Extermination through sterilisation - the solution to "skangerism"

Oink

Don't hold back there OP. Let me google that just to clarify. Is this what we're talking about?

http://untreaty.un.org/cod/icc/statute/99_corr/cstatute.htm

[SIZE=-1]Article 7[/SIZE] [SIZE=-1]Crimes against humanity
[/SIZE]
[SIZE=-1][SIZE=-1](g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;


[/SIZE][/SIZE]

bedrock#1

Thread should be closed - If this was about any other group (Muslims, Jews, homosexuals, blacks, asians ....) it wouldn't get past the first post.

J_E

Seriously, AH? Hitting a new low every day...

Seachmall

bedrock#1 wrote: »

Thread should be closed - If this was about any other group (Muslims, Jews, homosexuals, blacks, asians ....) it wouldn't get past the first post.

Scumbags are defined by their anti-social behaviour, so you're not generalising all scumbags when you say they're pricks, By definition they are pricks.

kylith

wesf wrote: »

Actually one night while having a few drinks with friends we were talking about this subject.
I came up with an amazing idea, here it is:
Choose a county nobody likes, lets say Roscommon, fence it off Jurassic Park style, take all the normal people and move them elsewhere while leaving the scumbags there.
Round up all the other scumbags around the country and throw them in also.
Here comes the best bit, charge people, stag do's etc, to enter the park on a hunting weekend, you get to hunt down and kill scumbags, while generating money for the country also, win win for everyone!!

I wouldn't agree with hunting them down, but why couldn't all the people who have never worked, and have no intention of doing so, be moved to these ghost estates? Give the social housing in the cities to people who want to find work there.

danniemcq wrote: »

its quite an odd one, it could work. Wasn't there something about rapists getting reduced sentances for being castrated.

or maybe i was readin the onion.

Maybe for chemical castration, though I haven't heard of it in Ireland.

Chemical castration is where they use drugs to remove libido, rather than using acid to burn their penis off; which is what I thought it was when I was little, and it seemed like a very fitting punishment to me.

General General

bedrock#1 wrote: »

Thread should be closed - If this was about any other group (Muslims, Jews, homosexuals, blacks, asians ....) it wouldn't get past the first post.

Your Mod application form is on the way.

y0pperz

bedrock#1 wrote: »

Thread should be closed - If this was about any other group (Muslims, Jews, homosexuals, blacks, asians ....) it wouldn't get past the first post.

Are you saying there's ANY rational comparison between scumbags and one of those ethnic groups you mentioned?

theholyghost

Thank god the holier than thou no sense of humor brigade have arrived to save us from ourselves.

anncoates

mike65 wrote: »

It won't catch all the bad genes

Are you suggesting that the genes of certain social classes are intrinsically bad?

How does that work?

Could the same be said for certain races, genders and people with disabilities?

iDave

Make what you want about sterilisation but we have to recognise there is an underclass in Dublin that trive on an existence of mediocrity and violence.

humbert

Offering would-be-terrible-terrible-parents an incentive to voluntarily sterilise themselves makes perfect sense to me. Seriously, who loses out?

anncoates

theholyghost wrote: »

Thank god the holier than thou no sense of humor brigade have arrived to save us from ourselves.

Maybe try and refute what they say instead of hiding behind imbecilic epithets about PC brigades and the like.

Links234

you know, if you really wanted to direct your ire somewhere, why not the judges who throw people back onto the streets despite having dozens of convictions, if not more, or give constant suspended sentences for violent rapists.

Uriel.

Links234 wrote: »

Wow, we're talking about exterminating the lower classes? beautiful, AH... absolutely beautiful.

that's gonna take a lot of work though, maybe we should relocate these undesirables to camps, so we can er, concentrate our efforts there. then it would be much easier to move on to other undesirable classes, such as jews, gypsies, homosexuals, socialists and others

**** sake

wow that's a great idea.
Weird though, thought you were more humanitarian than that...

If only there was some historical precedence of this kind of thing, something we could copy and use... hmmmmm

Ush1

I'm not a fan of eugenics per say or a Darwinian set of ideals applied to society(although Capitalism nearly sorts that out), I'd more want to lean towards weighted voting in elections.

The electorate are just too stupid to know what's good for them.

awec

bedrock#1 wrote: »

Thread should be closed - If this was about any other group (Muslims, Jews, homosexuals, blacks, asians ....) it wouldn't get past the first post.

Are feral youth a "group" now?

holystungun9

kylith wrote: »

In theory eugenics is a good idea... In theory.

Eugene had got nothing to do with this!

Uriel.

Personally,

I'd prefer a Running Man style approach...

By 2017, the global economy has collapsed and American society has become a totalitarian police state, censoring all cultural activity. The government pacifies the populace by broadcasting a number of game shows in which convicted criminals fight for their lives, including the gladiator-style The Running Man, hosted by the ruthless Damon Killian, where "runners" attempt to evade "stalkers" and certain death for a chance to be pardoned and set free.

but only with Killian as the presenter

awec

iDave wrote: »

Make what you want about sterilisation but we have to recognise there is an underclass in Dublin that trive on an existence of mediocrity and violence.

Of course there is. And it's not just Dublin.

People will stick their heads in the sand and pretend there isn't so they can get a pat on the back for their "forward thinking" PC mindset.

Or else they'll try and tell us that these people are victims of society.

Tiddlypeeps

Ush1 wrote: »

The electorate are just too stupid to know what's good for them.

That's an inherent issue with democracy. It's built on the logical fallacy that the majority of people are right most of the time.

As Winston Churchill once said, the best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter.

Unfortunately there aren't an over abundance of attractive alternatives.

bedrock#1

Seachmall wrote: »

Scumbags are defined by their anti-social behaviour, so you're not generalising all scumbags when you say they're pricks, By definition they are pricks.

But it's still incitement to hatred. Doesn't matter what your opinion is, although you are entitled to hold it. What exactly is "anti-social behaviour"?? Something that annoys you? Hurts your sensibilities? From the amount I've read on the subject it is primarily a definition of behaviour aimed at those from lower socio-economic classes. To try to rationalise it as pertaining to your non-specific 'scumbags' and 'pricks' won't really do for a coherent argument, because it's not coherent and it's not an argument.

Links234

awec wrote: »

Of course there is. And it's not just Dublin.

People will stick their heads in the sand and pretend there isn't so they can get a pat on the back for their "forward thinking" PC mindset.

Or else they'll try and tell us that these people are victims of society.

please don't mistake my lack of bloodlust for being oblivious to problems society faces such as feral youth, and much of the "scumbag" behavior of repeat criminal offenders... I've been a target for exactly these types, probably more than many here. I just think there could possibly be a more measured response that doesn't involve extermination and eugenics.

mattjack

danniemcq wrote: »

Spent some time in Limerick and its the only place i've been given fake money, the rest of it i see in news

Dublin? been (well attempted to be) mugged there, got started a few times for no reason etc plus in the OP both incidents were in....? plus its full of dubliners who think nothing exists outside the pale.

Hence only walling off Limerick but nuking Dublin

There's a lesson to be learned here , in this post.... how 'bout we sterilise people who were nearly mugged.

up for anything

Nature abhors a vacuum. If you get rid of those you deem undesirable another set of 'undesirables' will spring up to replace them. I'm sure the present Turkish government regards those people demonstrating as undesirable and would love to be able to wipe them out but if they did that then they would create an even bigger problem for themselves as people not involved now would surely get involved.

OP, who do you think should sit in judgement on who or who not should be deleted?

mariaalice

There has alway been" feral" children and various responses, its is only relatively recently that anyone bothered about this, it arose in Victorian times when book like people of the abyss, were written.

Anyone seen the purge.

--Kaiser--

Don't be stupid, be a smarty, come and join the Nazi party!

frank reynolds

lots of them have kids simply for the state allowances. take these allowances away and you will see a sharp drop in the amount of kids they have. guaranteed.

Ush1

up for anything wrote: »

Nature abhors a vacuum. If you get rid of those you deem undesirable another set of 'undesirables' will spring up to replace them. I'm sure the present Turkish government regards those people demonstrating as undesirable and would love to be able to wipe them out but if they did that then they would create an even bigger problem for themselves as people not involved now would surely get involved.

OP, who do you think should sit in judgement on who or who not should be deleted?

Well generally in nature it's the ones who have the ability to do the exterminating who decide who to exterminate.

mike65

up for anything wrote: »

OP, who do you think should sit in judgement on who or who not should be deleted?

I'm not proposing the deletion of anyone merely the lack of creation, read the last sentence of the OP again.

endacl

mike65 wrote: »

I'm not proposing the deletion of anyone merely the lack of creation, read the last sentence of the OP again.

You were serious?!?

:eek: