CNN journalist fired for telling the truth about the Jews

TMoreno

Rick Sanchez fired by CNN. On CNN, he hosted Rick's List and served as a contributor to Anderson Cooper 360° and CNN International, where he frequently reported and translated between English and Spanish. Sanchez was terminated from CNN on October 1, 2010.

On September 30, 2010, Sanchez was interviewed on Sirius XM's radio show Stand Up With Pete Dominick. Talking about Jim Stewart of the Daily show
“ Yeah, very powerless people. [laughs] He's such a minority. I mean, you know, please. What—are you kidding? I'm telling you that everybody who runs CNN is a lot like Stewart, and a lot of people who run all the other networks are a lot like Stewart. And to imply that somehow they, the people in this country who are Jewish, are an oppressed minority?"

Anybody surprised?

Sorry now, and not to take from the thrust of your argument, but its john stewart..but in fairness, what did yer man expect..if they got rid of Helen Thomas last year for essentially speaking the truth too(she was sitting in the press room since before the white house was built like),what makes yer man think hed get away with it..

Penn

Are Jewish people considered to be an oppressed minority?

reprazant

He was fired for calling John Stewart a bigot.

You seemed to have excluded that part from your quote for some reason.

Brown Bomber

reprazant wrote: »

He was fired for calling John Stewart a bigot.

You seemed to have excluded that part from your quote for some reason.

Yeah right...

Bigots dominate the media. If you are non-bigot you are forbidden from mentioning the bigot run media, if you are a bigot you can glorify the bigot run media and the bigot defamation league don't bat an eye-lid. If you dare to mention the unmentionable then what you've mentioned is proven by the actions of the bigots.

reprazant

Sorry, I forgot that this was CT, where it seems it is perfectly fine to go on national radio, called someone a bigot and then say that the Jews control the media and that it is all the Jews fault that he felt prejudiced against. In no way should you get fired for that.

Yitzhak Rabin

Haven't looked at the link, but imo, its the singling out of ethnicity thats the problem.

Had he said that the media is run by the right/left wing, or is run by a neo-con agenda etc. I would say he would be fine. Its when you say run by Jews, you immediately conjure up images of some homogeneous, nefarious ethnic group, and lump all members of this ethnicity into that group.

Also, calling your boss a bigot is never going to go down to well.

Brown Bomber

yekahs wrote: »

Haven't looked at the link, but imo, its the singling out of ethnicity thats the problem.

Had he said that the media is run by the right/left wing, or is run by a neo-con agenda etc. I would say he would be fine. Its when you say run by Jews, you immediately conjure up images of some homogeneous, nefarious ethnic group, and lump all members of this ethnicity into that group.

Also, calling your boss a bigot is never going to go down to well.

Here is a partial transcript which should help with the context.

Rick Sanchez: I don't think it's a conscious thing. I just think it's important that people who are not minorities understand that those of us who are – and very few of us will say the things that I just said – are actually more complex than they think we are.

Pete Dominick: [Jon] Stewart's a minority as much as you are. He's Jewish.

Sanchez: Yeah. Yeah. Very powerless people. Please. What are you, kidding?

Dominick: You're telling me that....

Sanchez: I'm telling you that everybody who runs CNN is a lot like Stewart, and a lot of people who run all the other networks are a lot like Stewart. And to imply that somehow they – the people in this country who are Jewish – are an oppressed minority? Yeah.

Sanchez is the son of working-class Cuban immigrants i.e. an oppressed minority. Stewart is the son of Jewish, middle-clash, white parents i.e. not oppressed. I think that is the key point Sanchez tries to raise.

I'd strongly suggest his card was marked from this moment.

Brown Bomber

paddyirishman85 wrote: »

Are Jewish people considered to be an oppressed minority?

Yeah and if you don't agree they destroy you.

Brown Bomber

reprazant wrote: »

Sorry, I forgot that this was CT, where it seems it is perfectly fine to go on national radio, called someone a bigot and then say that the Jews control the media and that it is all the Jews fault that he felt prejudiced against. In no way should you get fired for that.

That is not what he actually said. He said middle class american Jews couldn't understand oppression, despite their victimhood claims. Otherwise he told the truth on something that is quite visible and easily verifiable that Jews are heavily over represented in the media. Nothing wrong with that at all in itself, much like there is nothing wrong with saying fast food industry is dominated by Kurds here. Its a demonstratable fact.

In fact the group who act most like there is something wrong with this situation is the Jewish directors and executives of the media groups who try to hide it and censor any talk of it like its a dirty secret for some reason.

humanji

Eh, am I really wrong in thinking that he was justifiably fired? I mean, if I started publically bad mouthing my company, they'd fire me. If I started publically bad mouthing specific people, or departments, they'd fire me.

It's moronic to keep someone like that involved in your organisation. It causes unrest amongst the other workers, competitors will see it as a sign of weakness, shareholders and investors will worry that the company isn't in control. It's a disaster waiting to happen.

So BB and TMoreno, what do you think should be done to rectify this obviously dire situation?

Brown Bomber

King Mob wrote: »

So BB and TMoreno, what do you think should be done to rectify this obviously dire situation?

Perhaps you could rephrase your question without the sarcasm?

Brown Bomber

humanji wrote: »

Eh, am I really wrong in thinking that he was justifiably fired? I mean, if I started publically bad mouthing my company, they'd fire me. If I started publically bad mouthing specific people, or departments, they'd fire me.

It's moronic to keep someone like that involved in your organisation. It causes unrest amongst the other workers, competitors will see it as a sign of weakness, shareholders and investors will worry that the company isn't in control. It's a disaster waiting to happen.

I get what you are saying but it can only be considered bad mouthing if you accept that Jewish dominace has negative implications.

Di0genes

Brown Bomber wrote: »

I get what you are saying but it can only be considered bad mouthing if you accept that Jewish dominace has negative implications.

Do you think Jews control the media? And actively consort with each other?

Brown Bomber

Brown Bomber wrote: »

Perhaps you could rephrase your question without the sarcasm?

Well why not answer it instead of bitching about the inferred tone?
Or would you prefer to dodge the question?

Brown Bomber

King Mob wrote: »

Well why not answer it instead of bitching about the inferred tone?
Or would you prefer to dodge the question?

I'm more than happy to answer if you cut out the sarcasm and ask it in a civil and mature manner. Which you haven't done in the last 2 posts. Your call.

Brown Bomber

Di0genes wrote: »

Do you think Jews control the media? And actively consort with each other?

I suggest you read this thread. I've already given my opinion on the matter.

Brown Bomber

Brown Bomber wrote: »

I'm more than happy to answer if you cut out the sarcasm and ask it in a civil and mature manner. Which you haven't done in the last 2 posts. Your call.

So then what do you suggest should be done about the Jews controlling the media?

Brown Bomber

King Mob wrote: »

So then what do you suggest should be done about the Jews controlling the media?

1. There is no issue with Jews influencing the US media. However, a a potential problem is Zionists, Jewish or otherwise who have no or a lesser loyalty to the US.

http://maxblumenthal.com/

What should be done:
Transparency.
Just that this fact shouldn't be off limits for debate thereby making people more aware of the fact which would in turn help the judge the material presented more accurately which hopefully would prevent some of them in the future from becoming sycophantic, bleating sheep brainwashed by their tv to become apologists for war crimes and humanitarian crimes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=

Brown Bomber

Brown Bomber wrote: »

1. There is no issue with Jews influencing the US media. However, a a potential problem is Zionists, Jewish or otherwise who have no or a lesser loyalty to the US.

Except that's not what happened in the example given. It had nothing to do with Zionism, except of course it involved Jews.

Brown Bomber wrote: »

What should be done:
Transparency.
Just that this fact shouldn't be off limits for debate thereby making people more aware of the fact which would in turn help the judge the material presented more accurately which hopefully would prevent some of them in the future from becoming sycophantic, bleating sheep brainwashed by their tv to become apologists for war crimes and humanitarian crimes.

So then which shows/channels should this apply to?
How would you label these shows exactly?

Also maybe you should leave out the accusations of people being sheep since you refuse to answer questions that aren't "civil and mature".

Brown Bomber

King Mob wrote: »

Except that's not what happened in the example given. It had nothing to do with Zionism, except of course it involved Jews.


So then which shows/channels should this apply to?
How would you label these shows exactly?

Also maybe you should leave out the accusations of people being sheep since you refuse to answer questions that aren't "civil and mature".

Just a minute. Before we continue on with this witch hunt hows about you clarify if you agree or disagree with my statement. Namely:

What should be done:
Transparency.
Just that this fact shouldn't be off limits for debate thereby making people more aware of the fact which would in turn help the judge the material presented more accurately which hopefully would prevent some of them in the future from becoming sycophantic, bleating sheep brainwashed by their tv to become apologists for war crimes and humanitarian crimes.

Of course its working on the premise that Jewish people are heavily influential in the media industry in the US. I think only someone who is deeply ignorant would challenge that claim, which I don't believe you are.

Brown Bomber

Brown Bomber wrote: »

Just a minute. Before we continue on with this witch hunt hows about you clarify if you agree or disagree with my statement. Namely:


Of course its working on the premise that Jewish people are heavily influential in the media industry in the US. I think only someone who is deeply ignorant would challenge that claim, which I don't believe you are.

And that premise has yet to actually be validated by you or anyone.
Unless you're counting vague accusations based entirely on bigotry.

Either way it doesn't actually change what you think should be done, which leads back to two very simple questions:

So then which shows/channels should this apply to?
How would you label these shows exactly?

Brown Bomber

King Mob wrote: »

And that premise has yet to actually be validated by you or anyone.
Unless you're counting vague accusations based entirely on bigotry.

Here is two Jewish writers validating the claim.

Specific and I suppose these are anti-semitic Jews now in your expert opinion`? :rolleyes:

Ben Stein:
http://www.rense.com/general21/bet.htm

Joel Stein:
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/dec/19/opinion/oe-stein19

King Mob wrote: »

Either way it doesn't actually change what you think should be done, which leads back to two very simple questions:

Do you agree with my statement on transparency or not?

Brown Bomber

Brown Bomber wrote: »

Here is two Jewish writers validating the claim.

Specific and I suppose these are anti-semitic Jews now in your expert opinion`? :rolleyes:

Ben Stein:
http://www.rense.com/general21/bet.htm

Joel Stein:
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/dec/19/opinion/oe-stein19

Well one is on rense therefore I'm not even going to bother.
The other is the mainstream media, which you think the Jews control, Thus kinda disproving your point.
Also he says that most movie producers are jewish, not that they exercise undue (or any) influence based on their ethnicity.

Brown Bomber wrote: »

Do you agree with my statement on transparency or not?

No, because it's based on a premise that an ehtnic group is unduly controling the media, because they belong to that ethnic group.

But as I said this has no baring on what you exactly believe should be done.

So again:

So then which shows/channels should this apply to?
How would you label these shows exactly?

Di0genes

Brown Bomber wrote: »

Just a minute. Before we continue on with this witch hunt hows about you clarify if you agree or disagree with my statement. Namely:



Of course its working on the premise that Jewish people are heavily influential in the media industry in the US. I think only someone who is deeply ignorant would challenge that claim, which I don't believe you are.

Thats irrelevant. Whether there are jewish people working in the media or not, you have to show that there is a concerted organised attempt by these jews to infulence media.

<SNIP>

TMoreno

King Mob wrote: »

So then what do you suggest should be done about the Jews controlling the media?

They should all be arrested and judged for treason for what they did to the American people.
Same thing for the Fed, Wall Street and the US Congress.

The truth will set you free.

TMoreno

TMoreno wrote: »

They should all be arrested and judged for treason for what they did to the American people.
Same thing for the Fed, Wall Street and the US Congress.

The truth will set you free.

Dude, you really really should stop and think about what you just said.

And by judged do you mean stand trial or would you prefer to do away with that little formality?

fontanalis

Rick Sanchez is a tool. Stewart mocked him for being a tool and a useless journalist. And the fact that Sanchez referred to The Daily Show as the media really shows his jounralism integrity.

Brown Bomber

King Mob wrote: »

Dude, you really really should stop and think about what you just said.

And by judged do you mean stand trial or would you prefer to do away with that little formality?

FFS...Of course he doesn't mean that. WTF kind of judging usually follows the arrest for a crime?

I'm done engaging with you in this this thread,unless you change your tune - your clearly not interested in any kind of productive debate. Your trying to manipulate people into positions that they don't hold which I hope the moderators have taken notice of.

Brown Bomber

Brown Bomber wrote: »

FFS...Of course he doesn't mean that. WTF kind of judging usually follows the arrest for a crime?

He's the one who wants them arrested and it's pretty clear that he's already decided that they are guilty (of something not specified) so it's a relevant question.

Brown Bomber wrote: »

I'm done engaging with you in this this thread,unless you change your tune - your clearly not interested in any kind of productive debate. Your trying to manipulate people into positions that they don't hold which I hope the moderators have taken notice of.

I'm not manipulating anyone into anything, but I honestly can't see any answer you could possibly give that won't sound exactly like the reasoning the Nazis used.
I was hoping you could give an answer that didn't but you seem far more interested in finding something you can throw a strop over and avoid any questions entirely.

Brown Bomber

Di0genes wrote: »

Thats irrelevant. Whether there are jewish people working in the media or not, you have to show that there is a concerted organised attempt by these jews to infulence media.

<SNIP>

Not if you understand the meaning of he word potential.

You just have to read US media reportage of the Middle East. Recent examples are the little or no attention the UN report into the IDF massacre on the Mavi Marmara and coverage of the US based peace talks. I don't know how many times I have read recently in regards to the illegal settlements on occupied Palestinian land, and normally buried around paragraph 10 or so that they are considered as "regarded as illegal by some" or "legality of which is disputed by some in the international community" when the fact of the matter is they are considered illegal by everyone bar Israel. It's deception pure and simple. Deception which the gullible masses gobble up.

Watch this (courtesy of a friend )

Brown Bomber

King Mob wrote: »

He's the one who wants them arrested and it's pretty clear that he's already decided that they are guilty (of something not specified) so it's a relevant question.

TMoreno wrote: »

They should all be arrested and judged for treason for what they did to the American people.
Same thing for the Fed, Wall Street and the US Congress.

The truth will set you free.

See: "arrested" for "treason" and "judged" (i.e. by a judge) for "treason".

Hardly the position of calling for holocaust II like you are incessantly trying to make out now is it?

TMoreno wrote: »

I'm not manipulating anyone into anything, but I honestly can't see any answer you could possibly give that won't sound exactly like the reasoning the Nazis used.
I was hoping you could give an answer that didn't but you seem far more interested in finding something you can throw a strop over and avoid any questions entirely.

Look I see very little point in continuing the discussion when your basic knowledge is so lacking. You refuse to accept that the US media is top heavy with Jews. If you can't or refuse to accept the obvious there is really nothing for us to talk about here.

Brown Bomber

Brown Bomber wrote: »

See: "arrested" for "treason" and "judged" (i.e. by a judge) for "treason".

Hardly the position of calling for holocaust II like you are incessantly trying to make out now is it?

Actually the usual terms are you are arrested, then tried (as in trial) then afterwards, you where judged to have committed treason or judged to be innocent.
But you can't argue that TMoreno has already deicided what they are guilty.

Brown Bomber wrote: »

Look I see very little point in continuing the discussion when your basic knowledge is so lacking. You refuse to accept that the US media is top heavy with Jews. If you can't or refuse to accept the obvious there is really nothing for us to talk about here.

Actually no that's not what I believe, nor have I said otherwise.
There are a lot of Jews in the media. This doesn't mean they are influencing the media due to their heritage.

But why are you so intent on dodging very very simple questions?

So then which shows/channels should this apply to?
How would you label these shows exactly?

They aren't trick questions, and if you're position is indeed reasonable why not just answer them, get people to learn the truth, get them involved in this plan to stop undue influence and show me up?

TMoreno

King Mob wrote: »

Actually the usual terms are you are arrested, then tried (as in trial) then afterwards, you where judged to have committed treason or judged to be innocent.
But you can't argue that TMoreno has already deicided what they are guilty.


Actually no that's not what I believe, nor have I said otherwise.
There are a lot of Jews in the media. This doesn't mean they are influencing the media due to their heritage.

But why are you so intent on dodging very very simple questions?



They aren't trick questions, and if you're position is indeed reasonable why not just answer them, get people to learn the truth, get them involved in this plan to stop undue influence and show me up?

I said that they should be arrested and let the Jury decide. If Al Judea Al Qaeda did 9 11 people you provide evidence.

reprazant

TMoreno wrote: »

I said that they should be arrested and let the Jury decide. If Al Judea Al Qaeda did 9 11 people you provide evidence.

They have admitted it.

TMoreno

TMoreno wrote: »

I said that they should be arrested and let the Jury decide. If Al Judea Al Qaeda did 9 11 people you provide evidence.

So what exactly leads you to believe Jews did it in the first place?
Which Jews would you arrest exactly?

profitius

I googled some links regarding who controls the media. I found the following link but couldn't get it from the original source (Source: Altermedia.info) because a warning came on my computer that said the site could damage my computer. Coincidence or is somebody trying to block people from using the site?


Anyway heres the article.

The world’s media is 96% owned by just six Jewish companies. How could such a thing come to pass?


The power of lies, deceptions and disinformation as Americans pay the price of collective stupidity.

“You know very well, and the stupid Americans know equally well, that we control their government, irrespective of who sits in the White House. You see, I know it and you know it that no American president can be in a position to challenge us even if we do the unthinkable. What can they (Americans) do to us? We control congress, we control the media, we control show biz, and we control everything in America. In America you can criticize God, but you can’t criticize Israel…”


Facts of Jewish Media Control

The largest media conglomerate today is Walt Disney Company, whose chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew. The Disney Empire, headed by a man described by one media analyst as a “control freak”, includes several television production companies (Walt Disney Television, Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television), its own cable network with 14 million subscribers, and two video production companies. As for feature films, the Walt Disney Picture Group, headed by Joe Roth (also a Jew), includes Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and Caravan Pictures. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the Weinstein brothers.

When the Disney Company was run by the Gentile Disney family prior to its takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome, family entertainment. While it still holds the rights to Snow White, under Eisner, the company has expanded into the production of graphic sex and violence. In addition, it has 225 affiliated stations in the United States and is part owner of several European TV companies. ABC’s cable subsidiary, ESPN, is headed by president and CEO Steven Bornstein, a Jew. This corporation also has a controlling share of Lifetime Television and the Arts & Entertainment Network cable companies. ABC Radio Network owns eleven AM and ten FM stations, again in major cities such as New York, Washington, Los Angeles, and has over 3,400 affiliates. Although primarily a telecommunications company, Capital Cities/ABC earned over $1 billion in publishing in 1994. It owns seven daily newspapers, Fairchild Publications, Chilton Publications, and the Diversified Publishing Group.

Time Warner, Inc, is the second of the international media leviathans. The chairman of the board and CEO, Gerald Levin, is a Jew. Time Warner’s subsidiary HBO is the country’s largest pay-TV cable network. Warner Music is by far the world’s largest record company, with 50 labels, the biggest of which is Warner Brothers Records, headed by Danny Goldberg. Stuart Hersch is president of Warnervision, Warner Music’s video production unit. Goldberg and Hersch are Jews. Warner Music was an early promoter of “gangsta rap.” Through its involvement with Interscope Records, it helped popularize a genre whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge Blacks to commit acts of violence against Whites. In addition to cable and music, Time Warner is heavily involved in the production of feature films (Warner Brothers Studio) and publishing. Time Warner’s publishing division (editor-in-chief Norman Pearlstine, a Jew) is the largest magazine publisher in the country (Time, Sports Illustrated, People, Fortune). When Ted Turner, a Gentile, made a bid to buy CBS in 1985, there was panic in media boardrooms across the nation. Turner made a fortune in advertising and then had built a successful cable-TV news network, CNN.

Although Turner employed a number of Jews in key executive positions in CNN and had never taken public positions contrary to Jewish interests, he is a man with a large ego and a strong personality and was regarded by Chairman William Paley (real name Palinsky, a Jew) and the other Jews at CBS as uncontrollable: a loose cannon who might at some time in the future turn against them. Furthermore, Jewish newsman Daniel Schorr, who had worked for Turner, publicly charged that his former boss held a personal dislike for Jews. To block Turner’s bid, CBS executives invited billionaire Jewish theater, hotel, insurance, and cigarette magnate Laurence Tisch to launch a “friendly” takeover of the company, and from 1986 till 1995 Tisch was the chairman and CEO of CBS, removing any threat of non-Jewish influence there. Subsequent efforts by Turner to acquire a major network have been obstructed by Levin’s Time Warner, which owns nearly 20 percent of CBS stock and has veto power over major deals.

Viacom, Inc, headed by Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein), a Jew, is the third largest megamedia corporation in the country, with revenues of over $10 billion a year. Viacom, which produces and distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, owns 12 television stations and 12 radio stations. It produces feature films through Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing. Its publishing division includes Prentice Hall, Simon & Schuster, and Pocket Books. It distributes videos through over 4,000 Blockbuster stores. Viacom’s chief claim to fame, however, is as the world’s largest provider of cable programming, through its Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon, and other networks. Since 1989, MTV and Nickelodeon have acquired larger and larger shares of the younger television audience. With the top three, and by far the largest, media companies in the hand of Jews, it is difficult to believe that such an overwhelming degree of control came about without a deliberate, concerted effort on their part. What about the other big media companies?

Number four on the list is Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, which owns Fox Television and 20th Century Fox Films. Murdoch is a Gentile, but Peter Chermin, who heads Murdoch’s film studio and also oversees his TV production, is a Jew.

Number five is the Japanese Sony Corporation, whose U.S. subsidiary, Sony Corporation of America, is run by Michael Schulhof, a Jew. Alan Levine, another Jew, heads the Sony Pictures division. Most of the television and movie production companies that are not owned by the largest corporations are also controlled by Jews. For example, New World Entertainment, proclaimed by one media analyst as “the premiere independent TV program producer in the United States,” is owned by Ronald Perelman, a Jew. The best known of the smaller media companies, Dreamworks SKG, is a strictly kosher affair. Dream Works was formed in 1994 amid great media hype by recording industry mogul David Geffen, former Disney Pictures chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg, and film director Steven Spielberg, all three of whom are Jews. The company produces movies, animated films, television programs, and recorded music.

Two other large production companies, MCA and Universal Pictures, are both owned by Seagram Company, Ltd. The president and CEO of Seagram, the liquor giant, is Edgar Bronfman Jr., who is also president of the World Jewish Congress. It is well known that Jews have controlled the production and distribution of films since the inception of the movie industry in the early decades of the 20th century. This is still the case today. Films produced by just the five largest motion picture companies mentioned above - Disney, Warner Brothers, Sony, Paramount (Viacom), and Universal (Seagram) - accounted for 74 per cent of the total box-office receipts for the first eight months of 1995.

The big three in television network broadcasting used to be ABC, CBS, and NBC. With the consolidation of the media empires, these three are no longer independent entities. While they were independent, however, each was controlled by a Jew since its inception: ABC by Leonard Goldenson, CBS first by William Paley and then by Lawrence Tisch, and NBC first by David Sarnoff and then by his son Robert. Over periods of several decades, these networks were staffed from top to bottom with Jews, and the essential Jewishness of network television did not change when the networks were absorbed by other corporations. The Jewish presence in television news remains particularly strong. As noted, ABC is part of Eisner’s Disney Company, and the executive producers of ABC’s news programs are all Jews: Victor Neufeld (20-20), Bob Reichbloom (Good Morning America), and Rick Kaplan (World News Tonight). CBS was recently purchased by Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Nevertheless, the man appointed by Lawrence Tisch, Eric Ober, remains president of CBS News, and Ober is a Jew. At NBC, now owned by General Electric, NBC News president Andrew Lack is a Jew, as are executive producers Jeff Zucker (Today), Jeff Gralnick (NBC Nightly News), and Neal Shapiro (Dateline).


The Print Media

After television news, daily newspapers are the most influential information medium in America. Sixty million of them are sold (and presumably read) each day. These millions are divided among some 1,500 different publications. One might conclude that the sheer number of different newspapers across America would provide a safeguard against Jewish control and distortion. However, this is not the case. There is less independence, less competition, and much less representation of our interests than a casual observer would think. The days when most cities and even towns had several independently owned newspapers published by local people with close ties to the community are gone. Today, most “local” newspapers are owned by a rather small number of large companies controlled by executives who live and work hundreds or ever thousands of miles away.

The fact is that only about 25 per cent of the country’s 1,500 papers are independently owned; the rest belong to multi-newspaper chains. Only a handful are large enough to maintain independent reporting staffs outside their own communities; the rest depend on these few for all of their national and international news. The Newhouse empire of Jewish brothers Samuel and Donald Newhouse provides an example of more than the lack of real competition among America’s daily newspapers: it also illustrates the insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all the organs of opinion control on which they could fasten their grip. The Newhouses own 26 daily newspapers, including several large and important ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger, and the New Orleans Times-Picayune; the nation’s largest trade book publishing conglomerate, Random House, with all its subsidiaries; Newhouse Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television broadcasting stations and 87 cable-TV systems, including some of the country’s largest cable networks; the Sunday supplement Parade, with a circulation of more than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen major magazines, including the New Yorker, Vogue, Madmoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride’s, Gentlemen’s Quarterly, Self, House & Garden, and all the other magazines of the wholly owned Conde Nast group. This Jewish media empire was founded by the late Samuel Newhouse, an immigrant from Russia. The gobbling up of so many newspapers by the Newhouse family was in large degree made possible by the fact that newspapers are not supported by their subscribers, but by their advertisers.

It is advertising revenue–not the small change collected from a newspaper’s readers–that largely pays the editor’s salary and yields the owner’s profit. Whenever the large advertisers in a city choose to favor one newspaper over another with their business, the favored newspaper will flourish while its competitor dies. Since the beginning of the 20th century, when Jewish mercantile power in America became a dominant economic force, there has been a steady rise in the number of American newspapers in Jewish hands, accompanied by a steady decline in the number of competing Gentile newspapers–primarily as a result of selective advertising policies by Jewish merchants. Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership and management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising revenue that their editorial and news reporting policies are largely constrained by Jewish likes and dislikes. It holds true in the newspaper business as elsewhere that he who pays the piper calls the tune.


Three Jewish Newspapers

The suppression of competition and the establishment of local monopolies on the dissemination of news and opinion have characterized the rise of Jewish control over America’s newspapers. The resulting ability of the Jews to use the press as an unopposed instrument of Jewish policy could hardly be better illustrated than by the examples of the nation’s three most prestigious and influential newspapers: the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post. These three, dominating America’s financial and political capitals, are the newspapers which set the trends and the guidelines for nearly all the others. They are the ones which decide what is news and what isn’t, at the national and international levels. They originate the news; the others merely copy it, and all three newspapers are in Jewish hands.

The New York Times was founded in 1851 by two Gentiles, Henry Raymond and George Jones. After their deaths, it was purchased in 1896 from Jones’s estate by a wealthy Jewish publisher, Adolph Ochs. His great-grandson, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., is the paper’s current publisher and CEO. The executive editor is Max Frankel, and the managing editor is Joseph Lelyveld. Both of the latter are also Jews. The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co., 33 other newspapers, including the Boston Globe; twelve magazines, including McCall’s and Family Circle with circulations of more than 5 million each; seven radio and TV broadcasting stations; a cable-TV system; and three book publishing companies. The New York Times News Service transmits news stories, features, and photographs from the New York Times by wire to 506 other newspapers, news agencies, and magazines.

Of similar national importance is the Washington Post, which, by establishing its “leaks” throughout government agencies in Washington, has an inside track on news involving the Federal government. The Washington Post, like the New York Times, had a non-Jewish origin. It was established in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins, purchased from him in 1905 by John McLean, and later inherited by Edward McLean. In June 1933, however, at the height of the Great Depression, the newspaper was forced into bankruptcy. It was purchased at a bankruptcy auction by Eugene Meyer, a Jewish financier. The Washington Post is now run by Katherine Meyer Graham, Eugene Meyer’s daughter. She is the principal stockholder and the board chairman of the Washington Post Co. In 1979, she appointed her son Donald publisher of the paper. He now also holds the posts of president and CEO of the Washington Post Co. The Washington Post Co. has a number of other media holdings in newspapers, television, and magazines, most notably the nation’s number-two weekly news magazine, Newsweek. The Wall Street Journal, which sells 1.8 million copies each weekday, is the nation’s largest-circulation daily newspaper. It is owned by Dow Jones & Company, Inc., a New York corporation which also publishes 24 other daily newspapers and the weekly financial tabloid Barron’s, among other things. The chairman and CEO of Dow Jones is Peter Kann, who is a Jew. Kann also holds the posts of chairman and publisher of the Wall Street Journal.

Most of New York’s other major newspapers are in no better hands than the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. The New York Daily News is owned by Jewish real-estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman. The Village Voice is the personal property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of the Hartz Mountain pet supply firm.


Other Mass Media

The story is pretty much the same for other media as it is for television, radio, and newspapers. Consider, for example, news magazines. There are only three of any note published in the United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News and World Report.

Time, with a weekly circulation of 4.1 million, is published by a susidiary of Time Warner Communications. The CEO of Time Warner Communications, as mentioned above, is Gerald Levin, a Jew.

Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington Post Company, under the Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham. Its weekly circulation is 3.2 million.

U.S. News & World Report, with a weekly circulation of 2.3 million, is owned and published by Mortimer Zuckerman, a Jew. Zuckerman also owns the Atlantic Monthly and New York’s tabloid newspaper, the Daily News, which is the sixth-largest paper in the country.

Among the giant book-publishing conglomerates, the situation is also Jewish. Three of the six largest book publishers in the U.S., according to Publisher’s Weekly, are owned or controlled by Jews.

The three are first-place Random House (with its many subsidiaries, including Crown Publishing Group), third-place Simon & Schuster, and sixth-place Time Warner Trade Group (including Warner Books and Little, Brown).

Another publisher of special significance is Western Publishing. Although it ranks only 13th in size among all U.S. publishers, it ranks first among publishers of children’s books, with more than 50 percent of the market. Its chairman and CEO is Richard Snyder, a Jew, who just replaced Richard Bernstein, also a Jew.


The Effect of Jewish Control of the Media

These are the facts of Jewish media control in America. Anyone willing to spend several hours in a large library can verify their accuracy. I hope that these facts are disturbing to you, to say the least. Should any minority be allowed to wield such awesome power? Certainly, not and allowing a people with beliefs such as expressed in the Talmud, to determine what we get to read or watch in effect gives this small minority the power to mold our minds to suit their own Talmudic interests, interests which as we have demonstrated are diametrically opposed to the interests of our people. By permitting the Jews to control our news and entertainment media, we are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children, whose attitudes and ideas are shaped more by Jewish television and Jewish films than by their parents, their schools, or any other influence.

Altermedia.info

alastair

Jewish companies eh!?

I didn't know companies could have a religion or ethnicity.

Delighted to see the oul zionism/jewish ambiguity rolled out by those who claim to have nothing whatsoever in common with those other nasty racists/bigots.

Brown Bomber

alastair wrote: »

Delighted to see the oul zionism/jewish ambiguity rolled out by those who claim to have nothing whatsoever in common with those other nasty racists/bigots.

Is that nasty slur made in reference to me?

If it is please back it up with something I have said (and good luck finding it)

profitius

alastair wrote: »

Jewish companies eh!?

I didn't know companies could have a religion or ethnicity.

Delighted to see the oul zionism/jewish ambiguity rolled out by those who claim to have nothing whatsoever in common with those other nasty racists/bigots.

I didn't check out the facts in the article I posted so feel free to do so and if its nonsense you can use that as an argument instead of using the race card.

humanji

profitius wrote: »

I didn't check out the facts in the article I posted so feel free to do so and if its nonsense you can use that as an argument instead of using the race card.

In fairness, it's pretty much a pile of coincidental, racist ****. The logic is just mental: Jewish people have succeeded in various areas, therefore they are evil and trying to brain wash us. Seriously, that is just a bizarre leap of faith to come to that conclusion.

You'd almost think that the guys who wrote the "article" were some sor tof dis-info agents trying to discredit those who speak out against Isreal and the like, because it's just silly.

profitius

humanji wrote: »

In fairness, it's pretty much a pile of coincidental, racist ****. The logic is just mental: Jewish people have succeeded in various areas, therefore they are evil and trying to brain wash us. Seriously, that is just a bizarre leap of faith to come to that conclusion.

You'd almost think that the guys who wrote the "article" were some sor tof dis-info agents trying to discredit those who speak out against Isreal and the like, because it's just silly.

Well heres something to think about. Maybe they want to control the media to influence people?

Influence = power. Obama got elected and was the new messiah. Why? Because the media made him out to be.

And look no further than whats happening in the middle East. The USA media are so pro Isreal you'd have to wonder is it a coincidence. I'm not a big fan of coincidences myself.

Theres also Jewish groups who are against Zionism even though some people in the west says theres no such thing as Zionism!

humanji

But do you not see that that's more a conspiracy that the media are out to rule the world, not the Jews? They just happen to be Jewish. Israel has a large fan base in the States, so if you want these people on your side, you tell them you support Israel, they back you, you get more power. You can pretty much be assurred they tell all interest groups what they want to hear. That's how politics works.

TMoreno

humanji wrote: »

But do you not see that that's more a conspiracy that the media are out to rule the world, not the Jews? They just happen to be Jewish. Israel has a large fan base in the States, so if you want these people on your side, you tell them you support Israel, they back you, you get more power. You can pretty much be assurred they tell all interest groups what they want to hear. That's how politics works.

Israel has a large fan base because the Synagogue of Satan run the media, the Fed and blackmail the Congress. They have succeeded? The American people is totally misinformed, TV is full of trash, the US economy is almost bankrupt and the world is preparing for World War III. What an achievement indeed!

humanji

Do I really want to know what the Synagogue of Satan is?

TMoreno

humanji wrote: »

Do I really want to know what the Synagogue of Satan is?

New Testament Revelation 2:9

I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

humanji

So teh Jews don't run the media then?

TMoreno

humanji wrote: »

So teh Jews don't run the media then?

It just means that I am not an anti semite!:D

--Kaiser--

TMoreno wrote: »

It just means that I am not an anti semite!:D

You quite clearly are an anti-semite. Your posting history is enough proof of that.

TMoreno

--Kaiser-- wrote: »

You quite clearly are an anti-semite. Your posting history is enough proof of that.

Call me an anti Semite if it amuses you, but you clearly never read the Bible. Yes the Synagogue of Satan run the media.