Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

March Running Challenge

Options
135

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,181 ✭✭✭healy1835


    jamule wrote: »
    High risk mess. 5 outta 10 , I have no idea if i get more or less points! Had a GPS disaster at the end of the 8k, was at 4:18 at .98k, it jumped to 04:15 at .99k and then back to 4.20 at 1k, fook!


    1 00:04:23
    2 00:04:23
    3 00:04:23
    4 00:04:22
    5 00:04:21
    6 00:04:20
    7 00:04:19
    8 00:04:20
    9 00:04:18
    10 00:04:17

    Go big or go home :cool: Nice effort


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    jamule wrote: »
    High risk mess. 5 outta 10 , I have no idea if i get more or less points! Had a GPS disaster at the end of the 8k, was at 4:18 at .98k, it jumped to 04:15 at .99k and then back to 4.20 at 1k, fook!


    1 00:04:23
    2 00:04:23
    3 00:04:23
    4 00:04:22
    5 00:04:21
    6 00:04:20
    7 00:04:19
    8 00:04:20
    9 00:04:18
    10 00:04:17

    Need the link dude, thanks :cool: But provisionally thats some effort at the high risk.

    10 pts for the progression (once 10.00 validated)
    5 pts for 5/9
    -6 pts for missing 3 splits (such is the high risk)
    Provisional Total 9 points

    Edit: No real need for validation as you have 10 point on the table already. Goes to show that a simple progression is 10 points but the high risk is high risk!
    I'd recommend folk try the -5 or so first and bank 10 points. The bonuses are not easy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,388 ✭✭✭fletch



    High Risk
    10x exact 1 sec consecutive drops = + 10pts
    +1 point for every 1 sec faster split achieved plus +1 for hitting all 9.
    Remember its -2 points for a same/slower lap
    Should this read "9x exact 1 sec consecutive drops = + 10pts"?


  • Registered Users Posts: 933 ✭✭✭jamule


    Need the link dude, thanks :cool: But provisionally thats some effort at the high risk.

    10 pts for the progression (once 10.00 validated)
    5 pts for 5/9
    -6 pts for missing 3 splits (such is the high risk)
    Provisional Total 9 points

    Edit: No real need for validation as you have 10 point on the table already. Goes to show that a simple progression is 10 points but the high risk is high risk!
    I'd recommend folk try the -5 or so first and bank 10 points. The bonuses are not easy.

    https://www.strava.com/activities/4923546409/laps

    Am i on for the bonus bonus now?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    jamule wrote: »
    https://www.strava.com/activities/4923546409/laps

    Am i on for the bonus bonus now?

    Emmm yes you got 5, but lost all of your base progression score :eek:

    10 pts for the progression (once 10.00 validated)
    5 pts for 5/9
    -5 pts for missing 10.00 (10.01)
    -6 pts for missing 3 splits (such is the high risk)
    Actual Total 4 points

    @fletch - you are right.. Kurt_G pulled me up on that already :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,181 ✭✭✭healy1835


    10 Mile attempt in the bag. Wasn't feeling 100% today so skipped planned session and did this instead. Went for the 15 sec drop per mile, planning to start at 8:15 pace and work down to 6min miles and that actually felt like a bit of a stretch the way I was feeling.
    It sort of gradually occurred to me as the run went on that I'd really have to put it in coming home. At the same time my lunch choice of spicy cous cous was rearing it's head and I was feeling under pressure from about 5 miles on. Figured I'd come too far not to finish the thing so got it done in the end.

    Didn't get the 15 sec drops, was close on the majority. It's tough to get them bang on! If I had of tried for the last couple, it would have more than likely of been myself that would have been dropping into a ditch, so i backed off a little.

    I'll let Shotgun Vorderman work his computational magic :)

    My reading is the following;

    8:10
    7:54 (-16)
    7:38 (-16)
    7:23 (-15)
    7:07 (-16)
    6:51 (-16)
    6:35 (-16)
    6:18 (-17)
    6:07 (-11)
    5:56 (-11)

    Edit: Just looked at the OP by Shotgun. I actually stole the term 'Royal Flush' from Martin Yelling on Marathon Talk so I can't claim any credit for that :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,757 ✭✭✭ReeReeG


    Attempted the challenge this evening. My first mistake was forgetting to change my lap alerts to each km instead of each mile... and then many mathematical errors were made resulting in a pace much faster than intended for the final few kms! I think I only get a paltry 3 points thanks to my stoopid watch adding 0.01 at the end, and a failed progression in km 6 :-/


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    Healy 10 points, nicely done and close!

    ReeReeG 3 points. In fairness you were 1 second and 0.01km off 10 points!


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,388 ✭✭✭fletch


    High Risk
    10x exact 1 sec consecutive drops = + 10pts
    +1 point for every 1 sec faster split achieved plus +1 for hitting all 9.
    Remember its -2 points for a same/slower lap
    fletch wrote: »

    I make that 10 points for full progression (finished bang on 10:00 and didn't miss any splits) + 1 for 5/9 laps exactly 10secs faster giving a total of 11 points
    Had a go at the high risk. Splits were as follows, see activity here

    KM|Pace|Difference
    1|4:30|
    2|4:29|-1
    3|4:27|-2
    4|4:26|-1
    5|4:25|-1
    6|4:23|-2
    7|4:22|-1
    8|4:21|-1
    9|4:19|-2
    10|4:18|-1


    I think that's 6 points?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    fletch wrote: »
    Had a go at the high risk. Splits were as follows, see activity here

    KM|Pace|Difference
    1|4:30|
    2|4:29|-1
    3|4:27|-2
    4|4:26|-1
    5|4:25|-1
    6|4:23|-2
    7|4:22|-1
    8|4:21|-1
    9|4:19|-2
    10|4:18|-1


    I think that's 6 points?

    From Strava on the first split, I see 4:29, 4:29 for the overview or 4:30, 4:28 for the laps

    So I count 5x -1 which would give you 15 points for this, the top score so far for March and the overall lead :)

    Perhaps Garmin gives you that first split? Either way, hell of an effort!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,388 ✭✭✭fletch


    From Strava on the first split, I see 4:29, 4:29 for the overview or 4:30, 4:28 for the laps

    So I count 5x -1 which would give you 15 points for this, the top score so far for March and the overall lead :)

    Perhaps Garmin gives you that first split? Either way, hell of an effort!
    That is strange...I see 4:30 - 4:29 for the overview on Strava. I'm currently downloading the Connect IQ SDK to see if I can develop a data field with millisecond lap pace accuracy

    splits.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    fletch wrote: »
    That is strange...I see 4:30 - 4:29 for the overview on Strava. I'm currently downloading the Connect IQ SDK to see if I can develop a data field with millisecond lap pace accuracy

    splits.jpg

    :D Leaving no stone unturned :D Here's what I see. An the overview show 4:29, 4:29. I did say I wouldn't do decimal places for my sanity :rolleyes::(

    Apologies for being sticky about it, but if you show me the -1 for the first split, I'll pump it from 15 pts to 16 pts. Then I'll do a table update before I lose track

    Lap Distance Time Pace Elev HR
    1 1.00 km 4:30 4:30 /km 8 m 133 bpm
    2 1.00 km 4:28 4:28 /km -3 m 150 bpm
    3 1.00 km 4:27 4:27 /km -3 m 143 bpm
    4 1.00 km 4:26 4:26 /km 4 m 152 bpm
    5 1.00 km 4:24 4:24 /km 1 m 152 bpm
    6 1.00 km 4:23 4:23 /km -11 m 157 bpm
    7 1.00 km 4:22 4:22 /km 7 m 159 bpm
    8 1.00 km 4:21 4:21 /km 3 m 154 bpm
    9 1.00 km 4:19 4:19 /km 2 m 157 bpm
    10 1.00 km 4:17 4:17 /km -4 m 153 bpm


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,388 ✭✭✭fletch


    :D Leaving no stone unturned :D Here's what I see. An the overview show 4:29, 4:29. I did say I wouldn't do decimal places for my sanity :rolleyes::(

    Apologies for being sticky about it, but if you show me the -1 for the first split, I'll pump it from 15 pts to 16 pts. Then I'll do a table update before I lose track

    Lap Distance Time Pace Elev HR
    1 1.00 km 4:30 4:30 /km 8 m 133 bpm
    2 1.00 km 4:28 4:28 /km -3 m 150 bpm
    3 1.00 km 4:27 4:27 /km -3 m 143 bpm
    4 1.00 km 4:26 4:26 /km 4 m 152 bpm
    5 1.00 km 4:24 4:24 /km 1 m 152 bpm
    6 1.00 km 4:23 4:23 /km -11 m 157 bpm
    7 1.00 km 4:22 4:22 /km 7 m 159 bpm
    8 1.00 km 4:21 4:21 /km 3 m 154 bpm
    9 1.00 km 4:19 4:19 /km 2 m 157 bpm
    10 1.00 km 4:17 4:17 /km -4 m 153 bpm
    I won't split hairs over a point. :)

    I see the table you quoted above in the Laps of the activity alright (which would give me 15 points) but on the Overview, I see this (which would give me 16 points)

    splits.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    fletch wrote: »
    I won't split hairs over a point. :)

    I see the table you quoted above in the Laps of the activity alright (which would give me 15 points) but on the Overview, I see this (which would give me 16 points)

    splits.jpg

    Really odd :confused::confused:


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,388 ✭✭✭fletch


    Really odd :confused::confused:
    That is very strange...I didn't photoshop...I swear :D...go with the 15 points and I guess I'll go out and give it another shot...although I think I've got 5 points then in both the low and high risks so I'll have to give the medium a go for the brucey bonus :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    fletch wrote: »
    That is very strange...I didn't photoshop...I swear :D...go with the 15 points and I guess I'll go out and give it another shot...although I think I've got 5 points then in both the low and high risks so I'll have to give the medium a go for the brucey bonus :)

    You have the +5pts in high but not low. You got 5/9 for +1. You need +5 bonus for each challenge to get the last bonus...

    Med bonus you basically need to hit 5/5 -1s.

    Each risk is challenging and the last bonus is super challenging :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    March Table Update #2 :)

    A few more scores on the doors

    Pos|Runner|Jan|Feb|March pts|Total

    1|fletch*|19|18|15|54
    2|crisco10*|18|17|11|48
    3|jamule*|15|19|10|46
    4|Omeceron*|20|13|9|44
    5|mister paul*|12|16|10|40
    6|Comic Book Guy*|11|14|11|38
    6|Murph_D|18|8|11|38
    8|Lambay Island|14|18||33
    9|axe2grind*||18|13|32
    10|dna_leri*|4|13|10|29
    10|healy1835*|18||10|29
    12|Kander*|10|17||28
    13|Antrim Glens*||20|5|26
    14|Annie get your Run*|9|15||25
    15|Swashbuckler*|18|5||24
    16|eyrie*|18|4||23
    17|ReeReeG*|5|11|3|21
    18|Zico10*|1|11|7|20
    18|BeginnerRunner|20|||20
    18|Conor74*||20||20
    21|py*||19||19
    22|eposhea*||17||18
    22|Shotgunmcos*|16|2||18
    24|Unknown Unthought|17|||17
    25|Kurt_Godel*|1|15||16
    25|TFBubendorfer*||16||16
    27|edinrunna*||14||15
    28|Dudda|13|||13
    29|Dubh Geannain*|2|9||12
    29|racersedge||12||12
    29|Strawberry Swan*||12||12
    32|En Passant*|7|3||11
    33|Wubble Wubble*|10|||10
    33|jackc101*||10||10
    35|Laineyfrecks|1|7||9
    36|skyblue46|8|||8
    36|Pherekydes*|1|6||8
    38|omicron*|6|||6
    39|Huzzah|3|||3
    40|Tummer||||
    40|OOnegative||||


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,177 ✭✭✭crisco10


    In the spirit of posting poor efforts too... went for the high risk option this morning.

    Didn’t go so well, lol.

    Drops were (-1.6, -0.7, -1.8, -0.9, +1.1, +1.2, -1.0, -1.1, -1.4, -0.8). Also forgot to stop the watch at end and ran 10.06.

    So ended up with about -5 for the run. No need to check shotgun!

    What’s interesting is those times above are from garmin. But Strava shows a bonkers 5th km split for me. It’s about 6 seconds quicker than any of my other splits.

    Think that was my last effort with this challenge. My running pace is just not smooth enough to hit splits to 1 second resolution. And I need to see a physio about my left shoulder now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 933 ✭✭✭jamule


    I'm giving up on the high risk. going by watch I had 6 from 9, when it uploads its 4 , Strava has it at 3. At least i stopped the watch at exactly 10K this time

    https://connect.garmin.com/modern/activity/6433612640


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,454 ✭✭✭Comic Book Guy


    Must be the day that's in it but i went for the high risk one today too.
    Mile 1- 7:49
    Mile 2- 7:49, ah flip
    Mile 3- 7:47, ah here
    Mile 4- 7:46
    Mile 5- 7:45
    Mile 6- 7:44
    Mile 7- 7:43
    Mile 8- 7:42
    Mile 9- 7:41 I'm thinking this is a pure doddle!
    Mile10- 7:42 FFS!

    I was slightly too fast towards the end of the last mile so slowed way down and then forgot that my Garmin doesn't beep for a full 2 seconds after the lap goes from 0.99 to 1.00 and a mad 10 metre sprint couldn't save me!
    Amd then to cap it all my car was just up the road a small bit so never thought of stopping tye watch and ended up doing 10.05 miles.

    I won't even bother uploading a screenshot this time round, will have another go next Monday!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    Had a go. Stopped on 10.00km

    Km1 5:12
    Km2 5:10 (-2)
    Km3 5:09 (-1)
    Km4 5:08 (-1)
    Km5 5:07 (-1)
    Km6 5:06 (-1)
    Km7 5:05 (-1)
    Km8 5:02 (-3)
    Km9 5:00 (-2)
    Km10 4:07 (-53)

    Full progression (10pts) +5 bonus pts = 15pts total


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,388 ✭✭✭fletch


    Had a go. Stopped on 10.00km

    Km1 5:12
    Km2 5:10 (-2)
    Km3 5:09 (-1)
    Km4 5:08 (-1)
    Km5 5:07 (-1)
    Km6 5:06 (-1)
    Km7 5:05 (-1)
    Km8 5:02 (-3)
    Km9 5:00 (-2)
    Km10 4:07 (-53)

    Full progression (10pts) +5 bonus pts = 15pts total
    What was the last km all about? :confused::D


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    fletch wrote: »
    What was the last km all about? :confused::D

    Strides :) It wasn't necessarily planned as a go at the challenge but I had 10k easy to do so why not. The strides at the end were a planned part of the run. I might have abandoned strides if I was on for a full high risk bonus.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,393 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    Points on the board. Nice hilly route I wasn't within an asses roar of getting any bonus. I've done better progressions with less mental strain in the past. I was only going for the 10 second increments too.

    https://www.strava.com/activities/4956321827

    1. 5:43 - missed my 5:40 planned start
    2. 5:30 (-13) - okay I'll get into the swing of this. Steady now.
    3. 5:13 (-17) - NOOOOO! Need to reign in or I'll be into 10 k pace by the end.
    4. 5:02 (-11) - So close
    5. 4:53 (-9) - So close again
    6. 4:43 (-10) - Finally
    7. 4:29 (-14) - Useless. you got cocky kid.
    8. 4:23 (-6) - YES 10 seconds I thought. NO when I realised I was working off the wrong number when I got home.
    9: 4:09 (-14) - It really is a nice day to be out
    10. 4:00 (-9) - Just make sure it's a progression at least.

    PS - I now hate my watch. The lying b*****d.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,757 ✭✭✭ReeReeG


    1. 5:43 - missed my 5:40 planned start 2. 5:30 (-13) - okay I'll get into the swing of this. Steady now. 3. 5:13 (-17) - NOOOOO! Need to reign in or I'll be into 10 k pace by the end. 4. 5:02 (-11) - So close 5. 4:53 (-9) - So close again 6. 4:43 (-10) - Finally 7. 4:29 (-14) - Useless. you got cocky kid. 8. 4:23 (-6) - YES 10 seconds I thought. NO when I realised I was working off the wrong number when I got home. 9: 4:09 (-14) - It really is a nice day to be out 10. 4:00 (-9) - Just make sure it's a progression at least.


    I thoroughly enjoyed this commentary


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,623 ✭✭✭dna_leri


    dna_leri wrote: »
    Had another go at this last night.
    Conditions were not great and did relatively better but still no bonus points.
    On my Polar watch my progressions were -9,-7,-10,-12,-9,-11,-10,-9,-12.
    Strava was a bit more generous with the roundings: -9,-8,-9,-12,-10,-10,-10,-10,-11 but still not enough.
    That's as good as my watch accuracy will allow but I might still roll the dice once more next week as it fits well with my training at the moment. Keeps those Tuesday runs from being boring and sets me up for a few short hill reps at the end.

    Attempt #3 on Progression Tuesday.
    Can't complain about the conditions this time.
    Started out at recovery pace 5:23 /km and ended at tempo pace 3:50.
    In between the increments were: -8,-9,-10,-10,-12,-12,-11,-11,-10 - only 3 on target so no bonus. Strava was no better. Did 12x hill sprints after again.
    There are 2 more Tuesdays left in the month :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 577 ✭✭✭axe2grind


    Since I was last here, I moved my attempts to flat location with no trees, put on my glasses so I can read my watch...and switched to manual lap rather than auto. First 2 attempts with this approach failed as some laps ended up at 1.01 (and the following 0.99)and the odd time the watch skips a beat when I press the lap button.

    The same happened today with the watch sluggish when I press lap button. Some of the times were very tight, but it all worked out today :) for 20pts?

    547295.png


  • Registered Users Posts: 933 ✭✭✭jamule


    Mid Risk attempt, 7 points, I think. Should have a bonus bonus point by now.

    1 00:05:16 10
    2 00:05:14 -2
    3 00:04:51 -23
    4 00:04:50 -1 1
    5 00:04:27 -23
    6 00:04:26 -1 1
    7 00:04:04 -22 1
    8 00:04:03 -1 1
    9 00:03:42 -21
    10 00:03:43 1 -2
    10.01 00:00:09 -5

    Total 7


    https://www.strava.com/activities/4967322782/laps


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,208 ✭✭✭shotgunmcos


    March Table Update #3 :)

    Congrats axe2grind for hitting a perfect 20 points on the high risk :eek::)
    jamule I think you may be on 14 points but couldn't access your garmin link from 15 March :confused:

    Pos|Runner|Jan|Feb|March pts|Total

    1|fletch*|19|18|15|54
    2|crisco10*|18|17|11|48
    3|jamule*|15|19|10|46
    4|Omeceron*|20|13|9|44
    5|mister paul*|12|16|10|40
    6|axe2grind*||18|20|39
    7|Comic Book Guy*|11|14|11|38
    7|Murph_D|18|8|11|38
    9|Shotgunmcos*|16|2|15|34
    10|Lambay Island|14|18||33
    11|dna_leri*|4|13|10|29
    11|healy1835*|18||10|29
    13|Kander*|10|17||28
    14|Antrim Glens*||20|5|26
    15|Annie get your Run*|9|15||25
    16|Swashbuckler*|18|5||24
    17|Dubh Geannain*|2|9|10|23
    17|eyrie*|18|4||23
    19|ReeReeG*|5|11|3|21
    20|Zico10*|1|11|7|20
    20|BeginnerRunner|20|||20
    20|Conor74*||20||20
    23|py*||19||19
    24|eposhea*||17||18
    25|Unknown Unthought|17|||17
    26|Kurt_Godel*|1|15||16
    26|TFBubendorfer*||16||16
    28|edinrunna*||14||15
    29|Dudda|13|||13
    30|racersedge||12||12
    30|Strawberry Swan*||12||12
    32|En Passant*|7|3||11
    33|Wubble Wubble*|10|||10
    33|jackc101*||10||10
    35|Laineyfrecks|1|7||9
    36|skyblue46|8|||8
    36|Pherekydes*|1|6||8
    38|omicron*|6|||6
    39|Huzzah|3|||3
    40|Tummer||||
    40|OOnegative||||


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,177 ✭✭✭crisco10


    axe2grind wrote: »
    Since I was last here, I moved my attempts to flat location with no trees, put on my glasses so I can read my watch...and switched to manual lap rather than auto. First 2 attempts with this approach failed as some laps ended up at 1.01 (and the following 0.99)and the odd time the watch skips a beat when I press the lap button.

    The same happened today with the watch sluggish when I press lap button. Some of the times were very tight, but it all worked out today :) for 20pts?

    547295.png

    This confuses me, I thought it was the rounded times? not the decimals...not that it made a difference to me, but I was rounding to nearest second on each split. :confused::confused:


Advertisement