Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Electric Ireland Stops Feed In Tariff for Microgenerators

124

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭quentingargan


    DCENR is holding a workshop this Friday in Cork on Shaping Future Energy Policy for Ireland. Ringaskiddy 1.30pm to 5.00pm. If people can make it and share their views, it may be a useful forum at which to do so..


  • Registered Users Posts: 40 jathclare


    JonathonS wrote: »
    This thread contains a lot of heat but not much light on EI’s decision …..:)

    I am one of the majority of domestic electricity users for whom microgeneration is not an option. So my question is this. If EI and others pay 9c per kWhr for electricity generated by microgenerators, will this result in a reduction or an increase in total costs for these companies?

    My guess is an increase. The cost of administering applications from hundreds or thousands of applicants, and ongoing admin thereafter would not be offset by the value of the electricity supplied at 9c per kWhr, and maybe not even at 0c per kWhr.

    On the other hand, if anyone can prove that microgeneration will result in reduced costs for EI (which I perhaps foolishly assume will then result in lower costs for me…), then I will certainly join the campaign for the re-introduction of an FIT.

    The short answer is Yes. Electricity generation is only about 60% efficient from non-renewable sources, and a further 30% is lost getting it to households.

    A PVarray is about 98% efficient. If used by the producer, there is no transmission loss. If exported the grid and used, it is nearly 70% efficient. EI should be able to generate savings on the power they buy from the ESB based on that differential and pass it onto the producer. They can also look good by being environmental friendly etc.

    One thing I agree with EI is that they shouldn't be the only ones offering the scheme, the other companies should be compelled to offer a FIT, and at rates that make economic sense to the producer to get up and running.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭recedite


    JonathonS wrote: »
    The cost of administering applications from hundreds or thousands of applicants, and ongoing admin thereafter would not be offset by the value of the electricity supplied at 9c per kWhr...
    Annually, new applications would not be hundreds of thousands.
    It would be tens of thousands if they became a standard feature on newly built houses, which would obviously be considered desirable in terms of EU policy on reducing carbon emissions.
    And these are all subject to admin work anyway, as they require new meters and MPRN numbers with or without solar PV. Once set up, the whole process is automated.
    If the solar PV is to be discouraged from new houses, then we are only talking applications in the low hundreds, coming from the "enthusiasts".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭quentingargan


    JonathonS wrote: »
    If EI and others pay 9c per kWhr for electricity generated by microgenerators, will this result in a reduction or an increase in total costs for these companies?
    The 9c being paid to solar microgenerators is very little more than the 7c or 8c paid to wind farms. but arguably the electricity is more valuable because it is 100% produced during the day, usually at a time when there is less wind, and it is already on the local loop. My panels export their surplus to my neighbour at about 99% efficiency. I doubt there is more than a 1% cable loss between our houses.

    The downside is that when this happens, there is a gas fired station somewhere lying idle (or maybe a peat fired one...). It is the idle surplus capacity that costs money when renewables are added to the grid, but that applies to all renewables.

    The cost argument becomes difficult right now when oil is as low as $64 a barrel, but there are strategic (Russia...), environmental and long-term fossil fuel cost arguments that all suggest that a steady increase in renewable energy on the grid is required.

    But in truth, I expect that solar microgeneration does not increase the cost of electricity as much as wind.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 702 ✭✭✭JonathonS


    The downside is that when this happens, there is a gas fired station somewhere lying idle (or maybe a peat fired one...). It is the idle surplus capacity that costs money when renewables are added to the grid, but that applies to all renewables.
    Idle capacity and loss-making generation (such as Turlough Hill) is a necessary part of ensuring that there is a balanced supply from a variety of sources that can meet demand as it arises. It seems that the industry does not want to increase the idle periods and therefore add cost by paying microgenerators. As an EI customer that makes sense to me.

    As pointed out by others above the case for PV solar power would seem to rest solely on its capacity to reduce the cost of electricity for the user, and not on the potential to get a payback from an FIT.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 702 ✭✭✭JonathonS


    recedite wrote: »
    Annually, new applications would not be hundreds of thousands.

    I did say hundreds OR thousands.:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭recedite


    OK I misread that originally.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,180 ✭✭✭hfallada


    jathclare wrote: »
    The short answer is Yes. Electricity generation is only about 60% efficient from non-renewable sources, and a further 30% is lost getting it to households.

    A PVarray is about 98% efficient. If used by the producer, there is no transmission loss. If exported the grid and used, it is nearly 70% efficient. EI should be able to generate savings on the power they buy from the ESB based on that differential and pass it onto the producer. They can also look good by being environmental friendly etc.

    One thing I agree with EI is that they shouldn't be the only ones offering the scheme, the other companies should be compelled to offer a FIT, and at rates that make economic sense to the producer to get up and running.

    I studied LC physics and the teacher phoned the ESB to ask about the loss of electricity through transmission. Its was only something like €50000 per year. The fact most electricity is high voltage over long distant, means there is minimal losses to the network


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭recedite


    JonathonS wrote: »
    It seems that the industry does not want to increase the idle periods and therefore add cost by paying microgenerators.
    I don't accept the argument that all microgeneration or all renewable energy increases the cost of electricity. Because there are a lot of factors balancing supply with demand at any given moment.
    As a very crude national solution, we could determine maximum demand, and then run generators 24/7 that are capable of satisfying that demand. In that scenario, wind and solar increase costs because their back-up is still running.
    Hydro such as Ardnacrusha can be considered stable and reliable.

    Bring into the equation some "smart" solutions and synergies, and the economics change again. Solar corresponding with peak daytime usage. The possibility of more "Spirit of Ireland" Turlough Hill type facilities which convert night electricity into daytime power. Interconnectors to the UK to export wind and/or import nuclear power depending on the need.
    Smart meters and variable rate tariffs that allows users to take advantage of cheap power. Electric cars, charged whenever electricity is cheapest. Carbon taxes.
    Some of these are around already, some are not. More are needed.

    Simply saying we need to keep burning the same amount of fossil fuels all the time in the background, just in case the wind stops blowing and the sun doesn't shine, and then everyone might put on the electric kettle to make tea at the same time, that is just a lazy way out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 702 ✭✭✭JonathonS


    recedite wrote: »
    I don't accept the argument that ... all renewable energy increases the cost of electricity.

    Simply saying we need to keep burning the same amount of fossil fuels all the time in the background... is just a lazy way out.

    I'm not sure if you are suggesting that I made those arguments, I didn't.

    Renewables are key, but paying an FIT for microgeneration does not make financial sense right now.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,818 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    I was at a talk yesterday and a Japanese Govt speaker gave info on the Japanese market.

    The govt there are now pulling the feed-in-tariff as well, as it's costing the govt too much money. There are also issues with stability of supply and the capacity of the grid for the volume of connections.

    Current amount of PV supplied to the grid is 14,320MW, of which 49% is from installations generating less than 10kW.

    As of Sept 2014, they have suspended any new PV connections to the grid, and feel there is too much PV in the market and are looking to other sources.

    To wit, and because since the earthquake of 2011, their reliance on fossil-fuel generated power has gone from low 60% range to a now 88% reliance, they are re-commissioning nuclear from Spring 2015. They also stated that without nuclear, they are not in a position to offer any reductions in CO2 emissions. They currently have 57 nuclear stations offline.

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,334 ✭✭✭MayoSalmon


    recedite wrote: »

    Simply saying we need to keep burning the same amount of fossil fuels all the time in the background, just in case the wind stops blowing and the sun doesn't shine, and then everyone might put on the electric kettle to make tea at the same time, that is just a lazy way out.

    This has nothing to do with being lazy...its just how the "current" electricity grid operates.

    The whole energy sector needs to re-think/design what its doing instead of just trying to jam renewables into it and pretending it works.


  • Registered Users Posts: 40 jathclare


    In basic economic terms, EI are buying @ 9c from Micro Generators and selling it to consumers at 20c per unit.

    Thats a margin of 55% for clean energy. There is no question that an established business can cover costs and be profitable at that rate.

    As Mico-generation is more efficent than fossil fuels and has less transmission loss, they are really getting units closer to 5 or 6 cent, so this margin is actually higher in reality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,736 ✭✭✭ch750536


    Serious question people, why don't we start our own micro generation power company, that acts as middle man between micro's and grid?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,334 ✭✭✭MayoSalmon


    jathclare wrote: »
    In basic economic terms, EI are buying @ 9c from Micro Generators and selling it to consumers at 20c per unit.

    Thats a margin of 55% for clean energy. There is no question that an established business can cover costs and be profitable at that rate.

    As Mico-generation is more efficent than fossil fuels and has less transmission loss, they are really getting units closer to 5 or 6 cent, so this margin is actually higher in reality.

    Is it? Micro-Generation is variable generation aka it is NOT reliable. Unfortunately in terms of how the Irish grid works wind/solar etc is not efficient power.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭quentingargan


    The argument here seems to hinge entirely around whether it is cost effective for solar to go head-to-head with gas. In other countries, they are paying as much as 45c per KwHr for clean electricity to try to reduce their carbon emissions. We can't seem to pay 9c without wringing our hands.

    Do we all think that using coal, oil and gas to produce electricity can just go on forever? The vast majority of scientists, and governments, think we can't. But our regulator doesn't seem to think Ireland should pay for the infrastructure to displace it. This infrastructure is a combination of interconnectors, wind, solar, hydro, and most important, demand-side management - switching off non-essential loads when renewables are in insufficient. Then use your gas and oil fired stations to fill the shortfall.

    For that to work, you must have a lot of spare generation capacity which spends a lot of its time idling, so arguably energy from that source is expensive, and should be charged accordingly if you have essential loads (or forgot to put the washing machine on at 3.00am).

    We are going to have to get to that point somehow, unless we believe that oil and gas are an infinite resource which does no harm whatsoever to the environment on which we all depend.

    I'll now sit back and wait for a lashing from the climate sceptics. :rolleyes:


  • Posts: 5,238 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Jaysus sher go 'way outta that, our state can't even reliably support the GTI's they prescribe, yer mad with yer fancy talk, sher won't there be more coal fer us if Holland isn't burning it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,806 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    jathclare wrote: »
    In basic economic terms, EI are buying @ 9c from Micro Generators and selling it to consumers at 20c per unit.

    The 20c is inclusive of VAT. They can buy it in bulk at 4cent. With less overheads than dealing with seperate accounts.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭recedite


    ted1 wrote: »
    They can buy it in bulk at 4cent.
    Carbon tax needs to be higher then.
    Actually, do they pay carbon tax on the gas used in generating electricity, or is it just a tax levied on ordinary consumers?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,806 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    recedite wrote: »
    Carbon tax needs to be higher then.
    Actually, do they pay carbon tax on the gas used in generating electricity, or is it just a tax levied on ordinary consumers?
    It's dear enough as it is. Carbon tax is based in the principle that the end user pays.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭recedite


    Yes, but who is the end user of the gas used in a gas powered electricity generating station? The utility company or the consumer of the electricity?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,818 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    recedite wrote: »
    Carbon tax needs to be higher then.
    Actually, do they pay carbon tax on the gas used in generating electricity, or is it just a tax levied on ordinary consumers?

    Carbon tax needs to be abandoned you mean.

    It has no place in our market.

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,806 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    recedite wrote: »
    Yes, but who is the end user of the gas used in a gas powered electricity generating station? The utility company or the consumer of the electricity?

    Obviously it's the consumer, it's in the name


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭recedite


    ted1 wrote: »
    Obviously it's the consumer, it's in the name
    Its not altogether obvious, if the consumer does not even have a gas connection, that they would be paying a carbon tax for gas.

    Anyway, my point is that if an electricity provider can buy gas powered electricity from a generating station at 4-5c per unit (without paying carbon tax) then why would they be ar$ed paying 9c for solar or even 7-8c to wind farms? Buying at 9c and selling at 18c is a nice mark-up, but buying at 4c and selling at 18c is even better.
    Alloying for zero transmission losses, the solar is going to provide a higher mark-up to the provider than the 9c differential implies, probably the same or better than the wind farm electricity.

    AFAIK the generating stations are involved in an EU carbon credits scheme, but the credits started off being issued for free. At some point in the future, it will not be possible for providers to buy such cheap gas produced electricity because the ever increasing cost of carbon emissions will be factored in to the wholesale price.
    Maybe they will be able to buy in nuclear produced electricity then via the interconnectors when that time comes. But the same principles apply there; the economics of nuclear power depends entirely on who pays the long term clean-up costs - is it the industry or the taxpayer.

    Unless carbon taxes are properly applied, renewables are effectively subsidising fossil fuels because all their costs are front loaded.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,806 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    recedite wrote: »
    Its not altogether obvious, if the consumer does not even have a gas connection, that they would be paying a carbon tax for gas.

    Anyway, my point is that if an electricity provider can buy gas powered electricity from a generating station at 4-5c per unit (without paying carbon tax) then why would they be ar$ed paying 9c for solar or even 7-8c to wind farms? Buying at 9c and selling at 18c is a nice mark-up, but buying at 4c and selling at 18c is even better.
    Alloying for zero transmission losses, the solar is going to provide a higher mark-up to the provider than the 9c differential implies, probably the same or better than the wind farm electricity.

    AFAIK the generating stations are involved in an EU carbon credits scheme, but the credits started off being issued for free. At some point in the future, it will not be possible for providers to buy such cheap gas produced electricity because the ever increasing cost of carbon emissions will be factored in to the wholesale price.
    Maybe they will be able to buy in nuclear produced electricity then via the interconnectors when that time comes. But the same principles apply there; the economics of nuclear power depends entirely on who pays the long term clean-up costs - is it the industry or the taxpayer.

    Unless carbon taxes are properly applied, renewables are effectively subsidising fossil fuels because all their costs are front loaded.

    Electricity is bought on the SEM. They don't choose where IT comes from and all generators get the same price be they wind, gas, coal , EWIC etc. It's not a matter of buying for 4 cent and selling for 18. There are other costs such as DUOS and TUOS etc


  • Registered Users Posts: 12 user 97


    Photovoltaic Solar panels seem to offer a benign means to generate electricity at home/business/farm.
    With a longevity lasting 30years operating at over 80% efficiency and a depletion of 0.2.% each year.
    This creates a wonderful opportunity for everybody to start generating our own electricity rather than buying it from the National electricity grid network.

    However, maintaining our connection with the electrical supply companies will remain necessary as our need for the power may well be at a time where the Pv panels will not be generating any power. ( night time for an example ).

    Energy analysis at Ireland's latitude of 53*North.
    typical 5 Solar hours/ day
    therefore a 5kW Pv solar array should generate approximately
    5 x 5 : 25kW/hr per day . There are losses to consider , remember that the solar panels operate at around 80% and the system itself will occur losses .
    So if we take a 33% loss then this suggests that our 5kWatt Pv array should provide
    Approximately ( 25 x 365 ) - 33% equals approximately 6000 kW/hr's/ year.
    With regard to selling any surplus , don't worry about how much You get for each unit
    of electricity Your Solar panels export as long as governance is given to Your system.
    This way Your own Power get used by You in-house and not coming through the electrical
    meter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭Coles


    @user 97, It makes no sense to export excess electricity for nothing. The FG/Labour government have killed the renewable energy industry.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12 user 97


    You may be right ,
    however my comment related to ; A Photovoltaic array will rarely be exporting any electric if governance is given to the inverter, close to all should be consumed in-house.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭Coles


    user 97 wrote: »
    You may be right ,
    however my comment related to ; A Photovoltaic array will rarely be exporting any electric if governance is given to the inverter, close to all should be consumed in-house.
    And that's the bit that suggests that you are talking through your hat. An inverter can not regulate the consumption of electricity. If the home owner has no need for the electricity being produced then it is wasted. In Ireland it is not possible to get reimbursed for exporting excess production to the National Grid.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 5,238 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think your figures are a mite off there User 97.
    user 97 wrote: »
    operating at over 80% efficiency and a depletion of 0.2.% each year.

    Mono / poly modules are about 15% efficient at converting solar irradiation into electricity. Thin film is half that.

    0.8% depletion isn't guaranteed it's just manufacturers covering their bottoms for modules hung under partial shade and things.
    user 97 wrote: »
    typical 5 Solar hours/ day
    therefore a 5kW Pv solar array should generate approximately
    5 x 5 : 25kW/hr per day.

    Not on your life.
    Output = 15% of input. Input = flux density.

    My panels are producing 7am to 8pm these days. Naff all in Winter so I don't know where your 5 hours comes from.
    user 97 wrote: »
    So if we take a 33% loss then this suggests that our 5kWatt Pv array should provide

    If you manage to lose 33% between panel and load then chances are you will start a fire considering your 5kW array is producing 1.667kW of heat in your installation.


  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Coles wrote: »
    @user 97, It makes no sense to export excess electricity for nothing. The FG/Labour government have killed the renewable energy industry.
    True, I have a 4kw system installed at the start of the "summer" and have given away about 30% of the electricity generated :(.

    Until I can afford to add the battery module & batteries it will remain that way.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12 user 97


    Thank You Donal,
    Your comment proves my estimates are close to reality,
    also, a thermal gap must be left between each panel at installation.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12 user 97


    hello again,
    my figures do seem a bit off.

    * Polysilicon cells operate at over 80%
    * 0.7% depletion is more accurate
    * 5 Solar hours gain is a fair estimate for Ireland, this estimate can simply be used in an energy analysis to determine
    the annual yield expected, although it may be a little on the low side , but I never want to suggest more than
    is realistic at our latitude.


  • Posts: 5,238 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Modules are rated at 1000W/m²
    While the cells can be as high as 20% efficient. The modules are ~15%.
    If your 80% figure is not efficiency but expected output of rated on a sunny day then this may be more realistic.
    5 hours gain is not a fair estimate if you only have 5 hours exposure then it's Winter and you won't have anywhere near peak output.
    These statement are entirely back of an envelope calculations I'd recommend drawing from collected data.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭quentingargan


    These statement are entirely back of an envelope calculations I'd recommend drawing from collected data.

    There are very comprehensive simulators that can work out likely output each hour of each day. I use PVsyst but it costs €1k plus. However, Retscreen is free and pretty good, has local climate data links etc. I'd start there.

    But the overall jist of this thread remains the same. Unless you opt for battery storage, you will never match your production to your consumption, so to build an effective PV model, you need payment for surpluses exported.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,334 ✭✭✭MayoSalmon


    Coles wrote: »
    And that's the bit that suggests that you are talking through your hat. An inverter can not regulate the consumption of electricity. If the home owner has no need for the electricity being produced then it is wasted. In Ireland it is not possible to get reimbursed for exporting excess production to the National Grid.[/QUOTE]

    And you sir are talking through your hat.

    Electric Ireland will pay you 9.0 cent per kWh you export and have been doing so for the past 6 years. You will have to pay for your own meter through as ESB networks have stopped supporting that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭recedite


    The situation seems to be that a "new customer" won't get anything but an existing customer buying their electricity from Electric Ireland will get 9c (up until Dec 2016)
    Even for existing customers thinking of installing PV, the uncertainty of whether there will be any future payment is going to be offputting.


  • Registered Users Posts: 460 ✭✭joeirish


    Hi recedite

    I think the best way it to start putting pressure on government and opposition TDs, there is an election coming! So I've started what I hope will become a campaign to get FiT reinstated. I've set up a Facebook page as a starting point which can be found at https://www.facebook.com/FiTIreland

    If people want to they can go there and Like the page and maybe post something about the system they have installed. The idea is that if there are a lot of Likes then this can be used to show politicians that there is a significant number of voters who want FiT. Then maybe something might happen.

    There is also a consulation process about the close on Sept 11, so only a few days. Details can be found at http://www.dcenr.gov.ie/energy/en-ie/Pages/Consultation/Renewable-Electricity-Support-Scheme-Consultation.aspx and submissions can be emailed to ress@dcenr.gov.ie

    Encourage anybody you know to make a submission in support of small scale domestic microgeneration systems and reinstatement of FiT.

    Joe


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭Coles


    @Recedite, That's exactly right.

    @MayoSalmon. Apology accepted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭quentingargan


    joeirish wrote: »
    Hi recedite

    I think the best way it to start putting pressure on government and opposition TDs, there is an election coming! So I've started what I hope will become a campaign to get FiT reinstated. I've set up a Facebook page as a starting point which can be found at https://www.facebook.com/FiTIreland

    If people want to they can go there and Like the page and maybe post something about the system they have installed. The idea is that if there are a lot of Likes then this can be used to show politicians that there is a significant number of voters who want FiT. Then maybe something might happen.

    There is also a consulation process about the close on Sept 11, so only a few days. Details can be found at http://www.dcenr.gov.ie/energy/en-ie/Pages/Consultation/Renewable-Electricity-Support-Scheme-Consultation.aspx and submissions can be emailed to ress@dcenr.gov.ie

    Encourage anybody you know to make a submission in support of small scale domestic microgeneration systems and reinstatement of FiT.

    Joe

    Thanks Joe. Have made a submission. See here. Feel free to use as fodder for ideas, but don't cog word for word :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,834 ✭✭✭air


    Consultation period extended to September 18th.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭quentingargan


    Some people haven't been waiting for the consultation period to end and have already sought planning permission for huge solar parks. See here.

    Which calls into question whether the consultation process is a done deal, and if people with friends in low places (or even Lowry places) have a heads up on what is coming down the track.

    A number of companies are already snapping up land and signing deals with farmers for solar parks. See here and here for example.

    If you want solar to be a microgeneration rather than megageneration issue, it is good that there is still some time to voice an opinion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,722 ✭✭✭nice_guy80


    According to several industry people I talked to at the self build expo last weekend, you will be able to sell back your excess electricity to the grid next year some time

    But, they might have been just trying to sell me their solar panels!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,740 ✭✭✭hexosan


    nice_guy80 wrote: »
    According to several industry people I talked to at the self build expo last weekend, you will be able to sell back your excess electricity to the grid next year some time

    But, they might have been just trying to sell me their solar panels!

    You reckon, did they happen to quote a source for this info.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭quentingargan


    hexosan wrote: »
    You reckon, did they happen to quote a source for this info.

    Thats interesting... There is a consultation process going on, which hopefully isn't a forgone conclusion. But there are companies run by people with connections busily applying for planning permission for solar parks, and pulling in investment funds on the assumption that there will be a generous tariff regime next year.

    I hope there is a tariff on the way, and I hope it favors domestic and industrial rooftop way above solar parks, but something here is a bit whiffy....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,362 ✭✭✭rolion


    I hope for good news...

    What the new legislation can bring good or bad for us,smaller producers of let's say under 5kw ?
    Can any of you describe an existing system that you own and how is working please ?
    Also...can you suggest a blueprint for a new installation ?
    Do you think we will get new smart meilters installed at house side ?
    Will the energy generated will be offset against the energy consumption, in financial terms ?
    Can the "new" limit the tech parameters of the systems so you'll need to buy only systems with a pre-determined depth or colour of the ... framing?
    Will the local suppliers will take advantages in terms of pricing structure ?

    Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭quentingargan


    rolion wrote: »
    Can any of you describe an existing system that you own and how is working please ?
    Also...can you suggest a blueprint for a new installation ?
    Do you think we will get new smart meilters installed at house side ?
    Will the energy generated will be offset against the energy consumption, in financial terms ?
    Can the "new" limit the tech parameters of the systems so you'll need to buy only systems with a pre-determined depth or colour of the ... framing?
    Will the local suppliers will take advantages in terms of pricing structure ?

    Thanks
    I have some rather old 230W panels - eight of them facing south at about 45 degrees running through a slightly under-sized inverter. You can monitor the output of the system here. This is based in West Cork which has less sunshine than Dublin etc.

    I have a smart meter and I get paid for my exports at present as I had registered to export power a few years ago. My tariff runs out at the end of this year.

    I reckon we use about half of the electricity produced. The balance is exported. If we didn't have the feed in tariff, that surplus would be donated free to the grid. Madness.

    I got my smart meter for free, but later they started charging €340 for installation of a smart meter to record exports. That is annoying because you could use any meter to record exports, and such meters in the UK cost €40. If there is a proposal to role out smart meters, I don't see why microgenerators should have to buy them when everyone else gets them for free (ahem, assuming they do..)

    Hard to suggest a blueprint. I think whatever suits your budget. I personally wouldn't jump in until there is a tariff in place, and then I would decide. In the meantime, I might be tempted to use an OWL monitor to see how much power I normally consume during daytime.

    At present, prices in Ireland are quite competitive. That may change if there is a gold rush when the tariff comes in, but I doubt it. The framing etc., is a matter of taste. Black frames are slightly more expensive than bright aluminium but I think on a slate roof, the difference is well worth it. On a new house, I would install roof-integrated - the difference is minimal. Planning exemptions apply to solar on roofs up to 12m2 which is about 1.8kw of panels. If you want to go above 7 panels, you need to apply for planning, and I think a sensible layout and black framing would ease the process...


  • Posts: 5,238 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    rolion wrote: »
    Also...can you suggest a blueprint for a new installation ?

    This is what I'm working on in my spare time.

    48_V_grid_hopping_MK_II_12_VDC.jpg
    Still have a few wrinkles to iron out like a hard wired earth fault protection because my inverter/charger uses a relay which I think is unreliable.

    The 12V side could be done with a buck converter but I have most of that equipment already so seemed to me like the most efficient way to do things.

    48_V_grid_hopping_MK_II_48_VDC.jpg

    Self consumption system. No FITs.
    I might add another TriStar later for diversion control for water heating or someat else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,113 ✭✭✭freddyuk


    Is the Sunsaver correct? It will not take 25mm2 cables? Also I would expect it to be connected directly to the battery? You seem to have loads coming directly off the battery bypassing the protection of the controller?
    Not had time to look more closely so maybe I missed something.....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,362 ✭✭✭rolion


    Can't see it properly on the mobile...
    Is that a project based on battery's ? If yes,have taken in consideration that the price per kw is dearer trough battery than from mains ?
    Thanks


  • Advertisement
Advertisement