Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General Election 2016 - Louth Constituiency

Options
13468911

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,027 ✭✭✭sunshine and showers


    Maeve Yore was very passionate about services for disabled children. She has a child for whom she has being trying to secure services for a number of years.

    The impression I got is that she is a single issue candidate. The issue in question is an important issue, but I think the General Election is for electing a government that will deal with a huge range of issues.

    That's kind of the impression I got. Maybe I'll change my mind if I get some literature from her. I'm going off her website right now and all it says under Healthcare (for example) is: Our healthcare system is in crisis. We have to evaluate what we want as a society. For Childcare: is a major issue for parents particularly where both parents are out working.Childcare costs should be fair and reasonable for all.

    Usually people are in politics a lot longer than 18 months before they get that vague! :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,906 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    I thought the standard of candidates last night was shockingly bad.

    Fitzpatrick is shocking. Really ashamed he represents my constituency. He was put up as a candidate for one reason and one reason only.

    Coffey was appalling. She came across as overly aggressive and was clearly reading from a script, but still looked and sounded completely lost.

    Kevin Callan was coherent at least, but I don't buy his anti-government, anti-water stance. He would still be in Fine Gael if they promised him a place on the GE ticket.

    The older FF guy wasn't too bad, although I think he only spoke twice.

    The AAA/PBP candidate was an embarrassment, as was the Direct Democracy guy.

    The God-guy was bemusing.

    Fergus O'Dowd sounds polished, but once pushed on issues or given a hard question he quickly descends into waffle.

    Ged Nash was definitely the most coherent and well-spoken, but he had no answers on some of the cuts labour made. He also has a very "me! me! me!" focus." "I brought in this" "I have achieved this". You would swear he has been running the country single-handedly the past 5 years.

    Michael O'Dowd didn't get an awful lot of screen-time either, and didn't make much of an impression with the time he was given.

    Imelda Munster didn't say much of substance aside from defending Gerry.

    Mark Dearey came across as the most sincere imo, even if I don't agree with all the Green policies.

    For me, I'm probably leaning Deary>Nash>F. O'Dowd


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,838 ✭✭✭doncarlos


    Mark Deary came across as the most sincere imo, even if I don't agree with all the Green policies.

    Actually forgot all about Deary. Haven't seen the Vincent Brown debate but he has always come across very sincere in any dealings I've had with him. I'll likely give him one of my votes, not sure of first preference but possibly.

    I'm always a little warey of environmentalists as the more militant ones seem to be anti progress. Haven't seen any evidence of this from Deary yet.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,468 ✭✭✭White Horse


    doncarlos wrote: »
    Actually forgot all about Deary. Haven't seen the Vincent Brown debate but he has always come across very sincere in any dealings I've had with him. I'll likely give him one of my votes, not sure of first preference but possibly.

    I'm always a little warey of environmentalists as the more militant ones seem to be anti progress. Haven't seen any evidence of this from Deary yet.

    Dearey came across very sincere and intelligent. It's jus a pity that he is a Green.

    I find them obsessed with Dublin and always looking down their noses at rural Ireland.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,838 ✭✭✭doncarlos


    Dearey came across very sincere and intelligent. It's jus a pity that he is a Green.

    I find them obsessed with Dublin and always looking down their noses at rural Ireland.

    Well if he does get in may just be him on his lonesome. Maybe Eamon Ryan and Trevor Sargent at a stretch.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,098 ✭✭✭MonkeyTennis


    Mark should run as an Indpendent with strong green tendencies. The green partys name is still mud


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 42,420 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lord TSC


    Dearey called to my door the other day. Seemed a really nice chap, well spoken and not the usual Politican vibe about him. Not sure if thats enough to get a vote, but he shot himself up the list based on the conversation I had with him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    I listened to Gerry Adams being interviewed at length on Today with Sean O'Rourke this morning. He hadn't a clue about taxation and kept insisting their proposed marginal tax rate after 100k would be 7%. O'Rourke said 59%. "No" said Gerry "7%". A spokesman at one o'clock had to clarify that it was in fact 59%.
    In addition Gerry never answered a single straight question with a straight answer. Every time he veered off the question asked and the interviewer tried to get him back on topic, he came out with "if you'll let me finish" and variations on this.

    A very poor performance.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,468 ✭✭✭White Horse


    I listened to Gerry Adams being interviewed at length on Today with Sean O'Rourke this morning. He hadn't a clue about taxation and kept insisting their proposed marginal tax rate after 100k would be 7%. O'Rourke said 59%. "No" said Gerry "7%". A spokesman at one o'clock had to clarify that it was in fact 59%.
    In addition Gerry never answered a single straight question with a straight answer. Every time he veered off the question asked and the interviewer tried to get him back on topic, he came out with "if you'll let me finish" and variations on this.

    A very poor performance.

    Adams had upped his game on economics during this campaign. However, this was a reversion to his usual standards.

    What does Dundalk get out of having Gerry Adams as a TD. He has no affinity or interest in the area?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭PGE1970


    Mark Dearey is, by all accounts, a thoroughly decent fellow. However, I still see the Greens as being, primarily, a largely single issue party.

    I note a previous post about Ged Nash focusing, somewhat repeatedly, about his achievements. I can see where the poster is but I would say that, to his credit, his achievements have been in relation to national issues such as minimum wage increases etc.

    If I was a junior minister, I'd probably want to reinforce that with the electorate also (depending on how I performed, of course!).

    Again, it harks back to the macro rather than the micro.

    However, I suspect parish pump politics might prevail as usual. Despite not bothering to show up, Gerry Adams will probably romp home on an agenda of "every citizen is entitled to ABC" without ever explaining how he/SF will pay for it. He may also bring home his running mate in which case Nash would be vulnerable and that, I feel, would be a pity for the county.

    It is a democracy after all!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    Adams had upped his game on economics during this campaign. However, this was a reversion to his usual standards.

    What does Dundalk get out of having Gerry Adams as a TD. He has no affinity or interest in the area?

    That's something that has become abundantly clear in the past month or six weeks. He has no interest in Louth. That said I don't necessarily vote for someone because of local issues. He, however, seems at more of a remove from his constituency than any of the others.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,838 ✭✭✭doncarlos


    What does Dundalk get out of having Gerry Adams as a TD. He has no affinity or interest in the area?

    Couldn't agree more. He really took the easy option for running in Louth where he was always guaranteed a seat.
    I'd much rather see a local like Thomas Sharkey running. Another potential candidate that i'd have a lot of time for.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,838 ✭✭✭doncarlos


    PGE1970 wrote: »
    Mark Dearey is, by all accounts, a thoroughly decent fellow. However, I still see the Greens as being, primarily, a largely single issue party.

    I note a previous post about Ged Nash focusing, somewhat repeatedly, about his achievements. I can see where the poster is but I would say that, to his credit, his achievements have been in relation to national issues such as minimum wage increases etc.

    If I was a junior minister, I'd probably want to reinforce that with the electorate also (depending on how I performed, of course!).

    Again, it harks back to the macro rather than the micro.

    However, I suspect parish pump politics might prevail as usual. Despite not bothering to show up, Gerry Adams will probably romp home on an agenda of "every citizen is entitled to ABC" without ever explaining how he/SF will pay for it. He may also bring home his running mate in which case Nash would be vulnerable and that, I feel, would be a pity for the county.

    It is a democracy after all!

    While TDs have a responsibility for the best of the nation, they also have a responsibility for their constituents. Adams has done nothing for Louth but he'll still romp home next week


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,027 ✭✭✭sunshine and showers


    doncarlos wrote: »
    While TDs have a responsibility for the best of the nation, they also have a responsibility for their constituents. Adams has done nothing for Louth but he'll still romp home next week

    By an embarrassingly large margin too. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 51,524 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    That was some rubbish last night in the Carrickdale.
    Nash was by far the best of a bad lot.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,468 ✭✭✭White Horse


    That was some rubbish last night in the Carrickdale.
    Nash was by far the best of a bad lot.

    Vincent Browne was the worst and he was the presenter.

    The fellow who wanted to vote for God made more sense.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    Car crash interview with Adams right now on RTE TV news.


  • Registered Users Posts: 51,524 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Adams can't seem to get his sums right at all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,995 ✭✭✭10green bottles


    VB totally lost the plot as a moderator last night,talked over everyone as they tried to make their points and then told others off for doing exactly the same thing! I have always enjoyed the Peoples Debate shows but last night was the worst one.
    #DebateDebacle


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,838 ✭✭✭doncarlos


    Car crash interview with Adams right now on RTE TV news.

    Jesus. That was desperate


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    They were whinging about RTE not showing enougj of them not so long ago :p


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,098 ✭✭✭MonkeyTennis


    jeepers, I watched a bit of the debate. I'll be polite and say its hard to watch


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭PGE1970


    Out of curiosity, I watched a bit of the debate last night (from Dublin 15).

    By comparison, it was controlled and measured. The significant difference, for the 30 mins or so that I watched, was the audience who seemed to be less vocal and disruptive.

    The Louth debate was a bit of a free-for-all by comparison!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,080 ✭✭✭mada999


    pen123 wrote: »
    The only people Sinn Fein/AAA/PBP care about are those on welfare. The more people on welfare & the worse the country is the better for them. That's what they exploit for votes. They don't want these people getting jobs & doing well in life. I am in my early thirties & not rich but I am lucky to have a job but Sinn Fein won't mean more money in my pocket as they want me to keep paying the USC. If you work in any sector you won't be getting anything off them.

    First of all lets get into this USC thing, that a lot of people here have been bigging up:

    If you are going to vote for FG because they are "abolishing the USC" then you should probably read exactly what they are going to do for you.

    Lets have a look at the manifesto - word for word

    ZZBZs3o.png

    There are curently 4 rates of USC
    U9AAUAM.png

    So they are only pledging to reduce the 5.5% rate by 1% in Jan 2017 - how long is that away again ? There's NO mention of the first two rate bands being reduced at all and the higher rate of 8% will stay the same.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,468 ✭✭✭White Horse


    mada999 wrote: »
    First of all lets get into this USC thing, that a lot of people here have been bigging up:

    If you are going to vote for FG because they are "abolishing the USC" then you should probably read exactly what they are going to do for you.

    Lets have a look at the manifesto - word for word

    ZZBZs3o.png

    There are curently 4 rates of USC
    U9AAUAM.png

    So they are only pledging to reduce the 5.5% rate by 1% in Jan 2017 - how long is that away again ? There's NO mention of the first two rate bands being reduced at all and the higher rate of 8% will stay the same.

    Jan 2017 is less than 11 months away. The next budget deals with tax issues starting on 1 Jan 2017.

    They are prioritising middle income earners, who are the people who bear the greatest burden of tax.


  • Registered Users Posts: 51,524 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Jan 2017 is less than 11 months away. The next budget deals with tax issues starting on 1 Jan 2017.

    They are prioritising middle income earners, who are the people who bear the greatest burden of tax.

    Hallelujah. BUT let's hope it's not just more broken promises from them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,080 ✭✭✭mada999


    Jan 2017 is less than 11 months away. The next budget deals with tax issues starting on 1 Jan 2017.

    They are prioritising middle income earners, who are the people who bear the greatest burden of tax.

    Yup myself included, but to be honest i'd rather pay a bit more and get some good services out of it.

    As a middle income earner i'd be more scared in 2018 when the water charges will be going up and also 2019 when the LPT goes up.

    However, for FG to to say they are "abolishing" the USC is very misleading dont you think?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I just got to watch the TV3 People's Debate for Louth earlier, it wasn't easy viewing. While I might not be much clearer on who I will be voting for next Friday, the debate at least served to help me rule out a few candidates;

    Emma Coffey - If she knows what she is talking about, she did not do a very good job of showing it on the night, even with her script.

    Anthony Connor - The man is passionate, give him that, but just seemed to be there to mainly shout at Kevin Callan.

    Mary Moran - Ah, just no.

    Peter Fitzpatrick - Performed better at the debate than I imagined he would, but I fundamentally disagree with the reason he's there in the first place, so no.

    Gareth Weldon - I do like that 'regular' people are giving politics a go and trying to change something rather than just give out about it, but like Anthony Connor, I did not find anything inspirational in what Gareth had to say. Unfortunately, I cannot imagine these guys having what it takes to deal with all aspects of the job, let alone the causes they seem passionate about.

    Gerry Adams - Not even showing up, I will barely look at his name on the ballot, only to fill out a very low preference.

    Rather than now listing those who impressed me, cause they were scarce, I'll name those who didn't put me off...

    Ged Nash - One who did impress me. I do not agree with everything he says and his party allegiance should be enough to put me off giving him the preference, but I think he is a doer and comes across as someone who knows his job.

    Kevin Callan - Kevin has been hard at it on the ground in mid-Louth and Drogheda by the looks of it. Maybe someday he could be a worthy politician, or as close to one as can exist, but for now and the next few years I would like to see him back-up more of his talk and presence in the community. He is too fresh out of the FG party, too soon for me to decide if it was genuinely because of his beliefs, or just because he couldn't get on the party ticket for this election. There's potential there though.

    Mark Deary - The only candidate I'm familiar with, I know Mark loosely from playing in and socialising in his very well-run premises, the Spirit Store in Dundalk. However, I had never heard him talk in a political debate before and thought he came across well. I have some issues with the Greens, but at times a candidate's qualities can make me overlook the party, especially if the party have no hope of being the controlling partner in a coalition and therefore not get to enact all those policies.

    Imelda Munster - Thought she held her own mostly, did as well as she could considering Vinny B was intent on derailing the debate into an anti-SF episode.* Like the Greens, I have some issues with SF, but them as a minority partner in a coalition does not fill me with dread like it does to some. I do think they have some young, promising politicians and might one day be fit to govern, but that day is far away IMO and always will be with Gerry at the helm and the old-guard still around. Also, they need to ease up on their quest to punish the rich. Imelda did falter when Vinny B (or someone else present) pushed her on SF's stance on taxing high earners.

    Fergus O'Dowd - I haven't much fondness for him and some of the things he says, but he is clearly a politician and has been an active part of the government which held office when the country emerged from the worst point in its modern financial history. Between the two FG candidates running in our area, he'll be the one who does better on my ballot.

    Maeve Yore - Very passionate about her belief in special needs care, very important issue in the country but just one of many important issues. She did speak well and alluded to the possibility that her knowledge also drifts outside of her main cause. No harm if she gets in, no great gain to the overall good either as an Independent but I would like to see her achieve her goals. There are many fantastic people looking after those with special needs around the country, but their resources have taken a hammering.

    Declan Breathnach - It's mad to say it about a FFer, but he seems like a decent man. He wants to make it easier for SME's to do business and do away with some pointless red-tape, this is an important and sensible cause in my book. I also like the way that he did something rare in election debates, and said that he agreed with a point that Mark Deary from the Greens made. The point was in relation to these business hurdles in Dundalk, and for a moment made me think it possible for members from rival parties to rise above and take on the issues. Like Deary, a candidate whose party allegiance I would consider overlooking because of the man.

    Michael O'Dowd - Could have tried to get in more on some issues on the night, but spoke well when he did speak. I'm not too keen on Renua though so that will probably be a deciding factor for me next Friday.

    Pat Greene - Barely featured at all, but when he did I missed the screen caption with his name and party and was left wondering 'Who was that guy? He made some good points.' Is DDI the way forward? From my limited knowledge of the party, not really. While I do think that as a nation we paid a drastically unfair amount for the Euro crisis, I think the ship has sailed on recouping that money and from now on parties should be looking at ways to prevent the need for a bailout. Learn from the past by all means, and please do, but I think trying to fix it at this stage is a task akin to pissing in the wind.

    Dave Bradley - God is going to fix everything. You know what? Let Dave at it, this sort of thing is no harm in isolation :D He did say something that resonated with me - People seemed a bit less greedy around here pre-Celtic Tiger. There's no way to prove it or fix it, so while I believe that his heart is in the right place he might be better suited to writing rather than politics.

    That's where I'm at with the current crop of candidates. Overall they are not the best bunch but there's enough there to fill five seats. Whether they are the right five or not is obviously down to each voter, but I think I'd like to see Breathnach, Deary, Nash, F. O'Dowd and Maeve Yore get the nominations. That could change by voting time though.

    As for the debate itself, I thought Vinny B. stifled it and the crowd were a little noisy, and also too eager to applaud. Don't get me wrong, it was nice to hear that applause once or twice in agreement with a candidate telling Vinny B that he was interrupting too much, but between the crowd, control of them, and Vinny B's personal agenda there was so much time wasted.

    *On Vinny B's agenda - The Gerry Adams no-show was fully deserving of some kind of call-out and verbal reprimand on the airwaves, but I think Browne clearly overdid it at many times. At one point, he was asking (read: erupting at) Imelda Munster to make an official statement on one piece of press speculation about witnesses in a Slab Murphy case. Vinny B no more gives a hoot about the people of Louth or the current election issues, all he wanted to do was rile up any kind of anti-SF sentiment. I say this as a person who is not their greatest fan, but I was disappointed with Vincent Browne and his desire to stifle and derail the debate he should have been there to host. I remember when I first became aware of Browne years ago, I thought it was fresh to see someone challenge politicians with hard questions. By now though, I think he has completely jumped the shark and has entered 'parody of himself' territory.

    Winners on the night: Nash, Fergus O'Dowd, not the people of Louth, the audience commentator who hit F. O'Dowd about the amount of people in mortgage arrears and the failure to do anything notable about the problem. "Listen Fergus and you might learn something" :D He found it amusing himself.

    Losers on the night: Most of the Independents, Emma Coffey, the people of Louth, organised debate.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,468 ✭✭✭White Horse


    mada999 wrote: »
    ....to be honest i'd rather pay a bit more and get some good services out of it.

    I spent 20 years arguing against tax reductions and saying we should invest in better public services.

    It's horrible when it dawns on you that that will never happen.

    I know realise that improved public services is impossible in Ireland. The system is clogged with vested interests who will ensure that any additional investment goes into their pocket.

    Just look at the frenzy of vultures who syphoned off the billions that the FF governments of the Celtic Tiger years poured into the public sector.

    The best place for the money YOU earn is YOUR pocket. YOU can then look after YOUR own family.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 51,524 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    I spent 20 years arguing against tax reductions and saying we should invest in better public services.

    It's horrible when it dawns on you that that will never happen.

    I know realise that improved public services is impossible in Ireland. The system is clogged with vested interests who will ensure that any additional investment goes into their pocket.

    Just look at the frenzy of vultures who syphoned off the billions that the FF governments of the Celtic Tiger years poured into the public sector.

    The best place for the money YOU earn is YOUR pocket. YOU can then look after YOUR own family.

    As middle income workers we pay roughly 52% taxes and Levies. Add to that the Water Charges. You are taxed at source then VAT is added to everything you buy with the remainder. Hard to keep it in our pockets with those rates.


Advertisement