Freeman Megamerge

Farcear

"There followed accusations of potential breaches of, inter alia, the "Protection from Harassment Act 1997", which is an English, not in Irish, statute, and the "Data Protection Acts 1998/2003", the reference to 1998 presumably being a typographical error for 1988."

"4.4 Mr. Burns also submitted that he had "fired" the receiver because the receiver did not realise that he had an equitable duty to him."

...but did the court *see* the signed contract?


Nice find for Friday. littlemac1980.

Robbo

There I was, enjoying the weekend in Dublin when this greeted me at the Museum Luas stop.

I expect there to be chaos in the Library tomorrow when they realise the jig is up.

Indricotherium

Robbo wrote: »

There I was, enjoying the weekend in Dublin when this greeted me at the Museum Luas stop.

I expect there to be chaos in the Library tomorrow when they realise the jig is up.

Is there a constitutional provision for any profession?

Indricotherium

Indricotherium wrote: »

Is there a constitutional provision for any profession?

Judges, President, Taoiseach (to a lesser extent), TD's, Comptroller and Auditor General, Attorney General. That's about it.

They are jobs as opposed to professions obviously.

Tom Young

Indricotherium wrote: »

Is there a constitutional provision for any profession?

No and nor should there be. These crazy Freemen just run around spouting fallacies and inaccuracies to support their misguided notions of what they think is right versus their own version of wrong.

Farcear

Deleted User wrote: »

... Attorney General ...

There you go, a constitutional basis for legal professionals.

Robbo

Uncle Ben's been helping out to "fire" a receiver in Co Cork recently, unperturbed by his recent defeat.

Tom Young

Something went on in the High Court yesterday as well. These people are skating for issues with contempt. People who rely in their literal interpretation of the law are wrong, given false hope and staking for issues.

Principles: Borrow money, pay it back. Fail to do so, face the consequences.

Robbo

I shot the sheriff but I did not do the Law Societyyyyyyyyy.

Fey!

About a year ago I mentioned on a freeman thread about the BS I had to listen to during a car journey about how nobody had to repay bank loans or pay tax or pay off their credit cards. I can't find the original post right now.

Lo and behold, I picked up this card in my local petrol station yesterday. To be fair, the guy who owns the



This is the guy who was spouting all of that rubbish to me. As far as I know he's still on social welfare, but he now has this "business".

Is there any regulator who would oversee or regulate this kind of stuff? Or is he free to give bad advice and potentially muck up someones life?

Robbo

The posters about the Bar being invalid through lack of a constitutional provision have made it to Galway as well.

Tom Young

Actually - Article 26.2. 1° The Supreme Court consisting of not less than five judges shall consider every question referred to it by the President under this Article for a decision, and, having heard arguments by or on behalf of the Attorney General and by counsel assigned by the Court, shall pronounce its decision on such question in open court as soon as may be, and in any case not later than sixty days after the date of such reference.

Finnbar01

It looks like the Gardai are finally tackling this freeman guru.

I've posted the video below but to be honest it's a watse of time watching it.

He doesn't open the door and seems to hide away from any confrontation.

He's a right big mouth on his radio show advising people what to say and do but doesn't seem to practise what he preaches.

I'd say he's bricking it now that the Gardaí want to have a chat with him.

ResearchWill

Tom Young wrote: »

Actually - Article 26.2. 1° The Supreme Court consisting of not less than five judges shall consider every question referred to it by the President under this Article for a decision, and, having heard arguments by or on behalf of the Attorney General and by counsel assigned by the Court, shall pronounce its decision on such question in open court as soon as may be, and in any case not later than sixty days after the date of such reference.

Very very clever.

Robbo

The most recent posters in Galway are now about there being no Constitutional provision for income tax and that it's entirely voluntary. Jesus wept.

Tom Young

Yes, and the world is flat - Newsflash!

johnnyskeleton

Robbo wrote: »

The most recent posters in Galway are now about there being no Constitutional provision for income tax and that it's entirely voluntary. Jesus wept.

Leaving aside the fact that this is directly imported from an argument by a guy in the us who went to prison for non payment of tax and that it is abundantly clear, the world over, that constitutions don't need to expressly refer to taxation powers, the Irish constitution quite specifically permits taxation (art 45.2ii, albeit in a guidance rather than justiciable provision).

So the whole fremen theory ie that there are lies out there that a simple Readiother the constitution would disprove, is undermined by the fact that they haven't even read the thing.

littlemac1980

Another Guy who tried to fire a receiver here...

http://www.newstalk.ie/2012/news/landlord-warned-he-will-be-jailed-for-further-non-compliance/

Procrastastudy

Made me LOL so hard I almost spat out my coffee!

NoQuarter

Represented by "a friend". Sounds like that ill-informed crusader noel whats-his-face or one of the other members of the extraordinary league of freemen.

ResearchWill

NoQuarter wrote: »

Represented by "a friend". Sounds like that ill-informed crusader noel whats-his-face or one of the other members of the extraordinary league of freemen.

Yup I love how all these guys never take the risks themselves.

Grolschevik

On the plus side, there has been a significant drop off in their posts and/or posters influenced by them in these parts.


(I kind of miss it, actually!)

jblack

Bring back Derry.

Without him this thread is like Celtic without Rangers.

source

jblack wrote: »

Bring back Derry.

Without him this thread is like Celtic without Rangers.

He's a menace to mobile boards users.

Reloc8

littlemac1980 wrote: »

Another Guy who tried to fire a receiver here...

http://www.newstalk.ie/2012/news/landlord-warned-he-will-be-jailed-for-further-non-compliance/

He's doing it wrong.

Its the JUDGE he needs to sack.

NoQuarter

Reloc8 wrote: »

He's doing it wrong.

Its the JUDGE he needs to sack.

I'm sure Blackstones has a provision where you can sack the whole world? Toward the back.

Reloc8

NoQuarter wrote: »

I'm sure Blackstones has a provision where you can sack the whole world? Toward the back.

Its in the section on Admiralty Law.

(the only REAL law)

Our man in Havana

Ah lads, my lunch has gone everywhere! Good Stuff!

Robbo

Reloc8 wrote: »

Its in the section on Admiralty Law.

(the only REAL law)

I ****ing guarantee you that if a freeman ever got into a spot of bother that actual admiralty law would genuinely cover, they'd insist that the only Admiral they'd recognise was the ghost of Miklos Horthy.

Scealta_saol

I wonder if there were any Admirals during the Tall Ships festival they should have asked to oversee their legal problems... surely the best person to ask about Admiral Law would be an Admiral??