Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market 2020 Part 2

Options
1139140142144145339

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,000 ✭✭✭Hubertj


    brisan wrote: »
    Why would it be listed
    Pre 1963 buildings are not BER exempt as a group.

    Sorry it’s protected buildings are exempt. If it is a Georgian house it is likely listed?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭PropQueries


    Article in today's Irish Times titled: "Cost of building homes ‘much cheaper’ than industry claims"

    "The cost of building homes in Ireland is considerably cheaper than the construction industry claims and well below what local authorities are paying private developers for social housing, figures from the Department of Housing show."

    Link to Irish Times article here: https://www.irishtimes.com/business/construction/cost-of-building-homes-much-cheaper-than-industry-claims-1.4351897


  • Administrators Posts: 53,393 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I'm a bit confused by that article. It says:
    Where land is available, actual construction, de-risked from speculative markets and high-cost finance, is affordable, ” University College Dublin academic and housing expert Orla Hegarty, who obtained the figures, said. This is confirmed by the department’s own figures, Ms Hegarty said

    Is it saying that if you don't have to pay for land it's cheaper to build? In which case.... uh obviously?


  • Registered Users Posts: 681 ✭✭✭Pelezico


    awec wrote: »
    I'm a bit confused by that article. It says:



    Is it saying that if you don't have to pay for land it's cheaper to build? In which case.... uh obviously?

    Does not seem obvious to me. Not sure why land should impact building cost.


  • Administrators Posts: 53,393 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Pelezico wrote: »
    Does not seem obvious to me. Not sure why land should impact building cost.

    Land is part of the building cost, why do you think it wouldn't impact it?

    Of course it's cheaper to build a house when you don't have to pay for land, why do you think people in rural Ireland build on their families land?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    The article appears to refer to the "all in cost" not just the construction cost.


  • Administrators Posts: 53,393 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Graham wrote: »
    The article appears to refer to the "all in cost" not just the construction cost.

    Yea but it is implying that the "all in cost" is lower when councils build, because the "all in cost" for councils includes a land cost of €0.

    In which case, this is comparing apples to oranges.

    But maybe I'm just reading it wrong.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    I'd also guess councils don't have the financing costs that a developer may have to carry. I can't see the full article so just surmising here.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭PropQueries


    Graham wrote: »
    The article appears to refer to the "all in cost" not just the construction cost.

    I think the Cairn Homes interview on RTE landed them in it when he admitted that the average cost of their 17,000 sites (mostly in Dublin) was €32k. If you take out the cost of the expensive sites e.g. the €175k per site in Donnybrook, the majority of their sites cost a lot less.

    Since they build their 3 bed semis for less than €140k, I think the prices of many of their future 3 bed semis in Dublin are likely to be selling for well under the €300k mark as they compete with both Glenveagh and the second hand market for buyers. Cairn Homes can still make significant profits at these 'low' prices.

    I believe the first casualty will be ex-corporation homes within the M50 and then all other second hand homes within a certain distance of where they will be building.

    17,000 units is a lot to get rid of as they will be competing with future executor sales, people selling due to WFH, the so-called vulture funds getting out, Glenveagh, other small developers and many other sources of supply that will be entering the market e.g. student accommodation units converted to residential which brings the ex-rental properties people were previously renting back into the market etc. etc.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 32,278 Mod ✭✭✭✭The_Conductor


    awec wrote: »
    why do you think people in rural Ireland build on their families land?

    In a lot of cases- they are the only ones who are virtually guaranteed to get planning permission. Finance certainly is one aspect- but planning permission- particularly in some counties (such as Wicklow) can in many cases be an even bigger factor.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,014 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals


    Volkswagen subsidiary Man Trucks are laying off 9500 people :O

    https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/vw-man-truckmaker-cut-many-063144346.html


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,014 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals


    Cost of building homes ‘much cheaper’ than industry claims....... (in the irish times this morning)

    They wouldn't have lied to us would they??????

    Lorcan Sirr from DIT has been saying this and calling out the industries waffle for years.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,795 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Volkswagen subsidiary Man Trucks are laying off 9500 people :O

    https://au.finance.yahoo.com/news/vw-man-truckmaker-cut-many-063144346.html

    Ireland?

    Bare link dumping is a no-no anyway, but this isn't even vaguely relevant


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,014 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals


    L1011 wrote: »
    Ireland?

    Not all of course but these things dont happen in a vacuum, one of my friends is a sales guy in their Dublin office and is expecting quite a few layoffs.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,980 ✭✭✭✭Cuddlesworth


    I think the Cairn Homes interview on RTE landed them in it when he admitted that the average cost of their 17,000 sites (mostly in Dublin) was €32k.

    You missing a 0 there? No way you can build a house for 32k.


  • Posts: 17,728 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You missing a 0 there? No way you can build a house for 32k.

    average cost of their 17,000 sites (mostly in Dublin) was €32k.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,795 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    You missing a 0 there? No way you can build a house for 32k.

    Sites. Land. As in the cost per house of the land its on.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,969 ✭✭✭Assetbacked


    Ursabear wrote: »

    FFS, this infuriates me;
    Cairn has agreed in principle a €30.2 million deal to sell 61 apartments to Dublin City Council for social housing as part of its Part V obligation to allocate 10 per cent of any new private development to social housing. That values two-bedroom apartments at €521,377 and one-bed units at €472,797.

    The same DCC run by an FF (11, not 9)-GP(10)-Lab (8)-SD(5) coalition (with 62 councillors in total). Other notables; 9 FG and 8 SF.

    Some of the Local Property Tax they collect (which is pithy) is used to fund this disgraceful policy of propping up the margins of the big builders and investors. I'm not against a LPT per se or more tax in general but not if it is going to be wasted this way. I hope they get a funding shock from the covid crisis so they are forced to not persist with this nonsense policy.

    https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2020/0519/1139283-local-property-tax/


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,795 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    DCC is run by an FF (11, not 9)-GP(10)-Lab (8)-SD(5) coalition.

    SF have 8, not 7.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,969 ✭✭✭Assetbacked


    L1011 wrote: »
    DCC is run by an FF (11, not 9)-GP(10)-Lab (8)-SD(5) coalition.

    SF have 8, not 7.

    https://councilmeetings.dublincity.ie/mgMemberIndex.aspx?bcr=1

    I just counted the pictures here, with only a single espresso in me this morning.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 306 ✭✭ElBastardo1


    I think the Cairn Homes interview on RTE landed them in it when he admitted that the average cost of their 17,000 sites (mostly in Dublin) was €32k. If you take out the cost of the expensive sites e.g. the €175k per site in Donnybrook, the majority of their sites cost a lot less.

    Since they build their 3 bed semis for less than €140k, I think the prices of many of their future 3 bed semis in Dublin are likely to be selling for well under the €300k mark as they compete with both Glenveagh and the second hand market for buyers. Cairn Homes can still make significant profits at these 'low' prices.

    I believe the first casualty will be ex-corporation homes within the M50 and then all other second hand homes within a certain distance of where they will be building.

    17,000 units is a lot to get rid of as they will be competing with future executor sales, people selling due to WFH, the so-called vulture funds getting out, Glenveagh, other small developers and many other sources of supply that will be entering the market e.g. student accommodation units converted to residential which brings the ex-rental properties people were previously renting back into the market etc. etc.

    Cairn are building very little within the M50 that will be low cost sites.


  • Registered Users Posts: 220 ✭✭thefridge2006


    L1011 wrote: »
    Ireland?

    Bare link dumping is a no-no anyway, but this isn't even vaguely relevant

    In fairness i can see the relevance in this. All these global job losses will have a huge effect on Ireland and obviously the housing market. The Ulster Bank and KBC job losses hardly made the news yesterday and certainly didnt make the televised news... this would have been huge news back before this virus but its the new norm now. The amount of job losses that are coming down the line and the losses that haven't made the news will be eye watering IMO.

    I'm only new on this but have been following this thread in particular for months now and definitely feel there is a bias in here for the "everything is great gang" by some mods.

    Just my opinion


  • Registered Users Posts: 220 ✭✭thefridge2006


    On job losses in Dublin that aren't banking, retail, hospitality and travel/tourism, ;

    AirBnb
    Accenture
    UPS
    LinkedIn
    Smartbox, Oracle, Adroll and Glassdoor too apparently;

    WOW..... I didn't even hear of half of these redundancies ...... RTE are doing a good job of blocking the reality of the whole thing.... that's bleak


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,108 ✭✭✭TheSheriff


    WOW..... I didn't even hear of half of these redundancies ...... RTE are doing a good job of blocking the reality of the whole thing.... that's bleak

    You might want to take off that tinfoil hat of yours.


  • Administrators Posts: 53,393 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    WOW..... I didn't even hear of half of these redundancies ...... RTE are doing a good job of blocking the reality of the whole thing.... that's bleak

    He literally posted a link to the RTE story on one of them. :(

    They also covered the AirBnB one at the time (it was in May).

    The Accenture one has no Irish angle yet, you can be sure they'll have it covered when it does (and it will). This one hasn't really been covered by any real media anywhere yet.

    The UPS one was in March, pre-covid / lockdown.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,969 ✭✭✭Assetbacked


    Yeah, I mean they don't look major in the grand scheme of things, certainly not compared to the losses in hospitality, retail and travel. The big thing to watch is whether the projects to lease the large office complexes for the likes of Facebook, LinkedIn and Amazon still go ahead.


  • Registered Users Posts: 220 ✭✭thefridge2006


    TheSheriff wrote: »
    You might want to take off that tinfoil hat of yours.

    Ok so why haven't these been reported on RTE? I know there is very serious issues lately but its not like there minuscule or anything.....they had time to report from some garden in Navan where the locals are growing their own food or some irrelevant news instead

    Maybe i'm a bit cynical but very rarely hear negative news about our beloved Tech industry here


  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 53,393 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Yeah, I mean they don't look major in the grand scheme of things, certainly not compared to the losses in hospitality, retail and travel. The big thing to watch is whether the projects to lease the large office complexes for the likes of Facebook, LinkedIn and Amazon still go ahead.

    Yea, even the bank ones that the poster referenced, KBC was like 20 jobs and Ulster Bank was like 200, and the push was to move more banking online. This was sure to happen at some stage, covid or no covid, recession or no recession.

    There is no grand conspiracy here. Job losses are going to come and some of those on furlough are not going to get their jobs back, but so far nothing major has happened.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement