At what age did you become a Right Wing Nutter ?

Logical Fallacy

GombeanMan wrote: »

Libertarians are smarter than both:)

In fairness, anyone on boards who has been declaring themselves as Libertarian definitely seems to be at the back of the pack.

Granted, that's purely anecdotal but the sample size is reasonable.

Nodin

MaxSteele wrote: »

Newsletter ?? I sense sarcasm

Hardly.

Whats "pro-white"?

Daniel S

Nodin wrote: »

Hardly.

Whats "pro-white"?

It depends on how you look at it. It could be just not taking the shíte other races come up with like "You're only doing XXX because I'm XXX" or else it could be completely like KKK.

MaxSteele

Nodin wrote: »

Hardly.

Whats "pro-white"?

Well I haven't a clue about this newsletter thing he's on about.

I simply believe the indigenous population should always be a majority (ie, Anglo-saxons/celts in britain and Ireland or indigenous black africans in Africa etc.)
That goes for all countries. Just a personal belief, that's all.

Nodin

MaxSteele wrote: »

Well I haven't a clue about this newsletter thing he's on about.

I simply believe the indigenous population should always be a majority (ie, Anglo-saxons/celts in britain and Ireland or indigenous black africans in Africa etc.)
That goes for all countries. Just a personal belief, that's all.

So essentially you're saying you can't be black and Irish.

Daniel S

Nodin wrote: »

So essentially you're saying you can't be black and Irish.

No he's not. Read it again.

Nodin

Daniel S wrote: »

No he's not. Read it again.

I'm sure he'll be able to clarify what he means himself.

MaxSteele

Nodin wrote: »

So essentially you're saying you can't be black and Irish.

Never said anything remotely like that, not true. Would just rather live in a society of majority native Irish.

Nodin

MaxSteele wrote: »

Never said anything remotely like that, not true. Would just rather live in a society of majority native Irish.

You're saying that the "indigenous" population should always remain a majority. That automatically, of necessity, creates a division between people based on their origins. Thus, regardless of how long somebody can trace their roots back in this country, if they're provably of - for instance - Asian descent they'd have to be classed as a different kind of citizen. Follow?

MaxSteele

Nodin wrote: »

You're saying that the "indigenous" population should always remain a majority. That automatically, of necessity, creates a division between people based on their origins. Thus, regardless of how long somebody can trace their roots back in this country, if they're provably of - for instance - Asian descent they'd have to be classed as a different kind of citizen. Follow?

I'm not asking for a facist policy of a DNA screening for every citizen of the country, I'm just stating a personal opinion. Let's not get into the whole "the hunter gatherers who crossed the frozen Irish sea 10,000 years ago can be traced to the sands of the arabian peninsula" debate.

Don't worry, you're not gonna see me patrolling Dublin in black slacks, a brown shirt with a fist symbol stitched on it, carrying an AR-15 rifle. I just stated my personal opinions and hoped someone could clarify what side of politics I fit into.

Nodin

MaxSteele wrote: »

I'm not asking for a facist policy of a DNA screening for every citizen of the country, I'm just stating a personal opinion. Let's not get into the whole "the hunter gatherers who crossed the frozen Irish sea 10,000 years ago can be traced to the sands of the arabian peninsula" debate.

...................

Unfortunately the minute you say "indigenous", you have to do just that. Such things would have to be defined. You're also linking culture to "race" and so on. It's not the best road to go down.

MaxSteele

Nodin wrote: »

Unfortunately the minute you say "indigenous", you have to do just that. Such things would have to be defined. You're also linking culture to "race" and so on. It's not the best road to go down.

Right then...roughly speaking

The ancient Milesian Race,(ie, Celtic, goidelic tribes), white skin, ginger/Blonde/dark hair, etc.

That's the best way i can describe it.

RichieC

MaxSteele wrote: »

I'm not asking for a facist policy of a DNA screening for every citizen of the country, I'm just stating a personal opinion. Let's not get into the whole "the hunter gatherers who crossed the frozen Irish sea 10,000 years ago can be traced to the sands of the arabian peninsula" debate.

Don't worry, you're not gonna see me patrolling Dublin in black slacks, a brown shirt with a fist symbol stitched on it, carrying an AR-15 rifle. I just stated my personal opinions and hoped someone could clarify what side of politics I fit into.

White supremacy isn't politics.

MaxSteele

RichieC wrote: »

White supremacy isn't politics.

Well a PC, bleeding heart liberal would probably cast me in to the "right wing nutter" category for being a "white supremacist" as you'd call it. And it was one of many views I stated which happened to annoy a particular person. I didn't ask for race debate. I think a politicians stance on nationalism would have some impact in politics.

Former mayor of Naas Darren Scully ring a bell ??

Nodin

MaxSteele wrote: »

Right then...roughly speaking

The ancient Milesian Race,(ie, Celtic, goidelic tribes), white skin, ginger/Blonde/dark hair, etc.

That's the best way i can describe it.

So you've now created two classes of citizenship - one for the above, and the other with the sword of damocles over them in perpetuity.

MaxSteele

Nodin wrote: »

So you've now created two classes of citizenship - one for the above, and the other with the sword of damocles over them in perpetuity.

I haven't created anything as you so eloquently put it. Where did I mention creating different classes of citizenship ? You're twisting a simple opinion into something fascist and taboo. You're getting completely off the point of the discussion anyhow. If you want a race debate I recommend you visit Stromfront or another forum.
I'm done explaining myself.

kieranfitz

MaxSteele wrote: »

Newsletter ?? I sense sarcasm

Not really, apart from the pro white bit. Couldn't give a monkeys if someone was black, white or purple, just no gingers.

Nodin

MaxSteele wrote: »

I haven't created anything as you so eloquently put it. Where did I mention creating different classes of citizenship ? You're twisting a simple opinion into something fascist and taboo. .........

I'm just pointing out the unfortunate (and inevitable) consequences of your idea.

MaxSteele

kieranfitz wrote: »

Not really, apart from the pro white bit. Couldn't give a monkeys if someone was black, white or purple, just no gingers.

I still genuinely don't no what you meant by newsletters.

I could pretend I'm all for a multicultural utopia, but unfortunately I don't pretend to be a hypocritical idealist who makes racist jokes indoors

MaxSteele

Nodin wrote: »

I'm just pointing out the unfortunate (and inevitable) consequences of your idea.

*Sigh I never had any ideas about anything in the first place :rolleyes:

old hippy

MaxSteele wrote: »

I still genuinely don't no what you meant by newsletters.

I could pretend I'm all for a multicultural utopia, but unfortunately I don't pretend to be a hypocritical idealist who makes racist jokes indoors

What gets me is how many crawl out of the woodwork demonising mulitculturalism when you get the likes of lone nutters in Toulouse but nobody decries monoculturalism when you get the likes of lone nutters in Norway.

Why is this?

kieranfitz

MaxSteele wrote: »

I still genuinely don't no what you meant by newsletters.

I could pretend I'm all for a multicultural utopia, but unfortunately I don't pretend to be a hypocritical idealist who makes racist jokes indoors

Its a homerism

guitarzero

Radical left to radical right, OP, I think you come under "extremist".

MaxSteele

old hippy wrote: »

What gets me is how many crawl out of the woodwork demonising mulitculturalism when you get the likes of lone nutters in Toulouse but nobody decries monoculturalism when you get the likes of lone nutters in Norway.

Why is this?

"Old Hippy"...I'll tread carefully with you
Yes Anders Brevik is just as bad as the Toulouse nutter, the London, Madrid bombers etc. But my reasons for not being a big fan of multiculturalism actually have nothing to do with whatever extremist side that comes with it. Like i said above in my other post "I'm done explaining myself".

RichieC

You just don't like being swamped by blacks. understood..

czx

RichieC wrote: »

You just don't like being swamped by blacks. understood..

It's like you and Americans.lol

RichieC

czx wrote: »

It's like you and Americans.lol

Yes, it is exactly like my criticisms of US Policy.. lol

MaxSteele

RichieC wrote: »

You just don't like being swamped by blacks. understood..

Well at least you didn't feed me some high horse crap after your opinion

I wouldn't use as strong a term as that though ..

Rabidlamb

guitarzero wrote: »

Radical left to radical right, OP, I think you come under "extremist".

I ought to have you taken out & shot, in front of your family.
Ooooops, sorry, just fell into the stereotype there, you are fully entitled to your opinion, wrong though it may be.
Just keep hippies & liberal media out of my face & I'm a fierce nice fella.

Nodin

MaxSteele wrote: »

Well at least you didn't feed me some high horse crap after your opinion

I wouldn't use as strong a term as that though ..

...that was me trying to be "nice".