Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

AH royal wedding mega thread (no flaming queens)

Options
1…4142444647…49

Comments

  • Options
    #1292
    shadowninty
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,654 ✭✭✭shadowninty


    A Dub in Glasgo wrote: »
    As what? a stain in her grandfathers pants?

    lol
    What I mean was that we still had the King/Queen of England as head of state


  • Options
    #1293
    Corsendonk
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,871 ✭✭✭Corsendonk


    Classic



  • Options
    #1294
    Duckworth_Luas
    Registered Users Posts: 5,733 ✭✭✭Duckworth_Luas


    shadowninty wrote: »
    lol
    What I mean was that we still had the King/Queen of England as head of state

    No, Seán T O'Kelly was.


  • Options
    #1295
    admiralofthefleet
    Closed Accounts Posts: 15,515 ✭✭✭✭admiralofthefleet


    i understand the queen gave kate a trip to paris and a mercedes as a wedding present


  • Options
    #1296
    Leroy Lita
    Registered Users Posts: 605 ✭✭✭Leroy Lita


    can't believe that people on here are calling Prince Philip a legend. the man is a ignorant pig who looks down on people like there sh!t.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1297
    RobitTV
    Registered Users Posts: 4,517 ✭✭✭RobitTV


    admiralofthefleet wrote: »
    i understand the queen gave kate a trip to paris and a mercedes as a wedding present

    Wow! wish i could get that :eek:


  • Options
    #1298
    cesc77
    Closed Accounts Posts: 874 ✭✭✭cesc77


    Corsendonk wrote: »
    Classic



    ahh,bless


  • Options
    #1299
    TheMilkyPirate
    Registered Users Posts: 5,987 ✭✭✭TheMilkyPirate


    W.Shakes-Beer wrote: »
    who?

    I hate these posts, Someone starts a thread about someone that 99% of the population would know, The other 1% being people who have never watched a television nor read a paper in their entire life. Yet they have to appear better than everyone else by pretending not to know who the person is.

    You know who prince philip is your post isn't funny, Shut up.


  • Options
    #1300
    shadowninty
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,654 ✭✭✭shadowninty


    Duckworth_Luas wrote: »
    No, Seán T O'Kelly was.

    your right actually :o .. nonetheless we were part of the Commonwealth


  • Options
    #1301
    Corsendonk
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,871 ✭✭✭Corsendonk


    Leroy Lita wrote: »
    can't believe that people on here are calling Prince Philip a legend. the man is a ignorant pig who looks down on people like there sh!t.

    Yes the man is a racist bigot but then again most of his generation was in some form in the "I am not a racist but" role. At least he isn't colourless and PC false like most of modern society who say far worse behind closed doors.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFN2iGulYOs


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1302
    shadowninty
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,654 ✭✭✭shadowninty


    RobitTV wrote: »
    Wow! wish i could get that :eek:

    get Harry's number! :D


  • Options
    #1303
    Leroy Lita
    Registered Users Posts: 605 ✭✭✭Leroy Lita


    Corsendonk wrote: »
    Yes the man is a racist bigot but then again most of his generation was in some form in the "I am not a racist but" role. At least he isn't colourless and PC false like most of modern society who say far worse behind closed doors.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFN2iGulYOs

    dont care , the man is an ignorant pig. his no where near a legend. and his wife seems like a grumpy auld cow too.


  • Options
    #1304
    Duckworth_Luas
    Registered Users Posts: 5,733 ✭✭✭Duckworth_Luas


    shadowninty wrote: »
    your right actually :o .. nonetheless we were part of the Commonwealth

    Only due to De Valera's bizarre insistence.


  • Options
    #1305
    Duckworth_Luas
    Registered Users Posts: 5,733 ✭✭✭Duckworth_Luas


    OPENROAD wrote: »
    :eek: Another thread :eek:

    Only matter of time before AH is renamed AH UK

    I always thought that Ah is that corner of the interweb that is forever England.

    Copyright Q-bert Brooke


  • Options
    #1306
    Wibbs
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,112 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    He's like a child let do what they like. We're all so used to editing ourselves, it does come as some relief to see some gobsheen who doesn't feel that way. It also pisses us off too. Mainly cos any rebellion agin that seems newsworthy when we know its really not. I reckon it['s down t our notion of childhood. And I have to disagree with Mr. Christ of 1 Galilee Drive when is says - "Out of the mouth of babes comes"... wisdom or some such. Eh no. Usually out of the mouth of babes comes shíte, but occasionally it's funny in the "morons' say the funniest things" kinda way.

    Or something... I come to you well beered up. I blame the drink.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Options
    #1307
    vampire of kilmainham
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,048 ✭✭✭vampire of kilmainham


    thetonynator wrote: »
    Nobody has said up the ra yet and we're 9 posts in . . . :rolleyes:
    up the ra


  • Options
    #1308
    Dionysus
    Registered Users Posts: 3,420 ✭✭✭Dionysus


    Interestingly, while loads of people in this thread have claimed, without evidence, that the British royal wedding generates a fortune for Britain, in the 'Business This Week' section of Friday's Irish Times, they report that while the British economy will make over £600 million from the royal wedding it will lose over £6 billion because of lower productivity.


    In other words: in reality, the British economy is losing billions because of this royal wedding, not gaining billions.


  • Options
    #1309
    Cathaoirleach
    Closed Accounts Posts: 701 ✭✭✭Cathaoirleach


    Well played, Guardian.

    http://i.imgur.com/eOHzk.png


  • Options
    #1310
    TeddyTedson
    Registered Users Posts: 10,758 ✭✭✭✭TeddyTedson


    Cathaoirleach wrote: »
    Well played, Guardian.

    http://i.imgur.com/eOHzk.png
    That is strange. What are they like!


  • Options
    #1311
    Royal Irish
    Registered Users Posts: 2,401 ✭✭✭Royal Irish


    I would love to have a few brandy and ports with Phillip. I'd say the craic out of him would be 90.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1312
    Cathaoirleach
    Closed Accounts Posts: 701 ✭✭✭Cathaoirleach


    Dionysus wrote: »
    in reality, the British economy is losing billions because of this royal wedding, not gaining billions.

    Correct, but you could say the same for Paddy's Day in Ireland, which is a net loss for us monetarily if the day falls on a weekday. But it's a deep-rooted part of our culture so we have to make way for it.

    The Queen's visit to Ireland is also net loss for us, an event that the Gardaí can't even afford, and we certainly don't have the resouces to keep the city under control in the event of rioting like in 2006.

    At least with Obama's visit, it will get worldwide exposure, and the US Secret Service can manage the bulk of security. They have experience bringing former Presidents to Ireland. Britain doesn't, and there is a high chance that there will be a bombing somewhere on the island when she's here. Something we could do without.


  • Options
    #1313
    The Queen of England
    Site Banned Posts: 124 ✭✭The Queen of England


    He's crap in bed.

    Hasn't been able to get it up since 1964.

    Funny fucker, though.

    Queeny.


  • Options
    #1314
    robinph
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,089 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Dionysus wrote: »
    Interestingly, while loads of people in this thread have claimed, without evidence, that the British royal wedding generates a fortune for Britain, in the 'Business This Week' section of Friday's Irish Times, they report that while the British economy will make over £600 million from the royal wedding it will lose over £6 billion because of lower productivity.


    In other words: in reality, the British economy is losing billions because of this royal wedding, not gaining billions.

    Bit basic maths there to suggest that 6 bilion quid has suddenly dissapeared because of one days less of a work week. Whatever production might have been dues to happen yesterday is still going to happen, it just didn't happen yesterday. However many million people went and took advantage of the 11 day holiday will come back next week pretty happy with their time off and why should they not then be more productive?


  • Options
    #1315
    getz
    Registered Users Posts: 5,255 ✭✭✭getz


    vampire of kilmainham wrote: »
    i fcuking hate that ignoramaus ignorant ****...Your right what you say about him he looks on anyone outside the royal familey as pesants :mad::eek:
    how will your brain be when your 90 years old?...its not working that well now.


  • Options
    #1316
    Jesus Wept
    Registered Users Posts: 25,243 ✭✭✭✭Jesus Wept


    Corsendonk wrote: »
    Yes the man is a racist bigot but then again most of his generation was in some form in the "I am not a racist but" role.
    Corsendonk wrote: »
    At least he isn't colourless and PC false like most of modern society who say far worse behind closed doors.

    At least he isn't p.c...... = at least he isn't non racist.
    Erm, ok dude. He's got that going for him alright, what a CHARACTER!


  • Options
    #1317
    temply
    Registered Users Posts: 821 ✭✭✭temply


    The-Rigger wrote: »
    At least he isn't p.c...... = at least he isn't non racist.
    Erm, ok dude. He's got that going for him alright, what a CHARACTER!


    i do think he's a bit of a character myself


  • Options
    #1318
    AudreyHepburn
    Registered Users Posts: 5,673 ✭✭✭AudreyHepburn


    Personally, and I have no shame in saying so, I thought the Wedding was beautiful. Kate looked stunning imo. I thought her dress was perfect. And William was very handsome in his uniform.

    It was wonderful to see such a happy event when there is so much doom and gloom going in the world.

    Congratulations to Will and Kate and I wish them a long and happy life together.

    To all those who spent the wedding bitching about and slagging everything and everyone, I have to ask why you bothered watching it at all?

    If it offened you that much why couldn't you have just changed the channel?


  • Options
    #1319
    RobitTV
    Registered Users Posts: 4,517 ✭✭✭RobitTV


    AudreyHepburn wrote: »
    Personally, and I have no shame in saying so, I thought the Wedding was beautiful. Kate looked stunning imo. I thought her dress was perfect. And William was very handsome in his uniform.

    It was wonderful to see such a happy event when there is so much doom and gloom going in the world.

    Congratulations to Will and Kate and I wish them a long and happy life together.

    To all those who spent the wedding bitching about and slagging everything and everyone, I have to ask why you bothered watching it at all?

    If it offened you that much why couldn't you have just changed the channel?

    You are the only person that has spoke sense on here!

    100% Agreed


  • Options
    #1320
    Owwmykneecap
    Registered Users Posts: 2,237 ✭✭✭Owwmykneecap


    Don't you have news to report?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1321
    AudreyHepburn
    Registered Users Posts: 5,673 ✭✭✭AudreyHepburn


    Owwmykneecap wrote: »
    Don't you have news to report?

    Who me?


Advertisement