Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

WhoWillGo poll : Marmion vs Boss

Options
245678

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    thebaz wrote: »
    no joke - i know who i'd pick right now - Marmion time will come , but he hasn't progressed over the past 6 months - fact

    what is true , no one here seams to appreciate what Boss has brought to the Irish game - constantly ridiculed

    He's got a blank period for a few months, and Boss one last gasp. That doesn't mean in any case Boss is better


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,290 ✭✭✭aimee1


    CatFromHue wrote: »


    if moore and trimble dont make it then white and kearney are obvious replacements. otherwise i agree with quinlan's selection.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,015 ✭✭✭✭Mc Love


    Marmion should be ahead of Boss - the poll is fixed.

    In saying that, St Joe is making a big mistake by not having picked Duncan Williams!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I used to be looking forward to the start of the RWC to see all the rugby and cheer for Ireland.

    I'm now solely looking forward to it starting so this discussion will stop.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 14,166 Mod ✭✭✭✭Zzippy


    I used to be looking forward to the start of the RWC to see all the rugby and cheer for Ireland.

    I'm now solely looking forward to it starting so this discussion will stop.
    I don't in a million years think this will happen, but it might nearly be the best outcome in terms of the board being bearable.

    Getting close to backseat moderation lads. People are entitled to debate what they feel are legitimate points. Discussion has moved to this thread, which neither of you are forced to read. If you have nothing to contribute to the actual discussion, don't bother posting.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭total former


    Fair point, deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭The Rape of Lucretia


    I don't in a million years think this will happen, but it might nearly be the best outcome in terms of the board being bearable.

    If it were the outcome, given that Madigan would be the cover, would there be case for Murray and Marmion being the best pairing to bring. Giving the option of both Reddan and Boss to call up in the case of an injury ?
    It saves a place on the bench as well, meaning you could have both Madigan and Jackson there as cover or tactical subs. Jackson, Madigan, and Zeebededooda as subs would give a lot of options.
    And then Marmion could start the minnow games and play all 80 minutes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,066 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    In the RWC's of 2011, 2007 and 2003 Ireland took 3 Scrum Half's. It's the one position in the backs that is utterly unique and specialist. The cover is vital so it's pointless to suggest traveling with two.

    My only thought on Marmion's release is that he needs game time to buck up. Realistically he'll only go if Boss/Reddan/Murray are injured in the next 2 weeks; if you say he'd be lucky to be asked over Williams then I'd nearly agree with you.


  • Registered Users Posts: 110 ✭✭Witheringeye


    Just a thought. I was thinking about the lions tour in 2013 and IIRC gats only brought sexton and Farrell as his two 20s and Stuart Hogg in case of emergency. I think there is a chance of neither of them making it


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Just a thought. I was thinking about the lions tour in 2013 and IIRC gats only brought sexton and Farrell as his two 20s and Stuart Hogg in case of emergency. I think there is a chance of neither of them making it

    Well the squad rules for the Lions are very different. Hogg could cover 10. Which other player in our squad covers 9?

    I'd be shocked if Marmion or Boss are both at home.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,290 ✭✭✭aimee1


    Just a thought. I was thinking about the lions tour in 2013 and IIRC gats only brought sexton and Farrell as his two 20s and Stuart Hogg in case of emergency. I think there is a chance of neither of them making it

    and if one got injured and was out for 2 weeks there was no restrictions on call ups.

    If Murray gets injured versus Italy, and is unable to play france, can we really go into that game with no reserve 9?


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,972 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    It's one of the big differences between the RWC and tours. On a tour the travelling team might have a few guys in country on "sponsors" duty and they will be training with the team. In the RWC this isn't allowed. Only the named 31 can train.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭total former


    Just a thought. I was thinking about the lions tour in 2013 and IIRC gats only brought sexton and Farrell as his two 20s and Stuart Hogg in case of emergency. I think there is a chance of neither of them making it

    On this, Hogg didn't go as emergency cover, he started one (maybe two?) games.


  • Registered Users Posts: 30,308 Mod ✭✭✭✭.ak


    On this, Hogg didn't go as emergency cover, he started one (maybe two?) games.

    I suppose he'd be emergency cover for the tests tho.


  • Registered Users Posts: 110 ✭✭Witheringeye


    I know there are subtle differences but if Farrell had gotten injured I think Hogg would have benched so it doesn't make that much difference. I'm just saying there's precedent of a coach leaving themselves open to a small tail risk that had a major upside he majority of the time. I just don't think it can be ruled out as a possibility.
    Still think boss will travel though


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,051 ✭✭✭✭Interested Observer


    This post isn't about what should happen but about what I think will happen: Marmion has little or no chance of making the squad imo. He's barely been involved under Schmidt so far, not going to go to the RWC out of the blue.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 469 ✭✭smiley_face


    In the RWC's of 2011, 2007 and 2003 Ireland took 3 Scrum Half's. It's the one position in the backs that is utterly unique and specialist. The cover is vital so it's pointless to suggest traveling with two.

    Australia, Samoa and Argentina have only named 2 scrumhalves,
    as have Uruguay and United States.

    It's a talking point, Ireland have options, Madigan covering 9 would be ideal, allowing us bring another player, possibly a 6th prop, or take Jones as fullback cover.

    Anyway, point is it's not "pointless" to consider the options and debate them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,630 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    It's a talking point, Ireland have options, Madigan covering 9 would be ideal, allowing us bring another player, possibly a 6th prop, or take Jones as fullback cover.

    Yeah but the problem is Madigan doesn't actually play 9, he's not like Michalak or Laidlaw. Giteau can cover 9 for the Aussies.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,624 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    _Tyrrell_ wrote: »
    Yeah but the problem is Madigan doesn't actually play 9, he's not like Michalak or Laidlaw. Giteau can cover 9 for the Aussies.

    i think Madigan has the attributes to make a good SH - I know a WC is not the time to experiment - but, from my experience most good 10's can usualy become good 9's - 10's are usually talented ball players , the pass is usually the main issue in converting (my experience is just club level :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭total former


    http://m.independent.ie/sport/rugby/world-cup/comment/schmidt-keeps-punters-guessing-on-world-cup-gamble-31470706.html

    Brendan Fanning weighs into the two SHs discussion, concludes that it's very risky and extremely unlikely.

    If there was a concrete benefit to it, then grand, but I just don't see why Joe would bother when there's little or no upside.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,075 ✭✭✭✭vienne86


    I can't see Marmion going......but I'll admit that I haven't seen much of him.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    _Tyrrell_ wrote: »
    Yeah but the problem is Madigan doesn't actually play 9, he's not like Michalak or Laidlaw. Giteau can cover 9 for the Aussies.

    We actually have a Irish 9.5, and a talented one : James Hart from Grenoble. Of course it's too late, the camp integration means it has to be a Boss/Marmion head-to-head, but it's to consider for 2019...


  • Registered Users Posts: 21,630 ✭✭✭✭Squidgy Black


    connachta wrote: »
    We actually have a Irish 9.5, and a talented one : James Hart from Grenoble. Of course it's too late, the camp integration means it has to be a Boss/Marmion head-to-head, but it's to consider for 2019...

    Had a rough year last year with a back injury and lost his starting place. He'd be an interesting prospect to see playing for one of the provinces alright, was unlucky that the year he was trying to get into the Leinster academy was the same year as Cooney and McGrath


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,084 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I can't see Boss not going now but fwiw I'd take a punt on Marmion. Both are use in case of emergency and Boss looked slow and ponderous v Wales. Can Marmion be as bad. Friday night suggests he wouldn't be.


  • Subscribers Posts: 41,294 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    It doesn't bother me either way which goes


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    For those who were scorful toward this debate 2000 viewers, 56 posts and 90 voters (and quite close 56%-44%) in a single day are the best answer.
    And you can notice how honest I was I asked WWgo, not who should. And still a tight result, it isn't over yet


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,200 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    connachta wrote: »
    For those who were scorful toward this debate 2000 viewers, 56 posts and 90 voters (and quite close 56%-44%) in a single day are the best answer.
    And you can notice how honest I was I asked WWgo, not who should. And still a tight result, it isn't over yet

    I'm just impressed you managed to register so many accounts in a single day.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,200 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    connachta wrote: »
    We actually have a Irish 9.5, and a talented one : James Hart from Grenoble. Of course it's too late, the camp integration means it has to be a Boss/Marmion head-to-head, but it's to consider for 2019...

    He has played at 10 once in his professional career. Don't think it's reasonable for him to be considered 9/10 player.

    Plus he won't be in the reckoning at all unless he returns to Ireland.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭Tox56


    phog wrote: »
    I can't see Boss not going now but fwiw I'd take a punt on Marmion. Both are use in case of emergency and Boss looked slow and ponderous v Wales. Can Marmion be as bad. Friday night suggests he wouldn't be.

    If they had to come on after 50 minutes in a World Cup semi final I would have no faith in Marmion being better than Boss for us at that stage, and that's basically what it boils down to for me.

    Judging it on Friday night is pointless, it tells us nothing , literally nothing, about how Marmion would fare in the above scenario


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,965 ✭✭✭connachta


    Buer wrote: »
    I'm just impressed you managed to register so many accounts in a single day.

    Was waiting for the accusation, look at the profiles, they all sent hundreds of messages. impossible to do that in 24 h. You just can't admit it is captivating:D


Advertisement