Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

US considering Preemptive Strike against North Korea.

Options
1…153154155156157159»

Comments

  • Options
    #4742
    Taytoland
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,067 ✭✭✭Taytoland


    Time for Donald Trump to attack North Korea. Unacceptable.


  • Options
    #4743
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,407 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Taytoland wrote: »
    Time for Donald Trump to attack North Korea. Unacceptable.

    If a country reneged on a treaty/agreement do you think they should all be attacked?


  • Options
    #4744
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    If a country reneged on a treaty/agreement do you think they should all be attacked?
    Common enough occurrence for a war to start when a condition of a treaty is broken.


  • Options
    #4745
    Captain Obvious
    Registered Users Posts: 4,165 ✭✭✭Captain Obvious


    monty_python wrote: »
    http://www.iflscience.com/editors-blog/satellite-images-indicate-north-korea-is-making-rapid-upgrades-to-nuclear-reactor-why-thats-technically-allowed/

    Anyone know any more about this??


    Who could have thought international diplomacy was so hard?


  • Options
    #4746
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,156 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    If a country reneged on a treaty/agreement do you think they should all be attacked?

    what treaty have these changes broken? Even the article they havent broken any treaty.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4747
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,407 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    Common enough occurrence for a war to start when a condition of a treaty is broken.

    So should America be invaded because it has pulled out of the parisclimate change treaty or the iran deal?


  • Options
    #4748
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,407 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    what treaty have these changes broken? Even the article they havent broken any treaty.

    I agree! Taytoland wants war not me


  • Options
    #4749
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,156 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Common enough occurrence for a war to start when a condition of a treaty is broken.

    i quoted the wrong post the last time but i have the right one now.


    What condition of what treaty have they broken?


  • Options
    #4750
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,156 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    I agree! Taytoland wants war not me

    apologies, quoted the wrong post.


  • Options
    #4751
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    So should America be invaded because it has pulled out of the parisclimate change treaty or the iran deal?
    I was stating a fact based on historical events, not making a recommendation.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4752
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,407 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    I was stating a fact based on historical events, not making a recommendation.

    Tayto said trump should attack NK because of this, the question to all is should every country who reneges on a treaty/deal (we don't even know if NK have by the way) be attacked?


  • Options
    #4753
    monty_python
    Registered Users Posts: 1,671 ✭✭✭monty_python


    Any auld craic with Kimmy and trumpy these days??


  • Options
    #4754
    Hande hoche!
    Registered Users Posts: 7,452 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    monty_python wrote: »
    Any auld craic with Kimmy and trumpy these days??
    Nothing too exciting, the North Koreans seem to refer to the Americans as gangsters from time to time. Lots of diplomacy behind the scenes. Also the South Koreans have a high level visit to the North planned.


  • Options
    #4755
    Gatling
    Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Hande hoche! wrote: »
    Nothing too exciting, the North Koreans seem to refer to the Americans as gangsters from time to time. Lots of diplomacy behind the scenes. Also the South Koreans have a high level visit to the North planned.


    They were closing their nuclear test site and then started building on it ,then blew it up,
    Kim's been very quite lately ,
    360_F_102352090_ie3kLjDIvgrT1sxVDknWCUh8PxgMYzM7.jpg




  • Options
    #4756
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 17,381 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Taytoland wrote: »
    Time for Donald Trump to attack North Korea. Unacceptable.

    Before or after they've destroyed the EU in a war? I'd love a timeline of your perfect hypothetical future.


  • Options
    #4757
    Hande hoche!
    Registered Users Posts: 7,452 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Before or after they've destroyed the EU in a war? I'd love a timeline of your perfect hypothetical future.


    There's a fairly mediocre book about that. Larry Bond's Cauldron. Has the United States versus the European Union Confederation.


Advertisement