Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
JFK Assassination Autopsy Details Revealed After 55 Years
Options
Comments
-
-
-
Cheerful Spring wrote: »They are autopsy photos. I never heard anyone claim ( JFK researcher specifically claim they are photos taken later after the autopsy. Where did you read this?
Reseacrher called John Canal. Good articles here and here. It makes sense to me. Regardless of what you believe, theres no way the rear autopsy photo was taken as Kennedy came in. Skull flap aside his whole head is undamaged.
It was an autopsy/restoration project. A total mess.Cheerful Spring wrote: »Boswell and Humes, Finck were not qualified to do this kind of work.
Finck was, the other two weren't. But the other two started 30 minutes before Finck got there.Cheerful Spring wrote: »That not true. Many of the photos are missing that well known. They took over 52 photos.
Yes but they're locked away.
There were a batch of photos that were purposely exposed to light just after they were taken.
Cheerful Spring wrote: »That Photo I posted was used by the Warren Commission to prove Oswald fired the shot. Notice the ruler and few cm wide hole?
So how can it be? What happened to the large round that was 5 inches wide that extended from occipital bone to the Parietal bone?
Covered over by the scalp.0 -
Reseacrher called John Canal. Good articles here and here. It makes sense to me. Regardless of what you believe, theres no way the rear autopsy photo was taken as Kennedy came in. Skull flap aside his whole head is undamaged.
It was an autopsy/restoration project. A total mess.
Finck was, the other two weren't. But the other two started 30 minutes before Finck got there.
Yes but they're locked away.
There were a batch of photos that were purposely exposed to light just after they were taken.
Covered over by the scalp.
The autopsy photo is showing someone using a ruler to measure a small hole at the back of the head.
It is a fake autopsy photo that what I am telling you!
This photo was used by the Warren Commission to convict Oswald. According to them, the fatal shot entered through the back of the head, spot highlighted by the ruler a small wound and then exited out in front of the right ear.
Least you now seeing why conspiracy theorists don't agree with the Warren Commission findings.0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
Cheerful Spring wrote: »The reason I don't believe that is the eyewitnesses saw Kennedy body at two different locations Parkland hospital in Dallas and Bethesda in Washington DC. There no interactions between the witnesses.
Clint Hill was up close and personal and saw Kennedy in the car moments after he got shot. I saw a large hole in the back of the head.
You only post that picture of Clint Hill because I posted a video and you grabbed the screenshot. It suits your agenda so you don't look too further. But if you did heres what hes said.
Inside the U.S. Secret Service documentary: "I could see the back of his head and there was a gaping hole above his right ear about the size of my palm."
Heres an interview from 2017. Describes it as right and above the ear.
https://youtu.be/vzYwCmDDSLA?t=27m33s
And loads of other people saw a wound at the side of the head and the top of the head. As per this link.
Why do you only believe the people who suit your agenda?! You're completely ignoring established and documented fact. Thats the problem with confirmation bias. Gullibility. You just find something that confirms what you want to believe and don't look deeper. You want to believe that people who dont believe in a conspiracy are sheep but in reality you are the sheep.0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
No more vague than that Clint Hill picture you've posted about 5 times in the last 5 pages claiming it to be absolute proof of a conspiracy.
lol. Obviously yeah.
Clint Hill says there that the bullet hit him in the back of the head. He was holding onto the back of the car 3 feet away from JFK at the time. He not only heard the shot but was so close he "felt" the shot. You believed Clint Hill until about 4 minutes ago.
It might be possible you could be wrong about other things too if you dig a little deeper past your confirmation bias.
Where Clint places his hand in your photo is where I believe the large head wound was mostly located
How many times do i have to post this?
"The large and irregularly-shaped wound in the right side of the head (chiefly to the parietal bone, but also involving the temporal and occipital bone) is described as being about 13 centimetres (5.1 in) wide at the largest diameter.[11]
What you disagreeing about?0 -
Cheerful Spring wrote: »Where Clint places his hand in your photo is where I believe the large head wound was mostly located
How many times do i have to post this?
"The large and irregularly-shaped wound in the right side of the head (chiefly to the parietal bone, but also involving the temporal and occipital bone) is described as being about 13 centimetres (5.1 in) wide at the largest diameter.[11]
What you disagreeing about?
That you use one description as absolute proof of a conspiracy but ignore a conflicting description by the same person.
As for the wound - "Chiefly to the parietal bone". So as you say, that means "mostly located". Where is the parietal bone?
Not the occipital bone at the back of the head is it? You're posting quotes that completely contradict your theory.0 -
That you use one description as absolute proof of a conspiracy but ignore a conflicting description by the same person.
As for the wound - "Chiefly to the parietal bone". Where is the parietal bone?
It involved three areas right side above the ear and behind the right ear and at the back of the skull.
Clearly outlined here.
(chiefly to the parietal bone, but also involving the temporal and occipital bone)
It, not conflicting opinion. You assumed from just a still photo there no occipital wound Even though he already placed his hand there in one video. 0 -
Cheerful Spring wrote: »It involved three areas right side above the ear and behind the right ear and at the back of the skull.
Clearly outlined here.
(chiefly to the parietal bone, but also involving the temporal and occipital bone)
It, not conflicting opinion. You assumed from just a still photo there no occipital wound Even though he already placed his hand there in one video.
There was an occipital wound. Clearly. But as per your quote, The wound was "chiefly" to the parietal bone.
Did you not read the quote you kept posting? What it means is that the main part of the wound was not in the occipital bone.
Do you understand what "chiefly" means? It means "mainly".0 -
-
-
Bullet went in the back of the head to the right (just above the occipital line) causing a wound (including below where the bullet struck), continued high and right in the head (parietal) and also caused damage to the front right (temporal). Just like the Zapruder film shows.
You're assuming that bullets travel straight and exit in a straight line when they hit a head. They don't. Some explode, some can go straight through and just leave two holes etc. There is no pattern.
False and blatant lie again. On the Zapruder film, the large wound is in front of the right ear and extends and covers the right side forehead of President Kennedy. The Zapruder film large wound is located in the temporal and frontal lobe of his brain.
Large Wound according to the eyewitnesses and JFK autopsy was above the right ear and was behind the right ear. There no large wound/ hole seen in Parietal and Occipital on the Zapruder film.
What we actually see it a tiny hole in the parietal. Image 1
We know these fake autopsy images were added in to fool people and to cover up Kennedy back side of his head had been blown out.
Another fake autopsy photo. Image 2 Same culprits.
We have this image, a side view of the right side of the head behind the ear. No large wound in the Parietal. Image 3 is another fake autopsy image.
0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
Cheerful Spring wrote: »It pointless debating someone who can't see the large wound is in front of the right ear on the Zapruder film. The big red blob is in front of the ear and covers the right forehead
"The big red blob" is his brain which spills out from above the right ear to the front of the right forehead. Perfectly in keeping with the Zapruder film, autopsy photos and a load of witnesses.
"the big red blob" is not the hole in his head, it is what came out of the hole in his head.Cheerful Spring wrote: »Me and everyone else says the large wound was above the right ear and behind the ear. You think you right despite the evidence.
Nope thats right. Above the right ear and behind the ear (and in front) is the parietal bone.Cheerful Spring wrote: »If they found a large exit wound in the frontal lobe, they would have mentioned it and said so in the Autopsy findings.
And they didn't. Because there wasn't a large exit wound there. He has some eye socket fracturing though.
At Zapruder frames 316 and 317 the "big red blob" is on his face. Do you think he was shot in the face too? Or could that be gravity?
Notice his head moving forward. The bit I like best is all the fake blood and spray "they" managed to superimpose into the film.
0 -
"The big red blob" is his brain which spills out from above the right ear to the front of the right forehead. Perfectly in keeping with the Zapruder film, autopsy photos and a load of witnesses.
"the big red blob" is not the hole in his head, it is what came out of the hole in his head.
Nope thats right. Above the right ear and behind the ear (and in front) is the parietal bone.
And they didn't. Because there wasn't a large exit wound there. He has some eye socket fracturing though.
At Zapruder frames 316 and 317 the "big red blob" is on his face. Do you think he was shot in the face too? Or could that be gravity?
Notice his head moving forward. The bit I like best is all the fake blood and spray "they" managed to superimpose into the film.
Untrue and your spin will not change the facts.
The official theory is a bullet entered the back of Kennedy skull (left a small hole- entry point) and then the remaining bullet fragments exited out in front of the right ear. That what you looking at on the Zapruder film. That's the official account.
That not what the eyewitnesses said and autopsy findings are not hard to follow. There nothing in the autopsy report about a bullet exiting out in front of the right ear. You clearly see on the Zapruder, film, severe frontal damage that extends all the way to the right forehead.
What the Autopsy doctors said., the exit wound.
"The large and irregularly-shaped wound in the right side of the head (chiefly to the parietal bone, but also involving the temporal and occipital bone)[0 -
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
Advertisement