Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Paul McCartney Conspiracy Theory
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
mysterious wrote: »He was bewildered by my work. Like the teacher was bewildered you passed your spelling test.
Been an eggman simply means your intouch with your higherself.
I'm starting to think you're just a windup artist, mysterious
heh
But...mysterious wrote: »He was bewildered by my work. Like the teacher was bewildered you passed your spelling test.
Being an eggman simply means you're in_touch with your higherself.
People in glass houses...0 -
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
Dude honestly......
I really don't care.
I love the Beatles. I love their MUSIC
I couldn't give 2 fecks if they are controlled by the illuminati, Satan, NASA whoever,
As a musician I appreciate their musical talent. I have much more importnat things to worry about than who "runs the show" I mean what am i gonna do.
How about you send an email to Apple Corps, tell them your theories.
Good for you! No one is asking you to care! But the truth is there if people want to know the truth. Nobody is forcing you to read this. I appreciate their music talent minus fake Paul. I appreciate how John handled the whole thing before he got shot for it.
I don't need to send anyone an email. As I said specifically in this thread already, I'm not responsble for what any of you learn or believe and I'm not going to force my beliefs on this matter either.. It's your choice what you learn and you believe in life. 0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Source: http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=1&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wired.it%2Fmagazine%2Farchivio%2F2009%2F06%2Fstorie%2Fchiedi-chi-era-quel-%25C2%25ABbeatle%25C2%25BB-.aspx&sl=auto&tl=en
I always though the Paul is Dead CT was interesting but essentially complete bollox. This (decently google translated) from Italian Wired Magazine has got me thinking though...
An anthropmetery and craniometrics expert together with a computer expert analyse pre and post Paul is dead photo's
(read article for better explanation on their credentials)
This is some of their findings:Two images pre '66, compared and taken on a single scale of reference to homogenise proportions, show a perfect coincidence of the main key points.In particular, the mandibular curve, ie, the line can be traced to the computer to define the lower perimeter of the face, say from ear to ear via the chin, reveals essentially identical. . The margin of error is less than one percent. "For the perfect coincidence between two images is virtually impossible," says Gavazzeni, "by convention is considered acceptable at most 2.5 percent difference. Beyond this limit, the divergence is such as to favor the different identity between the two entities in question. Since in this case the difference is less than one percent the problem does not arise: the two photos show definitely the same person. " It was at this point to search for other photos with similar characteristics, but subsequent to the alleged incident.
So, pre-66' photos match.That McCartney certainly portrayed in the first half of 1967, was then joined to another picture, a few years later, taken between 1971 and 1972.This goal was to repeat the ready-made comparison with the images of the early sixties and then proceed with comparative figures come from two groups of pictures.
Again, the two new images there is a good compatibility.It only remains to compare the image data prior to the date of the alleged incident and subsequent ones.
"The surprise was great," says Gavazzeni, "The mandibular curve between the two groups of photos showed a discrepancy of over 6 percent, far beyond the error threshold.. But there was more. Changed its profile mandibular development: prior to 1966 on each side of the mandible consists of two sharp curves, since 1967 there seems to be a single curve. In Short, there is a different morphologic curve.
Mandubular Curve = Jaw Line Curve
So, Jaw line is different before and after 66'.
And the surprises do not end there because the relentless Gavazzeni, like a boxer who feels close to the opponent ko, grip does not let on that photo in which McCartney, ignorant, mentions a smile a bit 'confused' To the naked eye is known what will be a constant in the photos from that moment on, a pair of digital imaging to look pretty obvious expert. There is a gray area that covers the outside corner of left eye. Only some time no longer visible. And going to search at that point, where for years there was one dark spot, now there is a cross between a scar and a sign of skin stretched like a beauty retouching.
Pre-66 "a gray area that covers the outside corner of the left eye". Post 66 a scar.
The most immediate explanation is that probably in the sixties, was made for an action on the eyes but it was something imperfect, that for a long time he has gone on to mask. "
There is a detail regarding the shape of the skull: "Indeed, the impression is that the shape of the head has been made a little 'rounder', Gavazzeni says:" Then the reduced effective length, using a loophole in use time and that was achieved in print. " Eff activating change the conformation of the skull of an adult is an impossibility.Yet, judging from the photos, is what you see.
Paul's skull somehow got "rounder" after 66.Gabriella Carlesi adds an additional element: "Compared to the previous picture, that of clearly shows that the labial, ie the line formed by the union of the two lips, suddenly stretched. What is clearly not possible and with a mustache can not camouflage. "In other words, and is a phenomenon all too frequently these days, the lips may be swollen and increased in volume, but the extent of labial can not vary much. May be very slight, but this is not the case of photos examined: here the difference between before and after is too strong to have been caused by any surgery. Plus, always under the mustache McCartney Sgt Pepper's ,maybe you tried to hide something else: what specialists call the point or nose-cord sottonasale (edit by me: "sottonasale" = "subnasal" - http://www.dental-dictionary.info/words/81500-sottonasale.html) . It is the point between the two nostrils where your nose begins to break away from his face: "This is again a trait that medicine can not change surgery. Can change the shape of the nose but not the point nose-cord, "says Gabriella Carlesi. "And among the first group of photos of McCartney and the second one then varies clearly."
So post and pre 66 has different lips and nose.
There are impossible things, and things that are possible but at the cost of operations long, painful and never perfect. Now, careful examination of some of McCartney's pictures before and after the 1966 autumn leaves one , it must be said, shocked: "First of all there is right upper canine," observes Gabriella Carlesi. "In the photos prior to 1966 is known as forward of the line of the dental arch. It's the classic case of a tooth due to lack of space ends up misaligned, pushed out by pressure of other teeth. It is rather curious that the same dog (canine?), in photos from 1967 forward, but always stick out for no apparent reason: the images show that the space would have to be aligned with adjacent teeth. . It is as if you wanted to recreate a detail in a mouth where anomalia would never could express.
To summarise this
Paul's upper right canine seen here
Here is a more extreme example on the left.
is present in both the "before" and "after" pictures but there is a big and mysterious difference. Paul "before the crash" upper right canine protruded because of a lack of space in his mouth. Paul after the crash somehow had room to spare for all of his teeth comfortably
The best explanation the Italian expert can give is that the protruding canine in the "after" was intentionally put there after surgery.
The real crux of the argument suggested by Gabriella dental identification Carlesi covers the whole palate of McCartney that before 1966, shows narrow enough to justify various misalignments of teeth, albeit in less obvious forms of upper right canine. After the release of Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band , however, the palates of McCartney expands considerably, so that front teeth no longer rotate on its axis as before. With one on, except the usual canine."A change in the shape of the palate," concludes Carlesi 'sixties it was not impossible but would be very traumatic, the result of an actual intervention maxillofacial. In practice McCartney should have been subjected to an operation that would involve the opening of the palatal suture, breaking the bone and then a long prosthetic and orthodontic treatment In other words, to effect change so sensitive to McCartney in the sixties was necessary not only action particularly painful and bloody but also the use of a fixed orthodontic multiband then, for over a year. Which would not have been possible to hide and would be obvious repercussions on the performance of a professional singer voice. "But above all, Gabriella Carlesi concludes," that Paul McCartney might have reasons for undergoing such an ordeal?.Technically called tragus.. All we have two, one for each ear, but the characteristics are different for every human being. "In Germany, a recognition procedure craniometric, identification of the right ear is equivalent to dactyloscopy indeed, that the fingerprinting," recalls Carlesi. It's that little cartilage covered with skin above the ear canal entrance and which, like around the ear, can not be changed surgically. How then explain the differences between the right ear by Paul McCartney in a snapshot prior to 1966 and probably built in the late nineties? Not only is the tragus to betray a different conformation, but also other parts like, just above the entrance canal, Things that ordinary mortals can seem irrelevant or unclear but that every day allow experts to locate and identify persons, bodies and images.
So different ears too?
So thats Different
- Ears
- Teeth
- Lips
- Nose
- Shaped Skull
- Eyes
- Jaw Line
0 -
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The story goes that the Beatles stayed together until pauls remaining material was all released. The 'fake paul' was a musician called Phil Ackrill.
Previously he was with "The Diplomats Band" apparently he could sing like Paul
<script src='http://img215.imageshack.us/shareable/?i=philackrillfauxpaulmcca.jpg' type='text/javascript'></script><noscript>
</noscript> 0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
Advertisement