Lord Mayor of Dublin harassed at her home by protesters

25-01-2021 11:35am

RobbieTheRobber wrote: »

There we have it folks there is no racism in Ireland we can all stop looking!

I think the argument is that you can be vigilant and recognise the extent and occurrences of racism and all the other isms in ireland today without being a clichéd member of a baying mob desperate to find or misrepresent any evidence whatsover

Baggly · 25-01-2021 11:35am

Deleted User wrote: »

I think that you finally get it. Racism in Ireland is about the same threat as communism in Ireland. There are handful of nutters out there, like everywhere. But for practical purposes there is no serious racism. You can find it if you look very very hard and misrepresent the facts, sure. But if you are honest you will recognise that Ireland is as good as it gets. No other country is less racist imho. Unless you have an example?

Mod

Dont post in this thread again.

osarusan · 25-01-2021 11:40am

Deleted User wrote: »

If someone said the phrase " you *whatever ethnicity* prick", the insult is the word prick surely?

You only need to look at the kind of words inserted between 'you' and 'prick' to know that this doesn't make sense though.

you fat prick.
you ugly prick.
you stupid prick.

I don't think anybody would argue that the words fat, ugly and stupid are not part of the insult. Otherwise why is the word even in there.

Likewise:

you black prick.
you asian prick.
you muslim prick.
you catholic prick.
you traveller prick.

I don't think you can argue that these words in the middle are not also part of the insult. Otherwise, why is the word even in there.

In the real world, if a shop staff tells somebody to "Get out of my shop you (skin colour/ethnicity/religion/etc) prick", they will be in real trouble for it in terms of discrimination, and the defence that the word 'asian' or 'traveller' is merely descriptive and wasn't meant as part of the insult at all will get them nowhere.

RobbieTheRobber · 25-01-2021 11:41am

Deleted User wrote: »

I think the argument is that you can be vigilant and recognise the extent and occurrences of racism and all the other isms in ireland today without being a clichéd member of a baying mob desperate to find or misrepresent any evidence whatsover

Sorry I thought we had cleared this up and there was no racism in Ireland and humour was a perfectly valid reason for racism.

Why would we need to be vigilant and vigilant against what?

If I use the term in the link to describe someone either to other colleagues\friends or to an individual themselves is that racist?
Or on this forum as an attempt humour is that racist?

biko · 25-01-2021 11:44am

Every country with a mix of races gets racism, it happens inevitably. It can be a lot, or not a lot, but it will never be zero.
According to two studies in 2013 and 2016 these below countries are the most racist in the world.
Why are they so racist? That's up for debate.

India
Lebanon
Bahrain
Libya
Egypt
Philippines
Kuwait
Palestine
South Africa
South Korea
Malaysia
Nigeria
Iraq
Kyrgyzstan
Ecuador
Algeria
Pakistan
Yemen
Hong Kong
Russia

https://businesstech.co.za/news/lifestyle/116644/the-most-racist-countries-in-the-world/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2013/05/15/a-fascinating-map-of-the-worlds-most-and-least-racially-tolerant-countries/

Grab All Association · 25-01-2021 11:45am

https://twitter.com/hazechu/status/1353486604640399360?s=21

Reporting for what exactly? These tweets don’t breach Twitters Terms and Conditions nor do they threaten, incite against anyone. She reporting them to the same Garda Síochána that are racist murderers according to her.

Invidious · 25-01-2021 11:48am

nullzero wrote: »

Le Cheile's website is quite a read.

The tweet that was posted above describing the incident at the mansion House as Hazel Chu being "racially targeted" by people "Emboldened by the shooting of George Nkencho" is incredibly worrying.

Here we have an organisation that has only recently been established (their ten founding principles mention the covid19 crisis by name more than once) wading into this situation, leading with the George Nkencho shooting as being something that has encouraged supposed far right activists to shout weird rhetoric at the Lord mayor of Dublin.

How the George Nkencho case has emboldened the far right is beyond me. The workings of that case are clearly not racially motivated.

It would also appear that the protestors at the mansion House were not abusing Hazel Chu racially.

Why le Cheile feel the need to rubber stamp this incident as a racist incident connected to another incident which we can only assume they feel is racist (when it wasn't) is beyond me.

They then state; "This demonstrates the need for our campaign so please spread the word as far and wide as possible."

Here we reach the nub of the issue. Here's their second founding principle verbatim ; "We recognise that a new wave of far-right politics, emboldened by the toxic rhetoric of Trump in the US, Bolsonaro in Brazil, Orban in Hungary, Duterte in the Philippines, is a dangerous threat that, if unchallenged, will divide and weaken working people and all who believe in social justice, equality and freedom."

There in lies the problem for an organisation like Le Cheile, they are an Irish organisation fighting against far right groups that do not exist in this jurisdiction. We have the National Party (4773 votes or 0.2% of the total ballots cast in last year's General election), who do not measure up to any of the groups or individuals listed in their founding principles.

Is it not telling that they could not think to lost even one Irish far right group or personality for them to rail against in their founding principles?

Here we have a situation (and by extension two situations) that have nothing to do with their remit of fighting far right activism but they have decided to dip their toe in the water nonetheless.

Here we have an organisation which supposedly exists for the good of Irish society acting only in it's own interests for the sake of keeping itself relevant. And the saddest part is those mindlessly following their rhetoric.

I abhor any type of discrimination and the thought of fascists being allowed to do as they please doesn't sit well with me. However, there aren't any fascist groups operating in Ireland. The National Party is a joke that only makes the news when anti fascist activists turn up at their rallies to throw things at them.

We don't need an organisation such as le Cheile stirring racial tensions, which is exactly what what they are doing in lieu of any actual fascism to rail against in Irish society.

These people may have good intentions, but statements of the like they are releasing have no basis in fact and their actions are currently only serving the propagate a far right into existence in protest of their own nonsense.

Here are the member organizations:

https://lecheilednd.carrd.co/#memberorganisations

All the usual suspects represented -- Sinn Fein, People Before Profit, RISE, Pavee Point, Anti-Deportation Ireland, Extinction Rebellion Ireland, the Irish Palestinian Solidarity Campaign, the National Women's Council of Ireland, the Dublin Council of Trade Unions, the Peter McVerry Trust, etc., etc., etc.

Just another left-wing umbrella group, in short.

It's evident that if you oppose any of these member organizations' agendas, you're categorized as "far right."

Le Cheile doesn't exist to fight the far right; it exists to censor anyone who disagrees with any of its member organizations.

The far left is a much greater scourge in Ireland, and yet who dares fight it?

Baggly · 25-01-2021 11:49am

Grab All Association wrote: »

https://twitter.com/hazechu/status/1353486604640399360?s=21

Reporting for what exactly? These tweets don’t breach Twitters Terms and Conditions nor do they threaten, incite against anyone. She reporting them to the same Garda Síochána that are racist murderers according to her.

Mod

Lets have a chat via PM. Dont post in this thread again until i say so.

gozunda · 25-01-2021 12:25pm

Are the majority of the main print news who carried banner headlines of "racist abuse" / "vile racist abuse" culpable for the misleading reporting which on inspection shows no apparent incidents of racial abuse?

That the protest has been squarely framed as a direct attack on Ms Chu despite the fact the story derived from a protest by a small bunch of anti-maskers and their and Ms Chu's frankly bizarre interaction on the day in question

That the one arrest made at the protest was of a woman following “persistent lack of compliance with public health regulations and directions from An Garda Síochána”.

One hell of a way to fan the flames for sure.
Can our media be held culpable for such reporting?

FreudianSlippers · 25-01-2021 12:38pm

Grab All Association wrote: »

https://twitter.com/hazechu/status/1353486604640399360?s=21

Reporting for what exactly? These tweets don’t breach Twitters Terms and Conditions nor do they threaten, incite against anyone. She reporting them to the same Garda Síochána that are racist murderers according to her.

I suggest you actually read "The Twitter Rules" (which is actually what they're called) and pay close attention to the links under Abuse/harassment and the Child sexual exploitation policy. The second message clearly violates both.

Invidious · 25-01-2021 12:39pm

gozunda wrote: »

Are the majority of the main print news who carried banner headlines "of racist abuse" / "vile racist abuse" culpable for the misleading reporting which on inspection shows no apparent incidents of racial abuse?

Who will hold them accountable? I hardly see the Press Council of Ireland intervening here, because they wouldn't want to cross the woke brigade.

It's clear now that anyone who criticizes or protests against Hazel Chu will find him- or herself accused of "vile racist abuse" or similar, and nobody will dare say anything to the contrary.

biko · 25-01-2021 12:42pm

I think one news source start calling the protestors "far right" and everyone else copied because they are a little bit lazy and don't have time to check sources, it's all "get it out there fast".

RandRuns · 25-01-2021 12:56pm

biko wrote: »

I think one news source start calling the protestors "far right" and everyone else copied because they are a little bit lazy and don't have time to check sources, it's all "get it out there fast".

Plus, "mayor attacked in her home by far right" generates way more clicks than "mayor has slightly weird interaction with oddball annual protestors at public building, then whines that nobody should be allowed to protest in her presence" even if the former is false and the latter much closer to the truth.

jill_valentine · 25-01-2021 1:01pm

biko wrote: »

I think one news source start calling the protestors "far right" and everyone else copied because they are a little bit lazy and don't have time to check sources, it's all "get it out there fast".

Q Anon is a far right movement. What she was accused of by at least one protestor is Q Anon stuff. I would bet a significant amount of money that some of the unnamed participants and their affiliations are well known to journos, and if they're the lads I'm thinking of they'd have a very extensive history of nuisance legal action.

I would stake every cent I own the failure here is to not show their workings to avoid headaches from individual actors, rather than incorrect attribition of the incident.

gozunda · 25-01-2021 1:13pm

Invidious wrote: »

Who will hold them accountable? I hardly see the Press Council of Ireland intervening here, because they wouldn't want to cross the woke brigade.

It's clear now that anyone who criticizes or protests against Hazel Chu will find him- or herself accused of "vile racist abuse" or similar, and nobody will dare say anything to the contrary.

As a first up - the press Council require complaints to be submitted. Enough complaints and they will have to be reviewed. For certain Ms Chu is doing herself no favours either. But she is a politician with an eye on the next election so perhaps no real surprises there. She has previously said that others have unfairly claimed she is playing the 'victim'. From this incident - its hard to reconcile that position.

The more incidents like this that are highlighted as being inaccurately reported the better.

fantaiscool · 25-01-2021 1:24pm

jill_valentine wrote: »

Q Anon is a far right movement. What she was accused of by at least one protestor is Q Anon stuff. I would bet a significant amount of money that some of the unnamed participants and their affiliations are well known to journos, and if they're the lads I'm thinking of they'd have a very extensive history of nuisance legal action.

I would stake every cent I own the failure here is to not show their workings to avoid headaches from individual actors, rather than incorrect attribition of the incident.

Agree. Chu said in the newstalk interview that she has no problem with protests generally but this was far right stuff and her child was there too. I would be very surprised if some of the protesters weren't the usual far right types we see at other protests following the likes of Dee Wall like idiots.

Effects · 25-01-2021 1:30pm

fantaiscool wrote: »

Chu said in the newstalk interview that her child was there too.

Are you sure she said that? I thought it had been established that her daughter wasn't there.
I didn't listen to the whole interview myself as I lost interest.

weldoninhio · 25-01-2021 1:31pm

fantaiscool wrote: »

Agree. Chu said in the newstalk interview that she has no problem with protests generally but this was far right stuff and her child was there too. I would be very surprised if some of the protesters weren't the usual far right types we see at other protests following the likes of Dee Wall like idiots.

Her child was in the creche, and Mrs Chu was on her way out to get some lunch. The child was not there.

gozunda · 25-01-2021 1:31pm

jill_valentine wrote: »

Q Anon is a far right movement. What she was accused of by at least one protestor is Q Anon stuff. I would bet a significant amount of money that some of the unnamed participants and their affiliations are well known to journos, and if they're the lads I'm thinking of they'd have a very extensive history of nuisance legal action.

I would stake every cent I own the failure here is to not show their workings to avoid headaches from individual actors, rather than incorrect attribition of the incident.

Its still bull**** reporting by the media on the face of what appears to be a very small number of people who were voicing some very odd ideas at the protest. Whether they were left, right or otherwise is largely irrelevant. What was more relevant is that the protestors were breaking current restrictions. Ms Chu's interactions with the protestors was downright bizarre.

I believe it was Ms Chu herself who reported the 'dragon' comment. Afaik QAnons ideology centers on Alien lizards? So either the protestor was making it up as they went along or someone really didn't have a clue.

The rest of Ms Chu own comments on the incident in question appears to playing to the crowd.

RandRuns · 25-01-2021 1:32pm

fantaiscool wrote: »

Agree. Chu said in the newstalk interview that she has no problem with protests generally but this was far right stuff and her child was there too. I would be very surprised if some of the protesters weren't the usual far right types we see at other protests following the likes of Dee Wall like idiots.

What she means is that she has no problem with protests that are racist against white Irish people (like those falsely accusing the Gardai of a racist murder last week) but she has a huge problem with any protest that impinges on her, thus the fake claim of racist abuse against the mansion house protestors.

Effects · 25-01-2021 1:39pm

RandRuns wrote: »

What she means is that she has no problem with protests that are racist against white Irish people

No, I'm pretty sure that's not what she means.
Did she not say she had no issue with the original protest group, the ones that have been there every year?

RandRuns · 25-01-2021 1:40pm

Effects wrote: »

No, I'm pretty sure that's not what she means.
Did she not say she had no issue with the original protest group, the ones that have been there every year?

She had no problem with them until she could make a spurious "is it cos I is Asian" claim of racism against them.

FreudianSlippers · 25-01-2021 1:41pm

RandRuns wrote: »

What she means is that she has no problem with protests that are racist against white Irish people (like those falsely accusing the Gardai of a racist murder last week) but she has a huge problem with any protest that impinges on her, thus the fake claim of racist abuse against the mansion house protestors.

Wow, thank god you're here to decode the secret context of what people are actually saying as opposed to what they are literally saying. PHEW!

Effects · 25-01-2021 1:41pm

RandRuns wrote: »

She had no problem with them until she could make a spurious "is it cos I is Asian" claim of racism against them.

Or maybe she had no problem with them until they got out of hand.

RandRuns · 25-01-2021 1:44pm

FreudianSlippers wrote: »

Wow, thank god you're here to decode the secret context of what people are actually saying as opposed to what they are literally saying. PHEW!

Why, what did anyone at the protest "literally say" that was racist?

RandRuns · 25-01-2021 1:45pm

Effects wrote: »

Or maybe she had no problem with them until they got out of hand.

In what way did they get out of hand? My understanding from reading the media stories is that someone tried to shake her hand - hardly the Portland riots, was it?

FreudianSlippers · 25-01-2021 1:47pm

RandRuns wrote: »

Why, what did anyone at the protest "literally say" that was racist?

Sorry, I don't think you understood my post. I'll give you a few minutes to re-read it and come back to me.

jill_valentine · 25-01-2021 1:49pm

gozunda wrote: »

Its still bull**** reporting my the media on the face of what appears to be a very small number of people who were voicing some very odd ideas at the protest.

That said I believe it was Ms Chu herself who reported the 'dragon' comment. Afaik QAnons ideology centres on Alien lizards? So either someone was making it up as they went along or really did have a clue.

The rest of Ms Chu own comments on the incident in question appears to be mainly playing to the crowd.

Lizard People/Draconians/Dragons/Reptilians, are all terms that are used interchangeably for the same conspiracy theory, but the camera bit makes it clear what he means regardless.

It sounds like a joke, it's not, people believing that ****e have done serious harm, and there’s a less-than-coincidental overlap between people who get targetted by this particular loolah subset and people who are not Christian or not white.

Q Anon doesn't centre on this stuff as such, because once you dig into it every Q Anon faction has a different explanation of what's "really" happening, but this one in particular comes up in relation to weird lone wolf types of a sort I'd be more concerned about in Ireland than the kind of organised, militarised groups in the US.

The "lizard people" angle is also heavily involved with the 5G stuff. You'll recall somebody tried to burn down two masts in Donegal last year on the back of that, and the Nashville bomber - also obsessed with lizard people - is thought to have intended his bomb to sabotage 5G facilities. This isn't something that always stays safely online, as amusingly nuts as it sounds.

RandRuns · 25-01-2021 1:50pm

FreudianSlippers wrote: »

Sorry, I don't think you understood my post. I'll give you a few minutes to re-read it and come back to me.

You're fine. Little of what you post makes sense outside your head, so I'll go with my interpetation.

FreudianSlippers · 25-01-2021 1:54pm

RandRuns wrote: »

You're fine. Little of what you post makes sense outside your head, so I'll go with my interpetation.

Oh, ok you genuinely didn't understand my post... my bad. I'll explain it for you: you said "What she means is that [...]" and I said, essentially, thanks for telling us what she secretly meant, to which you replied (for some unknown reason) "what did anyone at the protest "literally say" that was racist?"

So you can see my thought process that you didn't fully read my post, given your reply made no sense in the context of the entire conversation right?

RandRuns · 25-01-2021 1:56pm

FreudianSlippers wrote: »

Oh, ok you genuinely didn't understand my post... my bad. I'll explain it for you: you said "What she means is that [...]" and I said, essentially, thanks for telling us what she secretly meant, to which you replied (for some unknown reason) "what did anyone at the protest "literally say" that was racist?"

So you can see my thought process that you didn't fully read my post, given your reply made no sense in the context of the entire conversation right?

Still makes no sense.

Try actually saying something, rather than alluding to it. That way, others can respond, and agree or disagree with your position.

biko · 25-01-2021 2:02pm

FreudianSlippers wrote: »

Wow, thank god you're here to decode the secret context of what people are actually saying as opposed to what they are literally saying. PHEW!

I think it would help if you linked and quoted the protesters saying racist things to Ms Chu.
So far we only have a protester saying they'd get her on camera while she was shape-shifting, that's all.

FreudianSlippers · 25-01-2021 2:04pm

biko wrote: »

I think it would help if you linked and quoted the protesters saying racist things to Ms Chu.
So far we only have a protester saying they'd get her on camera while she was shape-shifting, that's all.

I think you might have quoted the wrong post there.

Baggly · 25-01-2021 2:05pm

Mod

RandRuns and FreudianSlippers - cut out the sniping and bickering, or dont post in this thread.

Annasopra · 25-01-2021 2:05pm

Grab All Association wrote: »

https://twitter.com/hazechu/status/1353486604640399360?s=21

Reporting for what exactly? These tweets don’t breach Twitters Terms and Conditions nor do they threaten, incite against anyone. She reporting them to the same Garda Síochána that are racist murderers according to her.

What do you think she is reporting them for? There is a tweet referencing sexual abuse of her daughter.

biko · 25-01-2021 2:07pm

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

What do you think she is reporting them for? There is a tweet referencing sexual abuse of her daughter.

The words "she should be more worried about her daughter getting wanked on" is not suggesting it should happen.

It is a despicable tweet though and maybe the Twitter team will remove, or not. They are a private enterprise can do what they like.

Edit again, she reported it to Gardai too.
twitter.com/hazechu/status/1353489835743444992?s=20

FreudianSlippers · 25-01-2021 2:13pm

biko wrote: »

The words "she should be more worried about her daughter getting wanked on" is not suggesting it should happen.

It is a despicable tweet though and maybe the Twitter team will remove, or not. They are a private enterprise can do what they like.

What is it suggesting then?

Effects · 25-01-2021 2:15pm

RandRuns wrote: »

In what way did they get out of hand? My understanding from reading the media stories is that someone tried to shake her hand - hardly the Portland riots, was it?

I'd imagine your understanding is rather skewed.

RandRuns · 25-01-2021 2:17pm

Effects wrote: »

I'd imagine your understanding is rather skewed.

You would.

Tell us in what way it got out of hand then?

Effects · 25-01-2021 2:17pm

biko wrote: »

I think it would help if you linked and quoted the protesters saying racist things to Ms Chu.

Is there any footage of the altercation? Isn't there usually a load of people with their phones out at these things?

biko · 25-01-2021 2:17pm

RandRuns wrote: »

In what way did they get out of hand? My understanding from reading the media stories is that someone tried to shake her hand

Yes, this is correct, but she said she would not shake hands as there is a pandemic.

biko · 25-01-2021 2:18pm

Effects wrote: »

Is there any footage of the altercation? Isn't there usually a load of people with their phones out at these things?

Ask Freudian, he is the one claiming protestors said racist things. I'm sure that is based on actual evidence and not just guesses.

25-01-2021 2:20pm

biko wrote: »

The words "she should be more worried about her daughter getting wanked on" is not suggesting it should happen.

It is a despicable tweet though and maybe the Twitter team will remove, or not. They are a private enterprise can do what they like.

Edit again, she reported it to Gardai too.
twitter.com/hazechu/status/1353489835743444992?s=20

Nasty tweet indeed. Absolutely see no reason to report it to the police though. Bizarre.

FreudianSlippers · 25-01-2021 2:23pm

biko wrote: »

Ask Freudian, he is the one claiming protestors said racist things. I'm sure that is based on actual evidence and not just guesses.

Ok biko, go find me one post where I said that then. Go on...

biko · 25-01-2021 2:29pm

FreudianSlippers wrote: »

Wow, thank god you're here to decode the secret context of what people are actually saying as opposed to what they are literally saying. PHEW!

Doesn't "literally saying" mean they said something racist at the protest?

If not then I mistook your post, and we still have zero evidence something racist happened at the Mansion House protest.

biko · 25-01-2021 2:31pm

Deleted User wrote: »

Nasty tweet indeed. Absolutely see no reason to report it to the police though. Bizarre.

It is a bit odd, but she is after all Lord Mayor. I suppose it's protocol to have any abuse against council members logged.

FreudianSlippers · 25-01-2021 2:31pm

biko wrote: »

Doesn't "literally saying" mean they said something racist at the protest?

If not then I mistook your post, and we still have zero evidence something racist happened at the Mansion House protest.

You might have missed this.

FreudianSlippers wrote: »

Oh, ok you genuinely didn't understand my post... my bad. I'll explain it for you: you said "What she means is that [...]" and I said, essentially, thanks for telling us what she secretly meant, to which you replied (for some unknown reason) "what did anyone at the protest "literally say" that was racist?"

So you can see my thought process that you didn't fully read my post, given your reply made no sense in the context of the entire conversation right?

I do note you haven't provided any post where I "claim[ed] protestors said racist things"

gozunda · 25-01-2021 2:33pm

jill_valentine wrote: »

Lizard People/Draconians/Dragons/Reptilians, are all terms that are used interchangeably for the same conspiracy theory, but the camera bit makes it clear what he means regardless.

It sounds like a joke, it's not, people believing that ****e have done serious harm, and there’s a less-than-coincidental overlap between people who get targetted by this particular loolah subset and people who are not Christian or not white.

Q Anon doesn't centre on this stuff as such, because once you dig into it every Q Anon faction has a different explanation of what's "really" happening, but this one in particular comes up in relation to weird lone wolf types of a sort I'd be more concerned about in Ireland than the kind of organised, militarised groups in the US.

The "lizard people" angle is also heavily involved with the 5G stuff. You'll recall somebody tried to burn down two masts in Donegal last year on the back of that, and the Nashville bomber - also obsessed with lizard people - is thought to have intended his bomb to sabotage 5G facilities. This isn't something that always stays safely online, as amusingly nuts as it sounds.

A quick check of the specific term "dragon" & "camera" against QAnon. Yields feck all squared.

We don't even know it was QAnon who turned up or that comment was simply someone apparently making it up as they went along. The main issue being pushed was an apparent anti mask agenda.

As for the 'targeting'. With regard to the protest in question - nothing of relevance was doing until Ms Chu decided to exit the building to have a chat with an attending gardaí knowing the protest was ongoing. The interaction between her and the protesters which followed seems to have been mainly predicated on mask wearing

Yet according to the absence of 'vile racist abuse' detailed in the headlines - We have Ms Chu claiming

"You do have to have a reason why you're there protesting.
"It can't be just because they don't like the look of me because I can't change that."

I somehow doubt that was in reference to the alleged 'dragon' comment tbh.

Thing is - there's been protests outside the Mansion House during the residency of various of Lord Mayors over the years. There certainly seem to be some legitimate and some oddball protests from time to time.

It would seem more like playing to the crowd tbh.

Effects · 25-01-2021 2:41pm

gozunda wrote: »

There's been protests outside the Mansion House during the residency of various of Lord Mayors over the years. There certainly seem to be some legitimate and some oddball protests from time to time.

All protests always seem to attract smaller, more extreme people, using the main protest to try and bolster their attendance.
If talk of lizard people was happening at this protest, it sounds like it was a smaller separate group, with deluded ideas.

mynamejeff · 25-01-2021 2:43pm

Deleted User wrote: »

Nasty tweet indeed. Absolutely see no reason to report it to the police though. Bizarre.

o I don't know id like to see the person who sent that explain it to the police

Lord Mayor of Dublin harassed at her home by protesters

Comments