Alex Jones content removed from Facebook, Youtube, Apple

Zorya

MrFresh wrote: »

I made a factual statement. You responded with a rant against the authoritarianism of the left. You didn't actually address or challenge the content of my post though.

I did though. You just don't get it. Ah well.

mcmoustache

splashuum wrote: »

If what Batgoat says is true, shouldn’t RTE,BBC,CNN etc etc all be banned too for spreading the fake Russia gate propaganda?

Can you give an example of a fake story that RTÉ published in regard to US politics? A link will do.

batgoat

mcmoustache wrote: »

Can you give an example of a fake story that RTÉ published in regard to US politics? A link will do.

Certain users are pretty invested in pretending the Mueller report hasn't put Trump in hot water. RTE has basically only ever reported on the investigation in news items...

Sonics2k

mcmoustache wrote: »

Can you give an example of a fake story that RTÉ published in regard to US politics? A link will do.

Apparently RTE reporting on a legitimate investigation into accusations of collusion between Donald Trump and Russia is the same thing as spreading 'fake news'.

Y'know, just like the fake news from Alex Jones saying that murdered children were actually crisis actors. Totally the same thing.

MrFresh

Zorya wrote: »

I did though. You just don't get it. Ah well.

i get what you were saying in the post. You still didn't challenge the veracity of what I said though. To remind you, i said

Facebook, Youtube and Twitter were some of the greatest contributors to Trump's win and the Russians attempts to help him. They allowed Trump and his supporters to spread massive amounts of fake news to a massive userbase. .

Do you believe that is true or false? Simple question. Doesn't need a gif or a long rant about how terrible the left is.

Patty Hearst

Sonics2k wrote: »

Apparently RTE reporting on a legitimate investigation into accusations of collusion between Donald Trump and Russia is the same thing as spreading 'fake news'.

Y'know, just like the fake news from Alex Jones saying that murdered children were actually crisis actors. Totally the same thing.

Kind of like the way RTE portrayed crisis actors as murdered children in Syria.

And the way they portrayed the head chopping, child raping Islamists as 'rebel' freedom fighters..remember that?

batgoat

Sonics2k wrote: »

Apparently RTE reporting on a legitimate investigation into accusations of collusion between Donald Trump and Russia is the same thing as spreading 'fake news'.

Y'know, just like the fake news from Alex Jones saying that murdered children were actually crisis actors. Totally the same thing.

Or the Italian fake news outlet including footage from films as proof of migrant riots.. Definitely comparable to BBC.

mcmoustache

Sonics2k wrote: »

Apparently RTE reporting on a legitimate investigation into accusations of collusion between Donald Trump and Russia is the same thing as spreading 'fake news'.

Y'know, just like the fake news from Alex Jones saying that murdered children were actually crisis actors. Totally the same thing.

I know. I suspect that the user saw RTE reports like "A special council has been appointed to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 US election" and assumed that RTE was actually saying "OMG TRUMP GUILTY". Some people have difficulty with comprehension and even others have difficulty with comprehension in their native language.

Patty Hearst

Not RTE but Fintan O'Toole and the Irish Times were fairly blatant in their insinuations that Trump colluded with Russia.

DrumSteve

Patty Hearst wrote: »

Not RTE but Fintan O'Toole and the Irish Times were fairly blatant in their insinuations that Trump colluded with Russia.

Yeah, it's not like he was on national television or anything asking them to hack Hilary's emails.

batgoat

Patty Hearst wrote: »

Not RTE but Fintan O'Toole and the Irish Times were fairly blatant in their insinuations that Trump colluded with Russia.

Eh, that's an opinion piece... It's not remotely comparable to sharing footage from a film as a news story.

Secondly the findings of the Mueller report is that Congress should consider if the obstruction that Trump engaged in is sufficient grounds to impeach. In addition to that, there's been a fair few more scandals that followed including Mueller's issues with how AG Barr summarised the report. For the most part, the media reported accurately and when entirely wrong, they generally retracted stories.

So not remotely similar to intentionally false news stories.

Patty Hearst

batgoat wrote: »

Eh, that's an opinion piece... It's not remotely comparable to sharing footage from a film as a news story.

Secondly the findings of the Mueller report is that Congress should consider if the obstruction that Trump engaged in is sufficient grounds to impeach. In addition to that, there's been a fair few more scandals that followed including Mueller's issues with how AG Barr summarised the report. For the most part, the media reported accurately and when entirely wrong, they generally retracted stories.

So not remotely similar to intentionally false news stories.

Yeah sure

Trump-Russia is Qanon for normies

batgoat

Patty Hearst wrote: »

Yeah sure

Trump-Russia is Qanon for normies

Normies... Dear Jesus...

Patty Hearst

batgoat wrote: »

Eh, that's an opinion piece... It's not remotely comparable to sharing footage from a film as a news story.

Secondly the findings of the Mueller report is that Congress should consider if the obstruction that Trump engaged in is sufficient grounds to impeach. In addition to that, there's been a fair few more scandals that followed including Mueller's issues with how AG Barr summarised the report. For the most part, the media reported accurately and when entirely wrong, they generally retracted stories.

So not remotely similar to intentionally false news stories.

What about the fact that RTE reported on a 'chemical' attack in Douma without much evidence...the same 'Chemical attack' which has now found to have been staged

http://syriapropagandamedia.org/working-papers/assessment-by-the-engineering-sub-team-of-the-opcw-fact-finding-mission-investigating-the-alleged-chemical-attack-in-douma-in-april-2018

batgoat

Patty Hearst wrote: »

What about the fact that RTE reported on a 'chemical' attack in Douma without much evidence...the same 'Chemical attack' which has now found to have been staged

http://syriapropagandamedia.org/working-papers/assessment-by-the-engineering-sub-team-of-the-opcw-fact-finding-mission-investigating-the-alleged-chemical-attack-in-douma-in-april-2018

The OPCW did conclude that a chemical weapon attack occurred. So really you're the one who's engaging in propaganda... Are you able to provide credible sources rather than some blog. Opcw conclusions below.


https://www.opcw.org/media-centre/news/2019/03/opcw-issues-fact-finding-mission-report-chemical-weapons-use-allegation

Patty Hearst

batgoat wrote: »

The OPCW did conclude that a chemical weapon attack occurred. So really you're the one who's engaging in propaganda... Are you able to provide credible sources rather than some blog. Opcw conclusions below.


https://www.opcw.org/media-centre/news/2019/03/opcw-issues-fact-finding-mission-report-chemical-weapons-use-allegation

If you read the report you would see that the evidence is based from a leaked OPCW memo....of course you didn't read it though.

You take your cues from the same sources that claimed Trump colluded with Russia

pjohnson

batgoat wrote: »

Normies... Dear Jesus...

I guess normie is the term for non consiraportial people who actually use facts.

I think its a compliment.

DrumSteve

Patty Hearst wrote: »

If you read the report you would see that the evidence is based from a leaked OPCW memo....of course you didn't read it though.

You take your cues from the same sources that claimed Trump colluded with Russia

He did.

Sonics2k

DrumSteve wrote: »

He did.

Actually, I personally never believed that Trump directly colluded with Russia. Certainly members of his team were heavily involved with Russia.

But here's the thing. Trump is, and always has been, a loudmouth bragger who frequently says things he shouldn't. He literally just admitted to messing around with his taxes.

Putin however, is not a stupid man. He'd never directly collude with Trump because it would only end badly.

MrFresh

Sonics2k wrote: »

Actually, I personally never believed that Trump directly colluded with Russia. Certainly members of his team were heavily involved with Russia.

But here's the thing. Trump is, and always has been, a loudmouth bragger who frequently says things he shouldn't. He literally just admitted to messing around with his taxes.

Putin however, is not a stupid man. He'd never directly collude with Trump because it would only end badly.

For who?

splashuum

This thread is genuinely hilarious. People sticking up for fake news outlets while standing by facebook,twitter,YouTube scandalous actions.

batgoat

splashuum wrote: »

This thread is genuinely hilarious. People sticking up for fake news outlets while standing by facebook,twitter,YouTube scandalous actions.

There's nothing scandalous about it...

Patty Hearst

Zorya wrote: »

It's too late. The virus has mutated :pac: Alex Jones is so yesterday, dudes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdaUDeAGIck

This young lady is now being targeted by Buzzfeed who are attempting to have her removed from youtube.

Buzzed cannot countenance an articulate, politically aware 14 year old budding comedian who sees through the crap.


This 9 year old below however is perfectly fine with Buzzfeed so much so that have celebrated him in numerous articles.

splashuum

Great Upload on the Joe Rogan podcast today where they discussed exactly what I have been saying in this thread.

“Social media is in control of political discourse”

Tell me more how I’m a “conspiracy therorist”

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mFFFpXX4v8Q

Former Observer

Patty Hearst wrote: »

This young lady is now being targeted by Buzzfeed who are attempting to have her removed from youtube.

Buzzed cannot countenance an articulate, politically aware 14 year old budding comedian who sees through the crap.


This 9 year old below however is perfectly fine with Buzzfeed so much so that have celebrated him in numerous articles.ì

What am I looking at. Looks dodgy AF.

Patty Hearst

Former Observer wrote: »

What am I looking at. Looks dodgy AF.

Its a 'celebrated' 9 year old drag queen called Lactatia who has featured in many gushing articles.
And as you can see extremely dodgy photoshoots which are apparently 'normal' and you're the weirdo for having a problem with it.

batgoat

Patty Hearst wrote: »

Its a 'celebrated' 9 year old drag queen called Lactatia who has featured in many gushing articles.
And as you can see extremely dodgy photoshoots which are apparently 'normal' and you're the weirdo for having a problem with it.

I googled it, it was controversial in general from all sides. Honestly, I hadn't heard of it until you chose to post the image.

Seanachai

Patty Hearst wrote: »

Its a 'celebrated' 9 year old drag queen called Lactatia who has featured in many gushing articles.
And as you can see extremely dodgy photoshoots which are apparently 'normal' and you're the weirdo for having a problem with it.

I'm live and let live, up to a point, when I see this stuff, this is what comes into my head.

"I live back in the woods, you see
My woman and the kids and the dogs and me
I got a shotgun and a rifle and a four wheel drive
And a countryboy can survive, country folks can survive"

mcmoustache

splashuum wrote: »

Tell me more how I’m a “conspiracy therorist”

I'm not sure how posting a video of Joe Rogan as evidence of a conspiracy makes you less of a conspiracy theorist.

You might as well post a clip of Gemma O Doherty to make the case that chemtrails are a thing.

Cienciano

batgoat wrote: »

I googled it, it was controversial in general from all sides. Honestly, I hadn't heard of it until you chose to post the image.

It's used by a certain section of people to say "look, this is what liberals all want". If you don't support Trump, conservatism, anti immigration etc you must support this. Where in reality only a tiny percentage of people actually do.