Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
JFK Assassination Autopsy Details Revealed After 55 Years
Options
Comments
-
For anyone else needs a lesson in brain anatomy.
Nal claims the doctors said there was a huge hole in the frontal lobe/bone.
Not true.
The large and irregularly-shaped wound in the right side of the head (chiefly to the parietal bone, but also involving the temporal and occipital bone) is described as being about 13 centimetres (5.1 inches) wide at the largest diameter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_autopsy
The large wound that was 5 inches in diameter was at the back of the head.0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
You don't even need to look at the Zapruder film.
There no doubt there a conspiracy when you see this Autopsy image of President Kennedy head.
There no wound or hole behind the right ear. (occipital bone) You can clearly see the hairline is intact and undamaged.0 -
-
-
-
-
With these images, we now have a clear picture of the cover-up. The Autopsy findings confirm also the location of the large wound. A head wound behind the right ear, above and back of the head.
The large and irregularly-shaped wound in the right side of the head (chiefly to the parietal bone, but also involving the temporal and occipital bone) is described as being about 13 centimetres (5.1 inches) wide at the largest diameter.[11
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_autopsy0 -
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
"A wound". Thats not claiming "the doctors said there was a huge hole in the frontal lobe/bone." I never said that. The "huge" wound is the entire wound.
You're now attributing quotes to people (me) when they haven't even said them, despite the real quotes being on the same page for all to see.
And as above, you're back to ignoring questions and now just posting the same thing over and over. By far the worst (and I use these descriptions humorously) researcher/poster/historian I've ever seen. By a mile. Across this entire thread you haven't made one comprehensive point or come up with any sort of theory. Literaly nothing. Just silly pictures and quotes and other peoples opinions. And now you're purposely misquoting other posters.
You're a liar with an agenda and a time waster.
You decided to ignore everything I posted to this thread. Stop playing games, you told me there was a curve wound in one of your posts in front of the head. You even said the front of his brain was missing.
End of the day we have Clint Hill showing on video where he saw a large wound in the head.
Let's take a look at one of the Zapruder frames. You clearly see the back of the head where Clint put his hand is now covered up with a black mass (animation drawing)
You don't seem to care or does not register with you, the Medical staff at Bethesda Medical centre and at Parkland hospital observed a large wound ( a hole) in the area that now covered with a black mass on the Zapruder movie.0 -
Cheerful Spring wrote: »You even said the front of his brain was missing.
When?Cheerful Spring wrote: »End of the day we have Clint Hill showing on video where he saw a large wound in the head.
Let's take a look at one of the Zapruder frames. You clearly see the back of the head where Clint put his hand is now covered up with a black mass (animation drawing)
You don't seem to care or does not register with you, the Medical staff at Bethesda Medical centre and at Parkland hospital observed a large wound ( a hole) in the area that now covered with a black mass on the Zapruder movie.
Why not look at all of the Zapruder film as opposed to selectively choosing one still frame? Oh I know, because it makes your "theory" ridiculous.
Ill say it again...
You don't understand the difference between a laceration and a hole and a defect. You just go with "wound" or "hole".
You don't understand how there was a reconstruction of the scalp.
You don't understand that the skull is composed of two layers of bone.
You don't understand undermining of scalps.
You don't consider that they were trying to cover that large deficit in the head in for an open coffin funeral.
For example:
ARRB deposition by Dr. Humes “we were able to close it [the scalp] by undermining and stretching and so forth"
Why don't you read their testimonies? Try, just try to study one topic thoroughly as opposed to posting stupid and selective pictures.
Anyone can do that.
0 -
When?
Why not look at all of the Zapruder film as opposed to selectively choosing one still frame? Oh I know, because it makes your "theory" ridiculous.
Ill say it again...
You don't understand the difference between a laceration and a hole and a defect. You just go with "wound" or "hole".
You don't understand how there was a reconstruction of the scalp.
You don't understand that the skull is composed of two layers of bone.
You don't understand undermining of scalps.
You don't consider that they were trying to cover that large deficit in the head in for an open coffin funeral.
For example:
ARRB deposition by Dr. Humes “we were able to close it [the scalp] by undermining and stretching and so forth"
Why don't you read their testimonies? Try, just try to study one topic thoroughly as opposed to posting stupid and selective pictures.
Anyone can do that.
Read your posts. You uploaded a picture with a yellow line curving in front of the head and you stated the entire section of the brain there was missing.
All the Zapruder frames show the black spot at the back of the head. We even have an autopsy image of Kennedy's head and there no hole or wound behind the right ear.
What did Clint Hil say? I observed a large hole (his words) at the back of the head. What happened to the large wound or hole on the Zapruder film?
The JFK Autopsy findings, is when the Kennedy body was brought in.
The large and irregularly-shaped wound in the right side of the head (chiefly to the parietal bone, but also involving the temporal and occipital bone) is described as being about 13 centimetres (5.1 in) wide at the largest diameter.
That a large wound in the back of the head extending down the rear right side of the head ( where the black mass is on the Zapruder movie)
There no evidence reconstructive surgery took place at Bethesda. When did this happen?0 -
Cheerful Spring wrote: »Read your posts. You uploaded a picture with a yellow line curving in front of the head and you stated the entire section of the brain there was missing.
Nope, again, you're lying. I didn't say that. Its not missing, it spilled forward and out the right, which is clear in the Zapruder film.Cheerful Spring wrote: »All the Zapruder frames show the black spot at the back of the head. We even have an autopsy image of Kennedy's head and there no hole or wound behind the right ear.
There is, its been covered over. The scalp has been reset to its natural position in the autopsy photos. You either don't understand or haven't bothered to read about it.Cheerful Spring wrote: »What did Clint Hil say? I observed a large hole (his words) at the back of the head. What happened to the large wound or hole on the Zapruder film?
Its there, at Jackies chin below here. Scalp flapping about everywhere.
Cheerful Spring wrote: »The JFK Autopsy findings, is when the Kennedy body was brought in.
That makes no sense as a sentence.Cheerful Spring wrote: »There no evidence reconstructive surgery took place at Bethesda. When did this happen?
Yes there is. Lots. I've just posted evidence by the doctor who did it.
Go read about it yourself.
Hint, you probably won't find info about it on a conspiracy forum. For obvious reasons.0 -
Nope, again, you're lying. I didn't say that. Its not missing, it spilled forward and out the right, which is clear in the Zapruder film.
There is, its been covered over. The scalp has been reset to its natural position in the autopsy photos. You either don't understand or haven't bothered to read about it.
Its there, at Jackies chin below here. Scalp flapping about everywhere.
That makes no sense as a sentence.
Yes there is. Lots. I've just posted evidence by the doctor who did it.
Go read about it yourself.
Hint, you probably won't find info about it on a conspiracy forum. For obvious reasons.
The only person lying is you. You got caught out now you trying to change what you first thought.
You don't even know what you saying right now. Now you claiming the back of the head was fixed and reconstructed with new hair, is that right? When did this surgery take place? It did not happen at Bethesda.
Where did you post the evidence about the doctor doing it?
You waffling now. There no wound below Jackie's chin.
Let this sink in Nal and annoying you don't get this. You, not a stupid bloke you should be able to understand this.
The doctors are describing a wound that in the back half of the brain and extending down behind the right ear of Kennedy's head. The Zapruder film is showing an exit wound in front of the right ear. There should be a visible wound behind the right ear on the Zapruder film, but all you see is a black mass covering it up.
It not hard to follow. Occipital bone is behind the right ear all the way down to the base of the neckline ( back of the head)
The large and irregularly-shaped wound in the right side of the head (chiefly to the parietal bone, but also involving the temporal and occipital bone) is described as being about 13 centimetres (5.1 inches) wide at the largest diameter.[11]
0 -
Cheerful Spring wrote: »The only person lying is you. You got caught out now you trying to change what you first thought.
You don't even know what you saying right now. Now you claiming the back of the head was fixed and reconstructed with new hair, is that right? When did this surgery take place? It did not happen at Bethesda.
Where did you post the evidence about the doctor doing it?
You waffling now. There no wound below Jackie's chin.
Let this sink in Nal and annoying you don't get this. You, not a stupid bloke you should be able to understand this.
The doctors are describing a wound that in the back half of the brain and extending down behind the right ear of Kennedy's head. The Zapruder film is showing an exit wound in front of the right ear. There should be a visible wound behind the right ear on the Zapruder film, but all you see is a black mass covering it up.
It not hard to follow. Occipital bone is behind the right ear all the way down to the base of the neckline ( back of the head)
The large and irregularly-shaped wound in the right side of the head (chiefly to the parietal bone, but also involving the temporal and occipital bone) is described as being about 13 centimetres (5.1 inches) wide at the largest diameter.[11]
Vague statements like "all the doctors" backed up by a low res collage of people - some heavily involved in the event, some not - selectively pointing at parts of their heads is whats stupid. I could easily knock one up myself showing people pointing elsewhere on their heads.
You're taking people at their word, only when it suits your agenda. But the truth runs much deeper. The autopsy was the biggest botch in history. Which is one of the main conclusions of the HSCA. Of the three pathologists, Dr Finck was the only one who was a forensic pathologist. The other two according to Dr. Michael Baden (lead expert on the HSCA panel) "didn’t know the difference between an entrance wound and an exit wound." Yet Finck wasnt there for the first 30 minutes so it was already botched by the time he got there.
The autopsy doctors have also changed their stories a few times, contradicted each other and engaged in public spats.
The ARRB filed a report (authored y Doug Horne) saying their experts couldn't find an entrance wound on the xray, then Larry Sturdivan said he found it on the xrays
Couple that with ambiguous statements from Dallas doctors who weren't pathologists nor doing an autopsy, eye witnesses who were close to JFK (Zapruder, Sitman etc) whos wound descriptions match the Zapruder film, the fact that the scalp is moveable and rarely used to determine a wound and the fact that they undermined and stretched the scalp and its not as simple as you're making it out to be.
You keep quoting that quote from the autopsy - "chiefly to the parietal bone."
Thats completely consistent with what we see on the Zapruder film.:background_color(FFFFFF):format(jpeg)/images/article/en/the-parietal-bone/VHoYlB3QMSUM6iOpOTjXw_os_parietale_atlas_05Xk3rPri0f9OsnsgJRCrg.png)
As for the "blacking out", its called "the sun".
Same with everyone else in the car.
0 -
Vague statements like "all the doctors" backed up by a low res collage of people - some heavily involved in the event, some not - selectively pointing at parts of their heads is whats stupid. I could easily knock one up myself showing people pointing elsewhere on their heads.
You're taking people at their word, only when it suits your agenda. But the truth runs much deeper. The autopsy was the biggest botch in history. Which is one of the main conclusions of the HSCA. Of the three pathologists, Dr Finck was the only one who was a forensic pathologist. The other two according to Dr. Michael Baden (lead expert on the HSCA panel) "didn’t know the difference between an entrance wound and an exit wound." Yet Finck wasnt there for the first 30 minutes so it was already botched by the time he got there.
The autopsy doctors have also changed their stories a few times, contradicted each other and engaged in public spats.
The ARRB filed a report (authored y Doug Horne) saying their experts couldn't find an entrance wound on the xray, then Larry Sturdivan said he found it on the xrays
Couple that with ambiguous statements from Dallas doctors who weren't pathologists nor doing an autopsy, eye witnesses who were close to JFK (Zapruder, Sitman etc) whos wound descriptions match the Zapruder film, the fact that the scalp is moveable and rarely used to determine a wound and the fact that they undermined and stretched the scalp and its not as simple as you're making it out to be.
You keep quoting that quote from the autopsy - "chiefly to the parietal bone."
Thats completely consistent with what we see on the Zapruder film.
As for the "blacking out", its called "the sun".
Same with everyone else in the car.
Yep, your Skull photo is where the large wound was observed. You can see a large wound that looks identical to this on the Zapruder film? Show us then, I can not see it?
The autopsy was botched because they were not allowed to check the throat wound. They were told to not by someone in the room. Still, you will not miss a large wound a hole in the back of the head.
The Sun would have not have blocked us from seeing the head explosion at the back of the head?0 -
Cheerful Spring wrote: »Yep, your Skull photo is where the large wound was observed. You can see a large wound that looks identical to this on the Zapruder film? Show us then, I can not see it?
I can. The parietal bone looks like the where he was "chiefly" wounded - as per the quote you keep posting.
Cheerful Spring wrote: »The autopsy was botched because they were not allowed to check the throat wound. They were told to not by someone in the room.
The did check the neck. They just didn't dissect or remove any organs. They stupidly thought an open coffin funeral was possible at this stage.Cheerful Spring wrote: »Still, you will not miss a large wound a hole in the back of the head.
They did miss it though. As did the ARRB on the XRays.Cheerful Spring wrote: »The Sun would have not have blocked us from seeing the head explosion at the back of the head?
And it didn't. There was no explosion at the back of the head. There was a wound there though.
Again, you seem to be confused with words. "wound", "hole", "blast", "explosion", "laceration" etc all seem to the same to you.0 -
I can. The parietal bone looks like the where he was "chiefly" wounded - as per the quote you keep posting.
The did check the neck. They just didn't dissect or remove any organs. They stupidly thought an open coffin funeral was possible at this stage.
They did miss it though. As did the ARRB on the XRays.
And it didn't. There was no explosion at the back of the head. There was a wound there though.
Again, you seem to be confused with words. "wound", "hole", "blast", "explosion", "laceration" etc all seem to the same to you.
Yes and the occipital bone also.
Autopsy photograph without the blood. Notice there no large wound or hole in the back of the head? You have seen the side profile I posted also again the back area- top of the head can't find a large wound. How can this be President Kennedy head? It's clear to me some of the photographs were not taken during the autopsy.
This Autopsy image (below) without the blood, is interesting. Far too graphic to post the colour photo. The scalp has been messed with at the back (to hide the rear head wound) but I believe it's a genuine photo of President Kennedy head.
0 -
Advertisement
-
Advertisement