Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Official Free Money Betting Thread 2012/2013 Mark II Redemption

Options
1818284868790

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    I took the BaaBaas at -2 the other day, they're at +4 now!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    CatFromHue wrote: »
    I took the BaaBaas at -2 the other day, they're at +4 now!!

    Haven't seen that kind of line move in a while


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    Ah well it didn't matter anyway!


  • Registered Users Posts: 650 ✭✭✭preddy


    Lions betting any early betting value?

    Took Hibbert to start first test at 4/5
    OZ +1 for the draw 20/1
    SOB to start 11/8
    Looking at less than 2.5 English players to start the first test at 4/6 - banker?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    preddy wrote: »
    Lions betting any early betting value?

    Took Hibbert to start first test at 4/5
    OZ +1 for the draw 20/1
    SOB to start 11/8
    Looking at less than 2.5 English players to start the first test at 4/6 - banker?

    Did Gatty say anyone involved in the Prem final won't play in the 1st test?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,234 ✭✭✭trouttrout


    Rightwing wrote: »
    Did Gatty say anyone involved in the Prem final won't play in the 1st test?

    No


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    Rightwing wrote: »
    Did Gatty say anyone involved in the Prem final won't play in the 1st test?

    I don't think they'll play the BaaBaa game. Most of them won't have even had a training session with the Lions yet unlike all the other players who's club season finished on the last day of the club regular season.


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    preddy wrote: »
    Looking at less than 2.5 English players to start the first test at 4/6 - banker?

    If you're a believer that politics play a part in the test selection than England will have players involved.

    Let's analyse it by position:

    Prop: Little chance of an English starter. Vunipola has been brought as an impact type player. Can't see Stevens getting into the 23.

    Hooker: Hibbard is in front of Youngs most likely, Youngs would need a great run of form in the provincial matches.

    Lock: I think this has a good chance of an English starter in Parling. POC should start but other position is up for grabs IMO.

    Backrow: Croft has been in great form for Leicester and offers another lineout option. Potential test player and being a former test player might be in his favour.

    Scrumhalf: Gatty has always picked Phillips when he's fit/available, I think Youngs might be number 2.

    Flyhalf: I'd be shocked if Sexton didn't start.

    Centre: Oooh tough one. If Gatland is happy to play two boshers then Tuilagi will play.

    Wing: No English players

    Fullback: No English players

    You also have to factor in that a few players will get injured before the tests and that will influence selection. I personally wouldn't back less than 2.5 at 4/6 myself.

    Edit: As a reference, although it will bear little relevance to the test selection for 2013, here are the number of England players selected in 2009:

    1st test: 4 (Mears, Vickery, Croft, Monye)
    2nd test: 2 (Shaw, Croft)
    3rd test: 6 (Sheridan, Vickery, Shaw, Worsley, Flutey, Monye)


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    If you're a believer that politics play a part in the test selection than England will have players involved.

    Let's analyse it by position:

    Prop: Little chance of an English starter. Vunipola has been brought as an impact type player. Can't see Stevens getting into the 23.
    I'm guessing Healy/Jenkins and Jones will get the nod here

    Hooker: Hibbard is in front of Youngs most likely, Youngs would need a great run of form in the provincial matches.
    Can't see Youngs getting ahead of either Best or Hibbard here

    Lock: I think this has a good chance of an English starter in Parling. POC should start but other position is up for grabs IMO.
    Potentially, barring injury though I'd imagine POC AWJ will be the 1st choice pairing

    Backrow: Croft has been in great form for Leicester and offers another lineout option. Potential test player and being a former test player might be in his favour.
    Croft's primarily a 6 and a fit SOB and one of the Welsh lads are presumable ahead of him

    Scrumhalf: Gatty has always picked Phillips when he's fit/available, I think Youngs might be number 2.
    Agree here

    Flyhalf: I'd be shocked if Sexton didn't start.
    Likewise

    Centre: Oooh tough one. If Gatland is happy to play two boshers then Tuilagi will play.
    Do you think BOD won't get the nod?

    Wing: No English players

    Fullback: No English players

    Looks like a decent bet at those odds IMO


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,101 ✭✭✭Rightwing


    P_1 wrote: »
    Looks like a decent bet at those odds IMO

    That's a dreadful bet, in fact 1 of the worst I've ever seen. Far too many variables to consider.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 18,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatFromHue


    I wouldn't be going anywhere near the players from each country bet myself. It's just too far away and so much could happen both form and injury wise.

    Adam Jones may the favourite for TH but Cole wouldn't be far behind, any injury to Jones and Cole is in if you ask me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 650 ✭✭✭preddy


    BOD or Tuilagi is a big question at 13 but i think BOD starts all going well with fitness.
    Injuries/lack of form is the only factor that could push English players into the team but at the moment I wouldnt name any.

    The fact that Conor Murry has a size advantage over Youngs might push him into the Gat if Philips has an issue.

    4/6 is not great odds, think ill hold off on that one.


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Old Balance: 50.59 units

    2.59 units on Toulon -7

    New Balance: 48.00 units


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Old Balance: 50.59 units

    2.59 units on Toulon -7

    New Balance: 48.00 units

    :(


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,371 ✭✭✭GiftofGab


    Thomand can you explain what you mean by units?? How are you calculating them??


  • Registered Users Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    GiftofGab wrote: »
    Thomand can you explain what you mean by units?? How are you calculating them??

    A unit is €1x, 2 units is €2x and so on. It's just a way for me to post my bets here without disclosing the amount of money I'm betting.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Camilo Drab Range


    GiftofGab wrote: »
    Thomand can you explain what you mean by units?? How are you calculating them??

    Bets are often quoted in terms of units.

    One person's entire bankroll could be another person's average betsize.

    The idea being that by describing how big your bank is in units, and declaring your stake size in units that you can add weight to your belief in bets.

    For instance, if I say to you

    "I have €25 on Ulster to beat the HC."

    That could be 10 times bigger than I usually bet, or even ten times smaller.

    Instead, by saying
    Bank - 100 units
    Bet - 2.5 units on Ulster to beat the HC

    You see what confidence I have in the bet.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,371 ✭✭✭GiftofGab


    A unit is €1x, 2 units is €2x and so on. It's just a way for me to post my bets here without disclosing the amount of money I'm betting.
    Bets are often quoted in terms of units.

    One person's entire bankroll could be another person's average betsize.

    The idea being that by describing how big your bank is in units, and declaring your stake size in units that you can add weight to your belief in bets.

    For instance, if I say to you

    "I have €25 on Ulster to beat the HC."

    That could be 10 times bigger than I usually bet, or even ten times smaller.

    Instead, by saying
    Bank - 100 units
    Bet - 2.5 units on Ulster to beat the HC

    You see what confidence I have in the bet.

    Nice.....so when Thomand says he is at 50 units does that he he's made a profit of 50% of his original investment this season??


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,759 ✭✭✭P.Walnuts


    GiftofGab wrote: »
    Nice.....so when Thomand says he is at 50 units does that he he's made a profit of 50% of his original investment this season??


    No its even simpler than that

    A unit its just a value what an individual assigns to his "basic" bet. If you are really confident on a bet, you might bet 2 units....if the bet is a longshot you might bet 0.5 units

    So depending on how much you bet a unit it could be €10 or €100, it just depends on the person and usually the size of your bank. Thomand's bank now is 50 units, he started with 50 units, so no profit there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,371 ✭✭✭GiftofGab


    P.Walnuts wrote: »
    No its even simpler than that

    A unit its just a value what an individual assigns to his "basic" bet. If you are really confident on a bet, you might bet 2 units....if the bet is a longshot you might bet 0.5 units

    So depending on how much you bet a unit it could be €10 or €100, it just depends on the person and usually the size of your bank. Thomand's bank now is 50 units, he started with 50 units, so no profit there.

    Ok I get you now.

    But would it not be a better system for everybody to start off with 0 units regardless of how much your original investment.

    Then for example if you bet 10% of your investment and you lose your balance would be -0.1 (or -10.00). That way everybody can see exactly how much in terms of a % you won or lost over a period of a year.

    I want to join this unit system but just want all the details before I start posting. I've been placing about around 5 - 10 bets a week on the Super XV so would love to contribute to this thread.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    GiftofGab wrote: »
    Ok I get you now.

    But would it not be a better system for everybody to start off with 0 units regardless of how much your original investment.

    Then for example if you bet 10% of your investment and you lose your balance would be -0.1 (or -10.00). That way everybody can see exactly how much in terms of a % you won or lost over a period of a year.

    I want to join this unit system but just want all the details before I start posting. I've been placing about around 5 - 10 bets a week on the Super XV so would love to contribute to this thread.

    I started out with 50 units, so that's €50x in my account.

    If I bet 2 units (€2x) and lose, that goes down to 48 units or €48x. Incidentally 48 units is what my account holds at the moment, so I'm down 2 units since my initial deposit.

    Definitely use this unit system if you're posting, as it means we can follow your weighting on bets.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,371 ✭✭✭GiftofGab


    I started out with 50 units, so that's €50x in my account.

    If I bet 2 units (€2x) and lose, that goes down to 48 units or €48x.

    Definitely use this unit system if you're posting, as it means we can follow your weighting on bets.

    So if I start off with for example $20 will I put it as 20 units?

    Sorry for the stupid questions.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Camilo Drab Range


    GiftofGab wrote: »
    So if I start off with for example $20 will I put it as 20 units?

    Sorry for the stupid questions.

    depends what 'unit' you chose.

    If you start off with €20 but a 20c bet is your standard bet, you have a 100 unit bank.

    Ideally people would use the 100 unit bank as a start off as it's easier to explain to people because it goes straight into a percentage.

    "I have 10 units on Racing" = 10 % of my bank roll is on this game (not advised!).


  • Registered Users Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    I intende to do this next season. I'm going to start out with 100 units so it looks like I'm twice as good as Thomon!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,371 ✭✭✭GiftofGab


    Ok guys, 100 units is the investment

    Well I've be betting for a while. So if 100 units is the investment, I'm now at 91.7 units.

    I'll keep you posted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,549 ✭✭✭✭Judgement Day


    Western Force vs British & Irish Lions - the only bet worth a damn is the Lions to Win to Nil at 17/1. Surely worth 5 or 10 Euros? :D


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 14,599 Mod ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Western Force vs British & Irish Lions - the only bet worth a damn is the Lions to Win to Nil at 17/1. Surely worth 5 or 10 Euros? :D
    i put a couple of units on western force +43 (evens) earlier on in the week and followed it up with the same amount on B&I Lions -35 (evens) earlier today

    Am tempted by Samoa U20 +50 at 10/11 tomorrow


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,371 ✭✭✭GiftofGab


    Here's my bets for the Lions:

    Lions (-38.5) @ 1.90: 7.5 units
    George North to score a try @ 1.50: 7.5 units
    Tommy Bowe to score a try @ 1.45: 7.5 units
    BOD to score a try @ 1.80: 7.5 units
    Jamie Heaslip to score a try @ 2.50: 7.5 units
    SOB to score a try @ 2.5: 7.5 units
    1st try be converted - Yes @ 1.33: 7.5 units
    Back to score 1st try @ 1.40: 7.5 units
    2nd Half will be highest scoring half @ 1.67: 7.5 units
    Lions try will be the 1st score of the game @ 2.37: 7.5 units

    10 bets. Obviously I don't expect to win all 10 but I hope my winnings can outweigh the losses with the end result being a profit. I'm banking a a large Lions win.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,759 ✭✭✭P.Walnuts


    GiftofGab wrote: »
    Here's my bets for the Lions:

    Lions (-38.5) @ 1.90: 7.5 units
    George North to score a try @ 1.50: 7.5 units
    Tommy Bowe to score a try @ 1.45: 7.5 units
    BOD to score a try @ 1.80: 7.5 units
    Jamie Heaslip to score a try @ 2.50: 7.5 units
    SOB to score a try @ 2.5: 7.5 units
    1st try be converted - Yes @ 1.33: 7.5 units
    Back to score 1st try @ 1.40: 7.5 units
    2nd Half will be highest scoring half @ 1.67: 7.5 units
    Lions try will be the 1st score of the game @ 2.37: 7.5 units

    10 bets. Obviously I don't expect to win all 10 but I hope my winnings can outweigh the losses with the end result being a profit. I'm banking a a large Lions win.

    Good luck with your bets!

    Just for future reference though, 7.5 units is a very big unit stake per bet, if you happen to have a bad weekend with those kind of unit stakes you bank could suffer very badly indeed!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,371 ✭✭✭GiftofGab


    P.Walnuts wrote: »
    Good luck with your bets!

    Just for future reference though, 7.5 units is a very big unit stake per bet, if you happen to have a bad weekend with those kind of unit stakes you bank could suffer very badly indeed!

    Well it's 7.5% of my overall investment.

    I'm doubtfull of my try scorer bets. The rest I think should be ok. I'll let you know how I get on tomorrow.


Advertisement