Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Freeman Megamerge

Options
1…2425272930…283

Comments

  • Options
    #782
    Our man in Havana
    Closed Accounts Posts: 29,476 ✭✭✭✭Our man in Havana


    The Garda oath one is a new addition.


  • Options
    #783
    johnnyskeleton
    Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,488 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    Our man in Havana wrote: »
    The Garda oath one is a new addition.

    The last time I asked a guard for his oath he said "boll*x". "Good choice" I said.


  • Options
    #784
    Tom Young
    Legal Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,338 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tom Young


    Those folks are delusional. Tin hat wearers undoubtedly.


  • Options
    #785
    Robbo
    Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,560 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    Ben Gilroy's been out campaigning for a No vote on this weekend's referendum.
    “It’s a disastrous campaign,” says Ben Gilroy, leader of Direct Democracy, which is one of a number of micro-parties fighting the amendment. “Without money you can’t do anything.”


  • Options
    #786
    Robbo
    Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,560 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    Using the Constitution to hector the hell out of staff in provincial courthouses and the Household Charge has been "unlawfully concocted" (although this one has the bang of Isaac Wunder off it)


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #787
    johnnyskeleton
    Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,488 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    Robbo wrote: »
    Using the Constitution to hector the hell out of staff in provincial courthouses and the Household Charge has been "unlawfully concocted" (although this one has the bang of Isaac Wunder off it)

    Bun rock na hEireann. It's called the state because if it is not state-ed in bun rock then it doesn't exist. Nice.


  • Options
    #788
    Procrastastudy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,224 ✭✭✭Procrastastudy


    Nooo - tice. LOL


  • Options
    #789
    Pat Mustard
    Registered Users Posts: 9,554 ✭✭✭Pat Mustard


    Robbo wrote: »
    Using the Constitution to hector the hell out of staff in provincial courthouses and the Household Charge has been "unlawfully concocted" (although this one has the bang of Isaac Wunder off it)

    Beginning at 9.40:
    I, Mick of the clan O' Riordan, citizen of sovereign republic Éire, do demand An Cúirt Douche forthwith cease and desist all activites, this 12th day of November 2012, autographed by many. They no longer are in existence. They are been closed down as of today...

    Take that, An Cúirt Douche.


  • Options
    #790
    johnnyskeleton
    Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,488 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    The Mustard wrote: »

    Beginning at 9.40:



    Take that, An Cúirt Douche.

    Yeah, you'd think since being into brehon law and opposed to foreign English maritime law (or whatever) is such a big thing for these guys they would at least take the time to learn to read/speak Irish.

    Unless of course the word duiche is really a cypher for douche, and this proves that the district court is nothing more than a government feminine hygiene product!


  • Options
    #791
    Pat Mustard
    Registered Users Posts: 9,554 ✭✭✭Pat Mustard


    I blame JK Rowling for this recent Freeman carry-on. They watch one or two Harry Potter films, and then they can abolish the District Court.

    They'll have magic wands next.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #792
    johnnyskeleton
    Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,488 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    The Mustard wrote: »
    I blame JK Rowling for this recent Freeman carry-on. They watch one or two Harry Potter films, and then they can abolish the District Court.

    They'll have magic wands next.

    They should watch the baader-meinhoff complex to see what refusing to accept the courts jurisdiction really entails!


  • Options
    #793
    Finnbar01
    Registered Users Posts: 2,067 ✭✭✭Finnbar01


    ]full.png


  • Options
    #794
    Finnbar01
    Registered Users Posts: 2,067 ✭✭✭Finnbar01


    full.png


  • Options
    #795
    Grolschevik
    Registered Users Posts: 3,472 ✭✭✭Grolschevik


    ^^^
    Class!


  • Options
    #796
    AlmightyCushion
    Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,061 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    Finnbar01 wrote: »
    ]full.png

    Has anyone sent this onto Ben Gilroy? His next few videos could get interesting.


  • Options
    #797
    Robbo
    Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,560 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    If anyone's interested in how the Household Charge/LPT is to be toppled, the Summons is here. The blog hosting it is full of Freeman gold and other conspiracy stuff.
    “The Act” of the “Household Charge Act 2011” is equivalent to dictatorship, bondage and slavery … given that it wilfully aims and does deny and suspends all legal, political, civil and human rights, and subjects the
    People of the Island to the constraints and domination of “the State” and its illegal and unlawful enactments, on behalf of a foreign body/government.

    I particularly like the way the plaintiff's name and address are redacted in the interests of privacy but they left in the record number...


  • Options
    #798
    Grolschevik
    Registered Users Posts: 3,472 ✭✭✭Grolschevik


    Indeed...
    PHIL HOGAN and the herein named Defendants have been and are working in cahoots with each other, with the intention of misleading ME, one of the People into making “self-declarations” that are NOT MANDATORY, are NOT Constitutional and NOT Lawful, for the purpose of creating what is termed “a simple debt contract”. Wherein these “simple debt contracts” which may be used as the basis for the creation of instruments, as defined by the “Bill of Exchange 1882”. This is being done and carried out without the
    explicit consent and knowledge of the People. There is no “Consensus ad idem”, therefore it is unlawful, illegal and immoral.


  • Options
    #799
    Kosseegan
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 987 ✭✭✭Kosseegan


    Robbo wrote: »
    If anyone's interested in how the Household Charge/LPT is to be toppled, the Summons is here. The blog hosting it is full of Freeman gold and other conspiracy stuff.


    I particularly like the way the plaintiff's name and address are redacted in the interests of privacy but they left in the record number...

    Surprising the title on the proceedings is not Peter Anthony of the Family Keegan.

    http://highcourtsearch.courts.ie/hcslive/plaintiff_detail.show?sessionID=1889898921&yearNo=2012&recordNo=12340&processType=P


  • Options
    #800
    Ken.
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,898 ✭✭✭✭Ken.


    I was under the impression that these people didn't recognise the validity of our courts. Watch them claim the court is illegal when they get ruled against.


  • Options
    #801
    chops018
    Registered Users Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭chops018


    ken wrote: »
    I was under the impression that these people didn't recognise the validity of our courts. Watch them claim the court is illegal when they get ruled against.

    These people are a bunch of morons that don't have a clue what they're talking about.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #802
    valleyoftheunos
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,332 ✭✭✭valleyoftheunos


    Thats eh, quite the statement of claim they have there.


  • Options
    #803
    ThreeLineWhip
    Closed Accounts Posts: 473 ✭✭ThreeLineWhip


    That PO box where those defendants live must be huge.

    He even went after some poor sod working in a call centre. :(


  • Options
    #804
    Procrastastudy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,224 ✭✭✭Procrastastudy


    Looking at something Mustard posted I came across this little gem. Page 25

    http://www.lawsociety.ie/Documents/Gazette/Gazette%202012/May2012.pdf


  • Options
    #805
    Grolschevik
    Registered Users Posts: 3,472 ✭✭✭Grolschevik


    Procrastastudy wrote: »
    Looking at something Mustard posted I came across this little gem. Page 25

    http://www.lawsociety.ie/Documents/Gazette/Gazette%202012/May2012.pdf

    Ha! "Anonymous letter criticizes lack of transparency"!


  • Options
    #806
    ThreeLineWhip
    Closed Accounts Posts: 473 ✭✭ThreeLineWhip


    The cartoon was pretty funny also.


  • Options
    #807
    Procrastastudy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,224 ✭✭✭Procrastastudy


    ThreeLineWhip wrote: »
    The cartoon was pretty funny also.

    I thank you for assuming it was the long wordy thing I found amusing because of the nuanced irony and not the funny pictures. :D


  • Options
    #808
    Robbo
    Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,560 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    This Friday, Tom Darcy is in the Supreme Court fighting an order for possession, but he's decided that he's found a flaw in AIBs paperwork which means the bank has been operating unlicensed. Therefore, all debt (and one presumes everyone elses savings and paycheques) involving AIB will be null and void, the Death Star will explode and the Ewoks shall rejoice (no need to consider any potential collateral damage).

    On March 4th in the High Court, Peter Anthony Keegan's challenge to the Household Charge is listed. His expertly drafted summons bears repeating again, if only to marvel at the fact that it's not written in green ink.

    Busy times for the Freemen over the next week. Still, the stamping on their court documents means the state will at least get something back in return for being smashed by their legal prowess.


  • Options
    #809
    jd
    Registered Users Posts: 5,688 ✭✭✭jd


    Robbo wrote: »
    This Friday, Tom Darcy is in the Supreme Court fighting an order for possession, but he's decided that he's found a flaw in AIBs paperwork which means the bank has been operating unlicensed. .

    How long do we have to wait until he's handed his ass?


  • Options
    #810
    littlemac1980
    Registered Users Posts: 1,073 ✭✭✭littlemac1980


    Robbo wrote: »
    This Friday, Tom Darcy is in the Supreme Court fighting an order for possession, but he's decided that he's found a flaw in AIBs paperwork which means the bank has been operating unlicensed. Therefore, all debt (and one presumes everyone elses savings and paycheques) involving AIB will be null and void, the Death Star will explode and the Ewoks shall rejoice (no need to consider any potential collateral damage).

    On March 4th in the High Court, Peter Anthony Keegan's challenge to the Household Charge is listed. His expertly drafted summons bears repeating again, if only to marvel at the fact that it's not written in green ink.

    Busy times for the Freemen over the next week. Still, the stamping on their court documents means the state will at least get something back in return for being smashed by their legal prowess.

    The "Notice/Demand for Answers" associated with the Phil Hogan Summons is well worth a read also. Very thorough. It's also available on that Wordpress site - http://foolscrow.wordpress.com/

    Its about half way down on the November 28 2012 post - entitled : Household Charge Notice to Phil Hogan 2711121

    The Acronym of the "Company" through which the complaint was made is hilarious!


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #811
    LoveCoke
    Registered Users Posts: 453 ✭✭LoveCoke


    littlemac1980 wrote: »
    The "Notice/Demand for Answers" associated with the Phil Hogan Summons is well worth a read also. Very thorough. It's also available on that Wordpress site - http://foolscrow.wordpress.com/

    Its about half way down on the November 28 2012 post - entitled : Household Charge Notice to Phil Hogan 2711121

    The Acronym of the "Company" through which the complaint was made is hilarious!

    Why is his name deleted when the defendants are not?


Advertisement