Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Formula E - Gen.2

  • 17-09-2018 9:36pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,708 ✭✭✭


    Worth starting a new thread on this as we lead up to the new season 2018/2019 with the second generation of cars coming online. No more silly car changeovers mid-race but will the new cars make it interesting without the pit stops midway through.

    How will FE be interesting if you can't overtake in the tight city-based tracks. FE organisers need to keep the races accessible by not making it an exclusive event and not to take races out of cities. Maybe cars will be faster, but maybe races will just end up being processions due to lack of overtaking on tight tracks.

    BMW have revealed their Gen 2 car and the colour scheme seems neat but basic.

    https://www.motorsport.com/in/formula-e/news/bmw-formula-fe-photo-gallery/3176942/

    Feel free to post your thoughts and any links to other cars.

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



«13456713

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,028 ✭✭✭H3llR4iser


    Eliminating the car change is a step in the right direction - that fact alone was silly and defeated the purpose of Formula E: to show electric cars being capable of running races. It was "yep, sorry, still can't to the freaking distance!".

    The next step should be to introduce a recharge cycle - forcing teams and manufacturers to research into it. Regardless of what religious-fundamentalist-like fans of EV say, until they can be fully recharged in the same time it takes to fill up a tank of petrol, they won't be commercially viable on a large scale (provided batteries are the way to go, which I'm not sure about).

    I seriously dislike the looks of the "Gen 2" car: it's bulky, it's ungainly, looks like something out of a child's fantasy (reminds me of the "Mini 4WD" cartoons/toys) and most importantly, it's not a "formula" car, as it's simply not open wheels (you can't see the wheels from the top nor the front). It's more of a sport prototype, which clashes with the "Formula E" definition. It's however an understandable exercise in trying to gain the youngest audience interest (and a sneaky, sneaky, sneaky way to massively reduce drag to actually allow the cars to make race distance).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,827 ✭✭✭Inviere


    H3llR4iser wrote: »
    (and a sneaky, sneaky, sneaky way to massively reduce drag to actually allow the cars to make race distance).

    My thoughts exactly. I do, however, like the design. As for how it can progress? Yes, eliminating car changes is a step in the right direction. In my opinion though, they need to seriously look at doing something with the tracks, they're beyond bad. Yes I know the cars wouldn't translate well onto an actual racetrack as they'd show how slow they are, but the current tracks, and nothing short of painful to watch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,028 ✭✭✭H3llR4iser


    Inviere wrote: »
    My thoughts exactly. I do, however, like the design. As for how it can progress? Yes, eliminating car changes is a step in the right direction. In my opinion though, they need to seriously look at doing something with the tracks, they're beyond bad. Yes I know the cars wouldn't translate well onto an actual racetrack as they'd show how slow they are, but the current tracks, and nothing short of painful to watch.


    Fully agreed - with few exceptions, my mind immediately goes to Mario Kart when I see the snaking, twisty narrow mess most tracks are. Somehow, they manage to even make Rome and Paris look drab and flat...which is quite an achievement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,369 ✭✭✭Rossi IRL


    I would start watching it more regularly if they raced on some better/more familiar tracks. Even if they go to 3 or 4 proper tracks and then for Monaco just do the full track it would be a big step in the right direction for me.

    Exciting to see Rosberg and Massa racing again.

    Cars look OK from the small few images iv seen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,414 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    One thing you need to remember about the Formula E founder Alejandro Agag's ethos is that FE must have as small a carbon footprint as possible. Therefore the circuits must be accessible by public transport and not by cars or coaches. As most "traditional" circuits are outside of population centres public transport is usually limited.

    This too shall pass.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,827 ✭✭✭Inviere




    Catch fencing, catch fencing, and more catch fencing. The tracks may as well all be on the same land, with just redesigned circuits (everything looks exactly the same no matter where they're racing).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,537 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    flazio wrote: »
    One thing you need to remember about the Formula E founder Alejandro Agag's ethos is that FE must have as small a carbon footprint as possible.

    :pac::pac::pac:

    Do it all in one country then... As soon as you start the circus globe-trotting around the world that argument goes out the window. How many planes and trucks does it take to make it to each race?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,414 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    I'm not here to defend or praise the ethos. I'm just telling you as it is. Agog doesn't want people driving to attend his races if it can be avoided.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,849 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Rossi IRL wrote: »
    I would start watching it more regularly if they raced on some better/more familiar tracks. Even if they go to 3 or 4 proper tracks and then for Monaco just do the full track it would be a big step in the right direction for me.

    Exciting to see Rosberg and Massa racing again.

    Cars look OK from the small few images iv seen.

    Rosberg will not be racing in but he does have a big interest in it and think he has invested in it.
    Massa will be racing in it.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,369 ✭✭✭Rossi IRL


    AMKC wrote: »
    Rosberg will not be racing in but he does have a big interest in it and think he has invested in it.
    Massa will be racing in it.

    That's a shame, I really thought he was racing this season.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,827 ✭✭✭Inviere


    flazio wrote: »
    I'm not here to defend or praise the ethos. I'm just telling you as it is. Agog doesn't want people driving to attend his races if it can be avoided.

    It's as if the energy used to charge the car batteries comes from pixie dust :rolleyes: (not directed at you at all btw)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,369 ✭✭✭Rossi IRL


    Inviere wrote: »
    It's as if the energy used to charge the car batteries comes from pixie dust :rolleyes: (not directed at you at all btw)

    All the equipment and drivers and teams walk from country to country aswell, no planes involved at all.... :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,827 ✭✭✭Inviere


    Rossi IRL wrote: »
    All the equipment and drivers and teams walk from country to country aswell, no planes involved at all.... :)

    I'm all for environmental improvements and reducing our impact, but lets call a spade a spade, motorsport in any form, and in particular its travelling circus, isn't at all 'green' in any way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,708 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    Jaguar have launched their car: looks a little bit broken up but I'm sure someone can put it together again

    2962czr.jpg

    Or, here's the competed car if you need help assembling...

    jaguaritype3ontrackfrontright34180918-resize-1221x814-crop-1140x814.jpg

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,537 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    0 to 100 in 2.8s and vmax of 250kph, why exactly are they worried they look slow on proper tracks?

    Ok it's not F1 fast but still...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,028 ✭✭✭H3llR4iser


    0 to 100 in 2.8s and vmax of 250kph, why exactly are they worried they look slow on proper tracks?

    Ok it's not F1 fast but still...

    Because they would indeed look slow - touring car slow, as a matter of fact; They'll be slower than F3 cars, while the comparison will inevitably be with F1 (F.E pride themselves as the "electric F1", afterall).

    Something like the Barcelona pit straight would take comparatively forever to complete; They'd also be slow on fast bends compared to other single seaters due to the nearly non-existent downforce; Tracks featuring heavy and prolonged acceleration zones like Montreal would murder the batteries and make it next to impossible for drivers to finish the race (ICE race cars run into fuel issues on those). Longer laps like Monza, not to mention Spa, would make it clear the races are very short - 17 and 14 laps respectively (yep, they're moving to a 45 minutes timed race, but they wouldn't complete many more laps in that time).

    In short, racing "normal" tracks would expose all of the weaknesses of the electric race cars, which the current tracks are designed on purpose to conceal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,537 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    H3llR4iser wrote: »
    Because they would indeed look slow - touring car slow, as a matter of fact; They'll be slower than F3 cars, while the comparison will inevitably be with F1 (F.E pride themselves as the "electric F1", afterall).

    "touring car slow" leads to far far better racing though...

    the faster f1 has gotten recently the worse the racing has become too, speed isn't everything.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,414 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Look at it this way, if the model of racing was that bad, they wouldn't be launching their 5th season would they? Anyone remember A1GP?

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,708 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    flazio wrote: »
    Look at it this way, if the model of racing was that bad, they wouldn't be launching their 5th season would they? Anyone remember A1GP?

    A1 Team Ireland are reigning champions. That is all.

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,028 ✭✭✭H3llR4iser


    "touring car slow" leads to far far better racing though...

    the faster f1 has gotten recently the worse the racing has become too, speed isn't everything.

    Absolutely true - I have been saying this since before the current rules, when every idiot in front of a TV was screaming "F1 should be fashhhhterrr!!!" - faster cars mean zero margin of error and a razorblade thin limit, resulting in processional races.

    Yet, Formula E markets itself as the "Electric F1", so showing the world they can't even keep up with what the average spectator sees as "toy cars for kid drivers" (e.g. F3) would be a massive blow.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,827 ✭✭✭Inviere


    H3llR4iser wrote: »
    Absolutely true - I have been saying this since before the current rules, when every idiot in front of a TV was screaming "F1 should be fashhhhterrr!!!" - faster cars mean zero margin of error and a razorblade thin limit, resulting in processional races.

    I remember that a few seasons back, people made the point that there were lap records standing for 10+ seasons, and that current F1 cars were 5/6/7/8 seconds a lap slower than cars of eras gone by. So we got the cars we have today, destroying lap records but can’t follow or pass each other.
    Yet, Formula E markets itself as the "Electric F1", so showing the world they can't even keep up with what the average spectator sees as "toy cars for kid drivers" (e.g. F3) would be a massive blow.

    Similar logic applies to F1 too, as in, it kinda has to show its speed if it’s claiming to be the pinnacle of Motorsport open wheel racing. Imagine the F2 cars were quicker, it’d hurt F1. So it’s caught between a rock and a hard place...be faster than everything else, but provide great racing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,028 ✭✭✭H3llR4iser


    Inviere wrote: »
    I remember that a few seasons back, people made the point that there were lap records standing for 10+ seasons, and that current F1 cars were 5/6/7/8 seconds a lap slower than cars of eras gone by. So we got the cars we have today, destroying lap records but can’t follow or pass each other.

    If one plotted F1 average lap speeds over the years on a chart, the result is going to look a bit like an "ascending wave" - the general trend is towards an increase, but every X years there's a bit of a "cop on", and some rule changes make the cars slower for a few season; Keke Rosberg's lap speed record at Silverstone lasted from 1985 up to 2004 as a result of such trend, and the latter lasted until Monza this season for the same reason.

    It's only a matter of time until someone realizes and a rule change will be implemented to make the cars 5 to 10 seconds a lap slower again, rinse repeat.

    Inviere wrote: »
    Similar logic applies to F1 too, as in, it kinda has to show its speed if it’s claiming to be the pinnacle of Motorsport open wheel racing. Imagine the F2 cars were quicker, it’d hurt F1. So it’s caught between a rock and a hard place...be faster than everything else, but provide great racing.

    Not really - F1 was still faster than anything else including Indycar and LMP
    (pointless headline grabbing non-rule compliant record attempts aside). Formula E isn't nearly there, but the general concept is working well enough for now, so...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,708 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    I'm delighted for Vandoorne as he never got to shine at McLaren. He is a GP2 champ who written by a decent margin. If HWA get their act together really quickly, the likes of Buemi, JEV will have some decent competition.

    I'm not sure Massa will show anything special but might be good at setting up the car.

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,414 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Is that the team Susie Wolff is in charge of?

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,708 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    Susie is in charge (and shareholder) of Venturi, I think it's their second season. Massa and a lad called Mortara are the drivers.

    HWA are brand new to the sport but old hands at racing with DTM. Stoffel with be partnered by Gary Paffett to drive the cars.

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,708 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    Here's the testing entry list for Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday this week.

    http://www.fiaformulae.com/en/news/2018/october/entry-list-announced-ahead-of-pre-season-testing/

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,414 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,849 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    flazio wrote: »

    I have to say I think it is a big mistake. It is far too soon and totally the wrong time to put Formula e behind a paywall. They could have got a lot of viewers that were annoyed by Formula 1 going this way and were interested in something new maybe to watch it. Instead now they will have less viewers and if it comes to a choice for someone interested in single seater racing they more than likely will pay to watch F1 not Fe.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,827 ✭✭✭Inviere


    AMKC wrote: »
    I have to say I think it is a big mistake. It is far too soon and totally the wrong time to put Formula e behind a paywall. They could have got a lot of viewers that were annoyed by Formula 1 going this way and were interested in something new maybe to watch it. Instead now they will have less viewers and if it comes to a choice for someone interested in single seater racing they more than likely will pay to watch F1 not Fe.

    Couldn’t agree more, huge mistake, and reeks of pure greed. The whole of F-E should be on YouTube and the likes, lives races, past races, everything. It’s nowhere near mature enough to warrant being behind a paywall. Hell, F1 with its decades of history, global audience, and huge stars has suffered hugely by being behind a paywall...what chance does FE stand?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,708 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    That's a bit of a shame as it was handy being able to switch on the TV, plug in the auld aerial and there you go, 3e coverage. VM Sports is going to be a channel that not very many will watch this sport on. Unless they decide to simulcast with one of the saorview channels.

    Hopefully it'll still be on Channel 5 or Spike on FTA sat.

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,816 ✭✭✭TheChrisD


    rip Formula E in Ireland.

    First we had to suffer with two years of incompetent coverage on 3e, now it's only going to be TV broadcast on one of the major service providers in the country, and everyone else has to fork over €20 a month and have to watch on their phone. The level of idiocy in this move is baffling.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,616 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    I think it was only last week I praised FE for its FTA and use of youtube :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,532 ✭✭✭Harika


    http://www.fiaformulae.com/en/news/2018/november/bbc-to-air-every-formula-e-race-for-201819-season-in-uk/

    Was very excited for a moment, but only one race live on actual TV, the rest online.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,708 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    It says it's on the red button which means it's on the FTA satellite or Freeview telly, just not the cable box versions of BBC. And if you have VirginMedia, then you'll have the sports channel.

    There's ways and means, and I think any satellite dish should be able to get that red button feed.

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,904 ✭✭✭✭skipper_G


    astrofluff wrote: »
    It says it's on the red button which means it's on the FTA satellite or Freeview telly, just not the cable box versions of BBC. And if you have VirginMedia, then you'll have the sports channel.

    There's ways and means, and I think any satellite dish should be able to get that red button feed.

    I've used the Red Button feed for watching the snooker in the past, if you have a Sky box you can add it on the manual channels list


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,632 ✭✭✭✭antodeco


    skipper_G wrote: »
    I've used the Red Button feed for watching the snooker in the past, if you have a Sky box you can add it on the manual channels list

    Yup, a guy explained it here https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2238958933054080&id=1655924968024149
    You can program in the red button into your skybox on other channels the cod is
    10.773
    H
    22
    5/6
    DVB-S
    QPSK


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,028 ✭✭✭H3llR4iser


    Incredibly stupid move. If they'd need to do anything at all, they could have taken traditional coverage off TV entirely and go fully Youtube (free, of course), as I'd argue the vast majority of the target audience are younger generations. Proof once again that whomever manages these things has no idea what they're doing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,827 ✭✭✭Inviere


    H3llR4iser wrote: »
    Incredibly stupid move. If they'd need to do anything at all, they could have taken traditional coverage off TV entirely and go fully Youtube (free, of course), as I'd argue the vast majority of the target audience are younger generations. Proof once again that whomever manages these things has no idea what they're doing.

    Yep, if it was freely available, live, on YT, I'd prob make more of an effort to watch it and try to get engaged in it. The harder it is to watch a fledgling sport like this, the more is suffers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,708 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    I don't mind what platform it's on as long as it's free. So for this year, that's ok it's on bbc.

    What I'm thinking might be the biggest problem is that the mid-race car swap is gone. Which means there's no mid-race drama with energy management, going a lap shorter or longer. This year's no car swap might leave us with nothing to watch until the end of the race when energy stores are depleted. The race is possibly going to be who can go the slowest and finish 1st?!?

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,849 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    astrofluff wrote: »
    I don't mind what platform it's on as long as it's free. So for this year, that's ok it's on bbc.

    What I'm thinking might be the biggest problem is that the mid-race car swap is gone. Which means there's no mid-race drama with energy management, going a lap shorter or longer. This year's no car swap might leave us with nothing to watch until the end of the race when energy stores are depleted. The race is possibly going to be who can go the slowest and finish 1st?!?

    I think they said they are going to have some Mario kart style racing elements in it. Sounds like a gimmick. I just want to see good close racing.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,708 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    Attack Mode! :) Hopefully this will be limited, but very powerful. And I hope it'll only work like DRS and that a leader can't counter by also pushing a button.

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 728 ✭✭✭tigerboon


    astrofluff wrote: »
    Attack Mode! :) Hopefully this will be limited, but very powerful. And I hope it'll only work like DRS and that a leader can't counter by also pushing a button.


    Would you not think being able to counter would be better. There's nothing exciting about DRS. The driver being overtaken is a sitting duck. The excitement years ago was in the race long battle. DRS isn't a bad idea but should be changed. Maybe allow use anytime the driver choses. Risk brings rewards and all that. Same for this attack mode. The tyres will regulate it's use anyway


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,708 ✭✭✭Charlie-Bravo


    Right so attack mode: You have to go off line, and hit certain timing beams. They're not going to tell you exactly where they are. It'll only become obvious after race start when someone finds them.

    Here's more from our friends over at Autosport:

    "An FIA statement explained that the system "will be determined at each race by the FIA, according to the special features of the circuits, one hour before the start at the latest".

    Attack mode raises a driver's power level from 200kW to 225kW once they have travelled through an off-line activation zone.

    It is intended to increase strategy and overtaking options in FE now that the championship no longer features car swaps during races."


    This will be very interesting to see being used. It is a like video game's take on a reverse-joker lap.

    The great think will be the on-screen graphics so the TV viewer can see it. This is not Formula 1, but totally different.

    -. . ...- . .-. / --. --- -. -. .- / --. .. ...- . / -.-- --- ..- / ..- .--.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,849 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Well the new season starts this weekend.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,414 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    And its raining.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,414 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    It'll be live on BT Sport as well if anyone has access and so far, no sign of a geo block on YouTube.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,369 ✭✭✭Rossi IRL


    astrofluff wrote: »
    The great think will be the on-screen graphics so the TV viewer can see it. This is not Formula 1, but totally different.

    If that's the case then surely the teams will just tell the driver where it is after seeing it on the tv?

    Glad it's on TV, something to watch while the F1 & Nascar are on a break


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,904 ✭✭✭✭skipper_G


    Nice move from Massa on Vandoorne. Not a great start from Stoffel


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,056 ✭✭✭Sparks43


    Did I just see a woman in a veil taking a selfie?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,827 ✭✭✭Inviere


    Sparks43 wrote: »
    Did I just see a woman in a veil taking a selfie?

    Yep seen that too. I love the cars, but man these ‘tracks’ are shocking. Wall to wall catch fencing, it’s very claustrophobic to watch. Some decent racing I would say, but I’ve a hard time dealing with the near void of any interesting aspects of these man made street tracks.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement