Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Waggle your 'Joystick' - Post your 3Dmark Scores here

Options
12467…14

Comments

  • Options
    #92
    .G.
    Registered Users Posts: 5,415 ✭✭✭.G.


    Depends on what games you want a comparison of. I might not have them.


  • Options
    #93
    challengemaster
    Registered Users Posts: 16,931 ✭✭✭✭challengemaster


    F*ck it, made a massive mistake. Was running hugely outdated drivers, I only copped when I saw Jayo's scores.

    (in terms of how out of date - I was using 353.82, latest is 368.81)

    Dx11 new score: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13687103?

    That's a boost of ~1500. And that brings it to just about the exact same score as ShadowHearth's 2500 + 1060 combo.

    Dx12: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13687311?

    Boost of 670


  • Options
    #94
    jayo26
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,779 ✭✭✭✭jayo26


    challengemaster wrote: »
    F*ck it, made a massive mistake. Was running hugely outdated drivers, I only copped when I saw Jayo's scores.

    (in terms of how out of date - I was using 353.82, latest is 368.81)

    Dx11 new score: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13687103?

    That's a boost of ~1500. And that brings it to just about the exact same score as ShadowHearth's 2500 + 1060 combo.

    Dx12: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13687311?

    Boost of 670

    Where have mine gone wrong so is it yours is not stock settings?


  • Options
    #95
    wotzgoingon
    Registered Users Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    jayo26 wrote: »
    challengemaster wrote: »
    F*ck it, made a massive mistake. Was running hugely outdated drivers, I only copped when I saw Jayo's scores.

    (in terms of how out of date - I was using 353.82, latest is 368.81)

    Dx11 new score: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13687103?

    That's a boost of ~1500. And that brings it to just about the exact same score as ShadowHearth's 2500 + 1060 combo.

    Dx12: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13687311?

    Boost of 670

    Where have mine gone wrong so is it yours is not stock settings?
    He is using a Z170 motherboard with a old bios to unlock the blck over clocking of the CPU. He also has his GPU over clocked at higher frequencies than you.


  • Options
    #96
    challengemaster
    Registered Users Posts: 16,931 ✭✭✭✭challengemaster


    jayo26 wrote: »
    Where have mine gone wrong so is it yours is not stock settings?

    I've my i5 6400 @4.1Ghz and my GPU is 1400Mhz + GDDR5@7225Mhz. It's actually boosting to 1463Mhz under load. It's the Asus Strix 970 too, just done using GPU TweakII.

    Like ^himself says, I'm using an Asrock Z170 with the SKYOC bios to enable overclocking on the non-k cpu.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #97
    mossym
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭mossym


    no waggling here, but just for giggles i ran firecrest dx11 test on my new build. giggles bit it currently has a 5670 with 512mb of memory in it, an old card i am using until my new card arrives. a whopping score of 906 :)

    http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13697925

    only posting it as sitting here waiting on my new 1070 to arrive today, so will run it again once it gets here, suspecting there may be a bit of an increase..:)


  • Options
    #98
    cursai
    Registered Users Posts: 2,915 ✭✭✭cursai


    superg wrote: »
    Depends on what games you want a comparison of. I might not have them.

    The division, far cry 4, metro, crisis 3....


  • Options
    #99
    Xenoronin
    Registered Users Posts: 1,307 ✭✭✭Xenoronin


    mossym wrote: »
    no waggling here, but just for giggles i ran firecrest dx11 test on my new build. giggles bit it currently has a 5670 with 512mb of memory in it, an old card i am using until my new card arrives. a whopping score of 906 :)

    Absolutely crushed that Office PC from 2013. Is that old graphics card actually better than the integrated graphics on the 6500?


  • Options
    #100
    mossym
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭mossym


    Xenoronin wrote: »
    Absolutely crushed that Office PC from 2013. Is that old graphics card actually better than the integrated graphics on the 6500?

    it probably isn't, that thought never occured to me when i was building so i jsut stuck it in. something i read a week ago made me wonder was that the case, but i said i'd wait until the new card came to pull apart.


    played a bit of division on it, even with everything turned down it's stuttering along. funny thing is the card is meant to be a 5770, 1 gig of ram, says so on the sticker, and my order confirmation from years ago says so. but shows up in the system as a 5670 with 512mb. think i was done and never realised it. it was used in my htpc for a few years so neer noticed

    really can't wait to get the new card, due for delivery between 1 and 2 today according to dpd.


  • Options
    #101
    ShadowHearth
    Registered Users Posts: 22,929 ✭✭✭✭ShadowHearth


    challengemaster wrote: »
    F*ck it, made a massive mistake. Was running hugely outdated drivers, I only copped when I saw Jayo's scores.

    (in terms of how out of date - I was using 353.82, latest is 368.81)

    Dx11 new score: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13687103?

    That's a boost of ~1500. And that brings it to just about the exact same score as ShadowHearth's 2500 + 1060 combo.

    Dx12: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13687311?

    Boost of 670

    Now thats the benchmarks i love to see. :)

    I woke up today and Oced my cpu to 4.1ghz after sorting out my ram issue and that slight overclock on my 1060. I got this result:

    http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13699776?

    Its actually really interesting.

    Our CPU scores are very similar. I think if I would do proper overclock and try get usual 4.5ghz I would match your cpu. Pretty damn good for old 2500k!
    In gpu 1060 is getting slightly better score, but not by much. I guess with time and drivers 1060 will go a bit more ahead.

    If what, by the looks of it old 2500k and pcie 2.0 is still not a bottleneck for 1060.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #102
    wotzgoingon
    Registered Users Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    ShadowHearth, will you do a benchmark of the new timespy dx12 with the 1060 as I would like to see what score you get.


  • Options
    #103
    mossym
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭mossym


    mossym wrote: »
    no waggling here, but just for giggles i ran firecrest dx11 test on my new build. giggles bit it currently has a 5670 with 512mb of memory in it, an old card i am using until my new card arrives. a whopping score of 906 :)

    http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13697925

    only posting it as sitting here waiting on my new 1070 to arrive today, so will run it again once it gets here, suspecting there may be a bit of an increase..:)

    1070 arrived. installed.

    906 this morning.

    slight improvement alright

    http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13702822?


  • Options
    #104
    Redfox25
    Registered Users Posts: 1,517 ✭✭✭Redfox25


    mossym wrote: »
    1070 arrived. installed.

    906 this morning.

    slight improvement alright

    http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13702822?

    Hardly worth the upgrade really..........
    :)


  • Options
    #105
    ShadowHearth
    Registered Users Posts: 22,929 ✭✭✭✭ShadowHearth


    wotzgoingon wrote: »
    ShadowHearth, will you do a benchmark of the new timespy dx12 with the 1060 as I would like to see what score you get.

    I am still on win 7 m8. I think dx12 is only for new windows?
    I don't have spy one, isthat the one you pay?


  • Options
    #106
    .G.
    Registered Users Posts: 5,415 ✭✭✭.G.


    cursai wrote: »
    The division, far cry 4, metro, crisis 3....

    I have the first and the last of those.I don't play either of them anymore but If I have time I'll give it a bash.


  • Options
    #107
    .G.
    Registered Users Posts: 5,415 ✭✭✭.G.


    Crysis maxed out only getting to mid 30's at 4k. The Division a bit higher, early 40's. Geforce experience optimal settings and they both hit 60 no issue and still look every bit as good to my eyes.


  • Options
    #108
    wotzgoingon
    Registered Users Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    ShadowHearth wrote: »
    I am still on win 7 m8. I think dx12 is only for new windows?
    I don't have spy one, isthat the one you pay?

    Why are you still using a soon to be legacy OS?
    I would recommend the upgrade to Win 10.


  • Options
    #109
    mossym
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭mossym


    wotzgoingon wrote: »
    Why are you still using a soon to be legacy OS?
    I would recommend the upgrade to Win 10.

    and if so do it quick, runs out today doesn't it?


  • Options
    #110
    wotzgoingon
    Registered Users Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    mossym wrote: »
    and if so do it quick, runs out today doesn't it?

    Just looked it up and yes you are right the deadline is today.


  • Options
    #111
    ShadowHearth
    Registered Users Posts: 22,929 ✭✭✭✭ShadowHearth


    wotzgoingon wrote: »
    Why are you still using a soon to be legacy OS?
    I would recommend the upgrade to Win 10.

    I havent had a
    Legit
    ~Windows copy since 95.

    Prices of windows 10 is a bit lialia right now. And I dont know about those keys from reddit. Too many people get their revoked.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #112
    challengemaster
    Registered Users Posts: 16,931 ✭✭✭✭challengemaster


    ShadowHearth wrote: »
    I havent had a
    Legit
    ~Windows copy since 95.

    Prices of windows 10 is a bit lialia right now. And I dont know about those keys from reddit. Too many people get their revoked.

    Pretty sure once you use the key to upgrade nothing can happen to it.


  • Options
    #113
    Cuddlesworth
    Registered Users Posts: 13,980 ✭✭✭✭Cuddlesworth


    superg wrote: »
    Crysis maxed out only getting to mid 30's at 4k. The Division a bit higher, early 40's. Geforce experience optimal settings and they both hit 60 no issue and still look every bit as good to my eyes.

    Crytek(makers) were really always engine makers who set their sights on ****ting all over current gen cards. I don't think they ever gave a crap about sales. I'm not surprised a 3 year old game from them still creates problems at 4k.


  • Options
    #114
    EoinHef
    Registered Users Posts: 5,571 ✭✭✭EoinHef


    EoinHef wrote: »
    CPU Score is holding me back,its next on the list for an upgrade,probably next year some time.

    Still dialing in an overclock but this result is with gpu +103 core and +155 memory,tops out about 76C in the benchmark. CPU is @ 4.3Ghz

    Will update with DX12 scores at a later date


    DX11: http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9493546

    Adding DX12

    DX12:http://www.3dmark.com/spy/175742


  • Options
    #115
    cursai
    Registered Users Posts: 2,915 ✭✭✭cursai


    superg wrote: »
    Crysis maxed out only getting to mid 30's at 4k. The Division a bit higher, early 40's. Geforce experience optimal settings and they both hit 60 no issue and still look every bit as good to my eyes.

    Thanks for that. Getting around the same with a 980ti. but hitting the division mid thirties.


  • Options
    #116
    MarkAnthony
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,934 ✭✭✭MarkAnthony


    Frame rates on a 1080 @ 3440 x 1440:

    Doom - 100FPS+
    Warhammer Total war - 40-50FPS
    Fallout 4 - 75 FPS ish - haven't tested this much.


  • Options
    #117
    .G.
    Registered Users Posts: 5,415 ✭✭✭.G.


    Cooling is everything on these cards, overclocks don't matter much it seems. I can put up to 150mhz on my card but all that happens is it gets hotter faster and throttles the boost quicker. if I put 50mhz on it it ends up hovering at 75c and boost of 2012ish. If I go higher it will boost higher but once it hits the mid 70s in temps the boost drops back to the same level as with 50Mhz on it.

    So those Palit, Gainward, Inno cards with massive coolers may well do the better job of holding higher boosts.


  • Options
    #118
    cursai
    Registered Users Posts: 2,915 ✭✭✭cursai


    superg wrote: »
    Cooling is everything on these cards, overclocks don't matter much it seems. I can put up to 150mhz on my card but all that happens is it gets hotter faster and throttles the boost quicker. if I put 50mhz on it it ends up hovering at 75c and boost of 2012ish. If I go higher it will boost higher but once it hits the mid 70s in temps the boost drops back to the same level as with 50Mhz on it.

    So those Palit, Gainward, Inno cards with massive coolers may well do the better job of holding higher boosts.

    Get the AMD version of the 1080


  • Options
    #119
    EoinHef
    Registered Users Posts: 5,571 ✭✭✭EoinHef


    superg wrote: »
    Cooling is everything on these cards, overclocks don't matter much it seems. I can put up to 150mhz on my card but all that happens is it gets hotter faster and throttles the boost quicker. if I put 50mhz on it it ends up hovering at 75c and boost of 2012ish. If I go higher it will boost higher but once it hits the mid 70s in temps the boost drops back to the same level as with 50Mhz on it.

    So those Palit, Gainward, Inno cards with massive coolers may well do the better job of holding higher boosts.

    Thats why i was asking for your temps the other day. Ive found my card will happily OC with +100 core and +200 memory with a power limit of 95%,boost will then hoover around 2000Mhz-2050Mhz. Also using a a custom fan profile to keep the card reasonably cool,the zotac stock one was terrible and the card shot straight to 82C with no OC,with the custom profile i can keep it to about 77C but with the OC.


  • Options
    #120
    .G.
    Registered Users Posts: 5,415 ✭✭✭.G.


    EoinHef wrote: »
    Thats why i was asking for your temps the other day. Ive found my card will happily OC with +100 core and +200 memory with a power limit of 95%,boost will then hoover around 2000Mhz-2050Mhz. Also using a a custom fan profile to keep the card reasonably cool,the zotac stock one was terrible and the card shot straight to 82C with no OC,with the custom profile i can keep it to about 77C but with the OC.

    I found a memory OC actually made the card worse! Keeping them at mid 70's seems to be the key, anything higher and they throttle. I haven't touched power limits or fan profiles yet either.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #121
    EoinHef
    Registered Users Posts: 5,571 ✭✭✭EoinHef


    Yeah mid 70's would be ideal,im finding with the zotac that the fans become audible around 75% so once the cards hits 70C they ramp up to that as its the highest i really want them going as i dont want the rig to be loud,that keeps the card j in the 70's (78C max) with the games that push it hardest like Witcher and Crysis 3.


Advertisement