Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

So is prostitution to be outlawed in Ireland or what?

Options
1235714

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Austria!


    Yes, they are Irish and I have absolutely no reason not to believe them.

    Well if someone is forced into prostitution, they'd hardly be allowed to be honest about that with johns.

    Not saying I don't believe your ladies are on the level...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭nokia69


    @Austria

    sex traficking, slavery, kidnapping, holding people against their will are all illegal right now, the new law does not change that in any way

    what it does do is make it illegal to pay for sex, and any man caught will be a sex offender


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Austria!


    The evidence would suggest it is extremely rare for prostitutes to be trafficked, so yes, it is comparable.

    Where is this evidence and is it reliable?

    I quoted Lucy CHambers above as saying "a little simple research will tell you that trafficking cases can and do still happen quite regularly" and you seem to contradict that?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭nokia69


    Austria! wrote: »
    Well if someone is forced into prostitution, they'd hardly be allowed to be honest about that with johns.

    but at some point they would be, and thats one of the reasons I just can't see how its possible to hold so many women against their will

    whats to stop them asking a client for help, or just ringing the Guards, and yet it never happens


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,695 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    As a sex worker who has worked in Norway and Sweden I can assure you that the criminalisation of sex does not restrict any market for sellers - the amount of ladies advertising have remained static too. Unfortunately Sweden don't really publicise that because it doesn't look as exciting as prohibition but a little simple research will tell you that trafficking cases can and do still happen quite regularly, if there was no demand there would be no supply.


    Actually thank you for your time, and your considered post. If you read back through my posts though, I have consistently acknowledged that the Swedish model on it's own is completely ineffective without other support structures in place.

    It's interesting that you think early education will increase choice in employment, therefore eradicating all the naughty ladies of the night. My own education wasn't exactly short, indeed I feel quite able to make my own choices and I do not feel I lack the ability to do other things as you so kindly advocate (ironic) - I chose sex work. And why not? my body, my choice. Surely in 2015 we should be moving towards a progressive society? Restriction of choice is not progressive. Women aren't in need of protecting from men, or indeed themselves.


    Education does increase choices in employment. Because of your level of education, you had that freedom to choose sex work. Many people who enter sex work, do so because they lack the education to enable them to have more choices. I don't have any issue whatsoever with anyone who has the opportunity to make those choices of their own free will. I engage with people who feel that they did not or do not have that choice, because of their lack of education which limits their potential opportunities, and therefore their potential choices, or their freedom to choose for themselves, if you will.

    With regard to your comments that women do not need protecting from men, I'm sure you are also aware of male sex workers existence? It's not about protecting people from people, for me at least. It's about giving people the tools to make more opportunities and more choices for themselves. One of the most basic tools in enabling people to have the same freedom you have to make that choice for yourself, is education, better education, better opportunities to educate themselves. Is that too much to ask for in 2015 in what is supposed to be a progressive society?

    It's simply time prostitution was put to bed. It's an archaic means to earn a living, and really it has no place in a progressive society IMO, for anyone, of any gender, sex, or sexual orientation. It's not all about you, and it's not all about me. It's about society, and what kind of a society affords every member in that society with equal opportunities.

    Another thing to consider is I work extensively with people with disabilities. It's all too easy to write of clients as the stereotypical brown Mac wearer in need of perverted release, but actually that isn't true either. Many people aren't in the exceedingly lucky position of being able to go and meet sexual partners - some people aren't even in the lucky position of being able to leave their chair. These aren't black and white situations and silly restrictive laws which further criminalise the vulnerable can't be considered a good thing.

    Thanks for your time :)


    Fair play to you. Genuinely. I've often got a pain in my face trying to explain to people that sex work is not the sum total of a person, and that there's more to a person who is involved in the sex industry than just sex. I too work with people who are intellectually and physically disabled, and I am acutely aware of the challenges they face in their daily lives. I certainly wouldn't be so quick to write them off as undateable (I was only discussing this in another thread on here the other night about dating agencies in the UK for people with disabilities), so I wouldn't see people with disabilities, or their opportunities with regard to sexual fulfilment, in any way hampered by their physical disability.

    People with intellectual disabilities, I'm not sure if you're aware of their current legal position in Irish law that they are deemed unable to give informed consent in sexual matters, but this position too is being reviewed under the proposed Mental Capacity bill. That bill too has been dragging on for the last three years and is no closer to becoming an Act, just like the current Sexual Offences bill is being dragged on with no apparent resolution in sight yet.

    That doesn't seem to stop some people getting their knickers in a twist though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Austria!


    nokia69 wrote: »
    @Austria

    sex traficking, slavery, kidnapping, holding people against their will are all illegal right now the new law does not change that in any way

    what it does do is make it illegal to pay for sex, and any man caught will be a sex offender

    I'm completely against the new law. I think it should be fully legalised, taxed, regulated.

    What I am interested in is the amount of sex workers who do this willingly. It's an important thing to know before deciding on how to deal with this socially politically and legally. From what I see on the net, nobody really knows.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭nokia69


    Austria! wrote: »
    Where is this evidence and is it reliable?

    http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2009/oct/20/government-trafficking-enquiry-fails

    here is some evidence, from the Guardian, a paper that has at times supported Swedish style laws

    you would think in a country the size of the UK they could find more trafficking victims, or could it be that the whole thing is bull
    The UK's biggest ever investigation of sex trafficking failed to find a single person who had forced anybody into prostitution in spite of hundreds of raids on sex workers in a six-month campaign by government departments, specialist agencies and every police force in the country.

    of course none of this stops the feminists in the UK continue to push the trafficking lies


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 19 Crossubrigs



    It's simply time prostitution was put to bed. It's an archaic means to earn a living, and really it has no place in a progressive society IMO, for anyone, of any gender, sex, or sexual orientation. It's not all about you, and it's not all.

    I think everyone on this thread already knew this was your position, it was obvious from the logical inconsistencies you were spouting that you have a position based on personal preferences. From this position you then sought to backwards rationalise your position. Backwards rationalisation becomes apparent when logical inconsistencies are made.

    Bottom line you simply want to assert your personal preferences on society without any logic or reason to back it up.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Good grief. Courts are actually ordering people to pay money to Ruhama....

    Note the figures that these women earned in their short periods in the country for an idea of how much sex workers are earning in Ireland. No idea if it is typical but they are not insignificant sums.

    http://www.sundayworld.com/news/courts/brothel-manager-ordered-to-pay-10-000-to-ruhama-charity


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭Azalea


    nokia69 wrote: »
    the trafficking claims you hear about are bull****
    There is zero sex trafficking whatsoever and the documented cases, including via investigative reporting, are staged? (I'm not including Taken!)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭nokia69


    Azalea wrote: »
    There is zero sex trafficking whatsoever and the documented cases, including via investigative reporting, are staged? (I'm not including Taken!)

    that would seem to be the case


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭Azalea


    nokia69 wrote: »
    that would seem to be the case
    Zero sex trafficking - in the whole world?

    On what do you base this?

    (I don't doubt some of the claims are spurious by the way but some is not all).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭nokia69


    Azalea wrote: »
    Zero sex trafficking - in the whole world?

    On what do you base this?

    (I don't doubt some of the claims are spurious by the way but some is not all).

    oh wait now, in the whole world

    I thought we were talking about Ireland and the new law

    and yes I know I linked a story from the UK, but its very close to Ireland with very close links


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 621 ✭✭✭Under_Graduate


    nokia69 wrote: »
    @Austria

    sex traficking, slavery, kidnapping, holding people against their will are all illegal right now, the new law does not change that in any way

    what it does do is make it illegal to pay for sex, and any man caught will be a sex offender

    Okay, this is the first post that spells it out for me in plain English, regarding the nature of the new law itself.

    Is this indeed the case?

    This law will come into effect and, from that point on, the police will have the authority to arrest and detain ALL those paying legitimate independent sex workers, and charge them as being sex offenders??

    Is this what is in fact happening??


    Regarding "Ordinary Decent John"'s comments....

    He is currently an active client of sex workers.

    He claims no change will come about regarding his situation, and he will continue to be able to avail of such services, despite modifications to the law.


    :confused:

    So which is it?

    Are clients gonna be prosecuted for paying for sex or no?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,430 ✭✭✭RustyNut


    Okay, this is the first post that spells it out for me in plain English, regarding the nature of the new law itself.

    Is this indeed the case?

    This law will come into effect and, from that point on, the police will have the authority to arrest and detain ALL those paying legitimate independent sex workers, and charge them as being sex offenders??

    Is this what is in fact happening??


    Regarding "Ordinary Decent John"'s comments....

    He is currently an active client of sex workers.

    He claims no change will come about regarding his situation, and he will continue to be able to avail of such services, despite modifications to the law.


    :confused:

    So which is it?

    Are clients gonna be prosecuted for paying for sex or no?

    Thats the plan, dont know how they intend to enforce it tho,I cant see too many sex workers ratting out their clients.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4 Lucy chambers


    Okay, this is the first post that spells it out for me in plain English, regarding the nature of the new law itself.

    Is this indeed the case?

    This law will come into effect and, from that point on, the police will have the authority to arrest and detain ALL those paying legitimate independent sex workers, and charge them as being sex offenders??

    Is this what is in fact happening??


    Regarding "Ordinary Decent John"'s comments....

    He is currently an active client of sex workers.

    He claims no change will come about regarding his situation, and he will continue to be able to avail of such services, despite modifications to the law.


    :confused:

    So which is it?

    Are clients gonna be prosecuted for paying for sex or no?

    Yes, that is the case. It will be prohibited to buy any sexual service from any sex worker, and it will make criminals out of consenting adults. Courts will be allowed to publicise the name of anyone convicted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭nokia69


    So which is it?

    Are clients gonna be prosecuted for paying for sex or no?

    well that really depends on the guards, they may ignore the new law, they know well its based on lies and rubbish

    however they could be put under pressure to catch some men and make an example of them, I can see a few ordinary men getting their lives destroyed just because they had consensual sex with another adult

    it could all depend on the minister for justice of the day, even if they ignore the law its a bad thing to have on the books


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,985 ✭✭✭mikeym


    South Park Prostitution Sting :D

    https://youtu.be/neEevCiZjfc


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,695 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    :
    So which is it?

    Are clients gonna be prosecuted for paying for sex or no?


    Nobody yet can answer that question definitively for you UG. They may be prosecuted, or they may not. I don't know where nokia got his information about anyone being placed on the sex offenders register. I'm sure that should be read as a possibility though, more than anything actually guaranteed yet. At the moment all the Sexual Offences bill is just a series of proposals, with nothing guaranteed until it becomes an Act when it is written into law.

    When that could happen though, is still anyone's guess, as there's plenty to be thrashed out yet, and the proposals regarding prostitution are only one small part of the bill.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4 Lucy chambers


    Austria! wrote: »
    Do you think there are comparable chances though between a random waiter and a random sex worker? If not, then it's not really the same.

    Forgive me, I was referring to Sweden. There have been less than ten cases in the last decade that I can find in Ireland and all but two involved ladies who were trafficked of their own will.

    Trafficking refers to the movement of one person for the purpose of prostitution across a border. Strictly speaking if an escort in Northern Ireland bought a train ticket for another escort to travel to Southern Ireland she would be trafficking that escort. I'm not trying to make light of trafficking, it's a terrible issue, but it has been completely overhyped, any forced labour is evil and wrong but I guess being trafficked to cook in a takeaway, slave in someone's home or work in the black market just isn't as bothersome.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭nokia69


    I don't know where nokia got his information about anyone being placed on the sex offenders register. I'm sure that should be read as a possibility though

    that was the plan a while ago, it may have changed

    even crazier part of the plan was to also made it an offence to look at websites advertising escorts, and that was going to be similar to looking at child porn

    the people behind this stuff really are mental and they just hate men


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,430 ✭✭✭RustyNut


    If I use the services of a sex worker,pay the agreed consideration and leave is there a victim?


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,695 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    nokia69 wrote: »
    well that really depends on the guards, they may ignore the new law, they know well its based on lies and rubbish

    however they could be put under pressure to catch some men and make an example of them, I can see a few ordinary men (and women) getting their lives destroyed just because they had consensual sex with another adult chose to engage in an illegal activity in spite of being aware of the possible consequences of their actions.

    it could all depend on the minister for justice of the day, even if they ignore the law its a bad thing to have on the books


    Fixed that for you.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭nokia69


    Fixed that for you.

    it would still have been 100% consensual sex, you can't change that simple fact, nor can any law


  • Registered Users Posts: 4 SheikhSpear


    Criminalising the buyers is not restricting the choices the seller has. The seller is not being criminalised. They may still choose to engage in sex work, but their market will be that much more restricted and the effect of that is that eventually sex work just won't be worth getting into because it won't be a viable career choice. That's still leaving the person with a choice.
    It's funny that you think that logically makes any sense
    Okay, this is the first post that spells it out for me in plain English, regarding the nature of the new law itself.

    Is this indeed the case?

    This law will come into effect and, from that point on, the police will have the authority to arrest and detain ALL those paying legitimate independent sex workers, and charge them as being sex offenders??

    Is this what is in fact happening??


    Regarding "Ordinary Decent John"'s comments....

    He is currently an active client of sex workers.

    He claims no change will come about regarding his situation, and he will continue to be able to avail of such services, despite modifications to the law.


    :confused:

    So which is it?

    Are clients gonna be prosecuted for paying for sex or no?
    RustyNut wrote: »
    Thats the plan, dont know how they intend to enforce it tho,I cant see too many sex workers ratting out their clients.
    This post has been deleted.
    They'll observe John entering the escort's premises, see him leave after an hour or so and have her advert online with a complete list of the sexual services she offers. It won't take much to prove a case from there.
    He seems to be stating that he's willing to take the risk, but unless his regular escorts are working without advertising it is a risk.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 57 ✭✭play it again


    Let's say a man organises to go to a prostitute , who works under her own free will and advertises on a Web site , but with her face obscured and no identifiable trace to say it's her , he gives her a hundred euro for services rendered.. how can any judge or jury convict on that evidence , who is going to testify he paid her ? How do they trace how they got in contact ? I know they can check phones and laptops , but all that is easily circumnavigated these days

    A good barrister would have a field day with this nonsense


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 621 ✭✭✭Under_Graduate


    What about laws regarding massage parlors and sexual services being offered there at the moment?

    Is that currently prohibited or accepted?

    Because there are some parlors in Dublin that openly offer and advertise sexual services.

    If it's against the law - why haven't they been busted?


    Also, I've heard many references throughout this thread to "the main source or outlet for prostitution in Ireland".

    What exactly is that??

    And if/when this law comes into effect, how will that source remain active??
    Would the owners not be prosecutable by law and convicted as accomplices to sex offenders?


    Regarding the mention of sex work regulation being unsuccessful in countries like Holland, how did we draw that conclusion?

    It's taxed, policed, very open to the public - what about it hasn't been a success??


    I believe their current government are also endeavoring to abolish Red light Districts, again using the assertion that their presence encourages human trafficking.

    Once again, this is a case of no actual trafficking convictions or reported cases, at all, having been made.

    There was some form of interpretation of their laws where, girls coming from abroad and working without a visa were considered to be trafficked, and from that stemmed accusations and reports that trafficking was actually happening there on a large scale.

    Of course in reality, no one was actually working outside of their own volition, but I guess for the sake of casting negative light on the industry and demonizing it effectively, as a means to strengthen their arguments for abolishing the red light districts, they manipulated the genuine intention of the law itself.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,695 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    nokia69 wrote: »
    it would still have been 100% consensual sex, you can't change that simple fact, nor can any law


    Of course, nor do I seek to change that possibility (because we don't know for a fact that the sex is always consensual, so it cannot be stated as a fact that the sex was consensual when money is involved), nor does the law seek to change the nature of consent.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,050 ✭✭✭nokia69


    They'll observe John entering the escort's premises, see him leave after an hour or so and have her advert online with a complete list of the sexual services she offers. It won't take much to prove a case from there.
    He seems to be stating that he's willing to take the risk, but unless his regular escorts are working without advertising it is a risk.

    only in one eyed Jackies dream world would that be enough for a conviction

    if thats all the evidence on offer, Lionel Hutz could beat that rap


Advertisement