does anyone NOT believe there is a NWO/Illuminati global agenda

Ekancone

Science is descriptive, not prescriptive.

Kernel

rigormortis wrote: »

When it is not scientifically viable for you to live, will your views change. Or maybe those sort of things only happen to other people.

Look at eugenics. Look at nazi concentration camps. Cold logic over humanity. You become a number, an asset or a liability to be used in a system, and yes bonkey, this is part of the agenda of control. As I mentioned, and as Socrates identified a long time ago, democracy is inherently flawed and unpredictable, thus not compatible with a long term system. You're a mathematician bonkey, you should understand that a variable is a problem in predicting outcomes.

Kernel

rigormortis wrote: »

Science, Science, science. If real science was actually applied to many situations then I would agree with a lot of what you said. What is promoted as science nowadays is merely disguised propaganda.

Economics is a science? Well in the future when you are not producing/consuming to the required level, that level based on economic/scientific theory, maybe you will opt for euthanasia.

I agree 100%. Well said. Science is a great tool for the advancement of humanity, but if applied to controlling the masses and a 1984 style society, I'll pass! Science = a) curing cancer... or b) producing new and more lethal weapons for ending lives. Which one has recieved more resources?

Ekancone

Kernel wrote: »

I agree 100%. Well said. Science is a great tool for the advancement of humanity, but if applied to controlling the masses and a 1984 style society, I'll pass! Science = a) curing cancer... or b) producing new and more lethal weapons for ending lives. Which one has recieved more resources?

The issue you have is with politics, not science.

humanji

Kernel wrote: »

I agree 100%. Well said. Science is a great tool for the advancement of humanity, but if applied to controlling the masses and a 1984 style society, I'll pass! Science = a) curing cancer... or b) producing new and more lethal weapons for ending lives. Which one has recieved more resources?

Eh, a cure for cancer isn't just found by throwing money at it. You actually have to do a hell of a lot of work and research. Making weapons just happens to be cheaper and easier.

Because it's easier to make weapons doesn't mean that all science should be abandoned and we should go back to living in caves, banging rocks together.

Kernel

humanji wrote: »

Eh, a cure for cancer isn't just found by throwing money at it. You actually have to do a hell of a lot of work and research. Making weapons just happens to be cheaper and easier.

Because it's easier to make weapons doesn't mean that all science should be abandoned and we should go back to living in caves, banging rocks together.

You haven't addressed the point that many more resources are used on killing each other than on research that can directly benefit humanity. Resources. And I never mentioned that I am a Luddite by any means or that we should turn our backs on science. Assumptions young humanji.

Diogenes

Kernel wrote: »

Assumptions young humanji.

Irony thy name is Kernel...

Ekancone

Kernel wrote: »

You haven't addressed the point that many more resources are used on killing each other than on research that can directly benefit humanity. Resources. And I never mentioned that I am a Luddite by any means or that we should turn our backs on science. Assumptions young humanji.

You haven't acknowledged the fact that many of the technologies developed due to war have actually benefited mankind. With many of them being medical technology.

Kernel

daithifleming wrote: »

You haven't acknowledged the fact that many of the technologies developed due to war have actually benefited mankind. With many of them being medical technology.

I have actually, if you re-read my post, you'll notice I use the word 'directly'. In order to save myself time, I can be succinct in my posts, so you really have to read the words in my posts carefully.

Ekancone

Kernel wrote: »

I have actually, if you re-read my post, you'll notice I use the word 'directly'. In order to save myself time, I can be succinct in my posts, so you really have to read the words in my posts carefully.

Pedantry.

Kernel

daithifleming wrote: »

Pedantry.

*sigh*.. no, not really.

speedboatchase

Only WCW can defeat the mighty NWO

humanji

speedboatchase wrote: »

Only WCW can defeat the mighty NWO

lol

kippy

I dont believe theres an agenda.
Kippy

Eero New

humanji wrote: »

lol

Little amuses the innocent.

Kernel

kippy wrote: »

I dont believe theres an agenda.
Kippy

Then Kippy, you'd be wrong. There's a lot of evidence in the form of government reports, political papers etc. to show that there is an agenda. It's what the agenda is that causes the friction here.

humanji

Eero New wrote: »

Little amuses the innocent.

It's kept you busy.

Ekancone

Kernel wrote: »

Then Kippy, you'd be wrong.

How arrogant.