David Norris - Social welfare shouldn't be spent on alcohol

Roger_007

David Norris says he doesn't want his "tax dollars" to be spent on drink!

http://www.thejournal.ie/david-norris-welfare-drink-2496750-Dec2015/?utm_source=email

He seems to forget that it's our tax dollars which pay him.

Lights On

When did we start using dollars?

Nodin

Roger_007 wrote: »

David Norris says he doesn't want his "tax dollars" to be spent on drink!

http://www.thejournal.ie/david-norris-welfare-drink-2496750-Dec2015/?utm_source=email

He seems to forget that it's our tax dollars which pay him.

Between this and the rant about RTE the other day, I'm beginning to think oul Dave is losin his marbles.

Mesrine65

David Norris says a lot of things but very little of any consequence...

AnonoBoy

Roger_007 wrote: »

He seems to forget that it's our tax dollars which pay him.

"My dole pays your wages!"

Flatzie_poo

Roger_007 wrote: »

David Norris says he doesn't want his "tax dollars" to be spent on drink!

http://www.thejournal.ie/david-norris-welfare-drink-2496750-Dec2015/?utm_source=email

He seems to forget that it's our tax dollars which pay him.

I don't think he wants all welfare recipients not to drink, he wants them unable to binge drink.

But granted he very badly worded it, like here;

wrote:

Asked by presenter Ivan Yates if he was proposing that people on welfare should not be allowed to buy a drink, Norris said:
Not with tax money, no. I don’t think tax is for people to be drinking all the time, and I see them all around my area buying slabs of drinks for virtually nothing.

Jim Bob Scratcher

Lights On wrote: »

When did we start using dollars?

Since the Irish man brought down the flight from NY to Vegas.

RayM

Not the first stupid thing he's said this week. He's probably on a lot of medication. I wonder if that affects his judgement.

Sheep Lover

What a stupid comment.

What would people on the dole do all day otherwise?

The Backwards Man

Anybody that's spending money on drink that they should be spending on more important matters shouldn't be drinking, whether they are on the dole or millionaire's row.

Tabnabs

The other political scroungers (PBP) are not happy to have their entitlements questioned

https://twitter.com/KarlGill/status/675281686310068224

Jim Bob Scratcher

Sheep Lover wrote: »

What a stupid comment.

What would people on the dole do all day otherwise?

Increase the population and put more strain on the taxpayer.

Nodin

AnonoBoy wrote: »

"My dole pays your wages!"

"my theivin finances your security job"

AnonoBoy

I don't people on the dole should be allowed buy jambons.

Jambons are manky.

Harry Palmr

Kinda pointless argument as people can spend the money they have on whatever they like.

Happy enough to see social welfare drunks shot though.

Swiftly

Fascist

Penny Tration

Thankfully we don't yet live in a state where we're only allowed spend money on what the government deems acceptable.

If someone on the dole or working can have a few drinks and not go without food, shelter or heating as a consequence, who gives a fcuk?

donegaLroad

he had a liver transplant a couple of years ago, not because of excessive alcohol, but cancer (I think). Im guessing he will have seen and heard it all regarding Ireland's excessive drinking and the burden it is putting on the health service especially renal depts in hospitals.

He will certainly have heard it all from the consultants and heptologists he has been dealing with.

faceman

Penny Tration wrote: »

Thankfully we don't yet live in a state where we're only allowed spend money on what the government deems acceptable.

If someone on the dole or working can have a few drinks and not go without food, shelter or heating as a consequence, who gives a fcuk?

Unfortunately we do live in a country where both the government and the banks can decide on how people can spend their income. Check out the personal insolvency legislation.

Flatzie_poo

Penny Tration wrote: »

If someone on the dole or working can have a few drinks and go without food, shelter or heating as a consequence, who gives a fcuk?

Cause sometimes there are kids in the same house, that are most affected by those bad choices unfortunately...

But that is an extreme scenario in fairness...

Dave_The_Sheep

faceman wrote: »

Unfortunately we do live in a country where both the government and the banks can decide on how people can spend their income. Check out the personal insolvency legislation.

Which is when you declare yourself bankrupt, an entirely separate discussion altogether.

Penny Tration

Flatzie_poo wrote: »

Cause sometimes there are kids in the same house, that are most affected by those bad choices unfortunately...

But that is an extreme scenario in fairness...

Yeah but cases with alcoholism are totally different to the norm. Kids should absolutely be protected in those instances.

imitation

donegaLroad wrote: »

he had a liver transplant a couple of years ago, not because of excessive alcohol, but cancer (I think). Im guessing he will have seen and heard it all regarding Ireland's excessive drinking and the burden it is putting on the health service especially renal depts in hospitals.

He will certainly have heard it all from the consultants and heptologists he has been dealing with.

One could possibly say not being able to have a pint himself might have colored his view a tad.

Penny Tration

faceman wrote: »

Unfortunately we do live in a country where both the government and the banks can decide on how people can spend their income. Check out the personal insolvency legislation.

My apologies, I meant that in the most basic, day to day sense, in that the government don't dictate the food we eat, the clothing we buy, the electricity provider we use and so on.

Jim Bob Scratcher

Norris is forgetting that people on welfare who drink are taxpayers too, same with smokers...

glued

Sheep Lover wrote: »

What a stupid comment.

What would people on the dole do all day otherwise?

They should be looking for work for a start.

Flatzie_poo

Jim Bob Scratcher wrote: »

Norris is forgetting that people on welfare who drink are taxpayers too, same with smokers...

:rolleyes:

AnonoBoy wrote: »

"My dole pays your wages!"

Staplor

faceman wrote: »

Unfortunately we do live in a country where both the government and the banks can decide on how people can spend their income. Check out the personal insolvency legislation.

Not true, for insolvency, once you stay in the reasonable living expenses (RLEs)then you are fine. You could spend it all up to the RLEs on cheap cider and still proceed with insolvency. The RLE's are nonsense though.

Jim Bob Scratcher

glued wrote: »

They should be looking for work for a start.

What about after they've finished looking for work ? Should they look at the four walls ?

How I see it is, it's their money and they are entitled to do whatever they want with it, that's their business and nobody else's.

quarefarmers

The syphilis has advanced to his brain me thinks

kettlehead

Norris is free to write letters to the Israeli authorities asking for clemency for paedophile rapists just as people on the dole are free to spend their stipend on cans. I don't think either are really a great idea, but it's part and parcel of living in a free society.

Jim Bob Scratcher

Flatzie_poo wrote: »

:rolleyes:

If it wasn't for the local alcos a lot of pubs would be closing down and more people would be joining the dole ques.

faceman

Dave_The_Sheep wrote: »

Which is when you declare yourself bankrupt, an entirely separate discussion altogether.

You dont have to be bankrupt to be in the insolvency process

Diane Selwyn

Jim Bob Scratcher wrote: »

Norris is forgetting that people on welfare who drink are taxpayers too, same with smokers...

good point - anyone purchasing booze and ciggies is paying a shedload of tax that those who have to remain sober for 8 hours or so each day tend to avoid.

Gatling

He has a pint

Sunnyisland

Stupid thing to say, banning people from drinking has never stopped them drinking. Glad he is not our president.

lolokeogh

Sheep Lover wrote: »

What a stupid comment.

What would people on the dole do all day otherwise?

spend there time on boards.ie??

stupid comment from mr norris...but not for the first time

Jim Bob Scratcher

Diane Selwyn wrote: »

good point - anyone purchasing booze and ciggies is paying a shedload of tax that those who have to remain sober for 8 hours or so each day tend to avoid.

They played their part on getting the country out of the recession tbf.

Emme

Jim Bob Scratcher wrote: »

Norris is forgetting that people on welfare who drink are taxpayers too, same with smokers...

It's called clawback.

"Here's your dole, you can buy what you like with it but remember that we'll get a lot of it back in VAT and taxes on alcohol and cigarettes. Thanks from the government every time you buy alcohol and cigarettes in this country."

A message like that might put the unemployed and working alike off smoking and drinking. Seriously many of these people go over the border to buy drink or smuggle in cheaper cigarettes and who can blame them when it's so expensive most of the time.

I would be more worried about teenagers getting off their faces on cheap drink and ending up in A&E than about adults who can take care of themselves working or not.

Pizzle

Penny Tration wrote: »

Thankfully we don't yet live in a state where we're only allowed spend money on what the government deems acceptable.

If someone on the dole or working can have a few drinks and not go without food, shelter or heating as a consequence, who gives a fcuk?

Doesn't that imply they are on too much dole then?

jimgoose

As someone who exists entirely by and for the collective, at least in theory, I would have expected a little more humility from him regarding pronouncing Ex Cathedra on what people may and may not spend their money on. I'm not too keen on spending my tax dollars on enabling him to ponce around the place flapping his jaw, but you don't see me making a big hairy-arsed deal about it! :pac:

LDN_Irish

Pizzle wrote: »

Doesn't that imply they are on too much dole then?

Yeah, definitely. If there's another recession and thousands lose their jobs then I don't want them bastards affording anything except the bare minimum needed for survival. I don't give a **** how much PRSI they've paid, I don't care if it wasn't their fault that they lost their job, I don't care if there are less jobs then there are working adults. All of that is completely irrelevant as long as the people who still have jobs get the warm fuzzies from knowing that welfare payments won't cover anything recreational at all.

howamidifferent

I don't think seanad members should be allowed buy anal lube with my tax money! :pac:

Jim Bob Scratcher

howamidifferent wrote: »

I don't think seanad members should be allowed buy anal lube with my tax money! :pac:

Careful now. That might offend the PC brigade :pac:

jimgoose

howamidifferent wrote: »

I don't think seanad members should be allowed buy anal lube with my tax money! :pac:

I'm going to be the bigger man about it and say I don't mind if he shoves a few of my tenners into any of his various orifices, any more than I'd begrudge someone on the dole the odd €5.99 bottle of wine. Don't thank me. :cool:

c_man

He's a knob, glad he didn't get near the Presidency. Between this and his attack on RTE for highlighting the corruption recently, he really is coming off badly. Again.

Pizzle

Social welfare is there to assist needy families and individuals. It should be enough to survive on, but I don't see why people then feel there should be entitlements to luxuries like alcohol etc. I don't buy the social aspect of drinking in this context either. The pub is not the only place/activity where you get social interaction.

steddyeddy

So they should save money instead of putting it back into the economy?

Swiftly

Pizzle wrote: »

Social welfare is there to assist needy families and individuals. It should be enough to survive on, but I don't see why people then feel there should be entitlements to luxuries like alcohol etc. I don't buy the social aspect of drinking in this context either. The pub is not the only place/activity where you get social interaction.

So begrudge all responsible people who are urgently seeking work and genuinely trying their best from having a responsible drink if they wish to do so. Luckily our opinions don't matter they can do what they want with the money they receive so people will have to make do with being "outraged"

jimgoose

Pizzle wrote: »

Social welfare is there to assist needy families and individuals. It should be enough to survive on, but I don't see why people then feel there should be entitlements to luxuries like alcohol etc. I don't buy the social aspect of drinking in this context either. The pub is not the only place/activity where you get social interaction.

Are they allowed a tincture on Christmas Eve with the nice people, or should they be out shining shoes to supplement their gruel and black bread? :pac:

draiochtanois

This post has been deleted.