Brown Bomber wrote: » what legitimate reasons leaves you with this "little doubt" of yours. I can think of 0.
mysterious wrote: » Oh god not this again.... The oil nonsense. It's not about oil. If it was they could just invade oil reserves in other places in the world. The wars in Iran and Iraq are not oil wars. For god sake already. If it was really about Oil, WW3 would have started already, because China would not allow USA to invade it for that reason. It is also not about WMDs in Iran That lie was sold in Iraq. Do people not get it already. This war is about a war that has been going on since the beginning and before this civilization. Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan and Tibet is on a natural startgate. It's an ancient ground of many relics and many other secrets most of humanity cannot fathom. This oil and gas argument is just a distraction for the most part. We all know it's handy to steal a few billions barrels of Oil while we totally bomb this **** out of these countries. It's a cool thing to do apparently since nobody seems to mention this fact that the west has ALWAYS been sucking recources dry in every country they invade. The point about Iran here it's not just about "the oil or the money". Since Iran is a very risky war to start with. America just would not go to the bother of spending the last 12 years gearing for this Iran war if it was just about oil... Let's not forget Iraq wasnt about oil or WMDS.. So it's really a matter of people getting real with this now.
mugs1 wrote: » Is this legitimate enough for you??????http://www.iran-e-azad.org/stoning/women.html No?... Maybe this is......Warning the video link below is extremly graffic!!!!!http://www.stopahmadinejad.com/young-woman-stoned-in-iran/ Now stop talking Utter Sh1te!!!!!
digme wrote: » Israeli government desperately needs the distraction from the flotilla massacre, and the US government desperately needs the distraction from the unfolding catastrophe playing out in the Gulf of Mexico and beyond.
tallus wrote: » If your contention is that the US is invading because the Iranians are religious fanatics then you are mistaken. Don't forget that the U.S. had no problem training and supporting the likes of Bin Laden and his cohorts in Afghanistan when it was occupied by the old Soviet Union. It has nothing to do with religion.
tallus wrote: » It has nothing to do with religion.
mugs1 wrote: » My CONTENTION is, the enemy of your enemy is not necesseraly your friend!!! Just because Iran is fighting with America, does not automaticly make it a good place,My CONTENTION is that if a country can do this to it's own people what the hell do you think they will do to you.. if they have a chance!!!! J***s ch**st WAKE UP stoning woman has nothing to do with Religion!! That Browners lad smugly.... asked for 1 ligitamite example I gave it to him,then you come on here and try Dismiss the stoning of Woman as religion!!! and justify Irans behavior by reminding us of how Bad America is ( as if we all need reminding) All you have done there is read through my post to try and figure out a way to twist it out of context so you can inject your own arguement without actually addressing the real point!!! and thats just lazy!!!
tallus wrote: » Would you care to address my point that the U.S. invading Iran is not based on religious motives please ? No one said they were!! Your post was directly pointing at that as being the reason. Read back on the posts lad, Im not wiping your a**e either Secondly if you're not happy with people disagreeing with your posts, then you shouldn't post.
mugs1 wrote: » Your having a laugh right???
uprising2 wrote: » Lawmaker Calls UNSC Resolution Declaration of War against Iranhttp://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8904200788'US attack on Iran a matter of time'http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=134296§ionid=351020104
robtri wrote: » its gone from a few days to a matter of time.... its great to be able to keep moving the goal posts all the time... LOL
tallus wrote: » So you're point blank not willing to answer to the point I made.
uprising2 wrote: » That one reason you gave would mean that US should also invade Saudi Arabia, UAE, and other allies who also practice this sharia law. But you think because they do this to their own citizens that the US can blow sh1te out of EVERYBODY in Iran including future stoning victims. What type of fukked up reason is that?..
mugs1 wrote: » This is the only time I will engage with you!!! you *** are ***** if i actually printed that i would be banned.. now go talk to poopy, I imagine you could be great friends Stoning a woman to death is wrong, blowing mutiple families to pieces is also wrong. Well f***in DOH!!
uprising2 wrote: » Well fukkin Doh, whats your point?, having fun are ye?. Please print *** are ***** coz I'm trying different combinations of jibberish trying to work it out.But the reason why uncle sam should invade Iran is coz they stone women to death?.......is that all you can come up with? Whats poopy??, BB? I dont understand what the fukk your on about, either do you!, you don't seem to know anything about anything. Anyway some more war beats.....Hezbollah readying for urban war in southern Lebanon, IDF warnshttp://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/hezbollah-readying-for-urban-war-in-southern-lebanon-idf-warns-1.300617
Jeboa Safari wrote: » Anyway uprising2 and your sort, who are your ideal countries, who would you like to see counter the US? And why do you hate the US so much more than any other country? I don't get it, they've committed crimes, but so has almost every country that has ever existed
Brown Bomber wrote: » Guess you were out that day? those days?http://sciencedude.ocregister.com/2009/04/14/ready-to-shake-jets-to-bomb-pendleton/25153/
Brown Bomber wrote: » Some more from a military wives forum, which also shows how ****ing ignorant and brainwashed Americans have become.
mugs1 wrote: » Im dissapointed, I tought better of you tallus, but you took the easy route...
J***s ch**st WAKE UP stoning woman has nothing to do with Religion!! That Browners lad smugly.... asked for 1 ligitamite example I gave it to him,then you come on here and try Dismiss the stoning of Woman as religion!!! and justify Irans behavior by reminding us of how Bad America is ( as if we all need reminding) All you have done there is read through my post to try and figure out a way to twist it out of context so you can inject your own arguement without actually addressing the real point!!! and thats just lazy!!!
Your having a laugh right??? you managed to completly gloss over my last post like it never happened,which is clearly the norm for this forum!!
Im dissapointed, I tought better of you tallus, but you took the easy route...
Blue_Lagoon wrote: » Pendleton is a training base. You expect all training to stop, or training normal to their operations to all of a sudden signal that they are preparing for the invasion of Iran? They still have to keep training going for Afghanistan and Iraq? But there is no massive buildup as occurred months before the 2nd Gulf War (Iraq II) happening at the US Marines' largest training camp. Our beach cities are not flooded with leathernecks on leave during the weekends as occurred during months before Iraq II. There are no massive US Navy fleet exercises off our Pacific coast when training and simulating a coastal invasion of yet another nation (e.g., Iran), which I can see from where I live. I don't have to Google. I live and play in those beach cities immediately north of Pendleton, sail and surf the Pacific, and live where I can see any US Naval activity off our coast. So have your fun with this thread, but as Cinful said, an American invasion of Iran (like the Iraq II invasion) is not happening before 2012 presidential elections. Obama wants to be reelected, and to start a 3rd war (in Iran) would be a political kiss of death for his second term of office. Consider the source? The "military wives forum" now represents all American views? Military wives are a small highly biased minority of American women that don't speak for all American women, and certainly do not provide support for your claim that "brainwashed Americans" are the norm in a population of 300 million, which is a broad sweeping ethnocentric generalisation. One thing I have learned since leaving Ireland over 4 years past is how diverse Americans are in their views, rather than ideological clones as depicted by statements such as these. The only CT on this thread is the CT of CTs. What happened to the "within days" prediction on this thread? Weeks have already passed since it was posted? Soon it will be months? Then years? When the US does not invade Iran "within days," or weeks, or months, or during 2010 midterm elections, or before 2012 presidential elections, where will this thread be? Long since forgotten, with of course yet another sensationalist CT to take its place on a different topic? Does anyone see the craic?
mysterious wrote: » Oh dear God, my eyes began to peel at the latter half of this post. What is your actual point leading to the end. :rolleyes:
Torakx wrote: » What is the reason of sending lots of ships out if not to be ready to attack something.
Blue_Lagoon wrote: » Before 2012 a war with Iran waged by the Americans is not likely, because Obama wants reelection. After 2012, who knows? The US has a history of warfare since its founding, regardless who gets elected, or which party was in the Congressional majority (Republicans or Democrats)
Ireland at risk of Jihad attacks Monday, 12 July 2010 17:43 The former secretary of the US Homeland Security Department, Tom Ridge, has said the world should anticipate more attacks from al-Qaeda. Speaking at a conference in Waterford, Mr Ridge said intelligence services across the world were now working together like never before, which is essential in fighting the threat of terrorism.
Blue_Lagoon wrote: » Chest thumping to influence policy (aka sword rattling). Teddy Roosevelt sent the Great White Fleet about the world early in the last century to do a bit of chest thumping. The Fleet was huge, and it attacked no one when it sailed about the globe.
Brown Bomber wrote: » Yes but that was a simpler time before Zio-Con infiltration of US politics, there was no wars for Israel because there was no Israel.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wf.vanillicon.com/v2/fc7d50eddf86fd2a7872c6ffac511c39.svg)
