The begrudger attitude towards charity / charitable work

odyssey06

Terry wrote: »

Also, so what if Bertie increased aid to those who need it? Is that such a bad thing?

He seems perfectly happy to lecture us on what our money should be spent on, yet completely unwilling for us to have any say in what his money should be spent on.

The point is that Bono is a total hypocrite for asking for Irish taxpayers to spend money that he, despite being a multi-millionaire, is not.

And that's where we came in...

Terry

odyssey06 wrote: »

He seems perfectly happy to lecture us on what our money should be spent on, yet completely unwilling for us to have any say in what his money should be spent on.

The point is that Bono is a total hypocrite for asking for Irish taxpayers to spend money that he, despite being a multi-millionaire, is not.

And that's where we came in...

If you had that much money and were about to lose 42% of your earnings, what would you do?

walshb

eoin_s wrote: »

As much as I to defend the pompous little monkeyman - I believe it was U2's company that was moved to Holland, not just his; he is just a shareholder in it. Bono doesn't lecture the everyday person on donating money, he gets at heads of state etc (no matter how many newspapers and magazines he has to appear in, bless him). Everyone who has a pension fund is avoiding tax.

For gods sake, the government is the EVERY DAY person.
How the hell do we have governments?
Because we the people and all the people have a say.
It's a democracy. So you may not believe that Bono is
directly lecturing us the people on what we should and
should NOT be giving to overseas aid. He's demanding that
uor government, ie the people who directly pay taxes, increase
this....

When will people realise this:rolleyes:

Degsy

walshb wrote: »

For gods sake, the government is the EVERY DAY person.
How the hell do we have governments?
Because we the people and all the people have a say.
It's a democracy. So you may not believe that Bono is
directly lecturing us the people on what we should and
should NOT be giving to overseas aid. He's demanding that
uor government, ie the people who directly pay taxes, increase
this....

When will people realise this:rolleyes:

If he's so concerned about "overseas aid" why doesnt he liquidate his vast fortune and go and live in africa and build mud huts or pipe water personally?Because he's toom uch in love with money.He's doing it for purley selfish egomaniacal reasons.If he wants to be a saint he might try living like one..http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_of_Assisi

walshb

Muff_Daddy wrote: »

You make a good point about Bono seemingly not doing anyhing for Ireland, but the rest of your post is full of the typical 'Bono is looking for publicity' attitude of people, and thats who I was refering to in my post. You may believe charity starts at home, fair enough, but you can't just dismiss the fact that he is looking further from home to help people. And yes, he has done good work for charity. If by convincing 1% of the population to help 3rd world countries, that is doing something positive. Do you really believe he hasn't contributed a single penny to charity?

You talk about his 'vast wealth' that he and U2 have accumulated, and you say that he should donate his wealth (I'm positive that he does BTW), and he should stop mooching of us, but I would rebut that by saying 1) Why do you care what he does with his money and 2) He can't force us to hand over money to the poor, it's a choice an individual makes, so how is he 'robbing' us? If you don't like him, simply ignore him.

TBH, I've had a few jars, so I don't know how much sense the above made.

That's great isn't it
Ignore him?

Hello, he's the man demanding thaT the governemnet I had a part in electing
increases my hard earned money for Africa and Asia etc etc...

I don't care less what Bono does with his money, but I do fuc****
care what he does with mine. That's the y problem.

Bono is a marvelous man throwing around other
peoples money, but what about his money. Is there people
throwing his money around??

No there is NOT.

And No I do not believe for a second that Bono is donating proportinate
amounts of his wealth to charity. It has neve been revealed or even mentioned
by the man and if he wants to put himself out
there so arrogantly and publicly, then tell us, like he is telling
our government, how much exactly he donates. I believe it's
close on nothing

walshb

Degsy wrote: »

If he's so concerned about "overseas aid" why doesnt he liquidate his vast fortune and go and live in africa and build mud huts or pipe water personally?Because he's toom uch in love with money.He's doing it for purley selfish egomaniacal reasons.If he wants to be a saint he might try living like one..http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_of_Assisi

Agreed Degsy

Terry

http://www.forbes.com/lifestyle/2006/05/04/cx_me_0505featslide.html

Bono
Charity: Debt AIDS Trade Africa (DATA)

U2's frontman has campaigned so widely and vehemently against the spread of AIDS and for debt relief in Africa that in February he was among the 191 nominees for the Nobel Peace Prize. But his philanthropic efforts don't start or end with DATA, the organization he co-founded in 2002. He has participated in fundraising concerts including Live 8, Live Aid and Band Aid 20. In 2003, U2 donated €40,000 to One in Four Ireland, a charity that helps survivors of sexual abuse.

That's probably not enough though.

Degsy

Terry wrote: »

http://www.forbes.com/lifestyle/2006/05/04/cx_me_0505featslide.html



That's probably not enough though.

40 grand?It wouldnt even be a fraction of the interest on thier earnings for a week.To the average working stiff it'd be akin to a donation of 50 cent and i'm not going to brag about donating that much.

Ciaran500

Degsy wrote: »

If he's so concerned about "overseas aid" why doesnt he liquidate his vast fortune and go and live in africa and build mud huts or pipe water personally?Because he's toom uch in love with money.He's doing it for purley selfish egomaniacal reasons.If he wants to be a saint he might try living like one..http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_of_Assisi

Typical ballox irish attitude as this thread was started about. He gives money away and campaignes to get rid of world debt. But he still has money so he obviously isn't doing enough. :rolleyes:

Degsy

Ciaran500 wrote: »

Typical ballox irish attitude as this thread was started about. He gives money away and campaignes to get rid of world debt. But he still has money so he obviously isn't doing enough. :rolleyes:

Correct,he isnt doing enough.He's telling people what to do with thier money whilst sitting tight on his own vast fortune and at the same time bending over backwards to avoid paying taxes.Maybe if he came into the tax net the irish government could afford give some away to what he sees to be worthy causes.

Terry

Degsy wrote: »

40 grand?It wouldnt even be a fraction of the interest on thier earnings for a week.To the average working stiff it'd be akin to a donation of 50 cent and i'm not going to brag about donating that much.

Do you honestly think that is the extent of the charitable donations?

Just because they don't brag about it, doesn't mean they don't money give to charities.

Ciaran500 wrote:

Typical ballox irish attitude as this thread was started about. He gives money away and campaignes to get rid of world debt. But he still has money so he obviously isn't doing enough. :rolleyes:

Of course.
People see the name "Bono" and instantly see red.
How dare an Irish person make lots of money. The cheek of them.

Degsy wrote:

Correct,he isnt doing enough.He's telling people what to do with thier money whilst sitting tight on his own vast fortune and at the same time bending over backwards to avoid paying taxes.Maybe if he came into the tax net the irish government could afford give some away to what he sees to be worthy causes.

How do you know how much he gives to charity?

odyssey06

Terry wrote: »

If you had that much money and were about to lose 42% of your earnings, what would you do?

I would either
(a) Move the money and keep quiet on lecturing Irish people and politicians, except perhaps to complain about high tax rates that have forced me out or
(b) Keep the money and explain to the Irish people why I didn't move it and what I think politicians should be doing with *our* tax money

I would not do
(c) Move the money and lecture hard working Irish taxpayers on what I want to do with their money

You move your money out of the country your forego the privilege of saying how tax money should be spent.

Terry

When did Bono lecture any Irish person on how their tax money should be spent?

walshb

Ciaran500 wrote: »

Typical ballox irish attitude as this thread was started about. He gives money away and campaignes to get rid of world debt. But he still has money so he obviously isn't doing enough. :rolleyes:

No, he gives other peoples money away.
There's a difference...

He's lecturing and urging the Irish government to
give more of our money away, not HIS, that's the y
problem....

He does NOT lecture a single Irish person.
He lectures every single Irish person
when he demands from our government
that we should be increasing our overseas aid.
Why can't anyone apart from a few, see this...

Degsy

Terry wrote: »

Do you honestly think that is the extent of the charitable donations?

Just because they don't brag about it, doesn't mean they don't money give to charities.



Of course.
People see the name "Bono" and instantly see red.
How dare an Irish person make lots of money. The cheek of them.



How do you know how much he gives to charity?

I couldnt care less how much he gives to charity,i just want him to shut up telling other people what to do with thier money.But since you ask,would it not be leaked to the media if Bono gave X-amount of money to such-and-such a charity?Would he not be bigging it up himself?
I suppose what i'm trying to say is that as a tax exile he wants the government to spend my tax money on overseas causes,raising our taxes if necessary to pay for it,while he pays nothing,is incredibly wealthy and is an arrogant,pompous,attention-seeking little hypocrite to boot.

thefinalstage

The-Rigger wrote: »

Ah look, you are talking nonsense, I've made my feelings known on the tax bullsh1t, so if you want to know what I think, read up.

Enlighten me.

How much tax do you pay that you are not due?
Not a fúcking red cent, nor should you, nor should he.



He pays every single cent he is due. He didn't write the tax laws.

He certainly wrote the book on avoiding it.

WoW! How quickly we forget? Where would we be without the massive leg up we have gotten over the past decade from the European Union?
We'd wouldn't be near where we are.
Every Tom, Dick and Harry wouldn't be driving new/ish cars and pondering what investment property to spend their SSIA on.

But we got lots of funding and help, and now we are prosperous, so let's shut up shop, whatever we do let's not try and help anyone else out, that would cost us our money.

Since when we were donating all our tax revenue anyhow? I must of missed the most recent budget.

Unless you have forgotten the EU is essentially one big country, thats the idea behind a union. Is Africa part of this country?

Terry

Degsy wrote: »

I couldnt care less how much he gives to charity,i just want him to shut up telling other people what to do with thier money.But since you ask,would it not be leaked to the media if Bono gave X-amount of money to such-and-such a charity?Would he not be bigging it up himself?
I suppose what i'm trying to say is that as a tax exile he wants the government to spend my tax money on overseas causes,raising our taxes if necessary to pay for it,while he pays nothing,is incredibly wealthy and is an arrogant,pompous,attention-seeking little hypocrite to boot.

You're completely missing the point again.

He asked the G8 leaders to drop the debt owed to them by third world countries.
We are not one of the G8 countries.

Do you honestly think that Bertie was going to listen to him, just because he said it at a gig?

Just admit you begrudge hs success and be done with it.

Degsy

Terry wrote: »

He asked the G8 leaders to drop the debt owed to them by third world

Do you honestly think that Bertie was going to listen to him, just because he said it at a gig?

Its not his place to ask world leaders to do anything.He's a protestant who pretends to be from ballymun who writes nonsensical songs and pretends they're about relevant issues of the day,he roots around in political situations that dont concern him and inflicts it on his fans who've come to hear the music.A friend of mine told me they spent close to 200 quid on a ticket to see U2 the band and instead got an hour and a half of him spouting pseudo-political drivel.If he's a musician,stick to being one and shut up or if he wants to be a politician,run for office and start paying taxes.

odyssey06

I think Terry that you are incapable of accepting the facts. You asked us when Bono had lectured the Irish government to spend Irish taxpayers money. We established that this has occured at least once, in front of 70,000 witnesses.

Now you are shifting the ground to just G8 debt recovery? How does that change his hypocrisy? It doesn't. It actually makes it worse. What right does he have to lecture G8 leaders on what to do with their money when he isn't a citizen of those nations, and doesn't pay tax in a G8 state?

How does Bono imagine Ireland and the G8 nations are going to pay for this debt write-off, and increased aid except in tax? The tax that he refuses to pay in Ireland, and refuses to pay in a G8 nation. He seems to think tax is something only the hoi polloi pay. So Bono's message is do as I say not as I do, and what better indictment of his hypocrisy is there?

In comparison, Enya has made a fortune in her career. Personally I'm not a fan of her music, I am a fan of U2's, but I say fair play to her. No begrudgery there. She doesn't lecture us on how to spend public money that she refuses to contribute to.

walshb

Terry wrote: »

You're completely missing the point again.

He asked the G8 leaders to drop the debt owed to them by third world countries.
We are not one of the G8 countries.

Do you honestly think that Bertie was going to listen to him, just because he said it at a gig?

Just admit you begrudge hs success and be done with it.

Yes Bertie and the likes of Bertie have listened to him and Geldof and GOAL and Concern retc etc etc. We are continually increasing aid year in year out. That's why people like me have a problem.

That's why it is so annoying.

Bono and those I mentioned are spending everybody's money, but their own.
They are throwing money around like confetti, our damn money, the taxpayer....the majority of whom earn a damn sight less than the Bono's and Geldof's of this world.......


Bono, whether you like it or not is having an enormous impact on what our hard earned money is spent on. Government figures prove this....

Jesus Wept

Do any of you run a business?
Do you send extra taxes, Christmas bonuses and love letters to the revenue?

You would swear Bono was evading tax.

There is a world of difference between evading tax and avoiding tax, and if you aren't avoiding it, then you are a clown, and your business is suffering.

And do any of you honestly think that €40k is the extend of Bono's personal contribution to charities?
There aren't enough cat pictures on the internet for you if you do.

Terry

Degsy wrote: »

Its not his place to ask world leaders to do anything.He's a protestant who pretends to be from ballymun who writes nonsensical songs and pretends they're about relevant issues of the day,he roots around in political situations that dont concern him and inflicts it on his fans who've come to hear the music.A friend of mine told me they spent close to 200 quid on a ticket to see U2 the band and instead got an hour and a half of him spouting pseudo-political drivel.If he's a musician,stick to being one and shut up or if he wants to be a politician,run for office and start paying taxes.

Why is it not his place?
He is a well known person and has a bit of sway when it comes to these things.
Why shouldn't he use his influence to help others?
As for spending 200 quid on a ticket, well they shouldn't really be buying from touts.
Mine only cost €75.

What really struck me about your post though was this little nugget:

He's a protestant

What has that got to do wth anything?
You just destroyed any credibility you had left with that comment.

odyssey06 wrote: »

I think Terry that you are incapable of accepting the facts. You asked us when Bono had lectured the Irish government to spend Irish taxpayers money. We established that this has occured at least once, in front of 70,000 witnesses.

I was there. I even bought the T-shirt.
It was a couple of minutes out of a 2 hour show ffs.
I think you are blowing thing way out of proportion here.

Now you are shifting the ground to just G8 debt recovery? How does that change his hypocrisy? It doesn't. It actually makes it worse. What right does he have to lecture G8 leaders on what to do with their money when he isn't a citizen of those nations, and doesn't pay tax in a G8 state?

He doesn't have any right.
Then again, he's not telling them to do anything.
He asking them.
There is a big difference there.

Let's not allow facts get in the way of a good rant about Bono though.

How does Bono imagine Ireland and the G8 nations are going to pay for this debt write-off, and increased aid except in tax? The tax that he refuses to pay in Ireland, and refuses to pay in a G8 nation. He seems to think tax is something only the hoi polloi pay. So Bono's message is do as I say not as I do, and what better indictment of his hypocrisy is there?

Would you miss 1 cent out of your salary?

I'll ask you this:
Why shouldn't the worlds largest economies help the people of a continent whose resources they raped for centuries?

In comparison, Enya has made a fortune in her career. Personally I'm not a fan of her music, I am a fan of U2's, but I say fair play to her. No begrudgery there. She doesn't lecture us on how to spend public money that she refuses to contribute to.

Fair play to Enya.

odyssey06

Yes Bertie and the likes of Bertie have listened to him and Geldof and GOAL and Concern retc etc etc. We are continually increasing aid year in year out. That's why people like me have a problem.

That's exactly right. I've no problem with charities doing charitable work, or people donating money to charity, it's when charities or people's donations become fronts for political lobbies that we have to be criticical.

I find it morally questionable for a charity to focus on how taxpayer's money should be spent, instead of raising its own money from private citizens and companies volunatrily to spend as it sees fit - but at least you can't accuse Concern or GOAL of hypocrisy in that regard, as they aren't sitting on hundreds of millions of euros.

walshb

odyssey06 wrote: »

That's exactly right. I've no problem with charities doing charitable work, or people donating money to charity, it's when charities or people's donations become fronts for political lobbies that we have to be criticical.

I find it morally questionable for a charity to focus on how taxpayer's money should be spent, instead of raising its own money from private citizens and companies volunatrily to spend as it sees fit - but at least you can't accuse Concern or GOAL of hypocrisy in that regard, as they aren't sitting on hundreds of millions of euros.

GOAL and Concern are IMO just another business making money out of poverty.......

JOS of GOAL didn't have an ounce of time for the down and outs in the Simom community. He actually said this on the Late Late show a few wekks ago. He couldn't tolerate them. His own people:rolleyes:, yet he's off saving Darfur and Calcutta etc etc....

Red Hand

walshb wrote: »

JOS of GOAL didn't have an ounce of time for the down and outs in the Simom community. He actually said this on the Late Late show a few wekks ago. He couldn't tolerate them. His own people:rolleyes:, yet he's off saving Darfur and Calcutta etc etc....

Did he say that? I thought he was saying that he couldn't tolerate all the needless admin and waste in other charities and set up GOAL so that the maximum amount of money could reach the people they wanted to help.

walshb

Jeremiah 16:1 wrote: »

Did he say that? I thought he was saying that he couldn't tolerate all the needless admin and waste in other charities and set up GOAL so that the maximum amount of money could reach the people they wanted to help.

No he couldn't tolerate NOT being the big chief and not getting his way.
That is exactly what I interpreted, as well as him not having
time for the actual people in need....

So if he had a problem, why NOT set up a charity and help the people from Simon through HIS charity, without the admin and red tape...

No No, he wanted the big world stage, where he'd be noticed....

Red Hand

You sound a bit bitter towards him.

walshb

Jeremiah 16:1 wrote: »

You sound a bit bitter towards him.

Absolutely not. I have nothing to be bitter about.
Skeptical and extremely so is more accurate

Latchy

KIVES wrote: »

Similar to the last generation in Ireland who had no problems giving money in the Church Gate collection to the stricken people of 'Biafra' or to that common cliche - 'the poor black babies...' yet it's a different matter when the 'poor black baby' is now next door -

Absolutley , i recall a relitive of mine who decided to become a jehovahs witness and was forever quoting to me from the bible about how all the races on earth can live in Harmony in a very irritating way (i think it was catholic guilt ) .anyhows i bumped into him several years ago and his religious rant had gone and was replaced by ''. those flippng immigrants, coming over here and taking all the jobs ,house's etc'' , .The irony was lost on him .

it's all relative but I stand accused of giving money to Amnesty to fight causes of social injustice and the like in Central America yet finding it hard to throw a homeless man 50 cent on our own streets - I could be wrong but we tend to be more cynical when it comes to our own destitute

I remember back in the 80s working for a charity in dublin and the whole idea was to sell 100 tickets for a pound a ticket , to raise money to build a snooker hall for some part of inner city dublin.About 70 of us went from door to door and after a day collecting and reaching our total of £100, were each given £18 each for our help, the rest going to the charity .Only thing we learned later it didn't , it went into the team leaders pocket. (who mysteriously dissapeared ). Money for nothing , fools (us) everywere and behind every charity is somebody making a nice tidy or in some cases , a very large sum .I know most charitys are doing good but there are a lot like the one mentioned above out there to .

odyssey06

latchyco wrote: »

Only thing we learned later it didn't , it went into the team leaders pocket. (who mysteriously dissapeared ). Money for nothing , fools (us) everywere and behind every charity is somebody making a nice tidy or in some cases , a very large sum .I know most charitys are doing good but there are a lot like the one mentioned above out there to .

The sad thing is that if you multiply the figures by 1 million, change the name 'team leader' to 'president\dictator' and 'snooker hall' to 'hospital\airport' you pretty much describe the situation with the billions given in foreign aid to many Third World regimes.

In fairness to GOAL, I think as much as possible they try to support the people directly rather than putting the money into the hands of corrupt officials.