FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTICE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

iamanengine

channing90 wrote: »

Contract
Could someone please put up the contract. Questions? Also to pass a question must you get all the facts of the case on paper ? I forgot a fact in a case

This is what I think came up anyway

Q1 Exclusion Clause/Consumer Protection - S.14
Q2 Promissory Estoppel/Implied Terms - Business Efficacy Test
Q3 Misrep, I think, didn’t do this
Q4 Undue Influence, I think, didn’t do this
Q5 Damages - Mitigation
Q6 Breach - Anticipatory, repudiatory and innominate terms
Q7 Privity
Q8 a. Construction of Terms - I answered on factual matrix test and mentioned parol evidence b. Not sure what this is

Would appreciate input here as I’m hoping I answered on the correct topics!!

SwD

iamanengine wrote: »

This is what I think came up anyway

Q1 Exclusion Clause/Consumer Protection - S.14
Q2 Promissory Estoppel/Implied Terms - Business Efficacy Test
Q3 Misrep, I think, didn’t do this
Q4 Undue Influence, I think, didn’t do this
Q5 Damages - Mitigation
Q6 Breach - Anticipatory, repudiatory and innominate terms
Q7 Privity
Q8 a. Construction of Terms - I answered on factual matrix test and mentioned parol evidence b. Not sure what this is

Would appreciate input here as I’m hoping I answered on the correct topics!!

I think question 4 was Unilateral Mistake - Non Est Factum - Friends First v Lavelle

channing90

SwD wrote: »

I think question 4 was Unilateral Mistake - Non Est Factum - Friends First v Lavelle

I thought question 4 was non est factum too tbh and that’s what I answered but someone said it was undue influence

20082014

EU

In relation to the general principles and proportionality, what cases are people using? I know any case can be used here but just looking to see if theres any ones in particular that should be mentioned

iamanengine

SwD wrote: »

I think question 4 was Unilateral Mistake - Non Est Factum - Friends First v Lavelle

Fair, I only glossed over it in the exam assuming it was misrep whoops!

Would have been a nice Q if I had copped

Edit - Misunderstood, I glossed over Q3 assuming it was Misrep, Q4 I thought was undue influence from a quick glance but I could def be wrong

SwD

channing90 wrote: »

I thought question 4 was non est factum too tbh and that’s what I answered but someone said it was undue influence

In my conclusion I suggested that the Court would overlook the obligation to enquire into the content by virtue of duress undue influence and capacity but that was it. Yikes, fingers crossed.

rightytighty

Contract

8(b)

Wrote about terms implied by fact (officious bystander, business efficacy, customs & practices tests) and by law (common law, constitution, statute)

Anyone know if this is correct? I know OB came up later

nmurphy1441

rightytighty wrote: »

Contract

8(b)

Wrote about terms implied by fact (officious bystander, business efficacy, customs & practices tests) and by law (common law, constitution, statute)

Anyone know if this is correct? I know OB came up later

That’s what I did too but not too sure if it’s right or not!!!