Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

So who's going to see the Pope?

Options
1112113115117118135

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 40,353 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    The 16-29 part is indeed in the article, as the definition of what is meant by young adults. You must have overlooked it, along with all the other parts you somehow managed to overlook.



    And yet you somehow managed to miss the headline figure in the article. Let me quote it for you again, from the second paragraph: "around 24% of young people attend Mass weekly, according to the latest figures from the European Social Survey (ESS)."


    I posted the actual ESS figures earlier.


    and yet the actual figures don't say that at all. I suspect that he is, in the parlance of the youth, talking out of his hoop



    ess_Capture2.png


  • Registered Users Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    It really isn't.

    78 percent of the Irish population still self-identify as Catholics. We have the third highest church attendance in Europe, behind Portugal and Poland. Fewer than 10 percent of the population identify as having no religion.

    Ireland remains one of the most religious countries in the Western world, with Catholicism predominating.

    I wonder how many of the people actually fill in the form themselves rather than a mother/father filling it in and ticking Catholic for everyone in the house?


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,425 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    The pope has said in a recent interview: "It is not necessary to talk about [abortion, gay marriage and contraception] all the time. The dogmatic and moral teachings of the church are not all equivalent. The church’s pastoral ministry cannot be obsessed with the transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines to be imposed insistently."

    In short, there's much more to being a Catholic, in the eyes of Pope Francis, than "following the rules" on a narrow spectrum of issues.



    Well, many do want and need it. It's a personal decision.

    It’s called freedom of religion and our constitution protects it


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭Dannyriver


    To the question on how a family should treat a gay or lesbian child, the pope said: "To ignore a son or daughter with homosexual tendencies is a lack of paternity and maternity. You are my son, you are my daughter as you are! I’m your father, mother. Let’s talk! And if you, father and mother aren’t up to it, ask for help, but always in dialogue because that son and that daughter have the right to a family and that family of not being chased out of the family."

    This is a message of acceptance. He's telling parents who reject gay children that they are not fulfilling their parental role. He's telling gay children that they too have the right to a family. So where's the problem?

    Selective use of his statement he also suggested that psychiatric intervention also be an option thus alluding to conversion therapy which is out lawed by the American Psychiatric association for it being dangerous and damaging for those that have been put through it


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,425 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    I wonder how many of the people actually fill in the form themselves rather than a mother/father filling it in and ticking Catholic for everyone in the house?

    Loads of ppl are not at all devout or mass goers but are adamant they are Catholics and would tell you forcefully that they are catholic


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 210 ✭✭Sardine


    Money isn’t the new religion. And social media.


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,353 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Loads of ppl are not at all devout or mass goers but are adamant they are Catholics and would tell you forcefully that they are catholic


    There is a word for that : Hypocrisy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭xi5yvm0owc1s2b


    Dannyriver wrote: »
    Selective use of his statement he also suggested that psychiatric intervention also be an option thus alluding to conversion therapy which is out lawed by the American Psychiatric association for it being dangerous and damaging for those that have been put through it

    He said:
    Then, at what age does this restlessness of the child express itself? It’s important. One thing is when it shows itself in a child. There are many things to do with psychiatry, to see how things are. Another thing is when it manifests itself after 20 years of age… But I’ll never say that silence is a remedy.

    Where in this does he support conversion therapy?


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,425 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    There is a word for that : Hypocrisy.

    Maybe so. That’s for them to ponder I guess


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,148 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Loads of ppl are not at all devout or mass goers but are adamant they are Catholics and would tell you forcefully that they are catholic

    Generally when they want something only Roman Catholics can have. Otherwise it is 'whatever'.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭Dannyriver


    He said:



    Where in this does he support conversion therapy?

    You don t think the use of the word 'psychiatry' is pertinent no?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 17 Currache


    Probably not!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 565 ✭✭✭Trasna1


    I wonder how many of the people actually fill in the form themselves rather than a mother/father filling it in and ticking Catholic for everyone in the house?

    If you're not a dependent you should be filling in your section yourself.

    Maybe many would see Catholicism as almost a meaningless label, just something that you are but doesn't impart any obligations on you.

    When it comes to faith, it's not something that many are comfortable thinking about or questioning imo, hence you get a sort of default answer.


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,148 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    To the question on how a family should treat a gay or lesbian child, the pope said: "To ignore a son or daughter with homosexual tendencies is a lack of paternity and maternity. You are my son, you are my daughter as you are! I’m your father, mother. Let’s talk! And if you, father and mother aren’t up to it, ask for help, but always in dialogue because that son and that daughter have the right to a family and that family of not being chased out of the family."

    This is a message of acceptance. He's telling parents who reject gay children that they are not fulfilling their parental role. He's telling gay children that they too have the right to a family. So where's the problem?

    Even the language here is offenxive to gay people I would imagine.
    'homosexual 'tendencies'???

    You are either gay or you are not, I would have thought.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭Dannyriver


    He said:



    Where in this does he support conversion therapy?

    As a matter of interest why do you think he used the word 'psychiatry' as a possible intervention at the parents disposal.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭xi5yvm0owc1s2b


    Dannyriver wrote: »
    You don t think the use of the word 'psychiatry' is pertinent no?

    Not especially. You seem to have jumped to the conclusion that "The pope said the word 'psychiatry.' OMG he supports conversion therapy!"

    It's clear from the context that he supports dialogue between Catholic parents and their gay children, and acceptance of those gay children into the family structure.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭Dannyriver


    Not especially. You seem to have jumped to the conclusion that "The pope said the word 'psychiatry.' OMG he supports conversion therapy!"

    It's clear from the context that he supports dialogue between Catholic parents and their gay children, and acceptance of those gay children into the family structure.

    As a matter of interest why do you think he used the word 'psychiatry' as a possible intervention at the parents disposal.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭xi5yvm0owc1s2b


    I posted the actual ESS figures earlier.

    You clearly aren't able to make head nor tail of the ESS figures.

    Here's a chart from the BBC, also based on the ESS figures.

    _103051147_cic_mass_attendance-nc.png

    I'll wait for you to tell the BBC that they're wrong now as well.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,183 ✭✭✭RoryMac


    Yes, and he should be applauded for it, in my view. He is the most forward-thinking pope in a very long time, and is more than willing to acknowledge the many mistakes that the church has made in the past.

    Hes certainly the pope best versed in PR for a very long time and while he acknowledges many of the mistakes made in the past he's done little of substance to bring the perpetrators of this crimes to justice


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,353 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    You clearly aren't able to make head nor tail of the ESS figures.

    Here's a chart from the BBC, also based on the ESS figures.

    _103051147_cic_mass_attendance-nc.png

    I'll wait for you to tell the BBC that they're wrong now as well.


    It is funny how they apparently looked at the same data as the IT and came up with a different figure. the IT said 36% and they are saying over 40%. I posted the figures directly from the ESS website. Which do you think are more accurate?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 68,148 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You clearly aren't able to make head nor tail of the ESS figures.

    Here's a chart from the BBC, also based on the ESS figures.

    _103051147_cic_mass_attendance-nc.png

    I'll wait for you to tell the BBC that they're wrong now as well.

    We know Roman Catholics routinely lie about these things, you have admitted it yourself.

    No figure can be trusted. But by all means visit churches and the evidence is there. Like the vast area put aside for this visit yesterday you will find vast buildings with a smattering of people inside celebrating mass.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 17 Currache


    No I don't see any point in going to be honest


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,315 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    You clearly aren't able to make head nor tail of the ESS figures.

    Here's a chart from the BBC, also based on the ESS figures.

    _103051147_cic_mass_attendance-nc.png

    I'll wait for you to tell the BBC that they're wrong now as well.

    ahem

    I'll say it again

    % of Catholics

    What are we supposed to take that number as?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭xi5yvm0owc1s2b


    Dannyriver wrote: »
    As a matter of interest why do you think he used the word 'psychiatry' as a possible intervention at the parents disposal.

    He didn't mention "intervention." Read his comments in context. He was talking about people who realize they are gay as children, versus people who don't realize until much later, and suggested that psychiatry might be able to provide some insight on this.

    You have jumped to the conclusion that he supports "psychiatric intervention" and "conversion therapy," which he clearly does not. He said in his press conference that there have always been homosexual people in society. He advocates for them to be accepted by their families, and indicates that a mother or father who cannot accept a gay child is neglecting his or her parental responsibility to that child. This is actually the opposite of what supporters of conversion therapy would say.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,495 ✭✭✭cozar


    and still there will be thousands of children making their communion and confirmation next year.?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭xi5yvm0owc1s2b


    It is funny how they apparently looked at the same data as the IT and came up with a different figure. the IT said 36% and they are saying over 40%. I posted the figures directly from the ESS website. Which do you think are more accurate?

    It's remarkable how the BBC, the Irish Times, and numerous other media sources are all publishing entirely different interpretations of the ESS data -- and yet you're the one dancing around insisting that you are right and everyone else is wrong.


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,148 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    He didn't mention "intervention." Read his comments in context. He was talking about people who realize they are gay as children, versus people who don't realize until much later, and suggested that psychiatry might be able to provide some insight on this.

    You have jumped to the conclusion that he supports "psychiatric intervention" and "conversion therapy," which he clearly does not. He said in his press conference that there have always been homosexual people in society. He advocates for them to be accepted by their families, and indicates that a mother or father who cannot accept a gay child is neglecting his or her parental responsibility to that child. This is actually the opposite of what supporters of conversion therapy would say.

    Why would a gay child need psychiatry?

    Such demeaning language. Perpetuating the myth that there is something wrong with a child who is gay.

    Give it up Francis, you don't have a clue.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭Dannyriver


    He didn't mention "intervention." Read his comments in context. He was talking about people who realize they are gay as children, versus people who don't realize until much later, and suggested that psychiatry might be able to provide some insight on this.

    You have jumped to the conclusion that he supports "psychiatric intervention" and "conversion therapy," which he clearly does not. He said in his press conference that there have always been homosexual people in society. He advocates for them to be accepted by their families, and indicates that a mother or father who cannot accept a gay child is neglecting his or her parental responsibility to that child. This is actually the opposite of what supporters of conversion therapy would say.

    What kind of insight do you feel he is referring to?


  • Registered Users Posts: 40,353 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    It's remarkable how the BBC, the Irish Times, and numerous other media sources are all publishing entirely different interpretations of the ESS data -- and yet you're the one dancing around insisting that you are right and everyone else is wrong.


    I am just posting the actual data. How is then that the BBC and IT quote different figures? they can't both be right.



    I redid the figures only including those who claim to be catholic. still nowhere near the figures given by either the BBC or the IT


    ess_Capture3.png


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 27,171 CMod ✭✭✭✭spurious


    If you are already self-identifying as Catholic, 40% weekly (or even regular) Mass attendance is still low.


Advertisement