FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTICE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

laurar2019

jewels652 wrote: »

Absolutely is a very straight forward topic and it always comes up..

I passed contract last October and I only used the night before notes that’s all I had. Download the night before notes and go through it is only like a page and half

ohh that sounds good ! im only startin g contract today and my manual has likke 40 pages on it

Pyggg

Anyone know when the new EU examiner came in?

mariealice

Pyggg wrote: »

Anyone know when the new EU examiner came in?

October 2015 I believe? So there's been 7 papers with the new examiner 😊

Pyggg

mariealice wrote: »

October 2015 I believe? So there's been 7 papers with the new examiner ��

Thanks a million!

Fe1hayes

Pyggg wrote: »

Thanks a million!

You can tell. The reports and exams itself were a lot harder I think prior.

z6vm1dobfnca3x

Can someone please briefly explain the rule in Hastings-Bass?

nimcdona

Kyree Bumpy Shrimp wrote: »

Would I be mad to ignore all injunctions bar Quia Timet and Anton Piller?

I've struggled with the whole departures from the Campus Oils Principles bullsh*t since college and I don't want to waste the next 4 days wrapping my head around it again? It's such a dense area.

I have 14 other topics covered:

Quia Timet & AP
Charitable Trusts
Non-Charitable
Cy-press
Rectification
Specific Performance
Undue Influence
Recission
Satisfaction
Trusteeship
DMC
Three Certainties
Strong v Bird
Advancement

I'm leaving out mareva injunctions completely anyway and focusing on Quia timet
not a fan of injunctions either so hoping to just have enough not to have to answer a question on it

LawGirl3434

Contract

Hey,

For contract so far I have covered:

Offer/ Acceptance
Consideration/ Estoppel
ITLR
Capacity
Uncertain Terms - ambiguous, illusory, etc
Formal Requirements
Express/ Implied terms
Consumer Protection
Interpretation - plain meaning. factual matrix, contra performa, no est factum, etc.
Exemption and Exclusion clauses

Going to get remedies, discharge, mistake & misrepresentation done today

So basically think that leaves me with just duress, undue influence and & agency and privity - wondering if I can leave any of these out?

Additionally, if I am missing anything from the above please let me know!

z6vm1dobfnca3x

nimcdona wrote: »

I'm leaving out mareva injunctions completely anyway and focusing on Quia timet
not a fan of injunctions either so hoping to just have enough not to have to answer a question on it

Yeah I'm leaving out Mareva too.

I reckon QT inj. are on the cards or maybe AP. (I know enough about Campus Oils etc to cover me for a QT question).

Good chance it will be a regular interlocutory injunction Q too but if that's the case, hopefully I will have another question I can answer instead. The amount of cases, exceptions, departures etc just makes my brain hurt.

sbbyrne

Kyree Bumpy Shrimp wrote: »

Yeah I'm leaving out Mareva too.

I reckon QT inj. are on the cards or maybe AP. (I know enough about Campus Oils etc to cover me for a QT question).

Good chance it will be a regular interlocutory injunction Q too but if that's the case, hopefully I will have another question I can answer instead. The amount of cases, exceptions, departures etc just makes my brain hurt.

I'm the same - I despise injunctions in general so i'm also relying on knowing enough that it can be avoided at all costs. QT's arent the worst, and there isnt a massive amount on AP either. Here's hoping we'll have enough anyway!

z6vm1dobfnca3x

sbbyrne wrote: »

I'm the same - I despise injunctions in general so i'm also relying on knowing enough that it can be avoided at all costs. QT's arent the worst, and there isnt a massive amount on AP either. Here's hoping we'll have enough anyway!

Exactly - QTs and APs are lovely.

Even if it does turn out to be an interlocutory Q, there are still 7 other questions on the paper to choose from!

I'd rather put my time into backups than waste a huge amount of time on interlocutory injunctions when they might not even appear!

Natalie_06

Hi

does anyone have EU sample answers that they can send me from 2016 onwards? I have other things to trade! please pm

nimcdona

Just struggling to get an answer for the essay on specific performance for personal services, could anyone give me a quick overview of what cases you'd be discussing if answering it please?

emilieburke22

Hi there,
Just wondering if anyone would happen to have a SOG ACT 1893 or updated which I could purchase. I am sitting contract and eu both thursday and friday and would greatly appreciate the ACT. I will be in Red Cow wednesday afternoon.

I have both notes and sample answers I would be willing to trade.

Thanks

Legal_Eagle_95

Contract


Seems there is a lot of mixing so trying to cover all the important points - do you think I'm safe to leave out intention to create legal relations, illegal and void contracts and agency? I have everything else included

Olliepollie

Equity

Hi guys, does anyone for constructive trusts if an essay question comes up on "knowing assistance" am I to discuss Knowing Receipt and Dishonest Assistance as two separate and distinct areas, or as one area with all case law applying the same to Receipt and Assistance?

They're separate areas in my manual but the examiner reports always talk about knowing assistance as involving all the cases for both areas... sorry if this is really convoluted, my brain is as confused as this post!

LawGirl3434

Legal_Eagle_95 wrote: »

Contract


Seems there is a lot of mixing so trying to cover all the important points - do you think I'm safe to leave out intention to create legal relations, illegal and void contracts and agency? I have everything else included

Hey! It’s hard to know because she does mix questions but equally there is a decent choice on the exam.

For ITLR, maybe know the basics of it? I’m leaving out illegal too, but going to do duress and undue influence I think

loosehead1973

Hi Guys
Does any of you kind souls have 2017 and 2018 past papers for Equity.
TIA
Gus

sapphire309

Feel like this has been asked before, but how mad would it be to leave out all of Competition law? I'm really running out of time and I just can't get my head around any of EU struggling big time. I am planning on leaving out competition, mergers, state aids, private international law (whatever that even is).

I've also seen people refer to 'legislative procedures' - my manual doesn't have a chapter on that but what else would it include other than OLP and SLP?

Olliepollie

loosehead1973 wrote: »

Hi Guys
Does any of you kind souls have 2017 and 2018 past papers for Equity.
TIA
Gus

If you pm your email, I'll send them across

jamesob123

EU


Hi guys

Would someone mind telling me what came up in EU last time round? My grid doesn't go up that far - sigh.

Thanks

lisac223

Hi guys,

Do you think I will be okay with the following:

AP Orders/Quia Timet/Interlocutory
Constructive Trusts
Purpose Trusts
Charitable Trusts
Constructive Trusts
Resulting trusts (both automatic & presumed)
Estoppel
Rectification
Three certainties
Doc of satisfaction
Trustees Duties

Leaving out tracing, secret trusts, rescission, Mareva and mandatory injunctions.

Is there anything ye think I should cover as well just in case?

Thank you! :-)

sbbyrne

Hey,

Does anyone have the exam reports/sample answers for Equity 2017/2018? Thanks a mill!

Dliodoir2021

CASSIS DI DIJON

Can anyone tell me the relevance? I have a big mindmap done up and can't figure out which art to put it under!

If anyone needs stuff for equity let me know!

z6vm1dobfnca3x

lisac223 wrote: »

Hi guys,

Do you think I will be okay with the following:

AP Orders/Quia Timet/Interlocutory
Constructive Trusts
Purpose Trusts
Charitable Trusts
Constructive Trusts
Resulting trusts (both automatic & presumed)
Estoppel
Rectification
Three certainties
Doc of satisfaction
Trustees Duties

Leaving out tracing, secret trusts, rescission, Mareva and mandatory injunctions.

Is there anything ye think I should cover as well just in case?

Thank you! :-)

Looks good but maybe just know a few short topics like Strong v Bird, Advancement, Maxims in case there's one of those 3 part questions.

You can learn those really quickly.

the baby bull elephant

sapphire309 wrote: »

Feel like this has been asked before, but how mad would it be to leave out all of Competition law? I'm really running out of time and I just can't get my head around any of EU struggling big time. I am planning on leaving out competition, mergers, state aids, private international law (whatever that even is).

I've also seen people refer to 'legislative procedures' - my manual doesn't have a chapter on that but what else would it include other than OLP and SLP?

It's not mad I'm doing it myself but it means you can't skip over stuff in the areas you are covering and that you're likely to be choosing your five from six questions, presuming you aren't doing the necessary detail for the case note.

Yohnathan

sapphire309 wrote: »

Feel like this has been asked before, but how mad would it be to leave out all of Competition law? I'm really running out of time and I just can't get my head around any of EU struggling big time. I am planning on leaving out competition, mergers, state aids, private international law (whatever that even is).

I've also seen people refer to 'legislative procedures' - my manual doesn't have a chapter on that but what else would it include other than OLP and SLP?

I completely left Conpetition Law out during my exam last sitting. The lecturer in the grind school I went to said that it is too much and only likely to come up once or maybe not even come up. She highly recommended leaving it out and focusing on everything else.
In saying that, you have to cover everything else. People went crazy after the last sitting as the predicted topics didn't come up. I for once, had solid backup questions prepared and scrapped a 51! So my advice is to leave it out but do everything else with the exception of the case note!


Constitutional: what did people think came up? Thoughts on the paper?

Charles OCK

Resulting trusts
Estoppel
Rectification
Three certainties
Doc of satisfaction
Trustees Duties
Mand/Interloc/QT/APO Injunctions
Specific Performance
Tracing
DMC
Strong v Bird
Quistclose Trusts
Advancement
Recission/UI
Election
Cy-Pres


Do you reckon that is enough to cover? I've been selective in my learning of some chapters. Leaving out Secret Trusts, the bulk of charitable trusts, Contructive Trusts.

Any advice/insight appreciated!

Fe1hayes

Dliodoir2021 wrote: »

CASSIS DI DIJON

Can anyone tell me the relevance? I have a big mindmap done up and can't figure out which art to put it under!

If anyone needs stuff for equity let me know!

It's selling characteristics under art 34 indistinctly applicable rules where they could try defend it under mandatory requirements of general principles alcohol content 25% or below could not be advertised tried to say drinking culture lower alcoholic drinks more people will drink. Think it Germany was held to be a an infringement not sure though. Only doing contract until Thursday.

Fe1hayes

Is it enough to do Institutions, Sol,Gen Principles,DE msl,Infringements and Prelim ref,FMG,FMW,JR,Comp law,Equality and citizenship. Also I am planning not looking at this until Thursday after contract so if anyone thinks I could cut something out or missing something please let me know.
In the city college recommended predictions they say not to bother with Infringements or prelim ref but cover all comp law with SA and mergers which is a trek.