Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

N2 - Clontibret to NI Border [preferred route published; ABP in 2022]

124»

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,663 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    https://n2monaghanlouth.ie/c2b-publications

    Initial design for the route published



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,251 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Looks shoddy and cheap. Why the at-grade roundabouts?

    This should be the main route between Dublin and Derry (the most forgotten city on the island) and should be motorway. This is more of the usual, cheap, second rate, short termist disease the country suffers from.

    There is actually a random at-grade roundabout on the mainline near the southern end and immediately following that just to the south on the same mainline an overbridge. Why? How does that make any sense?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,495 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    There is definite discrimination against the north-west. The N2 at Clontibret has only an AADT only 10% less than the M9, and slightly higher proportion of HGVs. This route serves 4 counties, has no parallel railway, yet it is thought quite acceptable to have a second rate specification for the route.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,663 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    TII and the local authority like to work on numbers and reality. The AADT on the northern end is around 7k. It's not exactly the M50 or Interstate 405. It's an appropriate solution to the problem at hand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,251 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    We need to demand better. This not a future proofed scheme, it just isn't. Do it properly or don't do it at all.

    It's clear just by looking at a map. They won't even do the M4 to Longford properly. That's getting the shoddy, cheap, second rate treatment as well and that's the key route to the northwest and Donegal, another forgotten county.

    We want these regions to develop but we give them crap infrastructure.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,734 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    I won't reach the ranting level of others, but I do somewhat agree it's a bit frustrating to see new high quality roads projects constructed with roundabouts.

    I assume that perhaps the northern end terminates in a roundabout to allow for future connection with any future A5 upgrade, but I don't really understand the roundabout at the R214 intersection — it seems like such a thing could be avoided by routing via alternate roads, even if a full grade-separated junction isn't appropriate.

    Arguing that this should be a motorway seems like a pointless distinction though. If that R214 roundabout wasn't there, this would be a great bit of infrastructure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,508 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    80 metre roundabouts aren't substandard junctions. Where a significant amount of traffic joins or leaves, they're superior to compact grade-separated junctions. Roundabout and Compact GSJ are the only options on a 2+2 unless traffic volumes using the junction are extremely high.

    This road currently carries 7000 AADT in parts. That's well within the limit for a single carriageway (<13500). The road that is being built has over three times the current capacity (22,000 AADT). It's idiotic to say it's not a future proof solution. I'd rather not have the roads budget squandered just to satisfy some weird fetish for blue signs.

    This route has been upgraded massively to 2+2 because it's the main road to Derry. If it wasn't, it would be a single carriageway.

    Post edited by KrisW1001 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,633 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    one thing to be aware of is induced demand and the opposite effect. The traffic between NW and Dublin is much lower currently because if the state of the roads.

    Especially once the A5 phase 3 is done (ballygawley to Omagh), traffic volumes will increase hugely. Right now a not insignificant amount of traffic from NW to Dublin goes via A6 to Belfast then south on the M1. This will all move to A5/N2 in time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,251 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    There should not be at grade interruption on any interurban route on this island. This is not 1980's Ireland, this is basic stuff across the continent.

    You're being an apologist for mediocrity and penny pinching.

    Post edited by Kermit.de.frog on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,392 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    The other side of that is that the N2 is currently used for many local journeys (school run, popping to the shop, visiting granny, etc.). The infrequency of junctions on the new road will mean most of those journeys will not transfer. 2+2 seems entirely appreciate here, motorway can't be justified.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,734 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    I would say that roundabouts and compact GSJs are not the only two options in this specific case — there's also the option to not have a junction at this spot at all, which I think could be preferable here.

    Post edited by spacetweek on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,495 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    This is the key point, you have a bad road and people do not use it so you claim that it does not need improving.

    Traffic to the North-West has also had political interference. The border might still be there when this road opens, but does anyone seriously believe that it still will be there when it has to be resurfaced?

    This is not about a fetish for blue signs, it is about having equity in travel time to Dublin from different quadrants of the country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,508 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    There's no situation where this road would justify a Type 1 Dual Carriageway. None.

    Type 1 DC is for traffic volumes over 35000 AADT.

    NIRS is building their section of this route as their equivalent of a type 2 DC, and that's with major towns like Omagh along the route..(and yes, they have considered this becoming the main Dublin Derry route... that's most of the reason it's a dual carriageway all the way)

    Volumes in the Republic do not justify a 2+2, and won't even after A5, but it's being built as this for continuity, and because it is a national primary route from Dublin to Derry (and Letterkenny).

    Just because we've one motorway that shouldn't have been (M9 south of Carlow) , it doesn't mean we need to make more of them. That road was built as a Type1 DC because there was no other standard available at the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,495 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    This does not address the issue of equity, many aspects of public policy have to consider equity and not just cost minimisation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,251 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Unfortunately that poster represents the type of small mindedness that has inflicted the state really since independence. A complete failure to think long term, bigger and strategically and do things right. Instead it's all penny pinching, parochial scale, holding the country back.

    It's a mentality I can't wrap my head around. It's unfortunate.

    So many other countries have no problem thinking strategically 30 or 40 years ahead but we are inflicted with a portion of the population with that mentality.

    I agree with you it's the northern half of the country that are the biggest losers from it. The country overall loses too.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,663 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    The money that would be wasted on overspeccing this route as a Type 1 DC could be much better spent on upgrading other roads in the region such as the N13/N15 or the brutal secondary roads in the area.

    Type 2 DC is more than enough here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,495 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    Upgrading secondary roads will not improve travel time to the North-West.

    There is a case that places where the government has closed the railways should get some additional consideration, as quite an amount goes to Irish Rail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,734 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    The difference between a Type 1 and Type 2 isn't going to make any difference to travel time either though



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,495 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    A 120kmh road gets you there in less time than a 100kmh road, especially one where you have to stop at roundabouts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,251 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    It will because apparently going on the Slane Bypass if repeated all along the N2 there will be at grade roundabouts all along the route and an inconsistent standard.

    There should be motorway from Dublin to Derry. Problems solved. That's what serious countries do.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,734 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    Then you want a motorway, not a Type 1 DC, given how rare 120kmh DCs are?

    As I said, I agree on the roundabouts



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,734 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    There's space for other options in between your two examples, and your ranting on this topic is doing it no favours tbh



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,251 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    They aren't going for options in between, are they? We are getting a substandard interurban route, a mish mash of standards, and it does annoy me that some are being apologists for that.

    Why can't we just do things properly?

    I wouldn't mind an in between on the whole N2 but we aren't getting that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,495 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    As this road is on a new alignment, bar the southernmost km, there is no reason why it could not be a motorway.

    And of course the other main route leading to the border is 120kmh DC .



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,367 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    ”Equity” is not considered by engineers. If we want motorway here when one isn’t needed just for the sake of political optics, then the Taoiseach would have to get involved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,734 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    Well it's leading not to the border, but to another capital city.

    Anyway I don't disagree that the North-west route needs significant improvement, but largely agree with others that motorway standard is not necessary — let's just get rid of those on-line roundabouts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,290 ✭✭✭mackerski


    If you're going via Slane from Dublin to Derry, somebody needs to show you the N33.



Advertisement