Rangers FC On Field Gossip & Rumour Thread 2017 Mod Note in OP(Updated 14/08)

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Game over 3-0 it finishes

bobbysands81

Dempsey wrote: »

You think I care that much, I dont.

I doubt he'll be crying into his pillow tonight or anything but its an attempt at operant conditioning whether you realise it or not. Just reminded me of TBBT and how Sheldon tried to condition Leonard & Penny with chocolates and a water sprayer.

You work in that kind of field Dempsey?

Jelle1880

Raith Rovers at home in the cup, I'll take that.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Alloa v Rangers in the semi of the PT Cup with a 7:30 kick off. One change to the Rangers starting 11 from Saturday Boyd in for Daly

Jelle1880

Horrible so far, same old crap served up by McCoist.

Alloa should be leading here.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Jelle1880 wrote: »

Horrible so far, same old crap served up by McCoist.

Alloa should be leading here.

It is probably the worst 45 minutes of football from a Rangers team that I have watched in many many years of watching :mad:

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Rangers go one up. Miller puts it in the bet after the keeper fails to hold a Boyd free kick

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Rangers go two up Shiels with a nice finish

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Alloa pull one back sloppy defending from Rangers
Oh FFs more shocking defending twinned with some good play from Alloa and it is 2-2

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Alloa deservedly rake a 3-2 lead. I really don't see how McCoist can keep his job and a these Rangers players should hold their heads in shame

Game over didn't think we could ever play as badly but under McCoist it is becoming the norm

delaad

Broxi_Bear_Eire wrote: »

Alloa deservedly rake a 3-2 lead. I really don't see how McCoist can keep his job and a these Rangers players should hold their heads in shame

Game over didn't think we could ever play as badly but under McCoist it is becoming the norm.

"You say Alloa?, and they say GOODBYE!"

Sorry lads, couldn't resist,...this thread is seriously lacking in humour.

Intifada

delaad wrote: »

Sorry lads, couldn't resist,...this thread is seriously lacking in humour.

I think some of us would beg to differ

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Rangers v Cowdenbeath in the Championship today. One change with Shiels in for the injured MacLeod.
I see Rangers winning this comfortably and it papering the cracks for another week.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Shiels puts Rangers one up with a neat finish. But overall a pretty dire performance

Hearts look unstoppable, no sign of any slip ups but then look at what happened to Chelsea today!

Broxi_Bear_Eire

zorro2566 wrote: »

Hearts look unstoppable, no sign of any slip ups but then look at what happened to Chelsea today!

Be very surprised and even if they do I am not sure this side are in any way capable

bobbysands81

PauloMN

http://www.rte.ie/sport/soccer/scottish/2014/1210/665866-rangers-admit-attendance-figure-was-incorrect/

Rangers must have been using the Seville calculator they keep banging on about!!

Intifada

PauloMN wrote: »

http://www.rte.ie/sport/soccer/scottish/2014/1210/665866-rangers-admit-attendance-figure-was-incorrect/

Rangers must have been using the Seville calculator they keep banging on about!!

Every club does it tbf

Still it is particularly funny in this case. Remember when they kept banging on about attendances at the start? Was bad enough given that at the time, ours were still higher, but made even worse now!

YDDWA

Jelle1880

Intifada wrote: »

Every club does it tbf

Still it is particularly funny in this case. Remember when they kept banging on about attendances at the start? Was bad enough given that at the time, ours were still higher, but made even worse now!

YDDWA

:pac:
Load of crap.

Our attendances in Div 3 were actually that high, lowest attendance in that season was 30.000 in the league with the average game between 45.000 and 49.000.

It's only since the last 2 seasons when attendances have dropped significantly that it has become so obvious that the club was lying about it.

Dempsey

Jelle1880 wrote: »

:pac:
Load of crap.

Our attendances in Div 3 were actually that high, lowest attendance in that season was 30.000 in the league with the average game between 45.000 and 49.000.

It's only since the last 2 seasons when attendances have dropped significantly that it has become so obvious that the club was lying about it.

It was obvious what was going on long before you got admission to Division 3.

bobbysands81

Jelle1880 wrote: »

it has become so obvious that the club was lying about it.

How do you know it was the club lying and not the company?

Eirebear

bobbysands81 wrote: »

How do you know it was the club lying and not the company?

Sigh.
I can almost envision you slapping yourself on the back after such a well aimed zinger.
You sure showed him.

Jelle1880

Dempsey wrote: »

It was obvious what was going on long before you got admission to Division 3.

So in Division 3, where like I said attendances were genuinely as high as claimed they were lying about it ?

Ok.

edit. nice one bobby, brilliant joke

Intifada

Eirebear wrote: »

Sigh.
I can almost envision you slapping yourself on the back after such a well aimed zinger.
You sure showed him.

Jelle1880 wrote: »

edit. nice one bobby, brilliant joke

Lads I think the joke was meant to be at your expense rather than for your amusement.

Eirebear

Intifada wrote: »

Lads I think the joke was meant to be at your expense rather than for your amusement.

I stand by my original statement, with bonus points going to Captain Obvious here.

Intifada

Except it is amusing to point out how your rabid mob were so desperate to draw a distinction between club & company when it justified your Same Club myth, yet you drop the ball so many other times over the same issue. Whether you find it amusing or not isn't really of any relevance. You wouldn't let a turkey tell you Christmas is ****e

Eirebear

Intifada wrote: »

Except it is amusing to point out how your rabid mob were so desperate to draw a distinction between club & company when it justified your Same Club myth, yet you drop the ball so many other times over the same issue. Whether you find it amusing or not isn't really of any relevance. You wouldn't let a turkey tell you Christmas is ****e

Just as well you and Bob are here to point out our fallibility in such amusing style isn't it.
Gobble Gobble Gobble.

Jelle1880

Intifada wrote: »

Except it is amusing to point out how your rabid mob were so desperate to draw a distinction between club & company when it justified your Same Club myth, yet you drop the ball so many other times over the same issue. Whether you find it amusing or not isn't really of any relevance. You wouldn't let a turkey tell you Christmas is ****e

When exactly, apart from in your weird little brain, did that happen ?

Dempsey

Jelle1880 wrote: »

So in Division 3, where like I said attendances were genuinely as high as claimed they were lying about it ?

Ok.

edit. nice one bobby, brilliant joke

It doesn't matter, ye were blind to the fact that you were being milked. Lies or not, attendences was a marketing tool for the cowboys running the club and ye were happy to be milked until they started cashing out.