Why don't women have full bush anymore?

LETHAL LADY

starling wrote: »

Pubes don't cause friction burns...stubble can, though. And folliculitis is way worse than that, trust me.

Would the fuller bush not catch on the penis during penetration and therefore get pushed inside the vagina and thus cause friction burns internally?

Nesta99

LETHAL LADY wrote: »

Would the fuller bush not catch on the penis during penetration and therefore get pushed inside the vagina and thus cause friction burns internally?

Nope! not with secretions/lube - as said stubble is the enemy! well in my experience and the itch growing back for the missus. Was a nice surprise at the time but deemed not worth the hassle so once off - and shes a redhead and proud of it!!:D

LETHAL LADY

LETHAL LADY wrote: »

Would the fuller bush not catch on the penis during penetration and therefore get pushed inside the vagina and thus cause friction burns internally?

I think it would have to be very long indeed for that to happen.

Nemeses

I believe the ladies have no bush as its bikini time!

roast

Not too bothered, I'll lob it in anyway.

starling

LETHAL LADY wrote: »

Would the fuller bush not catch on the penis during penetration and therefore get pushed inside the vagina and thus cause friction burns internally?

Nope. For a demonstration of the principle, try inserting your finger into your vagina and you'll get an idea of the mechanics of it and see what I mean:)
Seriously I'm not being a smart@rse here. Besides is fun:D

mariaalice

Its all to do with fashion.

What is strange is novel, or something like that.

In sexual behaviour something out side the norm acquires an eroticism, so now that shaving/waxing of public hair has almost become normalised it has lost a lot of its eroticism and the eroticism has transfered to having full pubic hair, primely becausing having un tended pubic hair is almost uncommon.

It is the same way something forbidden can become very erotic.

Lelantos

starling wrote: »

Nope. For a demonstration of the principle, try inserting your finger into your vagina and you'll get an idea of the mechanics of it and see what I mean:)
Seriously I'm not being a smart@rse here. Besides is fun:D

Hmmm

starling

Lelantos wrote: »

Hmmm

Lmao

mariaalice wrote: »

Its all to do with fashion.

What is strange is novel, or something like that.

In sexual behaviour something out side the norm acquires an eroticism, so now that shaving/waxing of public hair has almost become normalised it has lost a lot of its eroticism and the eroticism has transfered to having full pubic hair, primely becausing having un tended pubic hair is almost uncommon.

It is the same way something forbidden can become very erotic.

That's true! Once it was an uncovered ankle, now it's pubic hair..novelty and things that are "forbidden" can heighten the excitement:)

Reamer Fanny

con___manx1 wrote: »

find your self a ginger women.from my experience they seem to be proud of there fiery bushes.lol

Shivers up my spine ugh

kylith

LETHAL LADY wrote: »

Would the fuller bush not catch on the penis during penetration and therefore get pushed inside the vagina and thus cause friction burns internally?

The thing to remember when it comes to stuff like 'doesn't leaving it natural hurt/cause infection/turn men off?' is to remember that Homo Sapiens have been around for around 200,000 years and for all but the last 20 or so of those years they have been shagging with pubic hair, even when the Victorians (ICBW) were shaving it off because of lice they were glueing wigs back on there. If it hurt or got infected, or was any kind of detriment, our species would either have died out or evolved out of it.

The spreading of your legs at penetration occurs will clear the path of any hair, and on the off-chance that a little gets caught up then you just move it with your finger. IME it's reported to cause a pleasant tickling sensation, I know that male pubic hair definitely does.

FWIW, I shave my bush when I feel like it (less than once a year), but I keep it trimmed. I shave my underarms and legs when they're going to be on display, and I never touch my eyebrows unless there's a hair sticking up. I also don't wear makeup. I've never had a problem in the romance department, which I put down to being generally clean and well presented (and loving movies with explosions. Men love a woman who can appreciate a massive fireball).

imtdub

Who likes Katrina Law?

mcrods

kylith wrote: »

The thing to remember when it comes to stuff like 'doesn't leaving it natural hurt/cause infection/turn men off?' is to remember that Homo Sapiens have been around for around 200,000 years and for all but the last 20 or so of those years they have been shagging with pubic hair, even when the Victorians (ICBW) were shaving it off because of lice they were glueing wigs back on there. If it hurt or got infected, or was any kind of detriment, our species would either have died out or evolved out of it.

The spreading of your legs at penetration occurs will clear the path of any hair, and on the off-chance that a little gets caught up then you just move it with your finger. IME it's reported to cause a pleasant tickling sensation, I know that male pubic hair definitely does.

FWIW, I shave my bush when I feel like it (less than once a year), but I keep it trimmed. I shave my underarms and legs when they're going to be on display, and I never touch my eyebrows unless there's a hair sticking up. I also don't wear makeup. I've never had a problem in the romance department, which I put down to being generally clean and well presented (and loving movies with explosions. Men love a woman who can appreciate a massive fireball).

Is it fair to say you are a natural woman? I think all woman should be more like you... Society is changing due to magazines and porn... Like surely not all women around the world shave. I once said to my ex to not shave down below. She agreed and ever since has not. 5 years later still hasn't

Capt'n Midnight

3ndahalfof6 wrote: »

Thread needs to be moved to the, fooked up humans section, quicklier than fast.

And just what do you think AH is for exactly ?

starWave wrote: »

According to the internet, its like the 69 position without the bj part, i.e the woman is just sitting.

AKA 68 as in I'll owe you one.

Femme_Fatale wrote: »

There is. Lice! Lots of, ahem, secretions come from there and getting mixed in with tangled up hair is obviously not very hygienic. I know it's not necessary to get rid of pubic hair completely, but minimising it is definitely necessary for hygiene.

http://news.yahoo.com/endangered-species-bikini-waxes-wiping-pubic-lice-211923413.html

Pubic lice have plagued mankind for thousands of years, but the itchy pests are now facing a enemy that threatens to wipe them out: bikini waxing.

And because it's AH

Pubic lice are a different species from head lice, and evidence suggests humans caught pubic lice from gorillas some 3 million years ago (no not from human-gorilla sex, but rather from sleeping in their nests or eating apes),

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3715132.stm

Some head lice infesting people today were probably spread to us thousands of years ago by an extinct species of early human, a genetics study reveals.

It shows that when our ancestors left Africa after 100,000 years ago, they made direct contact with tribes of "archaic" peoples, probably in Asia.

Lice could have jumped from them on to our ancestors during fights, sex, clothes-sharing or even cannibalism.

Anyone feeling itchy after reading this ?

stuar wrote: »

"Hairy stockings aimed at deflecting unwanted male attention"

AFAIK that's just a hoax.

starling

Capt'n Midnight wrote: »

http://news.yahoo.com/endangered-species-bikini-waxes-wiping-pubic-lice-211923413.html

Lol, somehow I don't see PETA launching any "save the crabs" campaigns:pac:

bodice ripper

I never thought I'd say it, but I am very pleased to see the public support for bush.

martinedwards

starling

^^^^^^^

Dude how long have you been on the Internet it's not that hard to find pictures of muffs:pac:

kylith

mcrods wrote: »

Is it fair to say you are a natural woman? I think all woman should be more like you... Society is changing due to magazines and porn... Like surely not all women around the world shave. I once said to my ex to not shave down below. She agreed and ever since has not. 5 years later still hasn't

I guess it would be fair to say that, although I do dye my hair when I fancy a change.

I have heard that it's suggested that the increase in porn is changing the way people have sex, and I guess that changing attitudes to body hair would come under that. What they forget, though, is that the way they have sex in porn is for the camera; a lot of the positions they use are actually crap for having sex in but are done so the camera can see the angle, and that's probably why the hair started to be shaved off; as people started to want closer and more graphic views, and pubes do get in the way of that.

mcrods

kylith wrote: »

I guess it would be fair to say that, although I do dye my hair when I fancy a change.

I have heard that it's suggested that the increase in porn is changing the way people have sex, and I guess that changing attitudes to body hair would come under that. What they forget, though, is that the way they have sex in porn is for the camera; a lot of the positions they use are actually crap for having sex in but are done so the camera can see the angle, and that's probably why the hair started to be shaved off; as people started to want closer and more graphic views, and pubes do get in the way of that.

Completely agree... Porn is changing people attitudes which is not good. You would never see a natural woman on a porn DVD.... Like this should not be the case...

Rented Mule

mcrods wrote: »

Completely agree... Porn is changing people attitudes which is not good. You would never see a natural woman on a porn DVD.... Like this should not be the case...

You're not watching enough porn.

starling

mcrods wrote: »

Completely agree... Porn is changing people attitudes which is not good. You would never see a natural woman on a porn DVD.... Like this should not be the case...

Agree with you and kylith 100% there, I have no problem with porn in theory but people do need to remember just how unrealistic it is, it's not meant to be an instruction video! I think it's particulary a problem for younger people because they start watching porn well before they've actually had sex. Porn is the only graphic image of the actual act of shagging they see, so it starts to influence them before they have the experience to know "That looks hot but it's probably not all that comfortable in real life"
I've said it before I think, it's all very well to see something in porn that excites you and think "Hm I wouldn't mind trying that" but people do need to remember there's a difference between doing things for how they look and actually experiencing them yourself. Porn - the video and picture kind - naturally overemphasises the visual to a degree that doesn't have much to do with the actual experience of sex in real life.

mcrods

Rented Mule wrote: »

You're not watching enough porn.

Why is that now

Lelantos

mcrods wrote: »

Why is that now

Scared the wife will catch you?

Con Logue

I think I'd choke on my pint if a woman told me, randomly and with some emphasis that she waxed her bush, okay? A bit like one time where a friend of a friend in mixed company declared that no matter how much a man pestered her she would never take it up the bum.
Personally I think the plucked chicken look is awful but for obvious reasons isn't a deal breaker. Or even a conversation starter.

mcrods

Lelantos wrote: »

Scared the wife will catch you?

I don't need to watch it!

Capt'n Midnight

mcrods wrote: »

Completely agree... Porn is changing people attitudes which is not good. You would never see a natural woman on a porn DVD.... Like this should not be the case...

Porn movies and Disney are responsible for the most frustrated human beings I know http://gs1.wac.edgecastcdn.net/8019B6/data.tumblr.com/tumblr_l3r34jTkCa1qzr5kvo1_r1_500.jpg