Another "Freeman on the Land" Conspiracy Loon gets locked up for contempt of court

Seedy Arling

Iwasfrozen wrote: »

I don't agree to be bound by societies rules. I'm going to go live in a boat in the Atlantic. :cool:

Will you be sailing the boat or merely travelling in it?

Iwasfrozen

cursai wrote: »

do you know whats full retard........................................

The new star trek.......THATS FULL RETARD.

Doctor Carol Marcus would disagree.

http://www.cinemablend.com/images/news/37224/_1367190146.jpg

donegal_road

Ireland 2013, Neo Feudalist Utopia

Cody Pomeray

darkhorse wrote: »

Which man are you talking about?

The man who is speaking in the video, and possibly those who take him seriously.

I can see *some* place for Freemen in places like France which operate under the Napoleonic code, but not in Ireland, under a common law system.

darkhorse

Cody Pomeray wrote: »

The man who is speaking in the video, and possibly those who take him seriously.

You didn't happen to notice the two irish ministers?

Cody Pomeray

darkhorse wrote: »

You didn't happen to notice the two irish ministers?

What about them?

Freeman arguments seem to thrive on ambiguous commentary, is there any hard statement to make about the seal which actually can be looked at in detail.

When it gets down to the fundamentals, it's not clear what the Freemen expect.

States don't derive their authority from some magic clerk in the sky deeming individual jurisdictions to be legitimate or not. States ultimately derive their authority from popular co-operation - not just in plebiscites but in day to day interactions with a willing people who bestow upon that State the right to restrict individual freedoms at the expense of 'the common good'.

As we know from history, the public are more than capable of rebellion when they see fit. In a sense, peaceful bliss (at least, in terms of the administration of justice) is the greatest level of legitimacy that the State can earn.

darkhorse

Cody Pomeray wrote: »

What about them?

Freeman arguments seem to thrive on ambiguous commentary, is there any hard statement to make about the seal which actually can be looked at in detail.

When it gets down to the fundamentals, it's not clear what the Freemen expect.

States don't derive their authority from some magic clerk in the sky deeming individual jurisdictions to be legitimate or not. States ultimately derive their authority from popular co-operation - not just in plebiscites but in day to day interactions with a willing people who bestow upon that State the right to restrict individual freedoms at the expense of 'the common good'.

As we know from history, the public are more than capable of rebellion when they see fit. In a sense, peaceful bliss (at least, in terms of the administration of justice) is the greatest level of legitimacy that the State can earn.

Yeah.

--Kaiser--

MadsL wrote: »

The problem, as with advertising, is figuring out which half.

Care to have a stab at it?

Biggins has posted some fairly freeman-esque unique takes on the household charge.

http://bigginsblog.wordpress.com/2013/05/11/the-household-charge-property-tax-scam-exposed-bedroom-tax-and-all-yes-im-serious/

Christ, what a load of asinine drivel, I'm glad he's gone

pablomakaveli

Deleted User wrote: »

Can't say ill miss him though there was a lot of comedic value in his posts where he implied that was some sort of black ops operative, how he often rubbed shoulders with celebrities and most laughable of all the repeated posts where he spoke of some conspiracy where members of boards were out to get him and how the mods were looking into it. He had a wonderful imagination and I do fear for him now he's banned, hope his delusions don't takeover his life now that he no longer has boards.

I always thought he was a level headed voice of reason until i read this thread. Something must have changed in the last year or two i guess.

SB2013

MadsL wrote: »

The problem, as with advertising, is figuring out which half.

Care to have a stab at it?

Biggins has posted some fairly freeman-esque unique takes on the household charge.

http://bigginsblog.wordpress.com/2013/05/11/the-household-charge-property-tax-scam-exposed-bedroom-tax-and-all-yes-im-serious/

Poor guy. He doesn't know that the use of the word "shall" in legislation means you have to do it.

Big Nasty

SB2013 wrote: »

Poor guy. He doesn't know that the use of the word "shall" in legislation means you have to do it.

How dafuq can you even read it with all the italics, bold and underscores? :eek:

Micky Dolenz

What a cluster fcuk.