Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Any sympathy for an old bigot ?

Options
12346»

Comments

  • Options
    #152
    Ken Shamrock
    Registered Users Posts: 3,192 ✭✭✭Ken Shamrock


    inb4 the lock


  • Options
    #153
    DEFTLEFTHAND
    Registered Users Posts: 16,500 ✭✭✭✭DEFTLEFTHAND


    BarryD wrote: »
    Age is a funny thing - it's often said that as you get older, you get more conservative and less tolerant etc. Likewise young people can be very extreme in their views. What happens in the middle?

    You become a centrist, most average working people in the 35 to 55 demo like safe centrist politics and vote for parties like FF and FG.


  • Options
    #154
    bear1
    Registered Users Posts: 12,812 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    Cayden Weak Pantry wrote: »
    No, because being straight is the natural orientation.

    So it was natural that you were straight? So it was an unconscious decision?
    Pretty much like being born gay, it's still natural just they prefer things we don't.


  • Options
    #155
    wazky
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭wazky


    bear1 wrote: »
    Remember when Wanky said he had other accounts.... just saying ;)

    Reported

    I won't take being card mental and wanky.

    Childish


  • Options
    #156
    0byme75341jo28
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,571 ✭✭✭0byme75341jo28


    Why does it need to be locked? We're just having a discussion, I don't see any reason to stop conversing.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #157
    bear1
    Registered Users Posts: 12,812 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    wazky wrote: »
    Reported

    I won't take being card mental and wanky.

    Childish

    Report away, but I imagine the crap you've stirred won't go unnoticed either.
    You can't even justify why you think gayness is wrong.
    Pathetic.


  • Options
    #158
    Slicemeister
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,526 ✭✭✭Slicemeister


    Cayden Weak Pantry wrote: »
    Like he was conditioned to be gay.
    No he wasn't, far from it. And oddly enough for a gay, he was a fvckin pool shark.


  • Options
    #159
    Ken Shamrock
    Registered Users Posts: 3,192 ✭✭✭Ken Shamrock


    Cayden Weak Pantry wrote: »
    Why does it need to be locked? We're just having a discussion, I don't see any reason to stop conversing.

    I don't want it locked, it's just going that way, too many insults being flung around for it to continue.


  • Options
    #160
    shruikan2553
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭shruikan2553


    Cayden Weak Pantry wrote: »
    Why does it need to be locked? We're just having a discussion, I don't see any reason to stop conversing.

    The internet is unnatural so this all needs to be shut down. Can't have people doing unnatural things can we.


  • Options
    #161
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,458 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Cayden Weak Pantry wrote: »
    It is a choice.

    :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #162
    Mantis1234
    Registered Users Posts: 34 ✭Mantis1234


    Fat Christy wrote: »
    It is harmful to women! It gives men the idea that women are merely objects to be used and discarded.
    So what do you think of violent films or videogames where men are slaughtered by the hundreds or thousands even? I don't know about you but it doesn't give me the impression that men are objects to be used merely as bullet sponges, and I think most people would agree.

    And what about gay porn? Or straight porn whose target audience is women?


  • Options
    #163
    bear1
    Registered Users Posts: 12,812 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    shruikan2553 wrote: »
    The internet is unnatural so this all needs to be shut down. Can't have people doing unnatural things can we.

    Awful sordid don't ya know.


  • Options
    #164
    0byme75341jo28
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,571 ✭✭✭0byme75341jo28


    bear1 wrote: »
    So it was natural that you were straight? So it was an unconscious decision?
    Pretty much like being born gay, it's still natural just they prefer things we don't.

    Yes and yes.

    I disagree. I think it is unnatural, it may not be a choice, but the chances of being homosexual are certainly affected by someone's upbringing. Surrounded by liberal nonsense = high chance of being gay, brought up in a normal family = low chance of being gay, completely sheltered from liberal nonsense like my children will be = no chance of being gay.

    Simples.


  • Options
    #165
    Mark Tapley
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,193 ✭✭✭Mark Tapley


    wazky wrote: »
    So called liberals and open minds, yet they shout down others with differing opinions, odd that.

    Anytime somebody posts some **** which generally isn't agreed with, they start whining about being repressed by the liberals or the Pc brigade. You can't justify your view so resort to whining.


  • Options
    #166
    bear1
    Registered Users Posts: 12,812 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    Cayden Weak Pantry wrote: »
    Yes and yes.

    I disagree. I think it is unnatural, it may not be a choice, but the chances of being homosexual are certainly affected by someone's upbringing. Surrounded by liberal nonsense = high chance of being gay, brought up in a normal family = low chance of being gay, completely sheltered from liberal nonsense like my children will be = no chance of being gay.

    Simples.

    Seriously? And what will you actually do in the off chance your child announces he/she is gay?
    Disown him/her I imagine? Call him/her names?


  • Options
    #167
    krudler
    Registered Users Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    Manach wrote: »
    I'd say thanks for the sympathy, but the cultures wars are far from over. In spite of seeing the erosion of traditional Western values and their slide into oblivion into a nihilistic value free mindet beyond toleration for all except for all that disagree with the PC world view, the traditional values and morals will endure.

    I know, we need to go back to the days of traditional Western values like in the days when married women couldn't keep their jobs, pregnant girls could be put into slave labour laundries, unwed mothers could have their children taken and sold without their consent, gay people could be imprisoned and priests were above the law. Fine days they were, then the liberals came along with their "equality" and "rights" and ruined it all.


  • Options
    #168
    shruikan2553
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭shruikan2553


    Cayden Weak Pantry wrote: »
    Yes and yes.

    I disagree. I think it is unnatural, it may not be a choice, but the chances of being homosexual are certainly affected by someone's upbringing. Surrounded by liberal nonsense = high chance of being gay, brought up in a normal family = low chance of being gay, completely sheltered from liberal nonsense like my children will be = no chance of being gay.

    Simples.

    How do you completely shelter someone from liberal nonsense? I'm sure you have a natural study done to show that it prevents people from being gay?


  • Options
    #169
    0byme75341jo28
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,571 ✭✭✭0byme75341jo28


    bear1 wrote: »
    Seriously? And what will you actually do in the off chance your child announces he/she is gay?
    Disown him/her I imagine? Call him/her names?

    I'll tell him or her I'm disappointed in them, but I would still love them. I hold no hatred for homosexuals, I just disagree with the notion that it is a natural part of life.


  • Options
    #170
    shruikan2553
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭shruikan2553


    Cayden Weak Pantry wrote: »
    I'll tell him or her I'm disappointed in them, but I would still love them. I hold no hatred for homosexuals, I just disagree with the notion that it is a natural part of life.

    Said by someone on the internet...


  • Options
    #171
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,458 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Cayden Weak Pantry wrote: »
    Yes and yes.

    I disagree. I think it is unnatural, it may not be a choice, but the chances of being homosexual are certainly affected by someone's upbringing. Surrounded by liberal nonsense = high chance of being gay, brought up in a normal family = low chance of being gay, completely sheltered from liberal nonsense like my children will be = no chance of being gay.

    Simples.

    I honestly pray you have a GANG of gay children, every one of them camper than their younger sibling.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #172
    bear1
    Registered Users Posts: 12,812 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    Cayden Weak Pantry wrote: »
    I'll tell him or her I'm disappointed in them, but I would still love them. I hold no hatred for homosexuals, I just disagree with the notion that it is a natural part of life.

    So your child comes out with possibly the biggest news of their lives and the first thing you'll tell them is your disappointed in them? Fcuk me thats harsh.
    I wouldn't give a ****, as long as the child is healthy, happy and isn't bullied I couldn't give two fcuks what it's sexually orientation would be.
    I guess I'm just far too liberal :rolleyes:


  • Options
    #173
    humanji
    Registered Users Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    No real reason for this clusterf*ck of a thread to continue just so people can shout "You're wrong!" at each other.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement