Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Home charge points (purchase/problems/questions) (See mod note post#1)

1109110112114115297

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Tony H wrote: »
    sorry for stupid question , but is load management the same as a priority switch , I'm getting the pulsar plus with load/power management so does that mean I don't need a priority switch ?


    They have the same purpose, but work in different ways


    A priority switch will disconnect one load if another switches on. In effect it'll turn off your charger if an electric shower is switched on


    Load management/balancing will actively monitor the current load of your house and reduce the charging current to prevent it going over a set limit


    Load management is generally better since it won't completely stop your charger unless it has to


    If your Pulsar Plus has load management then you shouldn't need a priority switch

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,527 ✭✭✭Tony H


    They have the same purpose, but work in different ways


    A priority switch will disconnect one load if another switches on. In effect it'll turn off your charger if an electric shower is switched on


    Load management/balancing will actively monitor the current load of your house and reduce the charging current to prevent it going over a set limit


    Load management is generally better since it won't completely stop your charger unless it has to


    If your Pulsar Plus has load management then you shouldn't need a priority switch

    thanks for the simple explanation , just put in the order and got a date for the 8th April , so enough time herself to get the money together 🙄 .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 952 ✭✭✭Rusky rusky


    They have the same purpose, but work in different ways


    A priority switch will disconnect one load if another switches on. In effect it'll turn off your charger if an electric shower is switched on


    Load management/balancing will actively monitor the current load of your house and reduce the charging current to prevent it going over a set limit


    Load management is generally better since it won't completely stop your charger unless it has to


    If your Pulsar Plus has load management then you shouldn't need a priority switch

    Pulsar plus is installed with a C clamp wired into the unit. You just need to input max load of 63A in the app.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,566 ✭✭✭Risteard81


    Pulsar plus is installed with a C clamp wired into the unit. You just need to input max load of 63A in the app.
    The CTs or meter are extra - they aren't supplied with the Pulsar Plus. (We are Wallbox accredited installers.)

    One thing to watch out for is that your app is set to 32A charging. We had a customer complaining that his Pulsar Plus was only charging at 6A. When investigating this we discovered that he had inadvertently slid the halo around to 6A on his app.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,527 ✭✭✭Tony H


    Risteard81 wrote: »
    The CTs or meter are extra - they aren't supplied with the Pulsar Plus. (We are Wallbox accredited installers.)

    One thing to watch out for is that your app is set to 32A charging. We had a customer complaining that his Pulsar Plus was only charging at 6A. When investigating this we discovered that he had inadvertently slid the halo around to 6A on his app.

    I'm being charged 100 euro for the ct and another 100 for an extra 6m of cable but im still doing well at a net cost of 320 euro after the 600 grant , being honest I had a plumber charge 350 to install a new water heater 2 years ago for an hours work ,
    but you dont really pay good tradespeople for their time , you pay for their training , experience , insurance and the general cost of doing business , and you know they will pick up the phone if you have a problem .

    Thanks for the heads up Risteard


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,566 ✭✭✭Risteard81


    Tony H wrote: »
    I'm being charged 100 euro for the ct and another 100 for an extra 6m of cable but im still doing well at a net cost of 320 euro after the 600 grant , being honest I had a plumber charge 350 to install a new water heater 2 years ago for an hours work ,
    but you dont really pay good tradespeople for their time , you pay for their training , experience , insurance and the general cost of doing business , and you know they will pick up the phone if you have a problem .

    Thanks for the heads up Risteard
    No bother, or in the immortal words of Stephen Donnelly:


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,822 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Tony H wrote: »
    I'm being charged 100 euro for the ct and another 100 for an extra 6m of cable

    :eek: That’s unreal pricing you’ve been given, the mind boggles


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    slave1 wrote: »
    :eek: That’s unreal pricing you’ve been given, the mind boggles

    Markups mate, it what makes capitalism great :p

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 952 ✭✭✭Rusky rusky


    slave1 wrote: »
    :eek: That’s unreal pricing you’ve been given, the mind boggles

    I was charged 65+vat for the clamp.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 952 ✭✭✭Rusky rusky


    Risteard81 wrote: »
    The CTs or meter are extra - they aren't supplied with the Pulsar Plus. (We are Wallbox accredited installers.)

    One thing to watch out for is that your app is set to 32A charging. We had a customer complaining that his Pulsar Plus was only charging at 6A. When investigating this we discovered that he had inadvertently slid the halo around to 6A on his app.

    Yep, 65+vat. 32A is set and 7.4kWh without hiccups:)


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,822 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Pretty sure CT clamps are under €20 from any electrical outlet, can pick them up from myenergi for £15 or Amazon (and including a readout meter) for £20


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,262 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    I'd much rather tradespeople charge me cost price for equipment and an honest rate for equipment than trying to justify their costs by marking up the equipment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,566 ✭✭✭Risteard81


    liamog wrote: »
    I'd much rather tradespeople charge me cost price for equipment and an honest rate for equipment than trying to justify their costs by marking up the equipment.
    Equipment has to be marked up, to cover the time of specifying and sourcing it for one, but also the fact that legally it must come with a warranty. To sell at "cost price" actually means making a loss on it.

    I don't go into Sainsbury's and insist on paying what they paid for something. The nature of business is selling for more than you buy. It's simple economics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,460 ✭✭✭Felexicon


    slave1 wrote: »
    Pretty sure CT clamps are under €20 from any electrical outlet, can pick them up from myenergi for £15 or Amazon (and including a readout meter) for £20

    You need to use the CT clamp that is specified by the manufacturer. Not all CTs are compatible


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,822 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    I needed an extra CT clamp for my Zappi2 install and bought a generic one from local wholesaler, pretty sure is was something like €16+VAT


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Risteard81 wrote: »
    Equipment has to be marked up, to cover the time of specifying and sourcing it for one, but also the fact that legally it must come with a warranty. To sell at "cost price" actually means making a loss on it.

    I don't go into Sainsbury's and insist on paying what they paid for something. The nature of business is selling for more than you buy. It's simple economics.


    Markups are fine, and I undersatand electricians are running a business which needs to make money, but €100 for a 6m length of wire? How much sourcing could possibly be involved with that? Surely every electrical wholesaler stocks wire?


    If it was some exotic component that took research and time to source then yeah, fair enough, charge for the time involved in getting it


    But 1000% markup for some wire? That's just ripping someone off because you can

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,817 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    Risteard81 wrote: »
    Equipment has to be marked up, to cover the time of specifying and sourcing it for one, but also the fact that legally it must come with a warranty. To sell at "cost price" actually means making a loss on it.

    I don't go into Sainsbury's and insist on paying what they paid for something. The nature of business is selling for more than you buy. It's simple economics.

    Surely the manufacturer warranties the equipment?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,566 ✭✭✭Risteard81


    Cyrus wrote: »
    Surely the manufacturer warranties the equipment?

    So who covers the labour cost of replacement?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,822 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Markups are fine, and I undersatand electricians are running a business which needs to make money, but €100 for a 6m length of wire? How much sourcing could possibly be involved with that? Surely every electrical wholesaler stocks wire?


    If it was some exotic component that took research and time to source then yeah, fair enough, charge for the time involved in getting it


    But 1000% markup for some wire? That's just ripping someone off because you can

    Please don't tell me that was to extend CT clamps i.e. just ethernet ?


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 7,017 Mod ✭✭✭✭graememk


    Markups are fine, and I undersatand electricians are running a business which needs to make money, but €100 for a 6m length of wire? How much sourcing could possibly be involved with that? Surely every electrical wholesaler stocks wire?

    I think I'm coming down on the other side of this.

    Original quote was with the "free charge point" with a kia.

    Kia must have a deal done with a company/group of installers etc to install charge points, and have a fixed price for a straight and simple install.

    They have built into the price of the additions whaterver the estimated labour entails. Cable for instance, the price of the cable is say 3 euro per m for swa. And depending on where it goes, esp if clipped outside you don't want it like a wet noodle down the side of your house.

    So the extra for the ct includes the time needed to install and configure.

    I've worked around different trades and an hour can disappear very quickly.

    All that being said, some people seem to be getting charged a lot for charge points. A huge part of it is the actual charge point itself. Maybe going for a more bells and whistles than what is needed.


    Look on the likes of midsummer etc that's still the + vat price (I know the is trade price with has a bit more discount, but I'd say that's to make up for handing some of the support over to the installer).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    slave1 wrote: »
    Please don't tell me that was to extend CT clamps i.e. just ethernet ?


    It was for Tony H, I believe it was €100 for the CT and €100 for an extra 6m of cabling to the charger

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Risteard81 wrote: »
    So who covers the labour cost of replacement?


    The manufacturer should cover it in the event of a component failure, if the installer was at fault then they should cover the expense

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,566 ✭✭✭Risteard81


    The manufacturer should cover it in the event of a component failure, if the installer was at fault then they should cover the expense
    The manufacturer will only replace the faulty goods. They absolutely won't pay for the time involved in removing and replacing it. This is allowed for with markup.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,182 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    The manufacturer should cover it in the event of a component failure, if the installer was at fault then they should cover the expense
    Risteard81 wrote: »
    The manufacturer will only replace the faulty goods. They absolutely won't pay for the time involved in removing and replacing it. This is allowed for with markup.

    MyEnergi will cover a replacement unit and the labour costs as demonstrated by Nigel Daly this week. The home owner actually got a V2 upgrade as his original unit is no longer being made.

    Every electrician should have their own stock of cable, SWA. A general nominal amount to cover a job or 2. There should be no time wasted having to drive around picking cables for a job to an extent.

    My brothers van, when you open it, reels of cable there ready to be pulled out what and when required.

    This would avoid time spent having to pick up cable for each individual job.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 8,262 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    Risteard81 wrote: »
    The manufacturer will only replace the faulty goods. They absolutely won't pay for the time involved in removing and replacing it. This is allowed for with markup.

    I'd prefer if a tradesmen built that into an hourly rate instead as a cost of doing business. Charging me €250 for equipment I can find for myself for €25 just leaves a sour taste, the ability to find parts online means its much harder to hide the costs in crazy mark ups.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 377 ✭✭Sam W


    liamog wrote: »
    I'd prefer if a tradesmen built that into an hourly rate instead as a cost of doing business. Charging me €250 for equipment I can find for myself for €25 just leaves a sour taste, the ability to find parts online means its much harder to hide the costs in crazy mark ups.

    There’s also a tax obligation to report service charge and material charge separately. It’s absolutely not fine to inflate the material charges as that part of VAT is not liable to the service provider. In essence this is tax evasion.

    Plus I would definitely be pissed if I see a simple equipment being inflated for 10 times the charges.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,321 ✭✭✭✭KCross


    Sam W wrote: »
    There’s also a tax obligation to report service charge and material charge separately. It’s absolutely not fine to inflate the material charges as that part of VAT is not liable to the service provider. In essence this is tax evasion.

    I think you're gone a bit too far with that one. There is no tax evasion in someone buying materials at one price and selling it at another. Its called business.
    Sam W wrote: »
    Plus I would definitely be pissed if I see a simple equipment being inflated for 10 times the charges.

    Of course, buyer beware an all that.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,822 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Sam W wrote: »
    There’s also a tax obligation to report service charge and material charge separately. It’s absolutely not fine to inflate the material charges as that part of VAT is not liable to the service provider. In essence this is tax evasion.

    Plus I would definitely be pissed if I see a simple equipment being inflated for 10 times the charges.

    What?
    I think you are confusing two thirds rule.
    Anyone can charge whatever they like for a product or service they sell


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,822 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Risteard81 wrote: »
    The manufacturer will only replace the faulty goods. They absolutely won't pay for the time involved in removing and replacing it. This is allowed for with markup.
    Gumbo wrote: »
    MyEnergi will cover a replacement unit and the labour costs ...

    True, MyEnergi will pay equivalent of £75 for any warranty work carried out by Registered Installer to cover labour time


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,527 ✭✭✭Tony H


    this is the wording of the invoice that I received ,

    Kia Plus with
    Ct Coil
    Kia Plus upgrade with Ct Coil 1.00 700.44 13.5% 700.44

    Extra Metres
    of Instal over
    5M
    Extra Meters of Installation over standard 5m 7.00 15.83 13.5% 110.81
    Subtotal 811.25
    TOTAL 13.5% SALES VAT 13.5% 109.52
    TOTAL EUR 920.77



    Kia provide the basic pulsar unit , but because I have an electric shower I was told that the ct clamp only works with this model and I need this , despite the "slight" padding I think I am getting a fairly good unit for 320 euro total , it stings a bit but the kia "free install" despite the extras seems like the best option for me .

    I will probably complain to Kia about the cost of the "extras" but don't think I will get any where .


Advertisement