Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Planning permission up for greenway from Youghal to Midleton

135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,517 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Mirror the Waterford greenway? Some serious drugs being smoked.

    Unless it's followed up with serious promotion like the Waterford one, Youghal is somewhat of an uninspired and uninspiring backwater so they have their work cut out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Cork Trucker


    Unless it's followed up with serious promotion like the Waterford one, Youghal is somewhat of an uninspired and uninspiring backwater so they have their work cut out.

    Between that and some cable they want to run under the line I can’t ever see it reopening now even if they are future proofing it for quick conversion to railway. Do you know where in killeagh this plot of land is that the line used travel on that is not in Irish rail ownership?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,517 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Between that and some cable they want to run under the line I can’t ever see it reopening now even if they are future proofing it for quick conversion to railway. Do you know where in killeagh this plot of land is that the line used travel on that is not in Irish rail ownership?

    Cable for what now? The whole lot is Irish Rail's, someone chanced their arm with a land grab, I may know where that is.

    It'll never revert to rail once the path is in place.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Cork Trucker


    Cable for what now? The whole lot is Irish Rail's, someone chanced their arm with a land grab, I may know where that is.

    It'll never revert to rail once the path is in place.

    Yes it sounds like a land grab. Why build it in such a way for quick conversion then?

    Link to what I’m on about below
    https://amp.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/eirgrid-in-talks-with-cork-council-over-use-of-greenway-cable-for-france-interconnector-955711.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,517 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Yes it sounds like a land grab. Why build it in such a way for quick conversion then?

    Just to placate pro rail people.
    Can you imagine a path being installed and then closed and not having anyone objecting?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Cork Trucker


    Just to placate pro rail people.
    Can you imagine a path being installed and then closed and not having anyone objecting?

    I’m the first to admit it. If it was done in Waterford you’d have holy war


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,621 ✭✭✭Hibernicis


    Yes it sounds like a land grab. Why build it in such a way for quick conversion then?

    Link to what I’m on about below
    https://amp.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/eirgrid-in-talks-with-cork-council-over-use-of-greenway-cable-for-france-interconnector-955711.html

    Not sure what the issue is with that article. It makes perfect sense to use a single owner corridor (such as a rail track or a greenway) for a cable duct. ESAT in Denis O'Brien's time ran fibre from Cork to Dublin along the Cork-Dublin mainline by "agreement" with CIE. If an electricity interconnector has to be run from a landing point in say Youghal (or elsewhere in East Cork) to the ESB substation in Knochraha it would be crazy not to use the greenway (and then the Midleton-Cork rail alignment). It avoids negotiating with 50-100 landowners and/or digging up the N25.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Do you know where in killeagh this plot of land is that the line used travel on that is not in Irish rail ownership?

    Ballyquirke. House and yard and sheds on the alignment.

    I've pointed this out to the "anti-greenway, pro-Youghal-railway" people many times, but the point keeps getting lost.

    The landowners have squatters rights on that land now it's been encroached upon for a very long time.

    The people who want to reopen Youghal railway should be happy to see the greenway clear the line and should IMO also go further to try and deal with the encroachment issue now, rather than leaving it fester for some time in the future.

    There is a further issue near Youghal itself where a driveway encroached on the line. Thankfully this one isn't a building and can be dealt with more easily.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Hibernicis wrote: »
    Not sure what the issue is with that article. It makes perfect sense to use a single owner corridor (such as a rail track or a greenway) for a cable duct. ESAT in Denis O'Brien's time ran fibre from Cork to Dublin along the Cork-Dublin mainline by "agreement" with CIE. If an electricity interconnector has to be run from a landing point in say Youghal (or elsewhere in East Cork) to the ESB substation in Knochraha it would be crazy not to use the greenway (and then the Midleton-Cork rail alignment). It avoids negotiating with 50-100 landowners and/or digging up the N25.

    Minor details, but the 400kV line won't necessarily go to Knockraha substation and the landing point might be closer to Ballycotton but your overall point is very clear and IMO correct. I don't think the Amgen site is a viable location for the converter station AFAIK.

    It makes sense to use the corridor but would be ideal if they didn't lay directly under the greenway surface or the trackbed. I only say this because we have a poor record of routing all utilities under the "lesser needs" users such as pedestrians and cyclists. Digging these up and re-patching badly affects them worse than it affects other motorists. So the 400kV line needs its own serviceable corridor, and the greenway/railway should just be the access point for it. Can all three phases fit in such a narrow strip of land? Will they pay to underground the 400kV line? Lots of questions unanswered there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,517 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    Ballyquirke. House and yard and sheds on the alignment.

    I've pointed this out to the "anti-greenway, pro-Youghal-railway" people many times, but the point keeps getting lost.

    The landowners have squatters rights on that land now it's been encroached upon for a very long time.

    The people who want to reopen Youghal railway should be happy to see the greenway clear the line and should IMO also go further to try and deal with the encroachment issue now, rather than leaving it fester for some time in the future.

    There is a further issue near Youghal itself where a driveway encroached on the line. Thankfully this one isn't a building and can be dealt with more easily.

    This could be have been dealt with at little cost if IE visited the line every year or second year to reassert their ownership. If they were bothered, that is.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,764 ✭✭✭my3cents


    Isn't there also a way lever over an area of land each side of the track bed to give access for maintenance? You may get adverse possession but afaik its a different matter to fight a way lever agreement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    This could be have been dealt with at little cost if IE visited the line every year or second year to reassert their ownership. If they were bothered, that is.

    I know it's frustrating, but we are where we are.
    At least there's an opportunity to improve the situation to some degree now. I think the rail community should grasp opportunity with both hands: ask for the stations to be maintained to a higher standard now, that the encroachment issue be dealt with now, that cabling/utility issues be dealt with now etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 102 ✭✭CharlieR


    mordeith wrote: »
    I actually drive an electric car so you can remove the 'you' and direct your diatribe elsewhere.

    Whats the source of your power generation, there's nothing very green in Ireland yet and no incentive for people to install green systems like the UK offered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,744 ✭✭✭deRanged


    Clearance works are underway. This is the Midleton end of the line.

    49459506161_82c01b2b38_c.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 46 pukeko


    They're a nice bit of clearing done at the Killeagh stretch too - and work on the entrance\car park etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Cork Trucker


    Christ it makes me sick looking at this knowing the railway line isn't going to reopen


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,517 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    JonathonS wrote: »
    That is unfair and not true - at least according to the Tidy Towns adjudicators: https://www.tidytowns.ie/u_reports/2017/2017%20County%20Cork_South%20Youghal%20600.pdf

    Quote: "The stunning coastal location, rich history, unique buildings and elevated setting provide Youghal with an enviable range of attractions and we were delighted to see that your committee (and volunteers) with the support of the Council, local businesses and community are working hard. . . etc etc"

    Having said that I weep every time I pass the block of flats that overlook the strand. The people who were responsible for "designing" and building them have a lot to answer for. As for whoever gave them planning permission - what were they thinking?

    It's got potential, but it's a run down kip. It's been like that for decades. The TT people must be half blind they don't see any dereliction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 461 ✭✭cc


    cant wait to see the green way developed, I think the value of such an amenity will only be fully realised once it's up and running


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,278 ✭✭✭mordeith


    Some work at the Killeagh site

    501686.jpg

    501687.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,574 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Christ it makes me sick looking at this knowing the railway line isn't going to reopen

    Never say never , but it's been already been unused for decades ,so this a good start ...
    ( Scheduled passenger services finished in 1963 !!)
    And the last beet trains were in the early 80s )

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Cork Trucker


    Markcheese wrote: »
    Never say never , but it's been already been unused for decades ,so this a good start ...
    ( Scheduled passenger services finished in 1963 !!)
    And the last beet trains were in the early 80s )

    East Cork is very very different since the last special was out on in 1988. And an even more different world over the last 57 years. Apparently it is being prepared for a rapid conversion to a railway again if ever needed. Imagine the uproar if it’s tried


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,574 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    East Cork is very very different since the last special was out on in 1988. And an even more different world over the last 57 years. Apparently it is being prepared for a rapid conversion to a railway again if ever needed. Imagine the uproar if it’s tried

    Well if it needed for transport then ,put rails back , but for the foreseeable future if they've a few spare Bob for public transport in cork ,I can think of stacks of other projects that could do with the money ...

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,122 ✭✭✭c montgomery


    Christ it makes me sick looking at this knowing the railway line isn't going to reopen

    The railway might not reopen but this will bring alot of people to both Youghal and midleton and is fantastic for both towns.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,744 ✭✭✭deRanged


    I'm very pro greenway, but at the same time since I posted the original image of the planning permission, the numbers on the train have increased massively. I've changed to an earlier train and that's very busy leaving Midleton. The trains home in the evening are rammed. There's definitely something to be said for increasing the capacity of the line, and perhaps for increasing the line itself.

    There won't be any money for any improvements outside the Dublin commuter area for a very long time, so I still think the greenway is a good use of the line in the meantime.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Cork Trucker


    deRanged wrote: »
    There won't be any money for any improvements outside the Dublin commuter area for a very long time, so I still think the greenway is a good use of the line in the meantime.

    I accept your point, however this is Ireland, no railway in the entire 26 counties has closed, been turned into a greenway and reopened as a railway line in later years, the same will happen here.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I accept your point, however this is Ireland, no railway in the entire 26 counties has closed, been turned into a greenway and reopened as a railway line in later years, the same will happen here.

    As I've said before this is not a solid argument because very few railways in the 26 counties have been turned into greenway full stop. Most are recent. Looking for railways that became greenways that were proposed to become railways again gives you a handful of results, such as the Cork-Passage route. Which, contrary to your post is planned to become light rail once again.

    Why a similar level of "it's being prevented from becoming a railway again" ire isn't aimed at the roads that prevent the return of rail is a mystery to me. Cork Low Road recent redevelopment for instance? Kenmare to Kilgarvan recent redevelopment? God knows how many others. Seems one-eyed to me.

    Anyway above all else, Youghal is not getting a railway any time soon. Regardless of anything else that happens on the alignment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,744 ✭✭✭deRanged


    passenger numbers up almost 10% on the Midleton line. Still only about half the Cobh numbers, but Cobh has had the train for a lot longer and hasn't the same bus service. Irish-Rail-reveals-passenger-numbers-for-Cork-services-Highest-figures-ever-recorded


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Cork Trucker


    deRanged wrote: »
    passenger numbers up almost 10% on the Midleton line. Still only about half the Cobh numbers, but Cobh has had the train for a lot longer and hasn't the same bus service. Irish-Rail-reveals-passenger-numbers-for-Cork-services-Highest-figures-ever-recorded

    Until about 2 years ago all Cobh had was the train, yes the bus service went is a godsend to them but many are staying loyal to the only public transport they ever knew. If the railway in Youghal reopened you’d probably replicate that success, yes the number 40 bus and especially the 261 are always busy, but they sieve their time in traffic, you don’t get that on railway tracks unless it’s an unforeseen event.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,075 ✭✭✭questionmark?


    deRanged wrote: »
    passenger numbers up almost 10% on the Midleton line. Still only about half the Cobh numbers, but Cobh has had the train for a lot longer and hasn't the same bus service. Irish-Rail-reveals-passenger-numbers-for-Cork-services-Highest-figures-ever-recorded

    The Cobh line has a lot more stations to be counted, Cobh, Rushbrooke, Fota, Glounthaune and Little island. Where as the Midleton line only counts Carrigtowhill and Midleton(AFAIK) Encouraging that Midleton line has seen growth every year since it was opened. Even still it's a hard business case to open up to Youghal when Midleton West, Carrigtowhill IDA, Tivoli and Blackpool are ahead in the Q of importance for Station reopening on the Cork commuter service.
    Btw Cobh has had a pretty good bus service for the last year or so with Cobh Connect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    The Cobh line has a lot more stations to be counted, Cobh, Rushbrooke, Fota, Glounthaune and Little island. Where as the Midleton line only counts Carrigtowhill and Midleton(AFAIK) Encouraging that Midleton line has seen growth every year since it was opened. Even still it's a hard business case to open up to Youghal when Midleton West, Carrigtowhill IDA, Tivoli and Blackpool are ahead in the Q of importance for Station reopening on the Cork commuter service.
    Btw Cobh has had a pretty good bus service for the last year or so with Cobh Connect.

    Monard, Kilbarry and Kent passing loop are also ahead of Youghal.
    The money's not there for any of those five or six "safe bet" projects, so it's definitely not there for Youghal which has a longer and less certain ROI, it's that simple. And if it does become available, there would need to be serious questions about Mogeely and Killeagh development plans. Providing a greenway parallel to the alignment will be a very small issue by comparison.

    We keep giving the same explanation over and over. It feels like the M20 discussion. The numbers don't add up.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 453 ✭✭nokiatom


    How much will it cost the Cork County Counsel to lease the line from Irish Rail?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Cork Trucker


    Is it true that part of the land on which a house encroaches the line at a crossing in Killeagh is part of the reason why the line never reopened?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,278 ✭✭✭mordeith


    Is it true that part of the land on which a house encroaches the line at a crossing in Killeagh is part of the reason why the line never reopened?

    I think its outbuildings and not a house but I could be wrong. Either way I believe the greenway had to divert around it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Cork Trucker


    mordeith wrote: »
    I think its outbuildings and not a house but I could be wrong. Either way I believe the greenway had to divert around it.

    These outbuildings were built after the last train in 1988? If a greenway has to be diverted that says a lot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 453 ✭✭nokiatom


    These outbuildings were built after the last train in 1988? If a greenway has to be diverted that says a lot.
    well the land is belong to Irish Rail...can you build on someone elses land without permission?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Cork Trucker


    nokiatom wrote: »
    well the land is belong to Irish Rail...can you build on someone elses land without permission?

    Squatters rights, abandonment etc? Must be a reason they aren’t challenging it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 453 ✭✭nokiatom


    Squatters rights, abandonment etc? Must be a reason they aren’t challenging it

    would a part of a building encroaching the line stop an €80 - €100 million project? There was never a chance of the railway coming back...Irish Rail wanted it off their hands and the government had no interest in it either. There was studies done as far back as 20 years ago and resulted that it was not viable to reopen the line


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Cork Trucker


    nokiatom wrote: »
    would a part of a building encroaching the line stop an €80 - €100 million project? There was never a chance of the railway coming back...Irish Rail wanted it off their hands and the government had no interest in it either. There was studies done as far back as 20 years ago and resulted that it was not viable to reopen the line

    It wasn’t much out of the way so why would they argue it when they want rid of it? It’s a very different World today than in 2000


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,574 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    It wasn’t much out of the way so why would they argue it when they want rid of it? It’s a very different World today than in 2000

    It is a very different world , but the population along the line isn't that different at ,neither is the projected population ... ,

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,701 ✭✭✭Bacchus


    Markcheese wrote: »
    It is a very different world , but the population along the line isn't that different at ,neither is the projected population ... ,

    Which to me feels shortsighted... resulting in a chicken and the egg paradox. How will the regions in east Cork grow if the infrastructure isn't there to support or encourage that growth. It will be interesting if the tables turn as a result of COVID-19, where more people working from home sparks growth outside the city center, potentially fewer cars (2 car homes become 1 car homes) and there comes a need to encourage people IN to the city to work or spend money... something a decent train line would provide.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 453 ✭✭nokiatom


    Bacchus wrote: »
    Which to me feels shortsighted... resulting in a chicken and the egg paradox. How will the regions in east Cork grow if the infrastructure isn't there to support or encourage that growth. It will be interesting if the tables turn as a result of COVID-19, where more people working from home sparks growth outside the city center, potentially fewer cars (2 car homes become 1 car homes) and there comes a need to encourage people IN to the city to work or spend money... something a decent train line would provide.
    They are concentrating on tourism in Youghal rather than industry


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 453 ✭✭nokiatom


    Bacchus wrote: »
    Which to me feels shortsighted... resulting in a chicken and the egg paradox. How will the regions in east Cork grow if the infrastructure isn't there to support or encourage that growth. It will be interesting if the tables turn as a result of COVID-19, where more people working from home sparks growth outside the city center, potentially fewer cars (2 car homes become 1 car homes) and there comes a need to encourage people IN to the city to work or spend money... something a decent train line would provide.
    They are concentrating on tourism in Youghal rather than industry


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,701 ✭✭✭Bacchus


    nokiatom wrote: »
    They are concentrating on tourism in Youghal rather than industry

    I know the greenway will act as an attraction to the region but a train connecting to the second largest city in Ireland (with an airport too) would be useful on that front too.

    I'm not against the greenway btw. I would have preferred a train route but accept that on balance there's a lot of positives for greenway. I'm just interested in the knock on effects of COVID-19 on how populations will start to creep further away from city hubs in search of more affordable accommodation in nice parts of the countryside.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 453 ✭✭nokiatom


    people still like to travel in their own cars and people complain about the amount of traffic going into Cork and leaving Cork but yet very few get out of their car and park it in Midleton and take the train to Cork


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭Cork Trucker


    Well...... now that ‘mad’ Eamon Ryan is in charge (Of transport) expect to see some changes to reverse that trend.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 453 ✭✭nokiatom


    next train...15 years to 20 years in the future


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Most people who commute to the city living in Midleton and Carrigtwohill use their cars, and they have a train service on their doorstep. I live in Carrigtwohill and before Covid anyway I used the train daily. At rush hour it was the same 15 or so people using it and the main users tend to be students. A train to Youghal sounds great but it's not viable. The Greenway should be a big boost to tourism - like the Dungarvan one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 453 ✭✭nokiatom


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    Most people who commute to the city living in Midleton and Carrigtwohill use their cars, and they have a train service on their doorstep. I live in Carrigtwohill and before Covid anyway I used the train daily. At rush hour it was the same 15 or so people using it and the main users tend to be students. A train to Youghal sounds great but it's not viable. The Greenway should be a big boost to tourism - like the Dungarvan one.
    Thanks for that factual comment.....and thats why the track is becoming a Greenway


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,744 ✭✭✭deRanged


    I'd disagree with that. I also used the train daily, from Midleton and it was always busy. The train ex Cork in the evening is rammed. I do get the earlier ones though, maybe later in rush hour is quieter.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,329 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    deRanged wrote: »
    I'd disagree with that. I also used the train daily, from Midleton and it was always busy. The train ex Cork in the evening is rammed. I do get the earlier ones though, maybe later in rush hour is quieter.

    One maybe two trains in the evening and in the morning you could possibly describe as busy but rammed is a bit of stretch in fairness. Most of the trains are just 2 cars which tells it's own story about how busy the line is. When they run the odd 4 car train you'd never fail to get a seat regardless of the time of day. We're not talking London Underground here which I would describe as rammed.

    In any case the facts are that the Census from 2016 shows that only a small fraction of the population who commute to work from Carrigtwohill and Midleton use the train. The overwhelming majority travel by car with quite a few who walk to work locally:

    - Of the 3,002 people in employment residing in the Electoral District, Carrigtohill of Cork County, 75.55% or 2,268 commute to work by car.
    - Of the 4,825 people in employment residing in the Electoral District, Midleton of Cork County, 69.95% or 3,375 commute to work by car.

    According to the census 1,500 people who live in Carrgtwohill and surrounds work in Cork city but only c.100 people use the station there daily according to the NTA census which is just 6% of commuters. Many of those 100 are students and are not captured in the number classified as "working" in the city so the percentage is even lower. Midleton is a bit better but overall very low numbers using the train relatively speaking. Things have probably got busier since 2016 but not dramatically so i.e. the trains still run an hourly timetable except in the morning and evening for a short while and most trains are run as 2 car trains.

    There's a very small number of people living in Youghal and surrounds who actually work in the city. Certainly not enough to justify a commuter train line.


Advertisement