Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Anti-vaxxers

Options
1…156157159161162…199

Comments

  • Options
    #4742
    Titclamp
    Closed Accounts Posts: 409 ✭✭Titclamp


    kylith wrote: »
    For cervical cancer it’s about 40%.

    Is there really any percentage that’s ok to die of something preventable?

    Is it a crime to ask genuine questions?


  • Options
    #4743
    Mr. CooL ICE
    Registered Users Posts: 17,536 ✭✭✭✭Mr. CooL ICE


    Titclamp wrote: »
    Is it a crime to ask genuine questions?

    No, but why did you ask it?


  • Options
    #4744
    mountai
    Registered Users Posts: 953 ✭✭✭mountai


    Mark Rippetoe wrote: »
    No, but why did you ask it?

    Because he is entitled to .


  • Options
    #4745
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,486 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    mountai wrote: »
    Because he is entitled to .

    Really?


  • Options
    #4746
    Titclamp
    Closed Accounts Posts: 409 ✭✭Titclamp


    Mark Rippetoe wrote: »
    No, but why did you ask it?

    I wanted to know the figures of the cancers that the vaccine covered?
    Why is that difficult to comprehend?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4747
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Titclamp wrote: »
    I wanted to know the figures of the cancers that the vaccine covered?
    Why is that difficult to comprehend?

    There's this thing called Google


  • Options
    #4748
    mountai
    Registered Users Posts: 953 ✭✭✭mountai


    DubInMeath wrote: »
    There's this thing called Google

    Aha ha ha ha , the "Medical Stormtroopers" on these pages will ridicule anyone who source their information from "The Net" .


  • Options
    #4749
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 17,847 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    mountai wrote: »
    Aha ha ha ha , the "Medical Stormtroopers" on these pages will ridicule anyone who source their information from "The Net" .

    What is a "medical stormtrooper"?


  • Options
    #4750
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,486 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    What is a "medical stormtrooper"?

    It's the coronavirus version of "woke" or some other incel shìte.


  • Options
    #4751
    mountai
    Registered Users Posts: 953 ✭✭✭mountai


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    What is a "medical stormtrooper"?

    Google it .


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4752
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    mountai wrote: »
    Aha ha ha ha , the "Medical Stormtroopers" on these pages will ridicule anyone who source their information from "The Net" .

    Again godwining your argument shows that you don't have an argument.


  • Options
    #4753
    CramCycle
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,651 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    I thought it was a fair question, I would have also pointed out the awful experience of an early partial or full hysterectomy if the cancer is caught early enough. My daughter accompanied a friend for one, Her choice about starting her own family taken from her years earlier than expected. It's not just death that a vaccine maybe saving you from.


  • Options
    #4754
    ancapailldorcha
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    What is a "medical stormtrooper"?

    A pejorative used by pro-disease activists for anyone who calls them out on their BS.

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Options
    #4755
    Orion
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,807 ✭✭✭✭Orion


    Titclamp wrote: »
    I wanted to know the figures of the cancers that the vaccine covered?
    Why is that difficult to comprehend?

    A brief look at your profile begs to differ. It's actually very easy to comprehend why you're asking these questions.

    If you actually wanted to know the figures you'd look them up - they're not secret. WHO and other health organisations have them published.

    But no - that's not why you asked. You're one of these antivaxxers who "just asks questions" - who pretends to be reasonable but in reality is just looking for any type of excuse to cast doubt on life saving vaccines. You're not interested in answers - just in questions you have no interest in the answers for.

    It's not a new tactic. But it's increasingly easy to spot.

    So why not JAQ off somewhere else.


  • Options
    #4756
    paul71
    Registered Users Posts: 3,221 ✭✭✭paul71


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    What is a "medical stormtrooper"?

    A person with an education that goes beyond the book of genesis.;)


  • Options
    #4757
    Titclamp
    Closed Accounts Posts: 409 ✭✭Titclamp


    Orion wrote: »
    A brief look at your profile begs to differ. It's actually very easy to comprehend why you're asking these questions.

    If you actually wanted to know the figures you'd look them up - they're not secret. WHO and other health organisations have them published.

    But no - that's not why you asked. You're one of these antivaxxers who "just asks questions" - who pretends to be reasonable but in reality is just looking for any type of excuse to cast doubt on life saving vaccines. You're not interested in answers - just in questions you have no interest in the answers for.

    It's not a new tactic. But it's increasingly easy to spot.

    So why not JAQ off somewhere else.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/21/coronavirus-brings-light-to-the-35-billion-vaccine-market.html


  • Options
    #4758
    ancapailldorcha
    Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 38,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Titclamp wrote: »
    https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/21/coronavirus-brings-light-to-the-35-billion-vaccine-market.html

    What is the point of this lazy link dump?

    We sat again for an hour and a half discussing maps and figures and always getting back to that most damnable creation of the perverted ingenuity of man - the County of Tyrone.

    H. H. Asquith



  • Options
    #4759
    Titclamp
    Closed Accounts Posts: 409 ✭✭Titclamp


    Orion wrote: »
    A brief look at your profile begs to differ. It's actually very easy to comprehend why you're asking these questions.

    If you actually wanted to know the figures you'd look them up - they're not secret. WHO and other health organisations have them published.

    But no - that's not why you asked. You're one of these antivaxxers who "just asks questions" - who pretends to be reasonable but in reality is just looking for any type of excuse to cast doubt on life saving vaccines. You're not interested in answers - just in questions you have no interest in the answers for.

    It's not a new tactic. But it's increasingly easy to spot.

    So why not JAQ off somewhere else.

    I found my answers

    Multi billion industry.

    Every dollar invested 43 is returned.

    Can see now why people are brainwashed to get vaxxed up to the balls.


  • Options
    #4760
    paul71
    Registered Users Posts: 3,221 ✭✭✭paul71


    Titclamp wrote: »
    I found my answers

    Multi billion industry.

    Every dollar invested 43 is returned.

    Can see now why people are brainwashed to get vaxxed up to the balls.

    Don't forget the billions of lives saved ;-)


  • Options
    #4761
    Titclamp
    Closed Accounts Posts: 409 ✭✭Titclamp


    paul71 wrote: »
    Don't forget the billions of lives saved ;-)

    Oh they that obvious. needs to be acknowledged if you're not a real human being though.

    Isn't that the whole point of them? Jesus.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4762
    paul71
    Registered Users Posts: 3,221 ✭✭✭paul71


    Titclamp wrote: »
    Oh they that obvious. needs to be acknowledged if you're not a real human being though.

    Isn't that the whole point of them? Jesus.

    Do you want to try that again in English :)


  • Options
    #4763
    paul71
    Registered Users Posts: 3,221 ✭✭✭paul71


    Titclamp wrote: »
    How many actually die from the cancers mentioned? Is their figures

    And while you are at it could you translate this gibberish?


  • Options
    #4764
    Titclamp
    Closed Accounts Posts: 409 ✭✭Titclamp


    paul71 wrote: »
    And while you are at it could you translate this gibberish?

    Take it out of context all you want. I asked a simple question and people found it extremely hard to give a simple answer.

    I'm sure you can enlightened me can't you?


  • Options
    #4765
    Igotadose
    Registered Users Posts: 13,328 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Explains why Wakefield wanted to get his snout in


  • Options
    #4766
    Titclamp
    Closed Accounts Posts: 409 ✭✭Titclamp


    Igotadose wrote: »
    Explains why Wakefield wanted to get his snout in

    Same reason as the vaccine industry..


    Money!


  • Options
    #4767
    paul71
    Registered Users Posts: 3,221 ✭✭✭paul71


    Titclamp wrote: »
    Take it out of context all you want. I asked a simple question and people found it extremely hard to give a simple answer.

    I'm sure you can enlightened me can't you?


    You have come onto a forum to argue against millions of hours of peer reviewed medical and scientific research completed by university educated professionals. During the course of your contributions you produce a 3 word sentence "is their figures" which no matter which way you bend it, has 3 grammatical errors making a complete nonsense of any interpretation.

    There is no way I can take anything you say out of context because it is so illegible that it is beyond comprehension. So I will stick with the millions of hours of peer reviewed science from the professionals.

    Thank you, goodbye.


  • Options
    #4768
    paul71
    Registered Users Posts: 3,221 ✭✭✭paul71


    Titclamp wrote: »
    I'm sure you can enlightened me can't you?

    And you have done it again, barely legible.


  • Options
    #4769
    Titclamp
    Closed Accounts Posts: 409 ✭✭Titclamp


    paul71 wrote: »
    You have come onto a forum to argue against millions of hours of peer reviewed medical and scientific research completed by university educated professionals. During the course of your contributions you produce a 3 word sentence "is their figures" which no matter which way you bend it, has 3 grammatical errors making a complete nonsense of any interpretation.

    There is no way I can take anything you say out of context because it is so illegible that it is beyond comprehension. So I will stick with the millions of hours of peer reviewed science from the professionals.

    Thank you, goodbye.

    I didn't hear you using anyone of the peer reviewed research once?

    Something you hide behind. Because you've no brain of you're own.

    A fool who's fooled by fools. Great.


  • Options
    #4770
    Titclamp
    Closed Accounts Posts: 409 ✭✭Titclamp


    paul71 wrote: »
    And you have done it again, barely legible.

    Barely legible? **** phone auto correct. If it was a someone you fancied I'm sure you'd be able to make out what they're saying.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4771
    paul71
    Registered Users Posts: 3,221 ✭✭✭paul71


    Titclamp wrote: »
    Barely legible? **** phone auto correct. If it was a someone you fancied I'm sure you'd be able to make out what they're saying.

    Is there figures = phone autocorrect? Return your phone. Fast!


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement