Hail To The Chief (Read Mod Warning In OP)

Sonics2k

You just can't make this stuff up. It's like he's 12 years old.

https://twitter.com/AndreaWoo/status/826145871511351297

darkpagandeath

Billy86 wrote: »

Nah, he'd just fire them as he has zero interest in the constitution.

Is that the best Answer.

Are you saying there was another option for the office of the President to let the stand in attorney General remain ?

A Little Pony

Grayson wrote: »

darkpagandeath wrote: »

I'm sure one will show the rest of the class where the U.S constitution will allow Trump to take over power and become a dictator.

http://morgenstern.jeffreykegler.com/

Godel was probably one of the greatest logicians ever. He apparently found a loophole in the constitution which would allow a dictator to take power.


However he never said what it was although there has been speculation. I doubt Trump or any of his cabinet are smart enough to figure this out.

That is why the 2nd amendment is vital and should never be replaced. The Founding Fathers put it in for a very good reason.

darkpagandeath

Sonics2k wrote: »

You just can't make this stuff up. It's like he's 12 years old.

https://twitter.com/AndreaWoo/status/826145871511351297

Media is obsessed by him and his twitter what's the Issue ? There going to bring up Twitter.

darkpagandeath

A Little Pony wrote: »

That is why the 2nd amendment is vital and should never be replaced. The Founding Fathers put it in for a very good reason.

Ah right so don't like democracy.... What is he doing that he was not voted in on to do ?

Billy86

darkpagandeath wrote: »

Is that the best Answer.

Are you saying there was another option for the office of the President to let the stand in attorney General remain ?

Why do you think she was grilled about if she would stand up to the President during her confirmation hearings?

darkpagandeath

Billy86 wrote: »

Why do you think she was grilled about if she would stand up to the President during her confirmation hearings?

Grilled ? You mean 1 question in 2014 ? What next she was waterboarded ?

Sonics2k

darkpagandeath wrote: »

Media is obsessed by him and his twitter what's the Issue ? There going to bring up Twitter.

Media was obsessed with Obama too.

It's pathetic, and I mean absolutely pathetic, that the President of the United States is so petty and self obsessed that he sends his Press Secretary out on stage in front of the media with print outs of the mean things said about him.

Even Bush didn't send out one of his Press Secretaries to complain about the mean things people said about him.

Billy86

darkpagandeath wrote: »

Grilled ? You mean 1 question in 2014 ? What next she was waterboarded ?

So why was she?

darkpagandeath

Sonics2k wrote: »

Media was obsessed with Obama too.

It's pathetic, and I mean absolutely pathetic, that the President of the United States is so petty and self obsessed that he sends his Press Secretary out on stage in front of the media with print outs of the mean things said about him.

Even Bush didn't send out one of his Press Secretaries to complain about the mean things people said about him.

Entirely new level of social media hatred this time around. Hard to attack Obama as he was black so they kind of left him alone. Cos you would not want to be seen as a racist on campus would you.

darkpagandeath

Billy86 wrote: »

So why was she?

You said Grilled care to retract that nonsense ?

Grayson

I don't know if it was mentioned before but someone edited the wiki page on invertebrates to add in Paul Ryan

A Little Pony

darkpagandeath wrote: »

A Little Pony wrote: »

That is why the 2nd amendment is vital and should never be replaced. The Founding Fathers put it in for a very good reason.

Ah right so don't like democracy.... What is he doing that he was not voted in on to do ?

Some things are fundamental to a country and the 2nd amendment is one. If Trump was to start overbearing his responsibilities, locking up journalists and limiting freedom of speech, then it is my opinion that the US citizens would be entitled to resist that by force if needs be.

But I seriously doubt it will come to that. I don't  see Trump writing into law the banning of free speech, right to assembly and banning guns. The first thing a dictator would do if they had any sense would be to get rid of the 2nd Amendment.

Billy86

darkpagandeath wrote: »

You said Grilled care to retract that nonsense ?

You can't answer why she was, can you?

darkpagandeath being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian... who would have guessed. :rolleyes:

Grayson

And Sean Spicer has been caught tweeting fake news. To be fair I don't think he knows what the onion is.

https://twitter.com/seanspicer/status/825565510418968578


http://nymag.com/selectall/2017/01/sean-spicer-retweets-the-onion-calling-job-misinformation.html

darkpagandeath

Billy86 wrote: »

You can't answer why she was, can you?

darkpagandeath being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian... who would have guessed. :rolleyes:

Why she was asked a Question ? is that not what they do in them ? I did not use Grilled and still claim credibility.

Sonics2k

darkpagandeath wrote: »

Entirely new level of social media hatred this time around. Hard to attack Obama as he was black so they kind of left him alone. Cos you would not want to be seen as a racist on campus would you.

Absolute trash.
Fox pushed the Birther narrative, Sean Hannity really loved to spread that nonsense around.
When he mentioned the ACA and the purpose of trying to get basic healthcare for all citizens they called him a communist.

Breitbart attacked him on a near daily basis.

You're just saying nonsense now.

BlinkingLights

Jelle1880 wrote: »

Any of his fans want to donate ?

Clearly the spray tanning costs are getting out of hand.

darkpagandeath

Sonics2k wrote: »

Absolute trash.
Fox pushed the Birther narrative, Sean Hannity really loved to spread that nonsense around.
When he mentioned the ACA and the purpose of trying to get basic healthcare for all citizens they called him a communist.

Breitbart attacked him on a near daily basis.

You're just saying nonsense now.

Drones ? Invading Pakistan. All let away. You are seriously claiming Barry did not get an extremely easy time from the media ? They were still gushing over him till the end. Did he stop torture ? Did he close Guantánamo ?

Love the use of Britbart as some kind of credibility.. Jesus. Who even reads that ?

ultra violet 5

i was talking to a gentleman yestrday and he said trump is a rastafari and listens to japanese techno

Trent Houseboat

darkpagandeath wrote: »

Are you saying there was another option for the office of the President to let the stand in attorney General remain ?

The alternative option exists, you're just blind in your devotion. That option was spend time drafting a bill and putting it to relevant departments to find out if it was legal, constitutional and workable.
Not just signing whatever piece of paper Steve Bannon puts in front of you.

He was elected president, not emperor, he wasn't given a mandate to rule by decree and then remove anyone who dissents after the fact.

uck51js9zml2yt

BlinkingLights wrote: »

He's going to run the country like an authoritarian CEO who takes no advice until he's either reaches the end of this tenure or is impeached, whichever comes first.

It's as simple as that really.

At this stage, I don't think we can expect any diplomacy or compromise from him. It's just going to be clash after clash.

It will certainly make up for Sky ditching Eurosport:)

Christy42

A Little Pony wrote: »

Some things are fundamental to a country and the 2nd amendment is one. If Trump was to start overbearing his responsibilities, locking up journalists and limiting freedom of speech, then it is my opinion that the US citizens would be entitled to resist that by force if needs be.

But I seriously doubt it will come to that. I don't  see Trump writing into law the banning of free speech, right to assembly and banning guns. The first thing a dictator would do if they had any sense would be to get rid of the 2nd Amendment.

The citizens would lose horrifically if the military was not on their side. The amendment was made in a very different age when a loosely armed militia could stand up to an army. Now with increased military intellegence and weaponry (citizens can't really call on air support or many tanks). Any serious effort to organise would also likely be caught quickly.

All a dictator needs is the army and intellegence services on his side really and citizens won't be able to resist violently. I would leave the second amendment for quite a while if I thought it would give reassurances to the populace.

(Note: this is arguing against the point that the second amendment provides a serious defense against dictators, I am not saying that Trump is about to lock up journalists).

Billy86

darkpagandeath wrote: »

Why she was asked a Question ? is that not what they do in them ? I did not use Grilled and still claim credibility.

Why did they want to make sure that she would stand up to the president if they were going to just fire her for doing it?

You're not going to answer this, are you?

Grayson

Christy42 wrote: »

The citizens would lose horrifically if the military was not on their side. The amendment was made in a very different age when a loosely armed militia could stand up to an army. Now with increased military intellegence and weaponry (citizens can't really call on air support or many tanks). Any serious effort to organise would also likely be caught quickly.

All a dictator needs is the army and intellegence services on his side really and citizens won't be able to resist violently. I would leave the second amendment for quite a while if I thought it would give reassurances to the populace.

(Note: this is arguing against the point that the second amendment provides a serious defense against dictators, I am not saying that Trump is about to lock up journalists).

As Jim Jeffries says, "You're bring an assault rifle to a drone fight"

kunst nugget

darkpagandeath wrote: »

Love the use of Britbart as some kind of credibility.. Jesus. Who even reads that ?

And yet Steve Bannon now has a regular seat at the National Security Council…

darkpagandeath

Trent Houseboat wrote: »

The alternative option exists, you're just blind in your devotion. That option was spend time drafting a bill and putting it to relevant departments to find out if it was legal, constitutional and workable.
Not just signing whatever piece of paper Steve Bannon puts in front of you.

He was elected president, not emperor, he wasn't given a mandate to rule by decree and then remove anyone who dissents after the fact.

What are you on about I live in Ireland. Can you explain how these pieces of paper one is calling them are unconstitutional ? They have not been found to be yet. You do realise where those pieces of paper have to go ?

darkpagandeath

Billy86 wrote: »

Why did they want to make sure that she would stand up to the president if they were going to just fire her for doing it?

You're not going to answer this, are you?

No idea do you own a time machine I don't ? It was 2014.

MightyMandarin

Billy86 wrote: »

Why did they want to make sure that she would stand up to the president if they were going to just fire her for doing it?

You're not going to answer this, are you?

There's no point in trying to squeeze an answer from darkpagandeath, I had the same issue a few days ago. As slimy a poster as you'll find around here.

darkpagandeath

kunst nugget wrote: »

And yet Steve Bannon now has a regular seat at the National Security Council…

What has that got to do with the context of what I replied to ?