Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Antisemitism rising sharply across Europe

1111214161722

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    You think Muslims made Europe hellish???

    I think it was the Germans. They need diluting.:pac:

    "They need diluting"

    Perhaps this is the real reason for the upsurge in antisemitism lately


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    "They need diluting"

    Perhaps this is the real reason for the upsurge in antisemitism lately


    And the shrinking of your sense of humor!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    And the shrinking of your sense of humor!

    Joke or not you (being Jewish) know full well that the perceived enthusiasm of Jewish people for mass immigration to the West is a major factor in the current rise of Antisemitism.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Joke or not you (being Jewish) know full well that the perceived enthusiasm of Jewish people for mass immigration to the West is a major factor in the current rise of Antisemitism.
    No its not.

    First time i have ever heard it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    No its not.

    First time i have ever heard it.

    I find that hard to believe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    I know all about her, I think its interesting that in this entire thread the real reasons for the surge in contemporary Antisemitism are almost entirely ignored while the red herring of Palestine is discussed ad nauseum.


    Antisemitism is nothing to do with Jews.


    We can't behave for you. Is that what you are saying??

    Racism is not down to badly behaved black people.

    Its internal to a racist.


    Antisemites usually don't even know any jews.

    Do you realize how many jews are left in Europe??

    very few.

    There is no reason for antisemitism ..that is why its antisemitism.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    She is a nutjob.

    She is an Armenian genocide denier which is illegal in many countries.

    I assure you she doesn't want muslims immigrating to Europe.

    When she means multicultural she means jews only.

    What about Ronit Lentin, any opinions on her?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    I find that hard to believe.


    It's difficult to understand why you believe a Jewish conspiracy theory anymore considering there are so few jews in Europe anymore.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    Antisemitism is nothing to do with Jews.


    We can't behave for you. Is that what you are saying??

    Racism is not down to badly behaved black people.

    Its internal to a racist.


    Antisemites usually don't even know any jews.

    Do you realize how many jews are left in Europe??

    very few.

    There is no reason for antisemitism ..that is why its antisemitism.

    "We can't behave for you" I don't know what you mean there?

    By the by I've nothing against Israel and I very much admire their strength of National identity.
    I do though dislike the likes of Lerner Spectre.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    What about Ronit Lentin, any opinions on her?
    She is a nice lady. I don't agree with everything she says though. I don't disagree with everything she says though either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    A dimly lit basement in Mullingar.

    Mullingar RULES YALL!

    Don't diss my country!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    Regarding Soros, there was an interesting interview in the New York Times last year where George Soros son stated that his father was such a proponent of mass immigration and multiculturalism because he believed that Jews were safer in a multiracial society.

    To suggest this was a motivation of some Jews was always regarded as highly Antisemitic so it was interesting to hear Soros son actually confirm that it was true (in the case of Soros at least)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,797 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    re-reg wrote:
    Or evil old George Soros?

    Does the coincidental fact of being Jewish automatically make a person above legitimate criticism for using their money to interfere in the internal politics of other democratic countries? :confused: I didn't even know Soros was Jewish until recently, just that he's a wealthy individual who uses his money to fund political movements outside his own country of residence. Regardless of a person's ethnic heritage, most people find that kind of behaviour uncomfortable at the very least. It's no different to the very legitimate condemnation of wealthy American conservatives bankrolling the anti-equality and anti-abortion movements here during our two recent referenda, from funding the groups themselves to block-buying YouTube ads commenting on a democratic vote taking place in someone else's country.

    Does being Jewish mean a person can do this and be immune to others calling them anti-democratic assholes for doing so? :confused:

    Nicholas Sarkozy has (that I know of) no Jewish heritage whatsoever, and I and many others roundly condemned him, repeatedly, for his attempts to interfere in Irish democracy by vocally demanding we overturn our Lisbon referendum result and threatening to block various things at the EU level unless we did. Are you suggesting that if he had been a Jew, this criticism would suddenly have been "anti semitic" even though his Jewish heritage and the fact that he thought he had the right to tell a democratic electorate which way to vote would have still been two completely unrelated and separate facts?

    George Soros happens to be Jewish. He also happens to be using his wealth in an attempt to influence politics in countries he neither resides in nor hails from. These two sentences have absolutely nothing to do with eachother, but the latter is 100% something which makes him absolutely worthy of being called a scumbag.

    The Koch Brothers, to my knowledge, have absolutely no Jewish heritage whatsoever, and yet are constantly condemned by the left for the same reasons Soros is condemned by the right. Trying to use Soros' Jewish heritage as a deflective shield against criticism of the fact that he's a rich individual who attempts to undermine democracy with money, is exactly the reason so many people don't take accusations of anti-semitism seriously anymore.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Regarding Soros, there was an interesting interview in the New York Times last year where George Soros son stated that his father was such a proponent of mass immigration and multiculturalism because he believed that Jews were safer in a multiracial society.

    To suggest this was a motivation of some Jews was always regarded as highly Antisemitic so it was interesting to hear Soros son actually confirm that it was true (in the case of Soros at least)


    It would definitely be part of my motivation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    Does the coincidental fact of being Jewish automatically make a person above legitimate criticism for using their money to interfere in the internal politics of other democratic countries? :confused: I didn't even know Soros was Jewish until recently, just that he's a wealthy individual who uses his money to fund political movements outside his own country of residence. Regardless of a person's ethnic heritage, most people find that kind of behaviour uncomfortable at the very least. It's no different to the very legitimate condemnation of wealthy American conservatives bankrolling the anti-equality and anti-abortion movements here during our two recent referenda, from funding the groups themselves to block-buying YouTube ads commenting on a democratic vote taking place in someone else's country.

    Does being Jewish mean a person can do this and be immune to others calling them anti-democratic assholes for doing so? :confused:

    Nicholas Sarkozy has (that I know of) no Jewish heritage whatsoever, and I and many others roundly condemned him, repeatedly, for his attempts to interfere in Irish democracy by vocally demanding we overturn our Lisbon referendum result and threatening to block various things at the EU level unless we did. Are you suggesting that if he had been a Jew, this criticism would suddenly have been "anti semitic" even though his Jewish heritage and the fact that he thought he had the right to tell a democratic electorate which way to vote would have still been two completely unrelated and separate facts?

    George Soros happens to be Jewish. He also happens to be using his wealth in an attempt to influence politics in countries he neither resides in nor hails from. These two sentences have absolutely nothing to do with eachother, but the latter is 100% something which makes him absolutely worthy of being called a scumbag.

    The Koch Brothers, to my knowledge, have absolutely no Jewish heritage whatsoever, and yet are constantly condemned by the left for the same reasons Soros is condemned by the right. Trying to use Soros' Jewish heritage as a deflective shield against criticism of the fact that he's a rich individual who attempts to undermine democracy with money, is exactly the reason so many people don't take accusations of anti-semitism seriously anymore.

    Sarkozy has Jewish heritage


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Does the coincidental fact of being Jewish automatically make a person above legitimate criticism for using their money to interfere in the internal politics of other democratic countries? :confused: I didn't even know Soros was Jewish until recently, just that he's a wealthy individual who uses his money to fund political movements outside his own country of residence. Regardless of a person's ethnic heritage, most people find that kind of behaviour uncomfortable at the very least. It's no different to the very legitimate condemnation of wealthy American conservatives bankrolling the anti-equality and anti-abortion movements here during our two recent referenda, from funding the groups themselves to block-buying YouTube ads commenting on a democratic vote taking place in someone else's country.

    Does being Jewish mean a person can do this and be immune to others calling them anti-democratic assholes for doing so? :confused:

    Nicholas Sarkozy has (that I know of) no Jewish heritage whatsoever, and I and many others roundly condemned him, repeatedly, for his attempts to interfere in Irish democracy by vocally demanding we overturn our Lisbon referendum result and threatening to block various things at the EU level unless we did. Are you suggesting that if he had been a Jew, this criticism would suddenly have been "anti semitic" even though his Jewish heritage and the fact that he thought he had the right to tell a democratic electorate which way to vote would have still been two completely unrelated and separate facts?

    George Soros happens to be Jewish. He also happens to be using his wealth in an attempt to influence politics in countries he neither resides in nor hails from. These two sentences have absolutely nothing to do with eachother, but the latter is 100% something which makes him absolutely worthy of being called a scumbag.

    The Koch Brothers, to my knowledge, have absolutely no Jewish heritage whatsoever, and yet are constantly condemned by the left for the same reasons Soros is condemned by the right. Trying to use Soros' Jewish heritage as a deflective shield against criticism of the fact that he's a rich individual who attempts to undermine democracy with money, is exactly the reason so many people don't take accusations of anti-semitism seriously anymore.


    Soros is a man who places people before money every time. He doesn't care about his image.

    I am always HIGHLY amused by people complaining this rich man spends all of his money on leftist politicians and charity.

    Do you think he doing it for himself?? this big business man who throws money at people like Ocasio Cortez???

    This big business man who throws money at muslims refugees.This big Business man who threw money at poor black students going to university in Apartheid South Africa.This rich Business man who threw 100 million to Russian Universities.
    Yes this man who throws money like water towards education and Newspapers its HIM who is an enemy of democracy.


    He even funded the yes side for our abortion ref.


    He throws money like WATER at human rights in places he has never even BEEN. He throws money like WATER at politicians who want to tax the bejaysus out of him!

    Yet its purely for his own selfish ends. And do you know what ..YOU ARE RIGHT it is. He does all this ...because he wants to. For his own selfish reasons.

    And that is why he is own of my personal heroes.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    It would definitely be part of my motivation.

    Well there you go..

    Would you agree then that it's not exactly Antisemitic to suggest that this is a motivation of some Jewish people?

    I understand perfectly why Jewish people would feel this way even though I do not share the same goals.

    And do you not think its strange that there are those who would like to see Israel burn to the ground and yet at the same time would scream Antisemite at someone who suggested that multiculturalism was a motivation of some Jewish people?
    I don't know the answer to this I just can't quite get my head around it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Sarkozy has Jewish heritage


    You are antisemitic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Who here has antisemitic heritage ?? Just wondering.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    What about all the FAR RIGHT political funding that goes from the US into Ireland??

    What about the attempt of the far right in the states to close all philosophy courses here? Or don't you know about that?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    Soros is a man who places people before money every time. He doesn't care about his image.

    I am always HIGHLY amused by people complaining this rich man spends all of his money on leftist politicians and charity.

    Do you think he doing it for himself?? this big business man who throws money at people like Ocasio Cortez???

    This big business man who throws money at muslims refugees.This big Business man who threw money at poor black students going to university in Apartheid South Africa.This rich Business man who threw 100 million to Russian Universities.
    Yes this man who throws money like water towards education and Newspapers its HIM who is an enemy of democracy.


    He even funded the yes side for our abortion ref.


    He throws money like WATER at human rights in places he has never even BEEN. He throws money like WATER at politicians who want to tax the bejaysus out of him!

    Yet its purely for his own selfish ends. And do you know what ..YOU ARE RIGHT it is. He does all this ...because he wants to. For his own selfish reasons.

    And that is why he is own of my personal heroes.

    Does it not bother you that he said that working for the Nazis was the greatest time of his life?
    Obviously he had no choice, and the context was that he learned about business.
    but still it's a strange to be sentimental about confiscating the property of fellow Jews who were headed for death camps.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Does it not bother you that he said that working for the Nazis was the greatest time of his life?
    Obviously he had no choice, and the context was that he learned about business.
    but still it's a strange to be sentimental about confiscating the property of fellow Jews who were headed for death camps.

    He didn't work for the nazis. THat was a lie by people like you.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    You are antisemitic.

    Not at all why would you say that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Not at all why would you say that?

    Were your parents or grandparents anti Semitic??

    We need you clear for 5 generations.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    He didn't work for the nazis. THat was a lie by people like you.

    Come on now, the video where he discussed his time working for the Nazis is easily available to view online.
    He had no choice obviously but it did happen and he did say it was a great time in his life as he learned all about business.

    And remember before he was a paragon of altruism he was a highly predatory and downright evil individual.. 'The man who broke the bank of england' he deliberately crashed the economy of the UK and caused misery for millions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Does it not bother you that he said that working for the Nazis was the greatest time of his life?
    Obviously he had no choice, and the context was that he learned about business.
    but still it's a strange to be sentimental about confiscating the property of fellow Jews who were headed for death camps.


    Antisemites always claim this lie

    IT IS A COMPLETE LIE
    https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/george-soros-ss-nazi-germany/

    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/george-soros-nazi-jew-conspiracy-theory-roseanne-barr-twitter-rant-a8377301.html

    I know the people who say this. I know the SITES that say this. I KNOW where you have to LOOK for this lie.

    I know where you sleep.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Come on now, the video where he discussed his time working for the Nazis is easily available to view online.
    He had no choice obviously but it did happen and he did say it was a great time in his life as he learned all about business.


    It was doctored.

    And if you watched it you have to have been watching stormfront **** because its the only way it gets recommended.

    Antisemites always claim this lie

    IT IS A COMPLETE LIE
    https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ge...-nazi-germany/

    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices...-a8377301.html

    I know the people who say this. I know the SITES that say this. I KNOW where you have to LOOK for this lie.

    I know where you sleep.

    They also faked photos of him as a nazi

    https://www.apnews.com/afs:Content:2336951905


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    IMO antisemtism is in someone's DNA their blood. Just like racism.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    Were your parents or grandparents anti Semitic??

    We need you clear for 5 generations.

    Not at all..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Not at all..

    You sure everyone was lil antisemitic back then?

    Can you prove it?

    I NEED PAPERS!

    Ich brauche deine Papiere!

    tumblr_mfnsxftmxk1qh1g19o1_500.gif?w=680&h=370


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    You sure everyone was lil antisemitic back then?

    Can you prove it?

    I NEED PAPERS!

    Ich brauche deine Papiere!

    Chill out dude.. Everything was going well. No need to freak out.

    Here's the interview, make of it what you will..

    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://m.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DrCjkd44p_lE&ved=2ahUKEwjsl4m7x9PiAhWFShUIHZSbBzMQwqsBMAB6BAgHEAU&usg=AOvVaw07nFNqeINEZ4GRmOdJwuVj


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 290 ✭✭Patty Hearst


    What about all the FAR RIGHT political funding that goes from the US into Ireland??

    What about the attempt of the far right in the states to close all philosophy courses here? Or don't you know about that?

    I actually didnt know about that.. Got a link?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    I actually didnt know about that.. Got a link?



    The Regnery family. Koch Brothers.

    The regnery family in partic

    And they inherited their fortune. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/aramroston/hes-spent-almost-20-years-funding-the-racist-right-it


    http://dailynous.com/2019/05/01/british-philosophical-association-defends-philosophy-brazil/



    American funding into ireland you would be naive to think its just abortion.
    https://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/01/why-american-pro-life-dollars-are-pouring-into-ireland/266981/


    The far right in the states funds iona etc ..youth defense probably peter casey too



    The abortions rights campaign actually gave back Soros money ...i think they should have kept it ..

    Never give into the dogs of the right.

    https://www.thejournal.ie/abortion-rights-campaign-return-e23000-to-foreign-donor-3316866-Apr2017/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes



    Its been debunked as doctored. I linked already.

    Its clear you are purely antisemitic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    This thread is turning my stomach.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,221 ✭✭✭Greentopia


    Grayson wrote: »
    You find a lot of the right wing elements in eastern europe have always been there. In the west, and specifically West Germany, there was a certain amount of discussion about the war, the crimes and anti semitism. That didn't happen in eastern europe. In east Germany in particular there was a lot of bigoted thought. You can see this in the right wing groups that existed there. If you go looking you can find lots of evidence of hate crimes that occured in east germany that the government covered up. There was even horrific cases of lynchings.

    Yes, hate crimes in the east is something that doesn't get a lot of attention it seems, but it did happen against people from socialist "brother" countries who went there to study or work from places like Mozambique, Cuba, Vietnam.

    Some of those crimes are still being investigated to this day by journalists trying to get justice for the victims families.
    The reason as I've heard it put was it seems that there was no ground work done by officials to prepare local populaces for the arrival of these new people from foreign lands, and in places rumours began they were getting preferential treatment in housing and other services, and so resentment started and racist crimes were committed.
    This is how I have heard it told on some documentaries I've watched on the subject. Also there were still Nazis there who got jobs in local government after the war so they were still a presence there, albeit small in numbers.

    Grayson wrote: »
    I'm just saying that I believe there's a higher percentage and I think that's in part because they never had the national conversation about the war. What they were told and what they thought was basically dictated by their authoritarian regimes.

    I think it's more because the far right are more active in the east and antisemitism is simply a part of their ideology as it always has been.
    The holocaust was taught as historical fact in schools in the GDR and all pupils were brought to a concentration camp as part of their history lessons on the war, the same as in the rest of Germany.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭1641


    This thread is turning my stomach.


    There is no point in trying to have any reasoned discussion with dyed in the wool anti-semites. A racist conspiracy theory world view is immune to reason - it is a closed system that is not open to any disconfirming evidence. It will either dismiss it or deliberately falsify and distort it to fit their world view - eg David Irvine and his acolytes.


    I wonder though, where, the "nice", "egalitarian" anti-semite enabler posters are with this? "Nothing to do with us" is probably the attitude.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    1641 wrote: »
    There is no point in trying to have any reasoned discussion with dyed in the wool anti-semites. A racist conspiracy theory world view is immune to reason - it is a closed system that is not open to any disconfirming evidence. It will either dismiss it or deliberately falsify and distort it to fit their world view - eg David Irvine and his acolytes.


    I wonder though, where, the "nice", "egalitarian" anti-semite enabler posters are with this? "Nothing to do with us" is probably the attitude.

    Yes. They rant then all they have to do is deny deny deny.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,839 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Except it was the Israelis who invaded

    (possibly justified, but that's a whole other question and not fitting to your narrative)

    The Israelis never were the aggressors. Always the defenders. And, in some cases when agreements were reached (Sinai) they returned the lands in question. In others, agreements could not be reached and as such, Israel defends what they died to protect. All perfectly reasonable behavior in defense of their lives.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,138 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    Igotadose wrote: »
    Agreed. Neither Germany nor Poland were created by UN vote, unlike Israel. Israel's expansion is defensive in nature, they've expanded into land won during conflict. It's not invaded and annexed land, as Germany attempted in WWII and Russia just did recently in Crimea.

    Yes, it effectively is.

    [QUOTE=Igotadose
    Perfectly logical to expand your country when you've repelled invaders. Spread out and keep your sworn enemies further away. Actually that's not quite right - Israel's neighbor's have sworn to destroy it, Israel's not taken a counter-oath.[/QUOTE]




    What neighbours would these be?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,398 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn II


    There was some discussion on the thread earlier about why the left abandoned Israel post 1967 etc. Back then Israel did face serious threats from Arab nations - now it is the biggest force in the region and it’s supposed existential threat comes from the beleaguered citizens of Palestine. Any possible genocide there will be of Palestinians.

    Back then the US was somewhat neutral - in the 50s the US opposed Israel France and the U.K. in the Suez war. Now it is a major backer.

    It’s Israel’s treatment of Palestinians that attracts the right, and far right and fascists. They like what they see there, and they want it here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,398 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn II


    As for the whole anti Zionism = anti semitism malarkey that would make most of the world anti Semitic.

    https://www.vox.com/2018/11/20/18080086/israel-palestine-global-opinion


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,812 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    1641 wrote: »


    I wonder though, where, the "nice", "egalitarian" anti-semite enabler posters are with this? "Nothing to do with us" is probably the attitude.

    I'm curious who this is aimed at? Most of us here have been very quick to call out the anti-semitic posts straight away


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    Igotadose wrote: »
    Agreed. Neither Germany nor Poland were created by UN vote, unlike Israel. Israel's expansion is defensive in nature, they've expanded into land won during conflict. It's not invaded and annexed land, as Germany attempted in WWII and Russia just did recently in Crimea.

    Perfectly logical to expand your country when you've repelled invaders. Spread out and keep your sworn enemies further away. Actually that's not quite right - Israel's neighbor's have sworn to destroy it, Israel's not taken a counter-oath.

    You are confusing a vote with what's right. The UN or British more so, had absolutely no business voting on policy that relates to the land of others.

    By your logic Israel should be wiped out, I disagree. They are there now and a peace should be sought.
    Israel took land and continue to take land, which feeds any aggression towards them. You can make the same argument for Hitler as you make for Israel except the Nazis were honest enough to call it what it was, invasion and war with a view of wiping out a people they deemed not fit to exist, in this case the Palestinians.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    They are not oblivious. They perceive it as punching up because they perceive Jews to be wealthy and elite.


    They also have no idea that about 70% of Israelis are Arab Jews from Arab or descended from Arab countries. And that most present day Israelis have at least one grandparent from the original Palestinian Jewish population.

    And most Ashkenazi are descended from people who had to flee for obvious reasons. Hitler was the one who forced many ashkenazi to palestine. And the grand mufti supported hitler at the time.

    If Israel wasn't stealing land and murdering, I think antisemetism in the region would drop sharply ;)
    It's about the criminal Israel regime and it's policies. The sooner BiBi does time the better for everyone.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,812 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    Igotadose wrote: »
    The Israelis never were the aggressors. Always the defenders. And, in some cases when agreements were reached (Sinai) they returned the lands in question. In others, agreements could not be reached and as such, Israel defends what they died to protect. All perfectly reasonable behavior in defense of their lives.

    The 6 Day War?? 1956?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,186 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Odhinn wrote: »
    They're doing rather more than "protect" themselves, they're colonising areas outside their borders. Building housing and shifting their civillians to those areas can hardly be called defensive action.

    Do I have to reiterate the whole thing about how down through history states and nations have used captured territory?
    I don't agree with the likes of orthodox Jews setting up settlements in West Bank, but I can see how some Israeli's view it as fair game.
    A lot of Israelis don't agree with it either AFAIK.
    Odhinn wrote: »
    Your wee rant about muslims is because 'they're all the same' I suppose. Which is ironic, considering the anti-semites make the same leap of "logic" with regard to the Jews.

    And do we have to once again go down the rabbit hole of showing you how out of all the immigrant groups to Europe muslims are the ones that have not been integrating, have been causing social breakdown in certain states, clamouring for dispensation to not comfort to rules on equal rights for minorities/women/gays/etc ?
    And the reason I am lumping muslims together is that it does not matter whether they hail from Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, Tunisia, Morocco, Yemen, Somalia, Egypt and now Luton, Bradford, Moleenbeek they very often have very conservative views due to the ideology they subscribe to and believe in.

    Much like how islamist terrorists don't hail from any one class, any one ethnic background, any one race, any one gender.
    It is the ideology they believe in.
    It's not comparable to either IMO.
    Israel is a creation placed upon the region. Constantly expanding aggressively.

    You do know the whole freaking Middle East is a creation.

    There was no Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Oman, Yemen, Kuwait, UAE.
    These states didn't exist in any format pre 1923 ?
    The Brits had been moving into Arabian penisula from late 1800s and had chunks of what is now Oman, Yemen, Bahrain, UAE.
    And when the Ottoman empire was broken up they along with France were the drivers in creating new states or really what they were being mandated to rule.
    What were we saying about spoils of war again. :rolleyes:

    And the League of Nations rubber stamped the whole shambles.

    And much like how India was partitioned the lines drawn for states were often pretty arbitrary or at least not based on what were once ottoman provinces or along ethnic groups.
    Even then the borders of what passes for modern Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria were not fixed for years.

    Saudi Arabia only really came into being in 1930s.


    So Israel is not an abberation in the region in terms of just being a creation by the rest of the world.
    The big difference being that there was huge influx of people from elsewhere and a displacement of the natives that had been there.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭1641



    It’s Israel’s treatment of Palestinians that attracts the right, and far right and fascists. They like what they see there, and they want it here.


    Don't be ridiculous. Yes, dickheads waving Israeli flags are occasionally seen at far right anti- Muslim protests. But they are used as a provocation towards Muslims, not as support for Israel. These same people hate Jews just as much as they do Muslims. Anti semitism is rife in far right propaganda.


    And that faction of the left that is obsessed with demonising Israel is complicit with this, whether wittingly or unwittingly. There is a long history of anti-semitism on the left as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    jmayo wrote: »
    ....


    So Israel is not an abberation in the region in terms of just being a creation by the rest of the world.
    The big difference being that there was huge influx of people from elsewhere and a displacement of the natives that had been there.

    All's fair in love and war is it? We are striving to be civilised towards each other surely, or should be. Your argument centers on the person with the bigger stick being right. By displacement you mean occupation and expulsion.
    1641 wrote: »
    Don't be ridiculous. Yes, dickheads waving Israeli flags are occasionally seen at far right anti- Muslim protests. But they are used as a provocation towards Muslims, not as support for Israel. These same people hate Jews just as much as they do Muslims. Anti semitism is rife in far right propaganda.


    And that faction of the left that is obsessed with demonising Israel is complicit with this, whether wittingly or unwittingly. There is a long history of anti-semitism on the left as well.

    Let's re-visit your anti Rothschild comment...
    1641 wrote: »
    Anyone notice the banner at the anti - Trump protest today to the effect that they were all in the pocket of "the Rothschild's"? Not anti semitic, though, of course.

    Do you see the hypocrisy here?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭1641


    The 6 Day War?? 1956?


    I know hardly anything about the 1956 war although I thought it was mainly the British and French who were responsible?



    And from as little as I know about 1967, it was largely the responsibility of the Arab countries. Egypt closed the Straits of Tiran which was the access gateway to the Israeli port at Eilat (its major port for oil imports) and then began an army mobilisation. Yes, Israel then hit them with a pre-emptive attack. I suppose they were supposed to just wait until the Egypians for fully ready to roll in? I think the recent experiences in Europe might have deterred them from that naivete.


    The Jordanians then began attacks on the West Bank - albeit tricked by the Egyptians who told them they had the Israelis on the run.


    The Syrians were also "fooled" by the Egypian reports of victory and began shelling and sent in their jets. They ended up losing as well (BOO ISRAEL).



    I think people can't forgive the Israelis for being better prepared and better organised than their opponents. What would have happened in 1967 if they had not been? (Please answer) The Jordanians and Syrians both took to the war once they thought victory was at hand. Neither they nor the Egyptians were aiming to establish a Palestinian state - rather to grab as much as possible for themselves.


    The difficult Palestinian issue could have been resolved way back in those early decades had the surrounding Arab states shown an interest and willingness in having it resolved. Instead the Palestinians were just used as a wedge issue so that they could get as much from Israel as they could. It just didn't work for them.


    That the whole focus and blame for the Palestinian issue is loaded onto Israel by certain sections of the left is a symptom of lingering (or other) anti-semitism.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement