, robotic burger flipper and automatic dishwasher3000 will slurp up all the low-skilled work anyways.

That's the forward thinking and planning of our government for you :rolleyes:

mammajamma

I like how so many are in support of this, going from the poll, yet nobody has made a comment on why.

Surely that point of view can be logically defended?

CinemaGuy45

No chance the fire was caused by an electrical fault?

Spleerbun

Not trying to be funny, but is there some war or something going on in Nigeria that I'm not aware of? What makes Nigerians refugees? And if there is a genuine reason I'm not aware of, are there not dozens of surrounding countries that are perfectly viable alternatives for them?? Africa is an utterly enormous continent and Europe just doesn't have enough room to accommodate them all of them. I don't see any good argument for them coming all the way here tbh

dav3

Well the first step would be to condem an arson attack I would have thought. I think most reasonable intelligent people would condem it.

Leave the dregs of Irish society to applaud it. They’re going nowhere, except prison. Just like their parents and grandparents before them.

Yer Da sells Avon

mammajamma wrote: »

I like how so many are in support of this, going from the poll, yet nobody has made a comment on why.

Surely that point of view can be logically defended?

I voted 'Yes' in the poll because I'd happily welcome the people - but only if the infrastructure was there, and if adequate temporary housing was provided for them, rather than throwing them into hotels for Christ knows how long.

mammajamma

Yer Da sells Avon wrote: »

I voted 'Yes' in the poll because I'd happily welcome the people - but only if the infrastructure was there, and if adequate temporary housing was provided for them, rather than throwing them into hotels for Christ knows how long.

At least you are supporting your statement.

But do you not think its a bit contradictory to state support "if things were different" when in fact they very much are not different?

Richard Hillman

mammajamma wrote: »

I like how so many are in support of this, going from the poll, yet nobody has made a comment on why.

Surely that point of view can be logically defended?

That's easy. Migrant Centre's have been proven all over Europe to have a disastrous effect to towns and villages. What this person or persons have done, is attempt to stop the location plan through all means necessary. Some may say it's illegal, some may say that the Sentinel Islanders killing that guy was illegal. Is defending your homeland illegal? Technically, legally, probably but it's the people that are trying to replace us that are setting the laws. Was the 1916 Rising illegal? Yes. But it was the people who didn't want a rebellion and were trying to replace us that were setting the laws.

It's the great story of our time. The invasion of Europe. Are we going to be the generation that says "we wanted to defend out homeland but there were rules Against it and some people would have called us names, so we didn't bother".

CinemaGuy45

dav3 wrote: »

Well the first step would be to condem an arson attack I would have thought. I think most reasonable intelligent people would condem it.

Leave the dregs of Irish society to applaud it. They’re going nowhere, except prison. Just like their parents and grandparents before them.

Filthy animals burning down the centre I will join you in condemning it these people are not reasonable or intelligent.:mad:

Now as a reasonable and intelligent person I would love to help out and I am in no doubt you feel the same.

Have you got a free bedroom in your home that you can offer it would be so helpful come on show those thugs the true Irish cade media Falta.

Yer Da sells Avon

mammajamma wrote: »

At least you are supporting your statement.

But do you not think its a bit contradictory to state support "if things were different" when in fact they very much are not different?

Yes/No polls are never ideal.

Squatter

Yer Da sells Avon wrote: »

I voted 'Yes' in the poll because I'd happily welcome the people - but only if the infrastructure was there, and if adequate temporary housing was provided for them, rather than throwing them into hotels for Christ knows how long.

If the system worked correctly then Christ (or someone much less exalted) would be able to tell you that it would be only for as long as it takes to verify their claims to be asylum seekers - or otherwise.

But given the interminable appeal process that has enriched so many Irish lawyers, even Christ wouldn't have a clue.

tretorn

I believe the main interest most Irish people have in immigration is to see less of it, even Clinton has come out and said peoples fears about immigration must be listened to.

I am an Irish person and I wouldnt move to a rural town because the people living in these places are very cliquish. How on earth is someone from Nigeria or Pakistan supposed to be able to be able to cope with the weather and the isolation and where are they supposed to find work. All the children in the local schools will be related to each other and they will stick together against any outsiders, it would be the same if I transported my red haired freckly family to Nigeria, we would stick out like a sore thumb in a rural black town.

The Government are deliberately choosing these places to send a message to other people intending to seek asylum here that you wont end up in Dublin City Or Galway or Cork, you will live where the Government choose to send you and I am okay with that. Most of the people coming are not fleeing persecution, they are economic migrants and for the most part are no use to us. They will mostly have numerous children and will be relying on handouts and taking houses that young Irish working class people need. I would prefer they were housed in a facility near Dublin airport, their claims decided quickly and if declined they be put on the first plane back to wherever they came from. Lawyers on FRee legal aid wont like this efficiency, they and the numerous NGOs are making a nice living on what is absurd nonsense and its time for our elected representatives to pull the plug.

If any candidate puts themselves forwards on a platform for dealing with immigrants and asylum seekers they will get triple Peter Caseys vote, its long past time someone dealt with this issue.

mammajamma

Yer Da sells Avon wrote: »

Yes/No polls are never ideal.

True, but in this case its fairly appropriate (or as close as youre going to get).

Its based on very current events, with a history of similarity in other small towns. I think its fair to be able to state support or not as things stand.

Odhinn

Richard Hillman wrote: »

That's easy. Migrant Centre's have been proven all over Europe to have a disastrous effect to towns and villages. What this person or persons have done, is attempt to stop the location plan through all means necessary. Some may say it's illegal, some may say that the Sentinel Islanders killing that guy was illegal. Is defending your homeland illegal? Technically, legally, probably but it's the people that are trying to replace us that are setting the laws. Was the 1916 Rising illegal? Yes. But it was the people who didn't want a rebellion and were trying to replace us that were setting the laws.

It's the great story of our time. The invasion of Europe. Are we going to be the generation that says "we wanted to defend out homeland but there were rules Against it and some people would have called us names, so we didn't bother".

totally overblown guff.

tretorn

Any asylum seekers sent to Donegal wouldnt be able to go through the North to get to Dublin, they would have to travel via Sligo.

The Reception and Integration Agency said this wouldnt be a problem, they would provide comfort stops and hotel overnight stays for refugees needing to go to Dublin, how much would this cost the taxpayer. Nice little hotel stops for economic migrants who shouldnt be in this country anyway.

Richard Hillman

Spleerbun wrote: »

Not trying to be funny, but is there some war or something going on in Nigeria that I'm not aware of? What makes Nigerians refugees? And if there is a genuine reason I'm not aware of, are there not dozens of surrounding countries that are perfectly viable alternatives for them?? Africa is an utterly enormous continent and Europe just doesn't have enough room to accommodate them all of them. I don't see any good argument for them coming all the way here tbh

The North of the Nigeria yes. The South of Nigeria is as safe as it gets for Nigerian standards.

mammajamma

tretorn wrote: »

I believe the main interest most Irish people have in immigration is to see less of it, even Clinton has come out and said peoples fears about immigration must be listened to.

I am an Irish person and I wouldnt move to a rural town because the people living in these places are very cliquish. How on earth is someone from Nigeria or Pakistan supposed to be able to be able to cope with the weather and the isolation and where are they supposed to find work. All the children in the local schools will be related to each other and they will stick together against any outsiders, it would be the same if I transported my red haired freckly family to Nigeria, we would stick out like a sore thumb in a rural black town.

The Government are deliberately choosing these places to send a message to other people intending to seek asylum here that you wont end up in Dublin City Or Galway or Cork, you will live where the Government choose to send you and I am okay with that. Most of the people coming are not fleeing persecution, they are economic migrants and for the most part are no use to us. They will mostly have numerous children and will be relying on handouts and taking houses that young Irish working class people need. I would prefer they were housed in a facility near Dublin airport, their claims decided quickly and if declined they be put on the first plane back to wherever they came from. Lawyers on FRee legal aid wont like this efficiency, they and the numerous NGOs are making a nice living on what is absurd nonsense and its time for our elected representatives to pull the plug.

If any candidate puts themselves forwards on a platform for dealing with immigrants and asylum seekers they will get triple Peter Caseys vote, its long past time someone dealt with this issue.

I can agree with a lot there, not everything.

However, about sending a message, I doubt someone from Nigeria has the first clue about the differences between Sligo verus Wicklow, for example.

Would you know the difference between Taraba and Matsina in Nigeria? All you'll care about is "im getting to Nigeria, and that's what I want"

Arghus

Hot take central in here.

CinemaGuy45

Odhinn wrote: »

totally overblown guff.

mammajamma

tretorn wrote: »

The influential people mostly live in Dublin, especially the nicer parts so they will effectively block anything that impacts on their house prices.

Also any hotel in a nice area that isnt making much money can be redeveloped as housing if zoning allows. The Tara Tower hotel on the Rock Road in Blackrock
Dublin seems to be boarded up and I have heard apartment blocks will be built on the site. It would have been ideal for a small halting site or a direct provision centre but this site faces the seafront so expensive homes will be built for wealthy downsizers.

If we dont want hundreds and thousands of asylum seekers coming we have to make sure that we house them where other people mostly dont want to live, ie rural isolated areas with no services and no broadband and **** all to do from September till May. This means these people will either go back to where they came from or else make their way to another European country to try out their chances there. You can bet your life most of the refugees are male and young and they werent going to hang around Moville for too long anyway.

I see where youre coming from, but I cant totally agree.

An equivalent would be trying to get rid of a beggar by overloading them with money, in the hopes that they'll stop asking for more money because their pockets will be too full. If that were the governments plan, its a whopper

But sending these people to the least capable areas and least represented areas where they will have the greatest impact, that's just sneaky. Theres no better word for it.

Squatter

tretorn wrote: »

Also any hotel in a nice area that isnt making much money can be redeveloped as housing if zoning allows. The Tara Tower hotel on the Rock Road in Blackrock Dublin seems to be boarded up and I have heard apartment blocks will be built on the site. It would have been ideal for a small halting site or a direct provision centre but this site faces the seafront so expensive homes will be built for wealthy downsizers.

The hotel will be rebuilt as a four star Maldron hotel and the car park down the lane behind the hotel will be used to build 70 apartments.

No doubt some of the apartments will be snapped up by the local Council to provide social housing. Maybe Margaret Cash will get one of them.

mammajamma

Seeing as these communities are so small, how long would a door-to-door consensus take?

1 day?

Why haven't the government done that? If theres so much support, surely they would welcome such a solid consensus, no?

**Evil Conspiracy**
They know fully well that the vast majority of people don't want this in their community, and therefore are too clever to actually "ask". You know, that pesky democracy thing, tsk!

WinnyThePoo

Arghus wrote: »

Hot take central in here.

Another fascinatingly dumb after hours thread. Gemma o Doherty levels of codology.

mammajamma

WinnyThePoo wrote: »

Another fascinatingly dumb after hours thread. Gemma o Doherty levels of codology.

That "news" thing, eh? Terribly inconvenient.

But a fascinatingly dumb contribution to the thread!

Any actual contribution to make besides that? Do you support these asylum centres being set up in the least capable places in the country?

And most importantly for a conversation, why?

WinnyThePoo

mammajamma wrote: »

WinnyThePoo wrote: »

Another fascinatingly dumb after hours thread. Gemma o Doherty levels of codology.

That "news" thing, eh? Terribly inconvenient.

But a fascinatingly dumb contribution to the thread!

Any actual contribution to make besides that? Do you support these asylum centres being set up in the least capable places in the country?

And most importantly for a conversation, why?

Wanton destruction of property. I already know you don't want a conversation going by your ethno nationalist posting history.

Now go back to playing cod. That's a good place for you.

Cockford Ollie

I drive around the city and the percentage of non whites is depressing.