Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Isreal and American forces ready to attack Iran within days

13468921

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭mugs1


    what legitimate reasons leaves you with this "little doubt" of yours.

    I can think of 0.

    Is this legitimate enough for you??????


    http://www.iran-e-azad.org/stoning/women.html

    No?... Maybe this is......


    Warning the video link below is extremly graffic!!!!!

    http://www.stopahmadinejad.com/young-woman-stoned-in-iran/

    Now stop talking Utter Sh1te!!!!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Oh god not this again.... The oil nonsense. It's not about oil. If it was they could just invade oil reserves in other places in the world. The wars in Iran and Iraq are not oil wars. For god sake already.

    If it was really about Oil, WW3 would have started already, because China would not allow USA to invade it for that reason. It is also not about WMDs in Iran That lie was sold in Iraq. Do people not get it already.

    This war is about a war that has been going on since the beginning and before this civilization.


    Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan and Tibet is on a natural startgate. It's an ancient ground of many relics and many other secrets most of humanity cannot fathom.

    This oil and gas argument is just a distraction for the most part. We all know it's handy to steal a few billions barrels of Oil while we totally bomb this **** out of these countries. It's a cool thing to do apparently since nobody seems to mention this fact that the west has ALWAYS been sucking recources dry in every country they invade.

    The point about Iran here it's not just about "the oil or the money". Since Iran is a very risky war to start with. America just would not go to the bother of spending the last 12 years gearing for this Iran war if it was just about oil...

    Let's not forget Iraq wasnt about oil or WMDS..

    So it's really a matter of people getting real with this now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭mugs1


    mysterious wrote: »
    Oh god not this again.... The oil nonsense. It's not about oil. If it was they could just invade oil reserves in other places in the world. The wars in Iran and Iraq are not oil wars. For god sake already.

    If it was really about Oil, WW3 would have started already, because China would not allow USA to invade it for that reason. It is also not about WMDs in Iran That lie was sold in Iraq. Do people not get it already.

    This war is about a war that has been going on since the beginning and before this civilization.


    Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan and Tibet is on a natural startgate. It's an ancient ground of many relics and many other secrets most of humanity cannot fathom.

    This oil and gas argument is just a distraction for the most part. We all know it's handy to steal a few billions barrels of Oil while we totally bomb this **** out of these countries. It's a cool thing to do apparently since nobody seems to mention this fact that the west has ALWAYS been sucking recources dry in every country they invade.

    The point about Iran here it's not just about "the oil or the money". Since Iran is a very risky war to start with. America just would not go to the bother of spending the last 12 years gearing for this Iran war if it was just about oil...

    Let's not forget Iraq wasnt about oil or WMDS..

    So it's really a matter of people getting real with this now.

    You just read that now, didn't ya? I bet you have a second tab open on your browser don't ya..... F***in lol


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,324 ✭✭✭tallus


    mugs1 wrote: »
    Is this legitimate enough for you??????


    http://www.iran-e-azad.org/stoning/women.html

    No?... Maybe this is......


    Warning the video link below is extremly graffic!!!!!

    http://www.stopahmadinejad.com/young-woman-stoned-in-iran/

    Now stop talking Utter Sh1te!!!!!

    If your contention is that the US is invading because the Iranians are religious fanatics then you are mistaken.
    Don't forget that the U.S. had no problem training and supporting the likes of Bin Laden and his cohorts in Afghanistan when it was occupied by the old Soviet Union.
    It has nothing to do with religion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,910 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    digme wrote: »
    Israeli government desperately needs the distraction from the flotilla massacre, and the US government desperately needs the distraction from the unfolding catastrophe playing out in the Gulf of Mexico and beyond.

    How do you define "within days", it's been over two weeks since your post and no attack..


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭mugs1


    tallus wrote: »
    If your contention is that the US is invading because the Iranians are religious fanatics then you are mistaken.
    Don't forget that the U.S. had no problem training and supporting the likes of Bin Laden and his cohorts in Afghanistan when it was occupied by the old Soviet Union.
    It has nothing to do with religion.

    My CONTENTION is, the enemy of your enemy is not necesseraly your friend!!!

    Just because Iran is fighting with America, does not automaticly make it a good place,My CONTENTION is that if a country can do this to it's own people what the hell do you think they will do to you.. if they have a chance!!!!
    tallus wrote: »
    It has nothing to do with religion.

    J***s ch**st WAKE UP stoning woman has nothing to do with Religion!!

    That Browners lad smugly.... asked for 1 ligitamite example I gave it to him,then you come on here and try Dismiss the stoning of Woman as religion!!! and justify Irans behavior by reminding us of how Bad America is ( as if we all need reminding)

    All you have done there is read through my post to try and figure out a way to twist it out of context so you can inject your own arguement without actually addressing the real point!!!

    and thats just lazy!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,324 ✭✭✭tallus


    mugs1 wrote: »
    My CONTENTION is, the enemy of your enemy is not necesseraly your friend!!!

    Just because Iran is fighting with America, does not automaticly make it a good place,My CONTENTION is that if a country can do this to it's own people what the hell do you think they will do to you.. if they have a chance!!!!



    J***s ch**st WAKE UP stoning woman has nothing to do with Religion!!

    That Browners lad smugly.... asked for 1 ligitamite example I gave it to him,then you come on here and try Dismiss the stoning of Woman as religion!!! and justify Irans behavior by reminding us of how Bad America is ( as if we all need reminding)

    All you have done there is read through my post to try and figure out a way to twist it out of context so you can inject your own arguement without actually addressing the real point!!!

    and thats just lazy!!!

    Would you care to address my point that the U.S. invading Iran is not based on religious motives please ?
    Your post was directly pointing at that as being the reason.

    Secondly if you're not happy with people disagreeing with your posts, then you shouldn't post.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭mugs1


    tallus wrote: »
    Would you care to address my point that the U.S. invading Iran is not based on religious motives please ?

    No one said they were!!

    Your post was directly pointing at that as being the reason.

    Read back on the posts lad, Im not wiping your a**e either

    Secondly if you're not happy with people disagreeing with your posts, then you shouldn't post.

    Your having a laugh right??? you managed to completly gloss over my last post like it never happened,which is clearly the norm for this forum!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,324 ✭✭✭tallus


    mugs1 wrote: »
    Your having a laugh right???

    So you're point blank not willing to answer to the point I made.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭uprising2


    mugs1 wrote: »
    My CONTENTION is, the enemy of your enemy is not necesseraly your friend!!!

    Just because Iran is fighting with America, does not automaticly make it a good place,My CONTENTION is that if a country can do this to it's own people what the hell do you think they will do to you.. if they have a chance!!!!



    J***s ch**st WAKE UP stoning woman has nothing to do with Religion!!

    That Browners lad smugly.... asked for 1 ligitamite example I gave it to him,then you come on here and try Dismiss the stoning of Woman as religion!!! and justify Irans behavior by reminding us of how Bad America is ( as if we all need reminding)

    All you have done there is read through my post to try and figure out a way to twist it out of context so you can inject your own arguement without actually addressing the real point!!!

    and thats just lazy!!!

    That one reason you gave would mean that US should also invade Saudi Arabia, UAE, and other allies who also practice this sharia law.

    But you think because they do this to their own citizens that the US can blow sh1te out of EVERYBODY in Iran including future stoning victims.
    What type of fukked up reason is that?.
    Stoning a woman to death is wrong, blowing mutiple families to pieces is also wrong.


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    mugs1 wrote: »
    Is this legitimate enough for you??????


    http://www.iran-e-azad.org/stoning/women.html

    No?... Maybe this is......


    Warning the video link below is extremly graffic!!!!!

    http://www.stopahmadinejad.com/young-woman-stoned-in-iran/

    Now stop talking Utter Sh1te!!!!!

    Stoning:

    Horrific? Yes

    A sign of military expansionionism? No.

    A justifiable reason to invade a country and collectively punish it's whole population? No

    Try again...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭uprising2


    Lawmaker Calls UNSC Resolution Declaration of War against Iran
    http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8904200788

    'US attack on Iran a matter of time'
    http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=134296&sectionid=351020104


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,473 ✭✭✭robtri


    uprising2 wrote: »
    Lawmaker Calls UNSC Resolution Declaration of War against Iran
    http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8904200788

    'US attack on Iran a matter of time'
    http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=134296&sectionid=351020104


    its gone from a few days to a matter of time....

    its great to be able to keep moving the goal posts all the time... LOL


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,313 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    robtri wrote: »
    its gone from a few days to a matter of time....

    its great to be able to keep moving the goal posts all the time... LOL

    Think there was one here last year as well. Israeli and US Battleships being positioned near Iran. Are they still there?

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭mugs1


    tallus wrote: »
    So you're point blank not willing to answer to the point I made.

    Im dissapointed, I tought better of you tallus, but you took the easy route...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 101 ✭✭mugs1


    uprising2 wrote: »
    That one reason you gave would mean that US should also invade Saudi Arabia, UAE, and other allies who also practice this sharia law.

    But you think because they do this to their own citizens that the US can blow sh1te out of EVERYBODY in Iran including future stoning victims.
    What type of fukked up reason is that?..

    This is the only time I will engage with you!!! you *** are ***** if i actually printed that i would be banned.. now go talk to poopy, I imagine you could be great friends

    Stoning a woman to death is wrong, blowing mutiple families to pieces is also wrong.[/QUOTE]

    Well f***in DOH!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭uprising2


    mugs1 wrote: »
    This is the only time I will engage with you!!! you *** are ***** if i actually printed that i would be banned.. now go talk to poopy, I imagine you could be great friends

    Stoning a woman to death is wrong, blowing mutiple families to pieces is also wrong.

    Well f***in DOH!!

    Well fukkin Doh, whats your point?, having fun are ye?.

    Please print *** are ***** coz I'm trying different combinations of jibberish trying to work it out.

    But the reason why uncle sam should invade Iran is coz they stone women to death?.......is that all you can come up with?

    Whats poopy??, BB? I dont understand what the fukk your on about, either do you!, you don't seem to know anything about anything.

    Anyway some more war beats.....
    Hezbollah readying for urban war in southern Lebanon, IDF warns
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/hezbollah-readying-for-urban-war-in-southern-lebanon-idf-warns-1.300617


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,202 ✭✭✭Jeboa Safari


    uprising2 wrote: »
    Well fukkin Doh, whats your point?, having fun are ye?.

    Please print *** are ***** coz I'm trying different combinations of jibberish trying to work it out.

    But the reason why uncle sam should invade Iran is coz they stone women to death?.......is that all you can come up with?

    Whats poopy??, BB? I dont understand what the fukk your on about, either do you!, you don't seem to know anything about anything.

    Anyway some more war beats.....
    Hezbollah readying for urban war in southern Lebanon, IDF warns
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/hezbollah-readying-for-urban-war-in-southern-lebanon-idf-warns-1.300617

    Don't think he's saying that at all...
    Anyway uprising2 and your sort, who are your ideal countries, who would you like to see counter the US? And why do you hate the US so much more than any other country? I don't get it, they've committed crimes, but so has almost every country that has ever existed


  • Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    I don't hate the US but they need to get their own house in order. The political system neglects the people and serves criminals, interest groups and corporations and ****s over the general public. The main problem I have with America is that they are the single superpower in the world and have the capability alone to make the world a much better place, much better than pre 911 but the power is used for evil in attempts by a neocon/zionist alliance to control the whole globe and annihilate anything that they don't control either directly or by proxy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭uprising2


    Anyway uprising2 and your sort, who are your ideal countries, who would you like to see counter the US? And why do you hate the US so much more than any other country? I don't get it, they've committed crimes, but so has almost every country that has ever existed

    It would take a long post to answer this fully and I'm going to bed so I'll make it short, basically the USA is run by very dark deceitful people, and I'm not talking about Obomber's skin colour.
    I take it you have a mainstream view of America?, like you get all your American news etc from respectful sources such as CNN.
    There is so much american secret history, secret societies, secret operations that never get light of day from these same respectful sources.
    They are evil mass murdering scum, this is not the mainstream view of the USA, but it is the truth, I grew up believing USA were the good guys, then was wide eyed as I discovered what really went on behind the scenes.

    Honestly I'd advise you to look deeper into america's past, how they say it happened and compare it to how it really happened.

    Example:
    Vietnam, almost 5 million total dead.
    Started on a lie: Gulf of tonkin

    The lie: http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq120-1.htm

    The TRUTH: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB132/press20051201.htm

    http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB132/relea00012.pdf


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 47,767 CMod ✭✭✭✭Black Swan


    Pendleton is a training base. You expect all training to stop, or training normal to their operations to all of a sudden signal that they are preparing for the invasion of Iran? They still have to keep training going for Afghanistan and Iraq? But there is no massive buildup as occurred months before the 2nd Gulf War (Iraq II) happening at the US Marines' largest training camp. Our beach cities are not flooded with leathernecks on leave during the weekends as occurred during months before Iraq II. There are no massive US Navy fleet exercises off our Pacific coast when training and simulating a coastal invasion of yet another nation (e.g., Iran), which I can see from where I live. I don't have to Google. I live and play in those beach cities immediately north of Pendleton, sail and surf the Pacific, and live where I can see any US Naval activity off our coast. So have your fun with this thread, but as Cinful said, an American invasion of Iran (like the Iraq II invasion) is not happening before 2012 presidential elections. Obama wants to be reelected, and to start a 3rd war (in Iran) would be a political kiss of death for his second term of office.
    Some more from a military wives forum, which also shows how ****ing ignorant and brainwashed Americans have become.
    Consider the source? The "military wives forum" now represents all American views? Military wives are a small highly biased minority of American women that don't speak for all American women, and certainly do not provide support for your claim that "brainwashed Americans" are the norm in a population of 300 million, which is a broad sweeping ethnocentric generalisation. One thing I have learned since leaving Ireland over 4 years past is how diverse Americans are in their views, rather than ideological clones as depicted by statements such as these.

    The only CT on this thread is the CT of CTs. What happened to the "within days" prediction on this thread? Weeks have already passed since it was posted? Soon it will be months? Then years?

    When the US does not invade Iran "within days," or weeks, or months, or during 2010 midterm elections, or before 2012 presidential elections, where will this thread be? Long since forgotten, with of course yet another sensationalist CT to take its place on a different topic? Does anyone see the craic? ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,324 ✭✭✭tallus


    mugs1 wrote: »
    Im dissapointed, I tought better of you tallus, but you took the easy route...

    Why don't you quit blowing smoke, and address the point I made.

    You quoted two links that showed Iranian sharia law in action, which were supposed to back up your logic as to why the U.S. was going to invade Iran.

    I posted that they have trained and armed people who are just as fanatical in Afghanistan during the occupation by the U.S.S.R. which was a valid counter argument.

    Your reply did not address the point I made.
    J***s ch**st WAKE UP stoning woman has nothing to do with Religion!!

    That Browners lad smugly.... asked for 1 ligitamite example I gave it to him,then you come on here and try Dismiss the stoning of Woman as religion!!! and justify Irans behavior by reminding us of how Bad America is ( as if we all need reminding)

    All you have done there is read through my post to try and figure out a way to twist it out of context so you can inject your own arguement without actually addressing the real point!!!

    and thats just lazy!!!

    I didn't state for one minute that America was bad, as per the quote above, secondly, I have never tried to dismiss any part of your post regarding the stoning of a woman be it for religious reasons or any other reason.

    I didn't try to twist the context of your post in any way, I merely showed why I thought your idea lacked any real merit as it's a well known fact that the U.S. have armed and trained mujahideen rebels who were just as religiously fanatical as the Iranians.

    Then you accuse me of being lazy. (more smoke)
    Your having a laugh right??? you managed to completly gloss over my last post like it never happened,which is clearly the norm for this forum!!

    Above: more smoke, your post had nothing to do with the point I made, so why would I address it ?
    Im dissapointed, I tought better of you tallus, but you took the easy route...

    Yet more smoke....

    I didn't take the easy route, I posted what I think was a valid argument to your post regarding the stonings.
    Not one of your replies have thus far taken my point into consideration.

    So, is there any danger of you addressing my original point that religious fanatacism does not play a part in the supposed impending invasion of Iran?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Pendleton is a training base. You expect all training to stop, or training normal to their operations to all of a sudden signal that they are preparing for the invasion of Iran? They still have to keep training going for Afghanistan and Iraq? But there is no massive buildup as occurred months before the 2nd Gulf War (Iraq II) happening at the US Marines' largest training camp. Our beach cities are not flooded with leathernecks on leave during the weekends as occurred during months before Iraq II. There are no massive US Navy fleet exercises off our Pacific coast when training and simulating a coastal invasion of yet another nation (e.g., Iran), which I can see from where I live. I don't have to Google. I live and play in those beach cities immediately north of Pendleton, sail and surf the Pacific, and live where I can see any US Naval activity off our coast. So have your fun with this thread, but as Cinful said, an American invasion of Iran (like the Iraq II invasion) is not happening before 2012 presidential elections. Obama wants to be reelected, and to start a 3rd war (in Iran) would be a political kiss of death for his second term of office.

    Consider the source? The "military wives forum" now represents all American views? Military wives are a small highly biased minority of American women that don't speak for all American women, and certainly do not provide support for your claim that "brainwashed Americans" are the norm in a population of 300 million, which is a broad sweeping ethnocentric generalisation. One thing I have learned since leaving Ireland over 4 years past is how diverse Americans are in their views, rather than ideological clones as depicted by statements such as these.

    The only CT on this thread is the CT of CTs. What happened to the "within days" prediction on this thread? Weeks have already passed since it was posted? Soon it will be months? Then years?

    When the US does not invade Iran "within days," or weeks, or months, or during 2010 midterm elections, or before 2012 presidential elections, where will this thread be? Long since forgotten, with of course yet another sensationalist CT to take its place on a different topic? Does anyone see the craic? ;)


    Oh dear God, my eyes began to peel at the latter half of this post. What is your actual point leading to the end. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    mysterious wrote: »
    Oh dear God, my eyes began to peel at the latter half of this post. What is your actual point leading to the end. :rolleyes:
    That the original conspiracy theory was proven false and the goalposts have been moved accordingly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,831 ✭✭✭Torakx


    I take it you mean the americans forces are not ready for an attack?
    It certainly looks like they are to me.
    However the op did not say when they would attack only that they would be ready within days.It could be taken either way really lol
    But that is by the by :)
    What is the reason of sending lots of ships out if not to be ready to attack something.
    Are we to believe it isnt Iran? Who else nearby would be a possible target for agression?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 47,767 CMod ✭✭✭✭Black Swan


    Torakx wrote: »
    What is the reason of sending lots of ships out if not to be ready to attack something.
    Chest thumping to influence policy (aka sword rattling). Teddy Roosevelt sent the Great White Fleet about the world early in the last century to do a bit of chest thumping. The Fleet was huge, and it attacked no one when it sailed about the globe. The US has been doing such ever since, with no intent of actually launching a major invasion of a country in most cases. Further, the ships you see when surfing the web today are not near enough to mount an invasion of a country the size of Iran. Logistical support to invade a nation like Iran has to have massive mobilization of sea, land, and air forces, which is not happening "within days," or weeks since this OP originated.

    Before 2012 a war with Iran waged by the Americans is not likely, because Obama wants reelection. After 2012, who knows? The US has a history of warfare since its founding, regardless whom gets elected, or which party was in the Congressional majority (Republicans or Democrats). Iran is strategically located, and has the magic three letter word: OIL. Further, the US has a surplus of military aged youth with its Baby Boomlet, similar to the Baby Boom numbers it had during the Vietnam War, so maybe they will make war on somebody after 2012, but not before.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 831 ✭✭✭IrelandSpirit



    Before 2012 a war with Iran waged by the Americans is not likely, because Obama wants reelection. After 2012, who knows? The US has a history of warfare since its founding, regardless who gets elected, or which party was in the Congressional majority (Republicans or Democrats)

    Well this is it, why do you think Obama's wishes to be reelected is so important? No matter what Obama wants, the US has a history of warfare regardless who gets elected.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 831 ✭✭✭IrelandSpirit


    Though I'll just reiterate that without another high-profile false flag attack somewhere, I can't personally see anybody kicking off a war with Iran just yet ...

    Ireland at risk of Jihad attacks

    Monday, 12 July 2010 17:43


    The former secretary of the US Homeland Security Department, Tom Ridge, has said the world should anticipate more attacks from al-Qaeda.
    Speaking at a conference in Waterford, Mr Ridge said intelligence services across the world were now working together like never before, which is essential in fighting the threat of terrorism.

    http://www.rte.ie/news/2010/0712/terrorism.html


  • Site Banned Posts: 8,331 ✭✭✭Brown Bomber


    Chest thumping to influence policy (aka sword rattling). Teddy Roosevelt sent the Great White Fleet about the world early in the last century to do a bit of chest thumping. The Fleet was huge, and it attacked no one when it sailed about the globe.

    Yes but that was a simpler time before Zio-Con infiltration of US politics, there was no wars for Israel because there was no Israel.

    20104.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,473 ✭✭✭robtri


    Yes but that was a simpler time before Zio-Con infiltration of US politics, there was no wars for Israel because there was no Israel.

    20104.jpg

    and yet they still havent attacked....... despite it been a lot longer than days .....
    so whats the new goal post now?? when we looking at here..


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement